A September 12 NewsBusters' item, NYT Misreports Biden-Obama Exchange, detailed a reporting error in the New York Times' coverage of testimony delivered the previous day to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by General David Petraeus and Iraq Ambassador Ryan Crocker. The news story reported an exchange between Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) and Senator Barack Obama (D-IL), both Democratic presidential candidates:
The senators were allowed only seven minutes each for questions, a limit that Mr. Biden, as a committee chairman, tried to enforce. But he did not try overly hard to cut off Mr. Obama, perhaps because he did not want to be seen in the ungentlemanly act of silencing a political rival. “Why don’t you try to summarize quickly what you said, O.K.?” Mr. Biden genially asked him as his time ran out.
The NewsBusters' post pointed out that Senator Biden had requested the quick summarization not from Obama, but from Ambassador Crocker. The time restraint was necessary because Obama had devoted most of his allotted time for questions to political posturing, a circumstance not unknown in Congress.
Today the New York Times acknowledged its reporting error. Appended to the original article is this:
Correction: October 8, 2007
An article on Sept. 12 about a hearing on Iraq war policy before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee misidentified the person whom Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, committee chairman, asked to summarize his remarks quickly. It was Ryan C. Crocker, the United States ambassador to Iraq and one of the witnesses — not Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, a member of the committee.
As one who's been critical of the New York Times many times, I acknowledge that - at least in this instance - it's corrected itself. Now if only other mainstream media outlets would so readily follow suit.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Wow... Isn't this
October 8, 2007 - 10:13 ET by bigtimerWow...
Isn't this rich.
I am so grateful.
Not.
Everything that paper has done to hurt us during this war is unforgiveable.
Correct???
October 8, 2007 - 10:24 ET by paulnashtnBut they did NOT say WHY Ambassador Crocker was asked to cut his remarks short
“I would remind you
that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind
you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.”
Conversion
October 8, 2007 - 11:02 ET by Michael M. BatesBut they did NOT say WHY Ambassador Crocker was asked to cut his remarks short
That would require something closer to a conversion than a correction.
And it only took them
October 8, 2007 - 10:31 ET by Chris NormanAnd it took them only twenty six days to realize this?
Twenty six days, Chris
October 8, 2007 - 11:03 ET by Michael M. BatesAnd it took them only twenty six days to realize this?
They've been busy.
Michael, They've been
October 8, 2007 - 15:48 ET by Chris NormanMichael,
They've been busy making more "mistakes"? :)
Making mistakes the old fashioned way, Chris
October 8, 2007 - 15:59 ET by Michael M. BatesThey've been busy making more "mistakes"? :)
Exacto mundo, pretty soon they'll need to devote a full page just to the previous day's errors.
Michael,
October 8, 2007 - 16:29 ET by Chris NormanIt'd be interesting to know just how many people read the correction and put it together with the original story after so much time. If the mistake affects the gist, or at least an important part of the story, the damage might have already been done.