O’Reilly Cites CMI Report on Media Coverage of Ft. Hood Killer

  • Bookmark and Share

On Nov. 12, Bill O’Reilly led off “The O’Reilly Factor” by framing his “Talking Points” segment around a report from the Culture & Media Institute on the biased network coverage of the Ft. Hood Massacre.

“A new study, by the Culture and Media Institute, a conservative group, says the following: 85 percent of network evening news stories on Ft. Hood did not mention the word ‘terror,’ O’Reilly said. “In fact, in 48 reports, ABC, CBS and NBC referenced terrorism just seven times. Only 29 percent of the evening news reports even mentioned Major Hasan was a Muslim. Unbelievable. Of those mentions, 50 percent defended Islam. And before the president’s speech at Ft. Hood, 93 percent of the network evening news stories ignored any discussion about a terror connection. But after the president said that extremist views were involved, all three networks began to report a possible connection.”

“So you can see that apparently the American media’s still under the sway of the White House,” O’Reilly concluded, “and not accurately portraying things as they really are.”

CMI studied the evening news reporting of the three networks from Nov. 5, the day of the shooting, to Nov. 10, the day of the memorial service at which President Obama made what ABC’s Jake Tapper called “wa tacit acknowledgment of the Islamic extremist views investigators say were held by [Hasan].”

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Permission

It appears the MSM needed permission before telling the truth.

"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house." Acts 16:31

??

Gee, I wonder what the biggest clue is/was?

They Still Aren't Reporting Correctly on The Ft Hood Massacre

Has Bill O'Reilly or anyone else at Fox News mentioned this unborn baby? Why isn't Iraq Army Veteran Francheska Velez's unborn baby being counted among the murdered? 14 Victims not 13 Victims, this unborn child falls under:

 The Federal Law:
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public
Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a "child in utero"
as a legal victim, if he or she is injured or killed during the
commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law
defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at
any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[2]

 WHY isn't this being reported in the news cycle 14 victims only 13 Murder charges? This is how we honor OUR Military Veterans?

If the guy was a pro-life

If the guy was a pro-life Catholic, that would have been in the first paragraph of every report.  Even if that fact had nothing to do with the killings.

Imagine....

It could be worse, just imagine if he was a Koran Kool Aid drinking Radical Muslim and an abortion doctor.

Liberal Media Headlines: "Police Woman terrorist shoots down stressed out hero muslim doctor." 

 

Hoekstra says the White

Hoekstra says the White House is hiding info about Fort Hood.

http://thehill.com/b...