who wandered off their plantation.

How could he possibly compare to the "first black president?"

I absolutely adore and have the greatest admiration for Justice Thomas. His life is one of the greatest living Hollywood moments in history.

I will never forget that liar Anita Hill being drilled in questioning by Senator Specter and in the first round the media never even caught what I did that Specter got Hill to admit she was telling a different story. After lunch the fireworks begand and Hill just shrunk under fire.

Then came the big show of Thomas under the gun with Kennedy and Metzenbaum blazing away with Democrats at him............and then the infamous lines of Clarence Thomas of, "THIS IS NOTHING BUT A HIGH TECH LYNCHING OF A BLACK MAN".

Boy howdy times ten I will never forget the blank expressions of horror shock that came over Metzenbaum's face when Clarence Thomas' words echoed in that hearing chamber.

People will never realize that here is one American male who stood up to the entire media, the entire character assassination groups and the entire democratic party........the people who had destroyed so many other good people.......and he alone beat them.

Clarence Thomas is brave beyond brave and is one hard sell. I can not extol the virtues of this gentleman enough and if the liberals are squawking over his book.........he has simply hammered them again with Truth, Fact and Logic in beating their mob again fair and square.

God bless the Justice and may he live long and carry this nation through.............as liberals thought they were going to Bork him, but in the end Alito and Roberts both owe their position on the court to the one man stand Clarence Thomas took and won for all Americans.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

I'd buy a used car from Clarence Thomas before I'd ever even consider buying one from Bill Clinton.

I never reliazed elan was French for deception.  Fascinating...

Allow me to remind Newsbusters readers that Clinton's slander and defamation of Ken Starr was considered libelous under English law. This led the publisher to delete the slanderous passages for the British edition.

Here is a rather benign account of the incident from the New York Times:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E00E6DF173DF937A15754C0A9629C8B63&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/C/Clinton,%20Bill

"Most of the changes center on what Mr. Clinton portrays as Mr. Starr's attempts to persuade potential witnesses to lie about the activities of the former president and his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, now the junior senator from New York.

For example, in the United States edition, published by Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House Inc., Mr. Clinton speaks of Mr. Starr's ''continuing efforts to coerce people into making false charges against Hillary and me, and to prosecute those who refused to lie for him.''

In the British edition, published by Hutchinson, also part of Random House Inc. and its German parent, Bertelsmann, the word false was deleted and the final clause was changed to ''and to prosecute those who refused to tell him what he wanted to hear.''

According to the Times, they made twelve changes in all. Suffice it to say, the example they used was probably one of the least offensive.

I think I'd be "angry" and "caustic" if the media in conjunction with Democrats in the U.S. Senate (and the Jesse Jackson race-baiting shakedown artists) tried to ruin my career and personal life because I accepted the honor of being nominated to the Supreme Court.  The fact that drunken murderer Ted Kennedy and segregationist Howell Heflin were in a position to pass judgment on this great man is shameful.