Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » NB Staff's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Open Thread

By NB Staff | January 19, 2008 | 10:12

Change font size:  A |  A

For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: the economy and the markets.

It's been an absolutely horrible start to the new year for stocks. I heard yesterday that if the market doesn't rally in the next two weeks, this will be the worst January since 1950.

YIKES!

Of more immediate concern is the following chart:

If you draw a line through the lows going back to March 2003, this is the roughly five-year bull trend line. This week, as you can see at the far right of the chart, we blew through it, and cascaded down.

Lots of people talk about a bear market being a 20 percent or more decline. I've always felt that when you break the bull trend line, you're in a bear market regardless of the percentage drop from the top. As such, unless you want to mince words, the bull market that began in March 2003 ended this week.

Moving forward, the joke on Wall Street for many years has been that the market has correctly predicted eleven out of the last three recessions, meaning that bear markets are rarely an accurate foreshadowing of economic activity. The best example is 1987 when a crash of epic proportions occurred with no subsequent economic collapse.

With that in mind, and with Washington talking about a stimulus package, are we in a recession, or going into one? Is fiscal stimulus needed at this point, or just political expedience? Would Washington be talking about such things if it wasn't an election year?

Furthermore, is Fed Chairman Bernanke to blame for the current slowdown? Should he have cut interest rates more aggressively and sooner? Or, is he between a rock and a hard place?

After all, the monetary easing we've already seen has caused further dollar weakness along with commodities rising causing inflation (first chart is the CRB Commodities Index, second is the U.S. Dollar Index):

As the Fed's real charter is to keep inflation in check, is Bernanke in a bind inasmuch as the economy might need lower rates to grow, but every downtick in such fuels the commodities bull market and the dollar bear market?

Making this simpler, has Bernanke been slow on the trigger because the Fed knows that lower rates are just going to continue to push inflation higher, and they're more concerned with the Consumer Price Index than the consumer? 

Share this
  • Open Thread
  • NB Staff's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • The (I am pretty sure)
    7 min 34 sec ago
  • Rumored?
    8 min 2 sec ago
  • imbalance of power much?
    8 min 55 sec ago
  • What on earth
    11 min 10 sec ago
  • Excuse the delay, Kramer...
    12 min 27 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.