The Rise and Resilience of Conservative Women
My military friends have a favorite saying: "If you're not catching flak, you're not over the target." This campaign season, conservative women in politics have caught more flak than WWII Lancaster bombers over Berlin. Despite daily assaults from the Democratic machine, liberal media and Hollyweird — not to mention the stray fraggings from Beltway GOP elites — the ladies of the right have maintained their dignity, grace and wit. Voters will remember in November.
When "comedian" and "The View" co-host Joy Behar lambasted GOP Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle this week as a "b*tch" who would be "going to h*ll" for using images of illegal alien gang members in a campaign ad, Angle responded by sending a lovely bouquet of flowers and a good-humored note: "Joy, Raised $150,000 online yesterday. Thanks for your help. Sincerely, Sharron Angle."
Outgunned in the comedy department, Behar sputtered nonsensically and with bitter, clingy vulgarity: "I would like to point out that those flowers were picked by illegal immigrants and they're not voting for you, b*tch." Illegal aliens are not supposed to vote at all, Miss B. But why let such pesky details get in the way of a foul-mouthed daytime TV diatribe?
Just a week earlier, Behar delivered a hysterical rant against GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, accusing the mother of five and foster mother of 23 of being "against children" for opposing the expansion of federal health care entitlements for middle-class families and children (the SCHIP program) and for opposing the costly Obama takeover of health care. Behar merely parrots the demagoguery of Democratic leaders in Washington, who have ducked behind kiddie human shields to avoid substantive debate about the dire consequences of their policies.
As a result of the Obamacare mandates, of course, insurers have canceled child-only plans across the country. And there are plenty of compassionate reasons for opposing SCHIP expansion beyond its original mandate to serve the truly working poor. Behar called me a "selfish b*tch" three years ago over the same issue. Why is it "against children" and "selfish" to challenge the wisdom of redistributing money away from taxpayers of lesser means who are responsible enough to buy insurance before a catastrophic event — and then using their tax dollars to subsidize more well-off families who didn't have the foresight or priorities to purchase insurance with their own money?
But never mind those pesky details. Behar persisted in smearing Bachmann as "anti-children, anti-children." Facts be damned.
Distortions on "The Spew" are bad enough. But the "mainstream" media's complicity in spreading false narratives about GOP women is an affront to the First Amendment. When Republican Delaware Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell challenged Democratic opponent Chris Coons in a constitutional debate last week to name the five freedoms in that First Amendment, he blanked out after freedom of religion. Instead of reporting on the flub, the Washington Post and Associated Press misleadingly reported that O'Donnell had questioned whether the establishment and free exercise clauses were in the First Amendment. What she actually said to Coons during the debate was: "So you're telling me that the separation of church and state, the phrase 'separation of church and state,' is in the First Amendment?" It is not, of course. But never mind those pesky details.
In one of the most despicable last-minute campaign hits, gossip website Gawker — run by Internet smear machine operator Nick Denton — paid for and published on Thursday an anonymous tell-all from a man purporting to have had a "one-night stand" with O'Donnell. This misogynistic trash can't be verified, and the author admits that the sensationally titled "one-night stand" did not actually include sex. The sole purpose and intent of such checkbook journalism: Humiliation.
Pundits and late-night TV pranksters have ridiculed O'Donnell for exposing liberal bias against conservative female candidates. But these same smug mockers have spent the past two years deriding Republican vice presidential candidate and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, her children, her body, her accent and her brain. They snickered at reports of Democratic California gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown's campaign calling GOP challenger Meg Whitman a "wh*re." And they shrugged off "The View's" "b*tch" sessions as shtick.
The conservative women-bashers can laugh all they want. On November 2, success will be our best revenge.
Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.
- Michelle Malkin's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
"Class Warfare"
Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 11:32am.
Some people have “class”… some do not. The conservative constitutionally oriented ladies have that class. Put liberals with their anger and inability to recognize Constitutional principles in the no class category.
Very true, every word. The
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 11:34am.
Very true, every word. The only ones who have shown true class during this smear fest, have been the conservative candidates themselves.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Bill Clinton's used women
Submitted by MidAmerica on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 11:36am.
Bill Clinton used women as sex toys, the infamous Spitzer (client #9)gets his own TV show, Ted Kennedy was known for his drunken sexual escapades and many other high profile democrat MEN are given a pass on their boorish behavior. Even Hillary was ridiculed by the Lefties in a condescending manner that would never happen to a man. Attacks on good looking conservative women by Leftist Liberals include many disturbing references of a sexual nature. Beneath the Liberal mask of civility is a sexual pervert with violent tendencies.
Outgunned in the comedy
Submitted by Airforce_5_O on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 11:41am.
Outgunned in the comedy department, Behar sputtered nonsensically and with bitter, clingy vulgarity: "I would like to point out that those flowers were picked by illegal immigrants and they're not voting for you, b*tch." Illegal aliens are not supposed to vote at all, Miss B. But why let such pesky details get in the way of a foul-mouthed daytime TV diatribe?
Joy rarely engages in a little thing call research. She is a liberal shill plain and simple. She doesn’t care what the truth is at all. If it comes out of one of her liberal friends or Jesse Ventura’s mouth its gospel. This is the year of conservative women and it just pisses the liberals off.
What's really nauseating in all this...
Submitted by krendler on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 11:49am.
What's really nauseating in all this is watching Whitman - an extremely sharp and likeable candidate - losing to Brown as a result of
- a last minute smear orchestrated by a left-wing celebrity lawyer designed to cost her support among Hispanics (when it appears that Whitman acted in an entirely proper and ethical manner) - and, of course, covered extensively by the media.
- the media saying almost nothing about Whitman being called a whore by a Brown worker with Brown standing right there (they'd clearly discussed the matter previously). Quite the contrast to the media spending a couple of days on Carly Fiorian's remark about Boxer's harido. Brown campain refers to Whitman as a "whore?" Nothing.
Liberal victory
Submitted by cjk on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 11:50am.
Sadly there is a not so nice underlying reason for the ascension of conservative woman and indeed conservative minorities.
Our culture has been successfully poisoned by the PC mindset to a bias against conservative white males which is sad..
Having said that, it's still nice to see these conservative women and minorities doing so well.
And beauty.
Submitted by mattm on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 12:25pm.
And beauty.
Another thing
Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 3:13pm.
This is too easy, but this picture should have a new caption for it regarding the liberal gene(or genetic defect), something along the lines of "How you can tell who has the liberal gene" or "Victims of the DRD4 Disorder" (or whatever that was called) for the Dem Women.
There are so many possibilities on how that liberal gene could be used as a reason for something.
-Jon
Malkin on NewsBusters....?
Submitted by NeoKong on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 1:21pm.
I like it.
I think that is one of the reasons that conservatives are kicking butt this election cycle. The conservative internet is uniting and coming together with a common unified message.
All the big hitters are linking to each other and are expanding their reach. The bloggers are getting together and multiplying their power. Drudge , Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, Michelle Malkin, HotAir, The Blaze, RedState, Pajamas Media and others have a combined media reach that dwarfs any sort of network media and is too large to counter. This is a model long used by leftie blogs with much success but is being copied and perfected by the right. Keep it up.
history of women in politics not pretty, MM
Submitted by j17ghs on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 3:11pm.
Malkin is one tough woman, sharp as a tack and thinks like a computer. I love her. But the past 100 years of women in politics has not been much of anything to celebrate.
A lot of women loved the Darwinist-Marxist agenda and leadership for its reproductive "freedom" which was actually control of reproduction. Such women led directly to World War II, which was a clash of Marxist cultures, and, because Stalin had the most land, people, and resources, he won with the help of U.S. dictator FDR (and the election stolen from Dewey by Truman that allowed the holdovers from the FDR administration to staff the United Nations and give Stalin most of Eastern Europe and Mao Tse Tung most of Southeast Asia. Alger Hiss and John Service were instrumental in this.)
After the horrors of WWII, women left the dirty work to men and family, country and God prevailed. But soon we had Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Jane Fonda and too many other Marxist women to mention who reinstituted Marxism as feminism and environmentalism and converted millions of U.S. girls in to goosesteping along with them, all under the guise of equal rights and, ironically teaching that "men create all wars."
Today, we have outrageous social engineering taxation; our children in Nazi-styled propaganda schools while many mothers work cleaning and cooking for corporations; and our families, country and belief in God are all in tatters. What a cosmic irony for women if (actually, more like when) the Muslims conquer us.
~Whoa
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 8:54pm.
Well, women are the mothers of all evil, apparently. Let me guess, her lawyer was better than yours.
What a defeatist
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 9:09pm.
Apparently you have never heard of such women as Queen Elizabeth I, or Margaret Thatcher.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
One's view of the world can
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 9:13pm.
One's view of the world can be amazing indeed when shaped by a reading of "The History of the 20th Century" co-authored by Lyndon Larouche and the Ayatollah Khomeini.
Jer
Jer*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 9:21pm.
People with a "certain view of the world" got there not from reading these kind of books but just "looking at the pictures".
"thinks like a computer"
Submitted by troglodyt on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 12:32pm.
Was that supposed to be a compliment?Beautifully said, Miss Malkin.
Submitted by ghidorah15 on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 4:15pm.
With women like you, Ann Coulter, and my mom standing for the cause of freedom and self-determination, I'd say we have a great chance of winning this battle.
There two things to consider here...
Submitted by stage9 on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 5:29pm.
1) Liberals act the way they do because they're insane, in which case those who vote for them are stupid, or
2) They're not insane and they are dividing the country on purpose, in which case those who vote for them are stupid.
Either way, "we the people" have put them in office, made them deans of our colleges, elected them to school boards and support their hollywood trash, so in effect, we're stupid.
So, we have two choices:
1) We can continue to moan and groan about liberal marxists and their "hope and change", and watch as our country slowly destroys itself, or
2) We can grow a brain, and intelligently weigh the LONG TERM effects of electing a representative who hates America vs one who supports it.
STOP ELECTING LIBERALS! It's really a simple concept!
And if you're a fence-sitting independent, get off the stinking fence already and choose a side! It's those who are stuck in the middle of the battle field that die first. So make a choice. Do you want a free America or a totalitarian America? There is no such thing as "kinda liberal/kinda Conservative". The values of the two sides couldn't be any clearer. Stop being a wus and pick a side.
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
A note about conservative men
Submitted by KC Mulville on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 3:31am.
Has anyone noticed how conservative men have behaved bitterly and violently against the rise of these conservative women?
Yeah, me neither.
Speaking as a conservative man, I'm delighted to see women rise to prominence and leadership.
The threat of the NOW, NARAL, and lefty-feminist crowd was that men were keeping women down, and would violently suppress women if they dared to demand equality. Well, look around. See any conservative misogyny? Seems to me that conservative men are quite happy to work with women, and on an equal basis. You still find a jerk here or there, but you can't ascribe it to conservatism, because the vast majority of conservative men get along very well with conservative women.
I think the traditional threat that conservatives are sexists is more than debunked. Now, if we can get blacks and Hispanics away from that self-suppressing and self--defeating devotion to the Democrats, we could evolve to a mature electorate.