CBS Interrogates Cain on Wife's Feelings, Defense Knowledge
CBS's Bob Schieffer led his interview of Herman Cain on Tuesday's Early Show by asking, "Why did you accept the invitation?" Cain must have been wondering that himself by the end of the segment, as Schieffer and Norah O'Donnell conducted a hostile interrogation of the entrepreneur, pressing him about his qualifications to be secretary of defense, and even asked about the state of his marriage.
The Face the Nation host, filling in as CBS transitions to its new morning show lineup, noted how someone at his network "had the idea...why don't we ask Herman Cain to come on?...Well, of all things he said, yes." Schieffer then turned to the former GOP presidential candidate and asked his "why accept the invitation" question, adding, "Do you have something you want to tell us this morning? Are you going to endorse a candidate? What brings you to television this morning?"
After some initial back and forth between Cain and the journalists, O'Donnell proceeded to reference the sexual harassment accusations against the Republican: "It is interesting that you bring up the question of truthfulness because what drove you from the campaign were questions about your own truthfulness, in terms of your relationship with women. I do want to ask you this morning, how is your wife?"
The former candidate replied, "My wife is doing marvelous, thank you. We were blessed to have our fourth grandchild on New Year's Day. So, 2012 has gotten off to a great start for my wife and I. She is doing fine because, since I got out of the race, we don't have to constantly hear the spinning and the re-spinning of those false accusations." O'Donnell and Schieffer then launched their joint barrage at Cain, casting doubt on his ability to be defense secretary:
O'DONNELL: Mr. Cain, I know you've said in some recent interviews that if a Republican were to defeat Barack Obama, you would be interested in serving in the next administration as secretary of defense. That is a big job, to serve as secretary of defense. I just want to ask you a couple questions. You had some mistakes on the campaign trail. You were confused about the Taliban. You said that you thought that the Taliban might take control in Libya. You know that the Taliban are not in Libya, correct?
CAIN: Correct, Norah. Look, it's a learning process, and there are a lot of things that I have learned as a result of having been in the campaign, as well as after the campaign. Now, the reason that I indicated that I would consider being secretary of defense- I don't think that my qualifications to be the secretary of defense should be based upon something that I said months ago in error. No, it should be based upon leadership. National security is one of our biggest challenges that we have in this country, and I believe that as a leader in that position- if we have the right president- I would be able to bring a lot to the party, in terms of helping to prioritize those things that need to be prioritized.
SCHIEFFER: Mr. Cain, wouldn't you have to start out being kind of fairly familiar with what the basic national security issues are? I mean, you, throughout the campaign, seemed unaware of a lot of the things that the secretary of defense would have to deal with. I mean, good intentions are one thing and bringing fresh insight. But do you really sincerely feel that you have the background and, really, the knowledge, that you could handle a cabinet-level position like that?
CAIN: Bob, allow me to remind you something that didn't get picked up when I was beat up about what I didn't know. I served on the citizens advisory board of the Strategic Air Command in Omaha, Nebraska, for several years when I was there. I was exposed to some of those issues at that particular time. I started my career as a ballistics analyst with the Department of the Navy. I've actually been on a navy ship. So, I have been around some of these issues. So, it's not that I'm totally-
SCHIEFFER: Well, sir, if I may interrupt. I have been on a navy ship, too, but I don't think that qualifies me to be secretary of defense.
CAIN: Bob, I didn't say that qualified me to be secretary of defense. There you go, flyspecking one of the things that I mentioned, when I'm trying to make a point. That's not the point, Bob. I didn't say being on a ship one time qualified me for being secretary of defense. My point is quite simply this: we need strong leadership in that position, and it was a hypothetical question, and I gave a response based upon the question that was asked.
At the end of interview, the CBS White House correspondent played gotcha with Cain by asking him to give the size of the U.S. military. The Republican called her out in his answer:
O'DONNELL: Okay. Simple question: how many people serve in the armed services?
CAIN: We have about 3 million people who serve in the armed services. Was that a gotcha question, Norah?
O'DONNELL: Yeah. We have about 1.6 who are active duty and about 2 million total if you include reservists who are part of our armed services. Herman Cain, thank you so much for joining us. Good to see you. We appreciate it.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
No need to ask ...
Submitted by Fredy on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 6:24pm.
I cannot recall ANY EX-candidate being attacked by the media before.
Clearly Bob Schiefer is going to take his hatred to his grave.
What do you mean? Sarah Palin
Submitted by Darks Shadow Show on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 12:27am.
What do you mean? Sarah Palin has also been constantly attacked even though her 2008 run for VP has been done for years.
will someone in the MSM ask Obama to refresh us with his
Submitted by Paarl on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 6:27pm.
knowledge about the number of US states ?? of course..there are 57 states..Obama told us so...
Paarl
Armed Forces End Strenght = 2.97 million; Nora's Wrong, As Usual
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 6:45pm.
According to this article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_size_of_armed_forces, U.S. Armed Force total end strength is 2.97 million personnel.
If I can find the answer to this question in 2 minutes, you'd think the collective brain trust of the liberal idiots at CBS could find it also.
The bottom line is that Herman Cain was right.
Meanwhile,the present Sec Def, Panetta has no particular credentials prior to first being picked as the Director of the CIA and now the Defense Secretary other than being a Military Intelligence 2d Lieu in the Army some 50 years ago.
More importantly, Cain or any conservative should be well prepared to face what amounts to the enemy when going on one of these patently hostile shows with a liberal agenda. Don't go on unless you have to something to say and don't be deterred until you get it out.
Questioning each -- Answers must be within +/- 10%
Submitted by BuffNBone on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 7:10pm.
For the Democrat candidate. How many people serve in the armed services?
For the Republican candidate. Name them.
The two babbling CBS morons should be fired.
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 7:21pm.
Would they have asked these questions of O'batears? NO.
Between Schieffer's senility and O'Donnell's stupidity, they are Dumb and Dumber (or Beavis and Butthead).
Hasn't
Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 7:26pm.
Cain taken note of what the media did to him? Why oh why would he go on a show with two of the most radicals on TV. When are Conservatives going to learn to dismiss any and everything that comes out of the mouths of liberals and fight back with some guts if they insist on wasting time with such repulsive jerks. The media is running the campaign for boy barry so what is the purpose of interviews, I ask??