CBS Brings on Elizabeth Warren to Back More Bank Regulation; Spikes Cherokee Ancestry Controversy
On Monday's CBS This Morning, Charlie Rose and Erica Hill touted Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren's past time as "the government's chief watchdog during the 2008 bank bailout" as she was brought on to discuss JP Morgan Chase's $2 billion loss. Rose and Hill asked all of their questions from the left, and completely ommited any mention of the recent controversy over Warren's claim of Native American ancestry.
The anchor set up the Senate candidate to push for more regulations on banks without rebuttal: "It's appropriate to have some government oversight, and notwithstanding the fact that we're just coming out of this huge crisis." Hill even wondered if the banks themselves "should be broken up into smaller entities."
Rose began by mentioning only in passing that his guest was "the Democratic Senate candidate in that state [Massachusetts]." The liberal premise behind his first question was apparent: "What do you hope is the fallout from this, in terms of regulatory action?"
After Warren called for the resignation of JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon from the New York Federal Reserve board of directors, the anchor followed up by noting that Dimon "said that he supported 75 percent [sic] of Dodd/Frank, which was a principal regulation to come out." The senate candidate laughed this off, and replied that "what we have to remember is Dodd/Frank itself was a compromise, and now, what's happened is that the large financial institutions, led by Jamie Dimon, have gone after the regulators....They've done everything they can to stick with the idea that...there's no need for anyone from the outside looking at them. And I think that's just fundamentally wrong. It's wrong and it's dangerous."
Later in the segment, Hill asked her question about whether the banks should be broken up. As you might expect, Warren all but endorsed this idea: "The irony is that I was here talking about the risks posed by the largest financial institutions in 2008 and 2009, we talked about too much concentration in the banking industry; and now, here we are in 2012 with more concentration in the banking industry. The big have gotten bigger, and that's a danger."
Besides omitting the ancestry issue, the morning newscast didn't mention that Dimon was among the most frequent visitors to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner during the months after his confirmation in 2009. The CEO was also complimented by President Obama in early 2009: "[T]here are a lot of banks that are actually pretty well managed; JP Morgan being a good example. Jamie Dimon, the CEO there; I don't think he should be punished for doing a pretty good job managing an enormous portfolio."
Exactly two weeks earlier, on April 30, CBS This Morning gave leftist New York Times columnist Paul Krugman a platform to call for massive government spending: "Now is not the time to be slashing....Now is the time to be doing public works, to be rehiring those school teachers, to get this economy moving again."
The full transcript of the interview of Elizabeth Warren, which began five minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour of Monday's CBS This Morning, can be found at MRC.org.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Warren is not an ancestry fraud.
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 3:41pm.
She's an undocumented Cherokee.
And if she benefited
Submitted by Soldat44 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 3:52pm.
And if she benefited financially on federally funded student loans from this lie she committed a federal crime. When is someone going to take this further and find this out??
How?
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 4:09pm.
.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
http://dailycaller.com/2012/0
Submitted by Soldat44 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 5:09pm.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/10/upenn-also-called-elizabeth-warren-a-m...
http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/07/republicans-want-harvard-to-investigat...
My "How?" Comment
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:44pm.
My "How?" comment was a poor attempt at Native American humor. Thanks for the links, though.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
I got it right
Submitted by the struggler on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 8:23pm.
I got it right off,Kingfish...heh.
Princess Liawatha of the Wantum Your Wampum Tribe.
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 4:32pm.
Of course the Bocahontas (shout out to Blonde!) wants more regulation, more taxes and more government. Liars like her would not be employable otherwise.
The great-great-great-great-great-great-grandaughter....
Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 5:05pm.
...of Chief Shitting Bull!
I could not see her high cheekbones...
...because she remained seated the whole time...
Warren....
Submitted by Forbus on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 5:06pm.
Chief Talking Bull.
Just yesterday she said she's
Submitted by forest on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:00pm.
Just yesterday she said she's proud of her Native American ancestry on CNN. I don't know why her comrades at CBS wouldn't ask her about it. She's proud of it, c'mon guys, throw her a bone.
they are fixated on that loss
Submitted by dmacleo on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:07pm.
while ignoring there is still (even if this loss climbs) a profit for the year so far.
but we all know profits are bad.
so lets see, profits are bad and losses are bad, we need more rules to make sure all companies always break even.
any more or less would be criminal......
bastards..
Furthermore....
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:43pm.
We don't know all the details about all the trades on JPM's books. This particular trade had a loss of 2 billion, or maybe more. When the quarter comes out we may see other trades that were winners that largely offset this trade.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
this is a good point too
Submitted by dmacleo on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:52pm.
one I didn't think of, thank you.
My bad, Keemo Sabee.
Submitted by Soldat44 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 7:40pm.
My bad, Keemo Sabee. Yhat-ta-hey!
"completely ommited any mention of the recent controversy over W
Submitted by thestalkinghorse on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 11:22pm.
Actually an agreement was drawn up wherein the parties decided not to mention the issue.
Then they smoked a peace pipe.
"Spitting Bull"
Submitted by Qtaug on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 6:48am.
Chief of the Wannabees
Breaking up the banks
Submitted by Patriot_765 on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 8:02am.
OMG, I find myself agreeing with Hill. I am a big believer in competition, but the current banking industry in the US in no longer a market, it is a strangle. Banks should have a cap of 20 Billion; after that they should have to spin off a new bank.... give them 6 months to get there.
It is sad that the 2012 elections are over, the banks own the democrat and the republican candidates and have won again, before a choice is made by the American public.
Maybe Mitt will win, and grow a pair, and decide to return competition to the banking industry.
ha
Not holding my breath.....
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 9:38am.
I would be shocked if you answered this question: Where did you come up with that 20 Billion number?
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama