CBS Reporter Recites Media Bias Critique on Cain Coverage
On Monday's Early Show, CBS's Jan Crawford spotlighted conservative criticism of the broad media coverage of the Herman Cain sexual harassment charges. Crawford stated that Cain's "testy exchange" with reporters "could help...because a lot of conservatives...think there's this huge liberal bias against conservatives. You know, the media didn't cover Bill Clinton...like they're doing Herman Cain."
The correspondent noted the right-leaning argument in response to a statement from anchor Erica Hill about a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll that had Cain just barely behind Mitt Romney at the front of the GOP presidential pack: "It would seem these allegations didn't have much of an impact in the latest polling." Just prior to this, the morning show played a sound bite of Cain refusing to answer a reporter's question on the controversy at a weekend press conference.
Crawford first stated that "in that same poll, seven in ten Republicans say the charges just don't matter at this point, and that's really what we're picking up in our reporting out in Iowa and other key states." She continued with a personal anecdote before going into the conservative charge:
CRAWFORD: I was in Alabama over the weekend, for example, for the Alabama/LSU game....[and] the fans, when they weren't talking about the game, they wanted to talk about Herman Cain. They like Herman Cain, and they want to believe that these allegations just can't be true, because then, they feel like they may have to go somewhere else. So, so far, it's just not registering with his supporters.
And, you know, let me just add- that exchange that we just saw, that testy exchange- that's another thing that could help Herman Cain because a lot of conservatives don't trust the media. They think there's this huge liberal bias against conservatives. You know, the media didn't cover Bill Clinton or Ted Kennedy like they're doing Herman Cain. So, some of this stuff could actually come back to help him.
Near the end of the segment, the CBS correspondent highlighted President Obama's bad poll numbers a year ahead of the 2012 presidential election:
HILL: Real quickly, before we let you go, what are the numbers looking like for President Obama, as we are now one year out from Election Day essentially?
CRAWFORD: Right. I mean, it's one year. You know, it's going to be tough for him, and everyone knows it. He knows it; his campaign knows it; disapproval ratings right now- 53% in some of the latest polls. It's going to be tough, but, you know, they say they're ready to fight. So it's going to be quite a race, and already, you're seeing- you know, they're going after Mitt Romney. So I think Democrats think that's who the nominee is going to be on the Republican side.
On Monday, the MRC's Scott Whitlock noted how the Big Three networks have devoted 84 stories to the Herman Cain story in just one week. By comparison, when Juanita Broaddrick accused former President Bill Clinton of rape in 1998, there were only four stories during the week after.
The transcript of the relevant portion from the Jan Crawford segment on Monday's Early Show, beginning at the four minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour mark:
JEFF GLOR: We're going to turn now to politics. The sexual harassment claims against presidential candidate Herman Cain may not be sending voters away from him. The latest Washington Post/ABC News poll shows 23% of Republicans support Cain. He's just one point behind Mitt Romney.
[CBS News Graphic: "Washington Post/ABC News Poll: GOP Presidential Candidates: Romney, 24%; Cain, 23%; Perry, 13%; Gingrich, 12%; Margin Of Error: +/- 3.5% Pts."]
ERICA HILL: In the meantime, Cain is telling everyone he is done talking about those allegations. Listen to this exchange he had with reporters over the weekend.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE REPORTER 1: Mr. Cain, the attorney for one of the women who filed a sexual harassment complaint against-
HERMAN CAIN, (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Don't even go there.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 1: No gossip-
UNIDENTIFIED MALE REPORTER 1: Can I ask my question?
CAIN: No.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 1: No gossip-
UNIDENTIFIED MALE REPORTER 2: May I ask a good question?
CAIN: Where's my chief of staff?
UNIDENTIFIED MAN 1: I'm right here-
CAIN: Please send him the journalistic code of ethics.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN 1: Will do-
HILL: Political correspondent Jan Crawford is here with more on the GOP campaign. Jan, good morning-
JAN CRAWFORD: Good morning-
HILL: We mentioned that ABC News poll which, essentially, in some ways, mirrors the latest CBS/New York Times poll from a week or two ago, with both Romney and Cain neck-and-neck. It would seem these allegations didn't have much of an impact in the latest polling.
[CBS News Graphic: "Race For 2012: Cain Stays Strong In New Poll"]
CRAWFORD: Well, no- I mean, so far, they're not, and in that same poll, seven in ten Republicans say the charges just don't matter at this point, and that's really what we're picking up in our reporting out in Iowa and other key states. I was in Alabama over the weekend, for example, for the Alabama/LSU game-
GLOR: Sorry about that, by the way-
CRAWFORD: I'm still in mourning, but I got on my crimson-
GLOR: (laughs) All right-
CRAWFORD: But, you know, everywhere, the voters- I mean, the fans, when they weren't talking about the game, they wanted to talk about Herman Cain. They like Herman Cain, and they want to believe that these allegations just can't be true, because then, they feel like they may have to go somewhere else. So, so far, it's just not registering with his supporters. And, you know, let me just add- that exchange that we just saw, that testy exchange- that's another thing that could help Herman Cain because a lot of conservatives don't trust the media. They think there's this huge liberal bias against conservatives. You know, the media didn't cover Bill Clinton or Ted Kennedy like they're doing Herman Cain. So, some of this stuff could actually come back to help him.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
What happened to the
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 4:58pm.
What happened to the 'comments' and 'add a comment' section in the lower right hand corner of these articles???
Too bad Liberals
Submitted by Order270 on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 4:59pm.
You lost all claims to sexual harassment after saving Clinton's neck. If the most powerful man in the world has amorous encounters with subordinates in the work place and that is not sexual harassment, then nothing is.
Also notice how each time this story slows down, another empty accusation mysteriously pops up. First she couldn't say anything, then she does but doesn't want to be known, then identifies herself but doesn't want to take any action.
Hey
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 5:00pm.
Just cause bubba abused an intern in the oval office and lied about it under oath, doesn't mean he shouldn't be some great symbol of america. YES IT DOES!
And woman strangely, at this time are coming out of the woodwork that making accusations against Mr. Cain sure make me wonder. Is that why Obama needs so much for his campaign?
Notice her choice of words.
Submitted by Phryj1 on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 5:14pm.
Examples: "...conservatives...THINK there's this huge liberal bias against (them)." and "...and they want to believe that these allegations just can't be true...", as though there is no media bias and the allegations are true in an attempt to make it look like it's just conservatives being crazy.
Amusingly, she then gives a blatantly sympathetic appraisal of Obama's reelection effort, proving that, indeed, the media is liberally biased.
Not to mention, but if you're trying to disprove your liberal bias, it's generally not a good idea to work in a popular liberal viewpoint, in this case, the left's position that Cain is guilty until proven otherwise. She effectively undermined her own 'you only THINK we're liberally biased' claim.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
trying to convince us we're crazy
Submitted by kata on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 5:22pm.
Now that the liberal media bias has been documented and exposed, we're now going to be told we're outright crazy to believe our own ears and eyes.
I have seen the words "conservatives perceived persecution" too many times lately to believe it's a co-incidence.
I cannot recommend enough that people start cancelling their cable tv. Send a permanent message to these dolts that cannot ignore.
Or use their own strategy against them.
Submitted by Phryj1 on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 8:26pm.
If a race-baiting socialist kook like Van Jones can organize boycotts of advertisers, anyone can.
I'd like to see folks start boycotting companies that advertise on MSM 'news' outlets. Hit 'em in their wallets. Granted, they lose viewers all the time anyway because they've repeatedly undermined the public's trust in them, but getting advertisers to pull ads would nicely hasten the liberal media's demise.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
They're afraid of him. Good.
Submitted by mattm on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 7:37pm.
They're afraid of him. Good.
Since there's no video clip..
Submitted by greggy on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 10:02pm.
with which to look at how she delivered these comments, it's harder to form an opinion about it - but IMO her statement that conservatives think there's a huge liberal bias in the media, and that this is responsible for how they're covering the story - is helpful. She did even specify the comparisons to how they covered Clinton, and Ted Kennedy.
All in all, I'd count that as a net positive. It's not a common occurence for the media to acknowledge conservative criticism.
Holy crap..
Submitted by greggy on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 11:14pm.
Cain is on Jimmy Kimmel tonight?
Not an especially good night for it.
Classic response
Submitted by Prisondog1776 on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 1:22am.
fro the media here. Just LOL funny, they don`t even realize they doe these things do they? ..http://weaselzippers.us/2011/11/07/msnbcs-andrea-mitchell-snickers-at-journalisms-code-of-ethics-whatever-that-is/
oops
Submitted by Prisondog1776 on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 1:26am.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/07/msnbcs-andrea-mitchell-politicos-jonat...
To reduce Corporate power - Start with Commercial Media
Submitted by BenDoubleCrossed on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 12:12pm.
Although it frequently is difficult to tell the difference between news stories, editorials and political ads, campaign laws exempt the commercial press, because the 1st Amendment has been interpreted to prohibit abridging these corporations’ freedom of speech and the press. So the corporate media is free to spike, ignore or over hype stories and decide what views are presented as news.
The Federal ‘Press Exemption: 2 USC 431 (9) (B) (i) “The term expenditure does not include any news story, commentary, or editorial distributed through the facilities of any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, unless such facilities are owned or controlled by any political party, political committee, or candidate;”
But the press exemption is contrary to the 1st Amendment. Campaigns are assemblies of like minded citizens using speech and the press to petition the government for a redress of grievances. And the 1st Amendment denies Congress authority to abridge those rights:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Unless corporations have taken up worshiping God; freedom of assembly, press and speech are intended for flesh and blood citizens. And equal protection is still a fundamental tenet of law.
If the United States Supreme Court defined freedom of religion using the logic campaign laws use to define a free press only the church "as an institution" would enjoy freedom of religion, not its parishioners!
Muzzling communications by grass roots does not reduce corporate influence? When citizens and grass roots are free to spend unlimited amounts balance is restored and challengers are more likely to win.
Individuals and grass roots organizations have formed 527 and 501(c)(4) corporations to level the playing field and overcome some of the unconstitutional campaign laws that hinder participation by flesh and blood persons in American politics.
To restore the 'equal rights' of flesh and blood and grass roots corporations, the language of the press exemption, above, should be modified to read: “The term expenditure does not include any news story, commentary, or editorial distributed by any citizen, citizens group, broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication.”