Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal

CBS's Rose Hounds Boehner on Ryan Budget, Cites Bishops; Went Easy on Pelosi

By Matthew Balan | April 18, 2012 | 18:23

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

Charlie Rose did his best to forward liberals' talking points about Rep. Paul Ryan's budget proposal on Wednesday's CBS This Morning, during an interview of House Speaker John Boehner. Rose played up Mitt Romney's endorsement of the Ryan plan and how the former governor "talked about, perhaps, abolishing H.E.W. [sic]- I mean, HUD, as well as Department of Education."

The anchor even went so far to tout how "Catholic bishops today said that the Ryan budget fails to meet moral criteria and disproportionately cuts programs that serve the poor and the vulnerable, which sounds like the President." By contrast, Rose didn't even bring up Nancy Pelosi's notorious dissent from Catholic doctrine during a recent interview of Boehner's immediate predecessor on PBS.

Rose brought up the economy midway through the first segment of the interview.  When Boehner stated that the "the election's going to be about economics, economics, economics," the journalist replied with his H.E.W. gaffe (the name of HHS before 1979). The Republican insisted that "we've got to make choices, and we shouldn't criticize candidates because they're talking about the big choices that we have to make. When you have $1.3 trillion budget deficit, have you to do something."

The CBS anchor continued by forwarding a liberal talking point against Romney and the GOP for the upcoming election: "The President would say to you...this is going to be a referendum on the Ryan budget, because the Speaker has even said, it's a vision of what we want to do." The Speaker replied, "The President's going to try to make the election about anything other than his failed economic policies, because he can't run on his record. And so, they're going to pull out every boogieman they can."

Rose then pushed ahead on the topic of the Ryan plan, and referenced the Tuesday statement from two committees of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops:

Charlie Rose, CBS News Anchor; & Rep. John Boehner, (R), Speaker of the House | NewsBusters.orgROSE: Do you think the Ryan plan is the way to do that, because Governor Romney has clearly made it- at one with him?

BOEHNER: Somebody in this town has to own up to the problems that we face-

ROSE: And your budget does it?                

BOENHER: And that budget does it. Now, if the President doesn't like that budget, where's his budget? His budget failed on the floor of the House, zero to 414. Not one Democrat or one Republican voted for the President's budget. Why? Because he wasn't serious about dealing with America's problem.

ROSE: The Catholic bishops today said that the Ryan budget fails to meet moral criteria and disproportionately cuts programs that serve the poor and the vulnerable, which sounds like the President.

BOEHNER: I understand. Listen, when you look at the budget choices that we have to make, it's time that Congress and Washington and the President quit kicking the can down the road and address our challenges. I don't believe that our budget will hurt the poor in any way. I don't think it will hurt the safety net in any way. But we can't continue to spend money that we do not have.

Over two weeks earlier, on the April 2, 2012 edition of his PBS program, Rose interviewed Pelosi and not once mentioned how the same bishops' conference has been outspoken on the issue of religious liberty, in the wake of the Obama administration's abortifacient/contraception mandate (something the far-left politician vocally supported). The closest the journalist came was when he asked the Democrat, "So you are saying this coming election should be a battle of values?"

CBS's morning and evening newscasts haven't mention the HHS mandate controversy since February 11, 2012, according to a Nexis search. On that note, the bishops' conference issued a "call to action to defend religious liberty and urged laity to work to protect the First Freedom of the Bill of Rights" on April 12, but the document hasn't received any attention as of yet from the network. This difference is just the latest manifestation of what the MRC documented in our special report, "Secular Snobs":

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Journalists have a love-hate relationship with Vatican City. They love when the Pope is opposing capital punishment or U.S. wars, but when it comes to social issues and Catholic church governance, they portray the church hierarchy as a group of  white male celibate authoritarians viciously enforcing a "rigid" and ancient orthodoxy.

Earlier in the interview, Rose channeled another liberal talking point about Romney supposedly being out of touch with ordinary Americans:

ROSE:  No one doubts you're not in touch [sic], not only with the constituents you have Ohio, but generally, you're that kind of guy. Is Mitt Romney that kind of guy? He's had a very different lifestyle from you.

BOEHNER: Listen, we're all different. You know, we have different personalities-

ROSE: But can he be in touch? Does he need to figure out a way to have the same kind of visceral appeal?

BOEHNER: I think he's done a good job in a Republican primary, under some very difficult circumstances, and I think he's prepared for this general election and will appeal to more than half of America. But after any primary, there's always a little retooling; always some adjustments, in terms of now, you have a different opponent. And so, I think you'll see some new things out of this campaign.

The transcript of the first segment of Charlie Rose's interview of House Speaker John Boehner, which aired three minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour of Wednesday's CBS This Morning, is available at MRC.org.

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Christianity
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Labeling
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Budget
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Economy
  • Government Agencies
  • Religion
  • John Boehner
  • Paul Ryan
  • CBS
  • CBS This Morning (debuted 9 January 2012)
  • PBS
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Rose should talk to only Reid, Pelosi & Obama on federal budget

Submitted by Gary Hall on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 6:51pm.

Perhaps this is the first item that Rose should read, as it seems rather obvious that he's missed the news for the past 3 years:

Reid loses procedural budget ruling

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires both the House and the Senate pass a budget resolution every spring. For the first time since the Budget act was passed, the House, under Nancy Pelosi's hand, failed to pass a budget. Not only that, they didn't pass one for the first two years of the Obama administration; and more, Pelosi would not even allow for a vote.

The House (controlled by Republicans the last two years) has done its job - has passed two.

The Senate? The Senate-under Democratic control, Sen Harry Reid, has has failed for three straight years to do their job.

And I'm going to bet that if a national poll was done amongst the Democrats - who were likely to vote in the next election - that less than 5% would understand any of this recent history.

That is exactly the way that Charlie Rose and his pals in the national MSM want it. They work tirelessly, not only to promote hate and to divide the country, but they work overtime to make sure that the voters don't have a clue as to what is actually going on . . . or not going on.

Sad state of affairs.

(;~/ gary

  • Login to post comments

A Must See Video Answer to Charlie Rose Socialists

Submitted by libBuster on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 7:14pm.

Here is the pefect answer to Charlie Rose and his special socialists. Pay close attention to President Reagan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h8O7V-WxWQ&feature=youtu.be

  • Login to post comments

Nice,

Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 7:28pm.

And with over 900k views!

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

The bishops made a mistake

Submitted by octavioj on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 8:39pm.

The bishops should have said why is it the government's role to provide what the budget cuts. The bishops should have also demanded the Catholic faithful pick up the slack left by the government. It should not be the role of government to provide it all but the role of we the faithful.

  • Login to post comments

Congrats, Johnny B!

Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 9:18pm.

You went head to head with America's Funeral Director, and he couldn't even you talk you into the handrubbed tung-oil finish.

Hang tough, dude, and say something publicly once in a while, K?

  • Login to post comments

oh God, anyone but Charlie Rose

Submitted by Savonarola on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 9:59pm.

He is a puffed up motor mouth who never lets his guest answer the question because he loves the sound of his own voice and thinks that his doesn't stink.

  • Login to post comments

Why are Bishops being asked

Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Wed, 04/18/2012 - 11:54pm.

Why are Bishops being asked in the first place? I thought the left hated them, were the islamic clerics consulted?

Non, je ne regrette rien. "You aren't angry because I might be a racist, you're angry because you know I'm right".
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • National Media Skip Over Charges U.S. Ambassador Abused 'Minor Children'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use