CNN's Sanchez Misrepresents Dem Stupak's Amend. as a 'Conservative Republican' Challenge to Govt Med

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

Rick Sanchez, CNN Anchor | NewsBusters.orgCNN’s Rick Sanchez misrepresented the pro-life Stupak Amendment to the House Democrats’ health care plan on Monday’s Newsroom. Sanchez labeled the amendment a “conservative Republican challenge of health care reform.” The anchor also gave a false impression of an answer given by RNC Chairman Michael Steele in an earlier interview on American Morning.

Sanchez used the misleading label out of the gate in a segment which began 22 minutes into the 3 pm Eastern hour: “The Stupak Amendment was a conservative Republican challenge of health care reform by making Democrats agree to a provision to make sure that abortions are not covered under this new plan, and it was a successful challenge, by the way.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Actually, Representative Bart Stupak is a Democrat who has a pretty liberal record. He had a ACU rating of 12 and a ADA rating of 90% in 2008. His amendment, formally known as the Stupak-Pitts Amendment (Rep. Joe Pitts was the primary Republican co-sponsor), was supported by a bloc of House Democrats “concerned about abortion provisions in the [health care] legislation,” as the Washington Post put it in a November 3, 2009 article. Later in the article, the Post reported that 40 Democrats planned to oppose the House Democrats’ bill if it funded abortions. When the Stupak Amendment passed on November 7, 24 more House Democrats (64 total) voted for the pro-life proposal. While 176 out of 177 House Republicans voted for it, Sanchez’s characterization that the Stupak Amendment was a “conservative Republican challenge” is a misrepresentation.

The CNN anchor would go one to use this false impression to hint that Republicans were being hypocritical on the abortion issue:

SANCHEZ:  The Stupak Amendment was a conservative Republican challenge of health care reform by making Democrats agree to a provision to make sure that abortions are not covered under this new plan, and it was a successful challenge, by the way. But now, it’s been revealed that the Republican National Committee’s own insurance policy covers abortions. It puts chairman Michael Steele in a very difficult stop [sic]- one, that he had on his party’s platform that calls abortion an assault on human life. On the other hand, it’s offered to his employees in some cases. So CNN’s Kiran Chetry this morning asked Michael Steele about this and actually seemed to catch him by surprise by the question.

RNC CHAIRMAN MICHAEL STEELE: That’s got to be a part of the final conference report, if this ever gets to that stage, where you’re very clearly stating that you’re not going to do the accounting gimmicks that Washington is noted for, by putting it over here in this pot and you know that that pot can be used for a whole host of things, including abortions.

KIRAN CHETRY: You actually just found out that your own health insurance plan by Cigna for the Republican National Committee actually covered elective abortions and has covered elective abortions since 1991. How did that happen?

STEELE: Well actually, we’re about to- we have done some digging into that and we’re- it’s not as it appears, as we found out from our insurance carrier. And so, we’re going to be having a further conversation on that point. But just taking the initial news, the Republican Party’s made it very clear- and I certainly have as chairman- that we will not cover such elective abortions in our insurance policy. I’ve notified our insurance company of that. They have done an investigation that has come up with some very interesting information, which we’re going to- we’re sorting through right now. And so, we’ll be back to you on that later on.

SANCHEZ: ‘We'll be back to you on that later on,’ and of couse, we’ll be standing by for that response and we’ll stay on top of it.

It actually seems that instead of catching Steele “by surprise,” as Sanchez portrayed it, the RNC chairman actually tried to give a general clarification without giving specifics. But after his earlier misrepresentation of the Stupak Amendment, it’s not surprising that Sanchez would give a false impression of Chairman Steele’s answer.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

From Forrest Gump,

From Forrest Gump, modified:  Stupid is as Sanchez does.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

In all fairness to Sanchez...

English isn't his first language.

Sigh.  If only CNN dad hired a wise latino woman....

NOT STUPID, HE IS A LIAR ON PURPOSE

Bart Stupak, DEMOCRAT,MI is called a Republican to hide the dissent in the democrat ranks. This guy is a serial liar.

LITTLE LIAR...

 He lies for a living, that's his job, that's what he does. He is a straight up liberal hack, & is will to lie his @$$ off to promote his liberal agenda. He just uses the mask of being a "journalist" as cover. Coming from Cuba, he knows very well that he can hide behind that "journalistic" mask & promote his agenda. Because that is a way of life in his native Cuba, & many want to install that in the American media.

Over my dead body Sanchez, & I get the feeling that I'm not alone.

 

"...How blind can you be, don't you see...

...that the gambler lost all he does not have..."  

Nightwish

Sanchez not only kills innocents by his drunkenness, but

he is a very proficient liar, as well.

Richardo

    lay off the booze there fella      

 

 

 

 

  Proud HillBilly from NNY

clueless sanchez

You want to discuss the Stupak amendment, Sanchez?  How about highlighting the near-absolute likelihood that it will be a casualty of the 'bill reconciling' process, if the Senate's version passes?  How about 'splaining to viewers that abortion-advocatin' Dems like Pelosi allowed the amendment to be added, knowing full well it would be gone by the time the 'reconciled' bill comes out of committee?  How 'bout showing the Stupak amendment for the "bait and switch" (or "shuck and jive") strategy that it actually is?

Go suck on your bottle, Ricky.

Advocacy Journalism

Last week, CNN got rid of their "Advocacy Journalist."

Now if they could just get rid of their Advocacy Liars.

The Dirtiest of Sanchez's!

Advocacy liars, half-truthers. is the perfect description of the msm, and he was too moderate for msnbc. Still have hope that Lou goes to FOX!

Umm ...

Who's Rick Sanchez?

Seriously though.  Out of the 32 people who watch Chicken Noodle News, 30 of them are from NB and other conservative outlets who are fact-checking or exposing bias.  Why not just stop bothering so their ratings go to zero and we're finally rid of them?

Save the rainforest ... emit more CO2

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.