LAT Falsely Claims Laura Bush Distancing Herself from Sarah Palin

Photo of Matthew Vadum.
  • Bookmark and Share

Johanna Neuman of the Los Angeles Times yesterday misrepresented First Lady Laura Bush's words to make it seem like she was backing away from GOP veep candidate Sarah Palin's criticism of Senator Barack Obama's community organizing days.

Recall, as I noted in the NewsBusters post "Media Freak Out Over Palin and Giuliani's ‘Community Organizer' Jabs" earlier today, that community organizing, in the sense that Obama, a Harvard-educated lawyer uses the term, is Saul Alinsky-style political organizing. It's not about church bake sales, picking up litter, little leagues, or parent-teacher associations. It's about agitation aimed at securing big chunks of government money and radical social change. It is not noble. It is radical left-wing activism. It is not community service. It's more like community destruction. Think Jesse Jackson. Think Al Sharpton. Think ACORN. Think Mother Jones.

But that apparently didn't matter to one reporter who listened to the interview and heard what she wanted to hear. Thinking she scored a ‘gotcha,' Neuman wrote a piece called "Laura Bush defends community organizers -- take that, Sarah Palin." Neuman gleefully cited an interview the First Lady gave National Public Radio's "All Things Considered." (Link to audio here, link to text on NPR website here.) Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the interview that I took from the NPR website (the transcript posted there contained a few minor errors and I have corrected them):

ROBERT SIEGEL: You spoke glowingly the other day of a project in Chicago where people work with former gang members to try to prevent violence. And it reminded me of - well, I'll say, a cynical comment that a colleague of mine made. Which was, after the convention last week in St. Paul, Minn., that you attended and that I covered, would somebody who heard the mocking references to community organizers that were made there think that those people are actually serious about encouraging young people to go in and work with gang members in poor Chicago neighborhoods? Or is that just something you do when you're going to church?

LAURA BUSH: Well, CeaseFire Chicago, the group that you're talking about, is a program started by a man who happens to be a doctor. He's a public-health doctor. And the more he thought about violence in communities, the more he realized that that's a public-health problem and that it needs to be addressed, just like any other public health disease.

ROBERT SIEGEL: But is he working with people who could qualify as being called community organizers?

LAURA BUSH: I don't know if that's exactly what you would call them. I don't know exactly what that is. But I will say he gives former gang members jobs, to try to intervene to prevent young people from ruining the rest of their lives because some reason that they'd get into a fight and then end up incarcerated.

That certainly doesn't sound like a "yes" to me. Mrs. Bush opted to remain above the fray and refused to go for the bait. And the First Lady is consistent. At the ServiceNation Summit in New York City this morning, the First Lady called CeaseFire Chicago "violence interrupters," and not community organizers.

Besides, although CeaseFire Chicago does appear to favor gun control, it is not engaged in community organizing in the sense that Obama uses the term. It is not a political advocacy group. CeaseFire Chicago is "a Chicago-based violence prevention program ... administered by the Chicago Project for Violence Prevention (CPVP), which is located at the University of Illinois' School of Public Health," according to a Northwestern University Report. (brief summary here, full report here) CeaseFire Chicago is connected financially to the University of Illinois Foundation, a $1.2 billion charity, according to its tax year 2006 IRS Form 990 (tax return).

Of course, John McCain, Palin's running mate, hasn't been helping matters. As the Politico's Jonathan Martin reported yesterday:

Both Rudy Giulani and Sarah Palin offered mocking criticism of Barack Obama's time as a community organizer last week at the GOP convention, but John McCain said such work is commendable.

"Of course I respect community organizers," McCain said at a forum on public service tonight in New York.  "Of course I support people who serve their community and Sen. Obama's record there is outstanding."

But Senator McCain is another story.

—Matthew Vadum is Editor of Organization Trends and Foundation Watch at the Capital Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Outstanding?"

By all accounts I've heard, Obama accomplished virtually nothing for the South Side of Chicago, his area of operation. The people there don't seem able to think of much he did for them. Lord, please help McCain keep his foot out of his mouth.

The MSM would just love to have Palin become closer to the Bushes; then they could push their "same thing" meme even more. Since Palin not being closer to Linda Bush hurts the MSM-required slant, they have to point that out as a failing too.

They are flailing to beat the band. If they hadn't brought on this much-deserved comeuppance themselves, I'd almost feel sorry for them.

Almost.

 

"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall

Please

Let them lie about Laura, try their best to make Sarah look foolish. Eventually, the MSM will show the people what they really are. After Pres. Bush has been out of office for a time, two different histories will be written. One, if Obama is elected, will be the realization by the people that Pres. Bush was actually on the right path, called the country to a righteous war, and was vilified for it. The other, if McCain wins, will be more of the hate-filled eight years past. Until, that is, the people tire of the non-stop liberal campaign of smear and stop buying their product (as US magazine realized).

You pretty much summed it up

in the 2nd paragraph.

Exactly Right!

You are correct. The left is "inventing" reason after reason to NOT talk about the nature of the specific "community organizer" work that Barack Obama was engaging in in Chicago. 

 For example, at PolitickerNJ, a New Jersey politics site, a new commentator named Juan Melli actually has suggested that by poking fun at his work as a "community organizer" Sarah Palin had thereby betrayed and insulted all the "famous" American historical community organizers, beginning with Susan B. Anthony!

Few are buying it.  Today, we added our latest comments.  Here is a sample from one of them:

But let's examine the Melli logic of this post. 

Suppose a continuing supporter of one of a number of former [NJ] State Senators now in federal prison on criminal charges, wrote a post on Politickernj.  Suppose the writer took harsh exception to someone who, in a speech, poked fun at that former State Senator, by tagging him as a "politician."  Now, suppose the writer further alleged that the use of the term "politician" somehow sullied the memory of such famous American politicians, as Abraham Lincoln, or Franklin Delano Roosevelt, or John Kennedy, or Ronald Reagan . . . or whoever the writer's particular favorite "politician" might be. 

No one in their right mind would give credence to such rubbish.  Likewise, no one should give any credence at all to this post by Mr. Melli.  Mr. Obama's work as a "community organizer" should be examined on it's own merit, not inoculated from critical review simply because he called himself a "community organizer."

 

lipstick covered pig?

Is LAT just another lipstick covered pig?