Beauchamp Chronicles Tell More of Leftist Dishonesty Than Anything Else

Photo of Matthew Sheffield.
  • Bookmark and Share

Charles Krauthammer has a great syndicated column (h/t: Protein Wisdom) out that sums up the New Republic Scott Thomas Beauchamp scandal quite well:

For a month, the veracity of The New Republic’s Scott Thomas Beauchamp, the Army private who has been sending dispatches from the front in Iraq, has been in dispute. His latest “Baghdad Diarist” (July 13) recounted three incidents of American soldiers engaged in acts of unusual callousness. The stories were meant to shock. And they did.

In one, the driver of a Bradley Fighting Vehicle amused himself by running over dogs, crippling and killing them. In another, a fellow soldier wore on his head and under his helmet a part of a child’s skull dug from a grave. The most ghastly tale, however, was about the author himself mocking a woman that he said he saw “nearly every time I went to dinner in the chow hall at my base in Iraq.” She was horribly disfigured, half her face melted by a roadside bomb. As she sat nearby, Beauchamp said loudly, “I love chicks that have been intimate — with IEDs. It really turns me on — melted skin, missing limbs, plastic noses.” As his mess hall buddy doubled over in laughter, Beauchamp continued: “In fact, I was thinking of getting some girls together and doing a photo shoot. Maybe for a calendar? ‘IED Babes.’” The woman fled. [...]

[Trouble is,] it all happened before Beauchamp arrived in Iraq. But the whole point of that story was to demonstrate how the war had turned an otherwise sensitive soul into a monster. Indeed, in the precious, highly self-conscious literary style of an aspiring writer trying out for a New Yorker gig, Beauchamp follows the terrible tale of his cruelty to the disfigured woman by asking, “Am I a monster?” And answering with satisfaction that the very fact that he could ask this question after (the reader has been led to believe) having been so hardened and brutalized by war, shows that there is a kernel of humanity left in him.

But oh, how much was lost. In the past, you see, he was a sensitive soul with “compassion for those with disabilities.” In a particularly treacly passage, he tells us he once worked in a summer camp with disabled children and in college helped a colleague with cerebral palsy. Then this delicate compassionate youth is transformed into an unfeeling animal by war.

Except that it is now revealed that the mess hall incident happened before he even got to the war. On which point, the whole story — and the whole morality tale it was meant to suggest — collapses.

And it makes the rest of the narrative banal and uninteresting. It’s the story of a disgusting human being, a mocker of the disfigured, who then goes to Iraq, and, as such human beings are wont to do, finds the company of other such human beings who kill dogs for sport, wear the bones of dead children on their heads, and find amusement in mocking the disfigured.

—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A contradiction in glory

Beauchamp admits he went into the army to write about a world of dehumanized violence, and to find soldiers corrupted by it. I guess he wanted to write (as Krauthammer eloquently put it) a "New Yorker version" of the Red Badge of Courage, where war is stripped of false glory. But in his desire to write about a higher truth, he threw away the truth in front of him. He corrupted himself.

War is, unfortunately, a part of our history. It's a dangerous world, and war is a threat that never goes away. You can't wish it away, or pretend that you're "above" it. The self-adoring critic who takes a seat "above" the battle owes his seat to the soldiers who fought to give him that seat. Beauchamp wrote articles to prove he is "above" war, but he had to lie to prove it. The honor of soldiers is not that they have triumphed over violence, but that they've endured through it. Writers who lecture us about the dehumanization of war miss the humanity of the soldiers who fight it.

The worse it is...

the better it is. The truth never affected the views or agendas of the MSM. Happy Trails...

}}---> Beau Sham

So he went to war with a bunch of anecdotes already fleshed out in his head?

Remind you of anyone?  What else could he do but "go MSM" on his buddies?

Surprised he didn't reach way back to Junior High to relate the story of how he made a dead baby float. . .

Why did The New Republic

Why did The New Republic run it?
Because it fits perfectly into the most virulent narrative of the antiwar Left. The Iraq war — “George Bush’s war,” -
Krauthammer

If, instead of cruelty, he had chronicled incidents of charity such as this one, I wonder if TNR would have been interested?

John Gebhardt

This is why I am glad to

This is why I am glad to have found a great source for my Iraq news

With the exeption of a few, most "journalists" either aren't there or just recycle what the rest say.

Normally I would make the comment "If you don't have anything nice to say..." but If MSM would follow that NB wouldn't exist!

"I hired you to get some track laid, not jump around like a bunch a kansas city faggots" Slim Pickens

The New Republic? The Old

The New Republic? The Old Liberal ... that rag-azine has been leaning Left for more than 5 years now - hell, it's fallen completely over.

Now, if you cut it up into little 4" x 4" squares, then it begins to have a practical use.

When you say "leaning left"

I'm pretty sure there was a movie made about a "reportor" that worked there, I don't remember his name but I think the movie was titled "Shattered Glass".

"I hired you to get some track laid, not jump around like a bunch a kansas city faggots" Slim Pickens

Whatever IS is

Good memory.  Shattered Glass is about the fabrication of news by The New Republic's Associate Editor Stephen Glass.  You can read more about the movie here.

 From Wikipedia:

"TNR subsequently determined that at least 27 of 41 stories written by Glass for the magazine contained fabricated material. Of the remaining fourteen, former TNR executive editor Charles Lane said, "In fact, I'd bet lots of the stuff in those other fourteen is fake, too. ... It's not like we're vouching for those fourteen, that they're true. They're probably not, either."[1] Three other magazines, Rolling Stone, George Magazine and Harper's, to which Glass contributed also reviewed his work. Rolling Stone and Harper's found the material generally accurate but had no way of verifying information from Glass' anonymous sources. George discovered Glass fabricated quotes in a profile piece and apologized to the article's subject, Vernon Jordan, a Clinton advisor."

What has this lying Slick Willie of journalism been doing since being busted?  Wikipedia offers this:

"Stephen Glass completed his law degree at Georgetown University Law Center after being fired by TNR, and passed the written portion of the New York state bar exam, but has not yet been admitted to the bar. In 2003, he began appearing on television to promote his "biographical novel" The Fabulist. "I wanted them to think I was a good journalist, a good person. I wanted them to love the story so they would love me", he told Steve Kroft of CBS News' 60 Minutes in an interview, which was included as a special feature for the DVD edition of Shattered Glass. Also in 2003, Glass briefly returned to journalism, writing an article about Canadian marijuana laws for Rolling Stone.[2]

Glass lives in Los Angeles."

So he's an attorney, touts pot and lives in LaLa Land.  Anyone else see the symmetry?

For a concise listing of Glass' phony articles, the response by others in the media and a list of recently exposed plagiarists and liars in the media see http://www.rickmcginnis.com/articles/Glassindex.htm.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Same old same old

 I wonder if Beauchamp will learn how to pronounce Ghengis?  Just askin'....

The New Republic has been in

The New Republic has been in existence for almost 100 years. Yet it's only been in the past few years that the majority of their scandals have occured. Same with CBS News. They had maybe one scandal in 60 years, until Dan Rather's "fake yet accurate" memos came along.

It's obvious that those on the left in "journalism" have lost their collective minds. And it's all Bush's fault, of course!

I think it's a bit like the

I think it's a bit like the priest sex scandal.  There was always an element of it in the Church.  It's only recently that the volume of abuses over the years became exposed.

Media corruption has been ongoing from the beginning.  It's only in the last 20 years or so that it's received enough scrutiny to bring the corruption to light. 

I know there has always been

I know there has always been media corruption, as I used to be in that business myself (both newspaper and radio news). CBS News always had a biased slant, but they had never been hit with a scandal like Dan Rather's. The worst thing they ever did previous to that was to bankroll an invasion of Haiti solely to make a TV special in 1966.

Likewise, the New Republic pretty much kept themselves out of trouble until 1995.

What I am getting at is that the lefties who make up something like 90 percent of the national media had a massive brain seizure that day in December of 2000 when the Supreme Court by a 7-2 vote said Gore was the loser of the election. Ever since that day, they have lost all sanity.

...What I am getting at is

...What I am getting at is that the lefties who make up something like 90 percent of the national media had a massive brain seizure that day in December of 2000 when the Supreme Court by a 7-2 vote said Gore was the loser of the election. Ever since that day, they have lost all sanity.

Couldn't agree more Del.

I think there always has

I think there always has been a fair amount of corruption in the media, it's just easier to smoke out now. 

In the tradition of Jason Blair

Apparently the left live and breath the philosophy that the end justifies the means. It doesn't matter if the article is true or a fleshed out version of a third hand annecdote, as long as it gets their message accross.

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

Truth Detector

It's not whether the allegations are true are not, it's the seriousness of the charges. Or, something like that. Who said that? I forget. That, this, fits the liberal agenda.

Here's the latest from the

Here's the latest from the Weekly Standard:

http://www.weeklysta...