Royal Disaster: Networks Obsess Over Wedding, Barely Mention U.S. Border Deaths
The April 29 wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton has the media world abuzz as the couple prepares to walk down the aisle this week. Although the affair is more than 3,000 miles away and focuses on the royalty of a foreign nation, the U.S. media is giving the wedding overwhelming coverage.
In fact, according to Nielson, and highlighted by the Daily Caller's Laura Donovan, the U.S. media coverage of the wedding is “considerably higher” as a percent of all news reporting “than in the U.K. and Australia.”That is despite the fact that a New York Times/CBS poll found that just 28 percent of Americans say they have followed the wedding “somewhat closely.”
Worse, the media wedding blitz comes at the expense of more important stories impacting the United States, like the bloody drug war just across the border with Mexico.
The Culture and Media Institute found that the broadcast networks aired glowing stories of wedding dresses, carriages and castles at a rate of roughly two per day since the beginning of the year. Meanwhile, America’s neighbor to the south has continued to spiral into lawless violence, claiming hundreds of American lives and threatening the stability of the U.S.-Mexico border.
That didn’t matter. While U.S. citizens were murdered by Mexican drug cartels, the American media dedicated nearly five times more stories to the “global media event,” that is the royal wedding.
Between Jan. 1, 2011 and April 22, 2011, ABC, CBS and NBC ran a total of 228 stories about what CBS’s Erica Hill called the “fairy tale occasion.” The obsession over the U.K. royalty tying the knot averaged more than two stories per day from the American networks thus far in 2011.
In that same period, the networks presented only 47 stories dealing with Mexico’s drug-fueled violence, its U.S. victims and its spillover into U.S. border states. Many of those stories were brief reports of violence, like the April 4murder of two Americans at a Tijuana-area border crossing.
ABC was the most royal-obsessed, with 123 stories about the royal wedding in those four and a half months. CBS aired 62 stories. In terms of sheer numbers, NBC was the most restrained wedding enthusiast, airing 43 stories.
But the Peacock network took the wedding cake for most ridiculous wedding tie-in story. NBC “Sunday Today” show anchors Lester Holt and Jenna Wolfe spent two minutes, 14 seconds quizzing a Massachusetts woman who shares the same name with British princess-to-be Kate Middleton.
“You walked through grocery stores, you see, you know, your name in magazines, you hear your name all over, you know, TV reports,” Wolfe observed. “Do you like it? Is it annoying? Where do you stand with all of this?” After Middleton replied that she found it “pretty funny,” Wolfe and Holt then continued to quiz her about phone calls, newspaper articles and Facebook messages she has received in relation to the name coincidence.
On April 19, CBS “Early Show” anchor Erica Hill called the event a “fairy tale occasion” introducing a segment about the security process involving snipers, helicopter surveillance and plenty of police to protect the event. “The royal wedding is just 10 days away now and this morning we’re getting a reminder that this fairy tale occasion is also a major security operation,” she said.
But the day before, Hill did a segment on the same program dedicated exclusively to the speculation surrounding who designed bride-to-be Kate Middleton’s wedding dress. “Looks like a beautiful day there, and a perfect day, perhaps, to find out who has designed Kate’s dress,” Hill said to CBS News royal contributor Victoria Arbiter, stationed outside Buckingham Palace. The women exchanged conjectures on the dress’ designer for nearly three minutes.
During the April 20 “Good Morning America” broadcast, ABC royal correspondent Duncan Larcombe fawned over William and Kate’s ability to steal a few moments of quiet time during this hectic time. “It's quite nice that they're sort of doing these little sort of, little, sort of romantic things in the midst of what is a kind of global media event,” he stated, underscoring the weight the media have given this wedding.
Even as they kept the frenzy going, some occasionally made a show of stepping back to recognize the ridiculousness of it all. “Oh, you know, it's been at least a good 10 minutes since we talked about the royal wedding, so let's get to our ‘Royal Diary’,” ABC host Robin Roberts joked on the April 20 “Good Morning America.”
But the hard story of the incredible violence on our nation’s southern border is no joke. Mexican authorities have discovered numerous mass graves across northern Mexico, and more than 30,000 people have died in the violence since 2006. According to the U.S. State Department, 111 U.S. citizens were murdered south of the border in 2010, prompting the department to issue travel warnings for Americans planning visits to various areas of Mexico during Spring Break.
But the royal couple would have to honeymoon in Acapulco to get the networks to give reasonable air-time to Mexico.
Methodology
The Culture and Media Institute surveyed transcripts of ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows between January 1, 2011, and April 22, 2011, searching for “royal” and “wedding,” and found the networks ran 228 stories about the royal wedding.
CMI searched the terms “Mexico, Mexican” and “border,” and found that in the same time frame, the networks ran a total of 47 stories about the drug-inspired violence to the south.
- Erin R. Brown and Matthew Philbin's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
This royal wedding has gotten
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 04/27/2011 - 12:15pm.
This royal wedding has gotten WAY too much coverage than it deserves. I'm surprised it hasn't been analyzed to death on ESPN yet.
If a tree falls in the forest
Submitted by jdhawk on Wed, 04/27/2011 - 12:24pm.
If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it happen? Put in the context of this issue, what border deaths?
There is no war between our country and Mexico vis-a-vis illegal aliens and illegal drugs. There is only the war between this administration and the state of Arizona in their attempt to protect their citizens given the abject neglect on the part of duhbama and the Attorney General.
rhymes with witless
Submitted by Rousse on Wed, 04/27/2011 - 1:02pm.
Talk about the border? What are you---nuts? We can't talk about the border, because then we might have to talk about problem of illegal immigration, and we must not bring up that topic. That might cause us to talk about Arizona or Texas, and that might lead to talk about Rick Perry and that scares the witless MSN sh**less.
A homemade bomb was found on the side of a highway in Brownsville TX on Sunday. It was a dud, but no one is saying if the bombmaker was just inept and stupid, or if it was done to get everyone all excited. But it didn't make national news because, well---see above.
Here are some more important things than a royal wedding
Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Wed, 04/27/2011 - 3:09pm.
While a royal wedding may make for great eye candy, the make believe media should be focusing on such minor things as: soaring gas prices and a wrecked economy, unrest in the Middle East and our inept foreign policy, our bloated debt, etc. But the nutworks, as usual, ignore things that threaten the reign of their idol Ears and instead focus on mere trivia.
Priorities for the media*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 04/27/2011 - 3:35pm.
No one has been talking about this story.
If you dont know who or how many police work for you, then this story should be getting at least some mention.
Here's a good one via MSNBC:
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 04/27/2011 - 3:42pm.
Bashir, in the 3 EST hour, does a segment on the Brit's preparations to combat potential terrorism at the royal wedding.
In the lead-in clips, does he highlight the radical islamist Choudary who has vowed to turn the wedding into a nightmare?
No. This is MSNBC. The clips shown were of the English Defence League marching. Now the EDL are no angels to be sure, but why would Bashir feature them as the possible terrorist threat during the wedding?
MSNBC just gets more disgusting with every passing day.
And I'm Supposed To Be Upset Why?
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:07am.
Last time I checked, nobody seemed to go apoplectic over the media coverage of the wedding between Princess Diana and Prince Charles, even though the Ayatollah Komeni was taking power in Iran, and we were still fighting the Cold War with the Soviets and the Cubans. Truth be told, world tensions seem much less prevalent than they were 30 years ago, so why is a royal wedding at this time more insensitive than the Princess Di wedding? It sounds like you just want to be a bunch of sniveling ants that want to spoil the picnic.