Liberals can rest easier knowing that despite her outspoken views on newsworthiness and ethics, MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski can still be counted on to go to bat for the Democrats. The reporter and "Morning Joe" regular showed off her famous sense of journalistic integrity while filling in for host Joe Scarborough on Monday morning. In the first half hour, Brzezinski played a video of a journalist trying desperately to get an interview with Antonio Villaraigosa, the Democratic mayor of Los Angeles. Villaraigosa has been surrounded by controversy since revelations that he had engaged in an extramarital affair with Spanish language reporter Mirthala Salinas.
The video clip showed one female reporter and at least two cameramen chasing the embattled mayor hoping for an interview. Before she could reach the mayor however, one of Villaraigosa’s hired thugs intercepted the reporter, sending the much smaller woman barreling into what appears to be a dumpster.
Commenting on this deplorable video, Brzezinski came to the Democrat’s defense. Speaking of the checked reported and Mayor Villaraigosa’s philandering, Brzezinski said, "That’s an aggressive reporter. Yeah, you know, the problem I have with this is that, eh, it’s just the whole topic is probably not that pressing in terms of the state of our society but let’s role it again, why not?"
Brzezinski’s downplaying of the Villaraigosa affair is surprising when considering that she endured hours of conversation (without objection) about disgraced Republican Senator David Vitter. While "Morning Joe" guest and Hollywood screenwriter John Ridley made the most outspoken attacks against Vitter back in July, Brzezinski had no reservations about occasionally joining the fray. Here is a partial transcript from the July 11th show.
John Ridley: "Why is it with the far right, who’s always, they’re always proselyting and shaking their fingers at people and telling other people how to live? Why is it they always check with God after they make these mistakes? They’re always tight with God..."
Mika Brzezinski: "Very good point."
Ridley: "...but they never think about dialing God up prior to making mistakes or understanding that other people – God can forgive everybody."
Joe Scarborough: "God can."
Ridley: "So why is it that they’ve got some ownership on forgiveness from God..."
Brzezinski, who often criticizes headlines she is asked to read for not being "newsworthy" and achieved YouTube celebrity for tearing up and subsequently trying to burn a story on Paris Hilton, revealed her own double standard for the personal lives of politicians. Why is David Vitter’s sex life worthy of endless conversation while Villaraigosa’s affair is "not that pressing?" Is Vitter’s alleged hypocrisy more newsworthy than years of the Democratic mayor denying allegations of marital unfaithfulness? The video tape played on today’s "Morning Joe" should also concern Mika Brzezinski as a journalist. One would think that a high-minded reporter like Brzezinski would be enraged when a colleague is denied (in this case through brute force) from speaking to elected officials. Or how about the fact that Villaraigosa’s journalist mistress not only reported on the mayor but was given exclusive interviews? Isn’t that a pressing enough story, Ms. Brzezinski? Clearly one Republican’s hypocrisy is more "newsworthy" than a Democrat’s unfaithfulness and a reporter’s complete lack of ethics.














Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Mika is not a
August 6, 2007 - 16:07 ET by bigtimerMika is not a journalist.
Mika is dumber than a box of rocks.
Mika is a hypocrite like all the leftist talking heads.
I expect nothing less from her so-called reporting.....or msnbc.
woohoo
August 6, 2007 - 16:22 ET by RosI CAN FINALLY POST HERE! Hello all. I am a huge fan of Newsbusters and happy to finally be a part of the community.
That having been said, I agree with bigtimer.....Mika is a hack and its borderline insulting to call her a "reporter".
Welcome there Ros... You
August 6, 2007 - 16:27 ET by Airforce_5_OWelcome there Ros...
You are now apart of the most intelligent site on the net.
and one of the funniest too.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
"borderline"???
August 6, 2007 - 16:29 ET by RJ"borderline insulting"??? what are you, some kinda apologist for the liberal flaks?
(kidding...welcome Ros)
Howdy Ros... Glad to meet
August 6, 2007 - 16:32 ET by bigtimerHowdy Ros...
Glad to meet you here today...enjoy yourself as much as possible/
Like I have always said...NB's is or can be addictive....
LOL!
Btw...I also forgot to mention that Mika got her job on msnbc because of her last name...just like Dan Abrahams (sp)...No. Two in charge of msnbc which is laughable in itself as far as I am concerned.
"NB's is or can be addictive"
August 6, 2007 - 20:09 ET by Chris NormanBT,
Yeah, currently, some of our former whacky liberal moonbats are in rehab, trying to quit... :)
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Chris... ROFLMAO! Ya'
August 6, 2007 - 20:11 ET by bigtimerChris...
ROFLMAO!
Ya' gotta' love it!
I do anyway....
How do, Ros! Welcome, and
August 6, 2007 - 16:35 ET by drillanwrHow do, Ros!
Welcome, and enjoy! :^ )
Welcome Ros
August 6, 2007 - 19:42 ET by Pasco ConservativeEnjoy the privileges. This is a great site.
Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any
man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.
-Unknown
Mika is right
August 6, 2007 - 22:16 ET by slpMirthala Salinas is a hot reporter babe worthy of the Mayor's attentions. There is no news there. Senator Vitter is a Republican hypocrite who deserves to be villified by Mika.
I believe that the "good"
August 7, 2007 - 00:17 ET by RESTLESS 1I believe that the "good" mayor is married. He made vows that include to "forsake all others" as did Vitter. This would make Villagairosa just as much as a hypocrite as Vitter. We do not discriminate around here. If a Republican is wrong, we will call him or her on it. Liberals, however, will circle the wagons, misreport, or plain ignore trangressions on the part of their liberal leaders.
Will MSNBC please send Mika
August 6, 2007 - 16:18 ET by drillanwrWill MSNBC please send Mika out to cover the WWE?
MSNBC is unwatchable....
August 6, 2007 - 19:43 ET by Pasco ConservativeMichael you were one of the dozen that were viewing that show this morning. Mika is a terrible newsreader and a worse host/anchor.
Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any
man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.
-Unknown
A Disenting View
August 6, 2007 - 16:39 ET by allanfWhy should Mika be concerned if a Maria Salinas of Telemundo has an affair with Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa? It is not as if Maria Salinas is a real journalist or Telemundo a real news organization. She is an entertainer. Telemundo no more presents news than does "Entertainment Tonight"
The "news" operations of NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN are "news" in name only. They are really just alarmist entertainment, meant to frighten, scare and grab attention. The talent on those networks are entertainers, not reporters. How on earth Ms. Salina’s affair could hurt the journalistic integrity of an organization that has no journalistic integrity?
As for journalistic independence, do the names "Chris Cuomo", "George Stephanopoulos", "Chris Matthews", "Tim Russert" mean anything. Why would anyone in their right mind think these Democratic operatives are journalists?
Am I supposed to believe that Ditzy Diane Sawyer, sashaying about in Burka is a journalist? She is an actress. Is Ann Curry a journalist? The same holds for Maria Salinas. This is just show business folks - and free advertising for today's Democratic Party.
Let's follow the British lead and drop the term "anchor" for "reader" and begin recoginizing that this stuff is not journalism.
Ms. Brzezinski is it a Mr.
August 6, 2007 - 16:43 ET by Lame CherryThe idea of a leftist reporter is to show allot of leg and cleavage so you do not listen to them or see how ugly they are. That is basically what ABC execs were saying when Joan Lundin interviewed there as all they talked about were chic's legs on camera.
When I see Mika Brzezinski all I can think about is it looks like her old man in a bad wig. When she talks it does not help as she is monotone and boring, then that is followed by either leftist diatribe or just stupidity.
MSNBC apparently likes old CBS rejects Dan tarted up from that huge toothed Paula Zahn now on geezer retirement to Mika who is like a Circus freak show act in the audience is pondering what she is and not liking it.
I keep telling liberal media Couric's problem is they got her all German ober frau looking without her pudgy thighs like before. Liberals can not get ratings unless the gals have a pasted grin, low cut tops and skirts like Daisy Duke wears for shorts. Those are the only liberals who get watched and everytime they try and show off "their brains" the audience turns them off.
Mika is what Donald Trump said about Rosie, but at least Rosie had cheeks you could pinch convincing you the brat kid had to have something loveable inside.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
What Is An Anchor?
August 6, 2007 - 18:20 ET by NoMoreClintonsLet's follow the British lead and drop the term "anchor"
An old newsroom joke goes like this:
Q.: What is an anchor?
A.: Nothing but dead weight.
NMC... ROFL! (I agree
August 6, 2007 - 18:28 ET by bigtimerNMC...
ROFL!
(I agree about dropping the term...what I would insert instead would get me kicked off of here...lol)
Why is David Vitter’s sex
August 6, 2007 - 21:40 ET by dahliatraversWhy is David Vitter’s sex life worthy of endless conversation while Villaraigosa’s affair is "not that pressing?"
Great question, Michael.
Tonight's homework assignment, Mika: look up the meaning of the expression "double standard" and then report it on tomorrow's show.
Perhaps the context of the
August 6, 2007 - 22:01 ET by balboaPerhaps the context of the two incidents varies? I say that not knowing the context of either.
Then why did you say
August 6, 2007 - 22:06 ET by BlondeThen why did you say it?
Offering up a possible
August 6, 2007 - 22:12 ET by balboaOffering up a possible solution to this injustice conundrum.
Sorry, bal. Not buying
August 6, 2007 - 22:14 ET by BlondeSorry, bal. Not buying that.
I think you just did it to be "edgy". Not that it's working, of course.
I did a little reading on
August 6, 2007 - 22:26 ET by balboaI did a little reading on both situations, and my opinion is that the Vitter story is more salacious, so of course it's going to draw more attention. Plus, Republicans getting into sex scandals is more attractive as a story because of the Republicans' outspoken platforms on morals, ethics, etc.
Gotta admit,
August 6, 2007 - 22:35 ET by BlondeGotta admit, Bal....
That's one of your best answers yet.
You used the word "salacious". And then spun it as a more attractive thing for Republicans in a sex scandal....pretty bloody good, Bal.
salacious
August 7, 2007 - 09:13 ET by Michael LanzaI have to disagree. Did the mayor run on some pro-adultery platform that makes him less of a hypocrite? Isn't it hypocritical to tell the press that you're being faithful to your wife while having an extramarital affair with a member of that same press? I suppose that's outright lying, which as we know, is much more forgivable.
}}---> It's just about sex
August 7, 2007 - 09:25 ET by Cool ArrowSo the guy kept a press prostitute around. In exchange for sex, she got "journalistic" access.
As an admired role model to young girls in her community, she should be very proud of the example she showed in the art of honest, unbiased journalism.
Rep platform has nothing to do with consensual sex of any kind
August 7, 2007 - 09:50 ET by Dee BunkExactly Michael - It's false logic to say that Republicans look more hypocritical. If that were the case then you would see the Dem corruption examples highlighted more because they actually run on cleaning up corruption. I've never known of a Republican who tried to make a law against adultery or any type of consensual sex. I've also never known a Dem to be out there advocating and promoting adultery and sex with prostitutes.
}}---> The Difference, Dee Bunk
August 7, 2007 - 10:00 ET by Cool ArrowThe difference is Republican voters frown on extramarital affairs while Dem voters seem to see it as the spoils due the victor.
I'd just as soon keep the higher standard in place.
Yeah, well, that's just not
August 7, 2007 - 13:41 ET by balboaYeah, well, that's just not true. Nice try, though.
I don't know about Democrats in general, but I look at affairs as an unfortunate part of life. I don't condone it, of course, but I know it happens, and it sometimes happens to good people.
And while Democrat politicians value values, they don't wear it on their sleeves as much as Republicans. Again, that's why a Republican hanging out with hookers is a story that garners attention, much more than a "plain ol'" affair. The mayor's story is definitely noteworthy because it was a member of the press.
nice try also balboa but your statement isn't true either
August 7, 2007 - 22:49 ET by Dee BunkI agree and also think that affairs sometimes happen with good people and I think most Reps and Dems feel the same way. I completely disagree that Reps wear anything on their sleeve more than Dems when it comes to affairs and condoning or condemning them.
But even if that were true balboa, you completely avoided my comparison with corruption charges. If what you say was true then we should see corruption charges played much more often on the Dems and we don't. In fact we see significantly less coverage for the same type of offenses.
}}---> baloba
August 8, 2007 - 05:53 ET by Cool ArrowYour post speaks for itself. If you don't see the hypocrisy in it, you are truly a Democrat.
Can someone tell me why Mika
August 7, 2007 - 01:03 ET by RESTLESS 1Can someone tell me why Mika looks so upset in the photo? Oh wait, she is a liberal. She is always pissed off.