Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 22, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

Andrea Mitchell Bemoans 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' as 'Sad Episode'

By Matthew Balan | September 15, 2011 | 09:42

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

On her Wednesday program, MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell helped a homosexual filmmaker promote his documentary on what she labeled the "sad episode" of the passage of the military's soon-to-be lifted "don't ask, don't tell" policy in 1993. Mitchell touted how she questioned then-President-Elect Bill Clinton in 1992 on his campaign promise to allow open homosexuals to serve in the military, and let her guest, Fenton Bailey, attack the supposed "bigotry, homophobia, [and] ignorance" of supporters of the policy.

Before introducing Bailey, the anchor played an excerpt from his documentary, "The Strange History of Don't Ask, Don't Tell," where several unidentified members of Congress and servicemen all used the term "unit cohesion," followed by a clip from a man featured in the film who claimed that "they had to come up with a reason that sounded rational. And so, they came up with this idea of the unit cohesion to justify their homophobia."

Mitchell then turned to her guest and first asked, "Talk to me about what you found in making the documentary that was surprising to you about the history of this whole sad episode." Bailey, who recently put out a documentary on Chastity-turned-Chaz Bono titled "Becoming Chaz," and has produced two TV series for drag queen RuPaul, repeatedly used the adjective he used in the title for his documentary, "strange," to describe the policy's genesis:

BAILEY: Yeah. I think most surprising is that it is a long and strange history. It's such a strange law- 'don't ask, don't tell'- because it basically says that to be in the military, if you're gay, you just can't tell anyone about it. And the thing is, that people ask you all the time, what did you do this weekend? Where did you go? So, it was a law that forced people to be dishonest, forced people to lie, and kind of go against the very values of the military- you know, truth, honor, valor. These things all had to be contradicted by conforming to 'don't ask, don't tell.' It was very strange.

Later, the MSNBC personality gave her personal account of her question to Bill Clinton back in November 1992 on the issue of homosexuals in the military ( Mitchell gave a more detailed chronicle of the episode in a March 2007 blog entry):

MITCHELL: I was in at the beginning of this, sadly. I was the person who asked Bill Clinton the question- just before he took office, actually, during the transition on Veterans Day, November 11, which then led to a reaction from the Joint Chiefs, which then led to him being cornered. And it was just a sorry episode where it wasn't something he wanted to do, but politically, he felt hammered by the military back then- by all of the military- and the leading members of the Armed Services Committee- Democrats and Republicans- who were really much against it.

Bailey replied by smearing those who wanted to keep the explicit ban of homosexuals from the armed services:

Fenton Bailey, Filmmaker; Screen Cap From 14 September 2011 Edition of MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Reports | NewsBusters.orgBAILEY: Oh, those hearings in '93 were shocking and surprising - the bigotry, the homophobia, the ignorance. It was really shocking to go look back at those archives and see the kinds of things that people said. And, of course, as you said, it was such a sort of irony that here was President Clinton trying to deliver on that election promise, and he ends up basically being forced to pass a law that, for the first time ever, bans gay people from serving openly in the military. It was a law- it was against the law. It's extraordinary.

Actually, the filmmaker's statement on the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is misleading. A November 30, 2007 New York Times article acknowledged that "before the policy was put into place, gay men and lesbians were barred from serving in the military." Under the 1988 Uniform Code of Military Justice, those found guilty of sodomy "shall be punished as a court-martial may direct." Before this, a 1982 Department of Defense directive found that "homosexuality is incompatible with military service." The same directive also casts doubt on the claim Mitchell led the segment with: "The presence of [homosexuals] adversely affects the ability of the Military Services to maintain discipline, good order, and morale; to foster mutual trust and confidence among servicemembers." Sounds like "unit cohesion," doesn't it?

One of those who testified during one of those 1993 hearings was the late Vietnam War hero, Marine Colonel John Ripley, a Naval Academy graduate who won the Navy Cross for making repeated trips under the Dong Ha Bridge in 1972, climbing hand over hand to place explosives, so the communist North Vietnamese wouldn't be able to use the river crossing. This is the kind of man which Bailey tagged with "bigotry, homophobia, and ignorance."

During his May 4 testimony that year before the House Armed Services Committee, Col. Ripley stated that allowing open homosexuals to serve in the military would "virtually destroy the Marine Corps by imposing on us this deviation of values which we hold dear, which we have fought for, and which we know to be proper." Mitchell and her guest, both of whom never served in the military, could learn something or two about the services' "very values" from the 35-year veteran.

Near the end of the segment, Mitchell bemoaned the 18-year-old policy:

MITCHELL: The statistics are really numbing. Going into two wars, we managed to- the military, I should say- managed to discharge more than 13,000 men and women under this policy, including many of the language experts from Monterey- from the Monterey school, whom we needed desperately because they were Arabic speakers.

Back in June 2008, the journalist argued against former Democratic Senator Sam Nunn as a possible running mate for then-candidate Barack Obama during a roundtable discussion on NBC's Meet the Press, citing his involvement in the passage of "don't ask, don't tell":

MITCHELL: Minuses: He [Nunn] is anathema to the gay and lesbian community because of "don't ask, don't tell." He's tried to moderate his position, but it was he and Colin Powell who shoved that down the young Bill Clinton's throat in 1993, as a new President. So there are large Democratic interest groups who would rebel at the convention if Sam Nunn were the nominee.

The full transcript of Andrea Mitchell's segment with Fenton Bailey on Wednesday's Andrea Mitchell Reports on MSNBC, which began 38 minutes into the 1 pm Eastern hour:

Andrea Mitchel, MSNBC Anchor | NewsBusters.orgANDREA MITCHELL: 'Don't ask, don't tell'- it's officially going to end next week permitting gays and lesbians to serve in America's military openly. A new HBO documentary, 'The Strange History of Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' takes a closer look at the compromise put in place by President Clinton back in 1993.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 1 (taken from the HBO documentary, "The Strange History of Don't Ask, Don't Tell"): Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 2: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 1: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 3: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 4: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 5: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 6: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 7: Unit cohesion.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 8: They had to come up with a reason that sounded rational. And so, they came up with this idea of the unit cohesion to justify their homophobia.

MITCHELL: Fenton Bailey is one of the men behind the new documentary, and joins us now from California. Thank you. I think you're out there in San Francisco. Thanks very much. Talk to me about what you found in making the documentary that was surprising to you about the history of this whole sad episode.

FENTON BAILEY, FILMMAKER: Yeah. I think most surprising is that it is a long and strange history. It's such a strange law- 'don't ask, don't tell'- because it basically says that to be in the military, if you're gay, you just can't tell anyone about it. And the thing is, that people ask you all the time, what did you do this weekend? Where did you go? So, it was a law that forced people to be dishonest, forced people to lie, and kind of go against the very values of the military- you know, truth, honor, valor. These things all had to be contradicted by conforming to 'don't ask, don't tell.' It was very strange.

MITCHELL: In fact, what Admiral [Mike] Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said at that really extraordinarily powerful hearing-

BAILEY: Yeah-

MITCHELL: Perhaps, more than a year ago, which began the beginning of the end of this, was that you were basically asking the military men and women to go against the military code of honor, which is that you can't lie.

BAILEY: That's absolutely right, and, of course, the reason for saying that gay people shouldn't be open in the military is that it would impact unit cohesion. But, in fact, it created the very threat to unit cohesion by forcing people to lie, by forcing them to be closeted and secretive and not completely honest and open with their colleagues.

MITCHELL: I was in at the beginning of this, sadly. I was the person who asked Bill Clinton the question- just before he took office, actually, during the transition on Veterans Day, November 11, which then led to a reaction from the Joint Chiefs, which then led to him being cornered. And it was just a sorry episode where it wasn't something he wanted to do, but politically, he felt hammered by the military back then- by all of the military- and the leading members of the Armed Services Committee- Democrats and Republicans- who were really much against it.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

BAILEY: Oh, those hearings in '93 were shocking and surprising - the bigotry, the homophobia, the ignorance. It was really shocking to go look back at those archives and see the kinds of things that people said. And, of course, as you said, it was such a sort of irony that here was President Clinton trying to deliver on that election promise, and he ends up basically being forced to pass a law that, for the first time ever, bans gay people from serving openly in the military. It was a law- it was against the law. It's extraordinary.

MITCHELL: Here's one particularly telling clip from the HBO documentary- your documentary.

MARGUERITE CAMMERMEYER (taken from the HBO documentary, "The Strange History of Don't Ask, Don't Tell"): To have to sit in front of these elder statesmen, their pontification about me and about my sexual orientation.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN 9: We have to give up some of our constitutional rights. We have to give up a degree of privacy. If you feel that intensely and that patriotic that you want to serve, then give up a little something.

MITCHELL (on-camera): That was Marguerite Cammermeyer, of course, a signature case here. The statistics are really numbing. Going into two wars, we managed to- the military, I should say- managed to discharge more than 13,000 men and women under this policy, including many of the language experts from Monterey- from the Monterey School, whom we needed desperately because they were Arabic speakers.

[MSNBC Graphic: "The End of Don't Ask Don't Tell: Over 13,000 Discharged Under Policy; $53,000 For Every Service Person Expelled; There Are An Estimated 1 Million Gay Veterans in U.S."]

BAILEY: I mean, I think, without doubt, the military really weakened itself by throwing out fabulously talented people with impeccable records- a huge financial cost, but also a huge brain drain in skill-set loss. And, you know, consequently, I think, also, the military had to increase the moral waivers and lower its standards for admissions. It also created problems with the kind of people who were getting into the military. So, it hurt in every which possible way.

MITCHELL: Fenton Bailey, thank you so much for bringing us the story and your documentary. Thank you.

BAILEY: Thank you.

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Homosexuality
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Culture/Society
  • Military
  • Sexuality
  • Fenton Bailey
  • Andrea Mitchell Reports
  • MSNBC
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

It will be a great day when I no longer have to look at

Submitted by virginia republican on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:57am.

or hear that old botoxed crone braying all her BS.

  • Login to post comments

Don't bend over in the shower.

Submitted by JLin on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 10:48am.

Strange doings from the progs...

  • Login to post comments

Another completely biased one

Submitted by deerjerkydave on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 10:49am.

Another completely biased one sided interview by the liberal media machine. This isn't journalism, it's propagandist advocacy.

------------------------ 

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined.  Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James Madison
  • Login to post comments

Gee, Mitchell sure has a high opinion of herself.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 11:05am.

According to her account, just one question from her was enough to start the wheels in motion for DADT.

And I thought she was just another party hack.

  • Login to post comments

1) Military service is not a

Submitted by Maestroh on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 11:45am.

1) Military service is not a right.

2) Do they shower together? If so then ee can save money with coed flights & showers.

3) If not then they are already "marked" with a label.

That's what is meant by cohesion & let's note that most of those espousing this policy never spent a day in the military.

  • Login to post comments

PC marks & labels in your record

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 3:47pm.

Tyranny, or is that tranny, coming your way soon. Hit the UK, EU & Canada...

http://www.infowars.com/3-year-olds-branded-racist-homophobic-put-in-gov...

snip in-part:
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Thursday, September 15, 2011

3-Year-Olds Branded “Racist,” “Homophobic” Put In Government Database

Kids’ future careers jeopardized by committing hate crime of saying the word “gay”

Over 30,000 British schoolchildren, some as young as three, have had their names registered on a government database and branded “racist” or “homophobic” for using playground insults, infractions that could impact their future careers.

The shocking figures were disclosed after civil liberties group the Manifesto Club made a Freedom of Information Act request which betrayed the fact that kids who used petty jibes are now being treated as thought criminals by education authorities.

34,000 incidents of “racism” in total were reported for the year 2009-2010, with nursery school toddlers as young as three being put on a state database for using the words “gay” and “lesbian”. One child who called another “broccoli head” was also reported to authorities. Other cases included a child who used the word “gaylord,” while another who told a teacher “this work is gay,” was also added to the thought crime database.

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

on and on and on and on and on........

Submitted by Herbster on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 11:48am.

We can depend on Mrs. Greenspan to spout the party line - over and over and over. She gets her daily marching orders from the Ministry of Propaganda. Am I imagining it, or is she beginning to speak and sound like Baba Wawa? Has she been taking speech lessons from Elmer Fudd?

  • Login to post comments

DADT will never go away.

Submitted by BTW Biological ... on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 3:43pm.

It just officially went away, but it will still remain. As if all gays are going to come out in formation and declare "I am gay". I work with a few gays and none are the OUT on their sleeves type. So DADT will continue but more on a personal level.

Everyone who smiles in your face is not a friend.
  • Login to post comments

DADT is a bad policy

Submitted by LSBeene on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 3:50pm.

DADT is a bad policy.

Let me get some things out front:

1) I am in the US Army.
2) I have deployed with a few Soldiers where people knew they were gay or lesbian
3) I saw both ends of the spectrum : 1 NCO served outstandingly and is also a close persona friend vs. 1 Junior Enlisted Soldier wore her lesbianism on her sleeve and had an entrenched victimologist mentiality. (every problem she encountered was, according to her, due to her "secretly" being a lesbian)

The problem is not gays per se. It's really not. But the military is a unique lifestyle. Unique.

When we go to the field we have to have male and female quarters. Separate. Showers = same thing. There are usually policies against sexual intercourse (in the sandbox) within a unit. A lot of times that is ignored - many times with disasterous consequences : favoritism, morale destroyed, vindictive actions taken by spurned lovers, charges of adultery etc etc.

My problem even with ALL that, is not with gay Soldiers - but with Gay soldiers. People who have wrapped their identity around who they sleep with.

In the civilian sector, which I have worked in, I have seen gay men say things that, were I, a straight man, to say to a female collegue, I would be taken aside and reprimanded, or outright fired. But, no one dares when a lesbian or a gay man does this. It's not acceptance they seek, but forced acceptance, and a double set of standards. In civilian life it's horrible, but in the military, one of the few meritocracies in life, it's unacceptable and destroys unit morale and cohesion.

Let me explain?

Suppose a Soldier does something bad. There are specific punishments depending on their action. However, what has happened due to our PC culture is that bad Soldiers, who are scumbags regardless of gender, color, or religion, pull the PC race/gender/religious card and claim victimhood. And it works.

We had one female black Soldier who locked and loaded her weapon, and point it at her NCO because he had the temerity to point out how she was a bad Soldier. There were other Soldiers in her unit who were black, or female, or both - it was not an issue of color or gender - she was a wanna-be "gangsta" who dripped attitude and who could not follow orders. Her NCO corrected her in front of other Soldiers and when she tried to (literally) tell him "go and talk to the hand" and walk out of the room, he blocked her way and told her "no, you're not leaving, you're going to start acting like and being a Soldier." We were in the sandbox for Christ's sakes - going on missions every other day (literally - missions lasted 12-20 hours and so we got one day to refit, rearm, and rest - then out we went again). She was a complete discipline case.

So she decided to let him know, in her "gangsta way" that she "wasn't going to take disrespect". She locked and loaded her M-4, pointed it at her NCO, told him to shut up, to move out of her way, and if he didn't she was going to shoot him.

She was brought up on charges, and played both the race and gender card, and got a whopping ***2 WEEKS*** confinement at the Kuwait Naval Detention center and reduction in 1 grade (you can't make this sh!t up). Upon her arrival the Naval Correction NCO (also, black and female, btw) told her that she must have been born under a lucky star, because the last MALE who had done this had served 7 months, was reduced to E-1, and was being dishonorably discharged.

She proceeded to launch into her victocrat story of woe and oppression, when the Corrections Officer started to scream at her that she was now a convict, that she wasn't a victim, and how she'd learn to keep her mouth shut.

################

My point?

Adding one more, yet another, "special protected class" card for scumbag Soldiers to play is not a good thing. Scumbags are scumbags. They don't think their actions are wrong, and don't accept responsibility, and now they get an official "get out of jail free" card they can pull.

The next time an NCO or officer seeks to discipline this slacker, they will hesitate to do so because of fears of a false charge of "homophobia". The same way no one reported MAJ Hassan (of Ft. Hood) because he would claim to be a victim of "Islamaphobia".

Others Soldiers see this and see the double standard. They are denied promotions while affirmative action for females, people of color, & Muslims is done openly. Now it's gays too.

This destroys: (wait for it) Unit Cohesion.

So - the simple two word answer is accurate - but liberals in the media, never admitting that false charges are brought by "special protected classes" of "victims", and having not clue-one about how the military works, toss out those words like they are meaning less, and, worse, that they are "code words".

Unit Cohesion covers a lot of ground, and is vague, but it's not inaccurate. She never bothers to explain WHAT it means, how it would happen, or ASK those Soldiers what they mean.

It's like a lawyer : never ask a question unless you know the answer you're getting beforehand. So she doesn't.

Unit cohesion is not a fake-made-up phrase to cover bigotry. It's a catch-all phrase to describe a vital part of military operations and those things that amplify it, or nullify it.

Piss. Poor. Bigoted. "Reporting.

I hope I have added to the discussion.

Steven

  • Login to post comments

thank you for your service.

Submitted by kata on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 4:01pm.

Having been the best friend, sounding board, support system & wife of a navy man for 20 yrs I can say your well thought out example adds perfectly to this discussion. I hope people reply with the respect you deserve.

Give Peas a Chance. ☑ ABØ in 2012
  • Login to post comments

LSBeene---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 5:35pm.

Appreciate your service, and your candid observations.

Far too many politicians in positions of power to affect the way the military operates, have no clue regarding the potential for unintended consequences they unleash. 

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

So true, MD.

Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 8:32pm.

To too many politicians, the military is a social experiment, nothing more.  As has been posted at TAH and Blackfive, the push is already on for housing and benefits for "partners".  So, it's never, ever been about service, it's always been about acceptance of the lifestyle.  If the military can forced to accept the gay lifestyle, then it'll be that much easier to force the rest of the country to accept it.  Next, the President will appoint someone to make sure the schools teach acceptance of the gay lifestyle.  Wait, that's already happening.  My bad, yet again. 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Steven

Submitted by amyshulk on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 5:14am.

As a disabled vet {USN 1980-1991 total: from 1980-'84 ASE, Reserves '84-'85, Re-upped in 1985 and had to change to BU, disability discharge as an E5 in 1991} I thank you for your service and I totally agree with your assessment. This has *always* been about forcing acceptance and elevated status.

I experienced the backlash of their "accommodating" females.

I heard things like;
"You must have joined to find a husband"
" Because of you, I have to do back to back overseas tours"
"You got in the Seabees because you fill their quota for females"

I saw the attractive women get treated differently from the rest of us {both men and women} and that also created problems.

I actually feel sorry for those who are NOT scumbags - they will get tarred by those who play the victim.

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

DDAT Clinton work around to get gays in MIL

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 3:42pm.

Was it not Clinton who put in DDAT to get gays in the military? Before it was just plain illegal & no one has a "right" to be in the MIL. It is an honor & privilege. Clinton through DDAT encouraged gays to join & they did. It was the first step to where we are now. Just shows how when you let down your guard you are allowing the boat to flood & sink. 5 partitions have been flooded and the Titanic is doomed?

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

Nope

Submitted by amyshulk on Sun, 09/18/2011 - 3:00am.

There have *always* been gays in the military. What Clinton did is what we did with illegals - a wink and a nod

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use