During an interview of Brookings Institution senior fellow Kevin Casas-Zamora on Wednesday’s American Morning, CNN anchor John Roberts not only failed to mention the liberal political leanings of the fellow’s organization, but omitted any mention of the scandal which led to Casa-Zamora’s resignation from the vice presidency of Costa Rica.
Roberts brought on Casas-Zamora to discuss the recent military coup in Honduras, which unseated President Jose Manuel Zelaya, who had been seeking a referendum to extend his term in office. He introduced him as the “senior foreign policy fellow with the Brookings Institution- also recently served as the vice president of Costa Rica.” Specifically, the fellow served from 2006 until 2007 as the country’s vice president and minister of planning and economic policy.
Juan Carlos Hidalgo of the CATO Institute’s Center for Global Liberty and Prosperty wrote a column for the Miami Herald on October 5, 2007 which reported that in a leaked private memorandum written to Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, Casas-Zamora had “suggested, among other things, withholding public money to mayors who failed to deliver their districts’ votes on CAFTA [the Central American Free Trade Agreement], and circumventing some electoral rules. The ensuing scandal led to Casas’ resignation and caused a dramatic fall in CAFTA’s popularity.”
The Brookings Institution senior fellow offered a nuanced position on the return of ousted President Zelaya during the interview: “My sense is that President Zelaya’s idea of returning to Honduras immediately is probably a bad idea, and it’s likely to make a bad situation worse. I think that some groundwork needs to be laid out before that- that happens, and by groundwork, I mean that the return to Honduras of President Zelaya won’t solve anything, in and of itself.” However, in a blog item for Foreign Policy posted two days earlier on June 29, Casas-Zamora advised that “Zelaya, though he bears by far the greater responsibility for this crisis, must be reinstated in his position as the legitimate president of Honduras. The Organization of American States, the neighboring countries, and the U.S. government (which is still enormously influential in Honduras) should demand no less.”
Later in the interview, the former Costa Rican vice president stated that “this is not only a question of- of Chavez, as some people have said, coming out very strongly against the [Honduran] coup. It’s also President Lula from Brazil, President Calderon from Mexico- even President Obama, and that’s quite remarkable.” Even President Obama? An American liberal president siding with an ideological fellow traveler south of the border?
The full transcript of the interview, which began of the bottom half of the 8 am Eastern hour of Wednesday’s American Morning:
JOHN ROBERTS: Well, the message is clear- leaders from nations in North and South America are telling those behind the recent coup in Honduras, put your deposed president back in power. President Jose Manuel Zelaya is vowing to return. So what does it mean for the future of Honduras and Central America?
Joining me with more is Kevin Casas-Zamora. He’s a senior foreign policy fellow with the Brookings Institution- also recently served as the vice president of Costa Rica. Kevin, it’s good to talk to you this morning. So, President Zelaya is vowing to return. Originally, it was going to be tomorrow. Now, it looks like he’s not going to go back until at least Saturday. But Roberto Micaletti, who has assumed the presidency there, says if he sets foot in Honduras, he’s going to be arrested, tried and thrown in jail. He’s really playing hardball here.
KEVIN CASAS-ZAMORA: Indeed- well, thank you for- for having me here, John. My sense is that President Zelaya’s idea of returning to Honduras immediately is probably a bad idea, and it’s likely to make a bad situation worse. I think that some groundwork needs to be laid out before that- that happens, and by groundwork, I mean that the return to Honduras of President Zelaya won’t solve anything, in and of itself. There’s got to be some kind of- of- of political deal brokered before the underlying issue is tackled, and the underlying issue is how to make Honduras governable. Because in the end, it was not governable when President Zelaya was in power, and it is not governable now due to the immense international pressure that the- the new authorities in Honduras find themselves under.
ROBERTS: Yeah. Now, he was seeking changes to the constitution. He was trying to write them himself. He wanted another term in- in power. He has pledged that he’s not going to pursue that any longer. Do you think that that might open the door for his return, or is Micaletti- I mean, hanging on so hard and fast to power he’s never going to even let him back in the door?
CASAS-ZAMORA: My sense is that President Zelaya made all the right noises yesterday when he spoke at the General Assembly of the U.N., and he indeed opened some avenues of dialogue, and it remains to be seen whether the new authorities in Honduras are willing to respond in kind. If they- if they don’t, my sense is that the international community will keep cranking up the pressure, and I really doubt that the new authorities in Honduras will be willing or able to pull off the North Korean or the Myanmar card-
ROBERTS: Right.
CASAS-ZAMORA: And- and remain as a pariah state for even seven months until the- a new government takes over. I don’t think they’ll be willing to do that.
ROBERTS: But if they- if they do, what’s the effect in Central America? The president [President Obama] says he is very concerned about what happened there- he’s called for President Zelaya to be reinstated. He says that we- we have to be careful about or worried about moving backwards to an area of military coups that changed governments in central America. We all remember what was going on during the 1970s and the 1980s- Nicaragua now taking a step backwards from democracy. So if- if the coup holds in Honduras, what’s the net effect for Central America?
CASAS-ZAMORA: It will be a terrible precedent. It will be a terrible precedent and that explains the very strong and coherent reaction that you- that we’ve seen all through the Americas, not only in Latin America. Because this is not only a question of- of Chavez, as some people have said, coming out very strongly against the coup. It’s also President Lula from Brazil, President Calderon from Mexico- even President Obama, and that’s quite remarkable, because my sense is that this poses a golden opportunity for the U.S. to make a clean break with the past and come out very strongly on the side of- of democracy. So yeah- I mean the problem is that this situation in Honduras adds to a very volatile political situation in Latin- in Central America. In Central America, it is really unraveling politically- in Honduras, in Nicaragua and in Guatemala, particularly.
ROBERTS: All right. We’ll- it’s definitely something we’ll keep watching very, very closely. Kevin Casas-Zamora, it’s good to talk to you, sir. Thank you for joining us this morning.
CASAS-ZAMORA: Thanks for having me.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
HELEN T...hero of the week???
July 1, 2009 - 17:31 ET by reelman46a most amazing happening...I had to post this...
HELEN THOMAS…HERO OF THE WEEK???
July 1.2009…from realclearpolitics…with the VIDEO:
CBS’ Chip Reid and Helen Thomas double teamed Robert Gibbs today at
the daily press briefing on the “tightly controlled” town hall meeting
President Obama will hold on health care. Gibbs kept saying lets have
this discussion AFTER the meeting.
(ultra liberal democrat fossil) Helen Thomas accused the White House
of “controlling the press.” She said almost all White House/Obama
events are “prepackaged.” She accused the White House of not “having
any answers.”
CRAWFISH NOTE: Fan me, look outside for the mother
ship…look for JC on a cloud..the biased secular socialist media
actually NOTICED that the Obama admin is led by a lying arrogant jerk
who hates real freedom of inquiry!
This is historic…the network fawners actually speaking up for freedom
of the press against gov-meant lies-secrecy-info control freaks in the
White House now.
How will this be minimized? Spun? Stay tuned…truth and honesty in
very short supply these D.C. days. My-o-my…July starts with a bang.
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)
This twit from Brookings..or how to obfuscate Democracy. ACA
July 1, 2009 - 17:48 ET by acaiguanaLet's get one thing really straight here. Honduras is a Constitutional Republic.
That means they have a Constitution.
President Jose Manuel Zelaya is a Marxist. He wanted to circumvent the Constitution to run for a 2nd term when the Constitution says he can't. So he tried to pull a Chavez.
Pull a Chavez?
That means he wanted a referendum by the people in an un-Constuional Election to change the Constitution.
That made him ... well...
un-Constitutional.
So, now President Jose Manuel Zelaya has been told to leave the country (with the use of the Army) and he is currently whining.
So, pulling a Chavez didn't work, huh?
Now if we uphold Democracy in Honduras then we have to respect their redress of the un-Constitutional move by President Jose Manuel Zelaya.
Get it?
So, the 'New Authorities' aren't new at all. They are the 'old' authorities, that is to say the Congress and the new Presidente, recently elevated from Vice-Presidente.
Get it?
That means that Honduras has internally decided by the power vested through their Constitution to remove the President, using the Army which is the tool of the power vested in the Constitution, to resolve the conflict that brought us to Obama.
Obama says reinstate President Jose Manuel Zelaya. Who the hell is he?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
I admire the folks and Representives in Honduras
July 1, 2009 - 18:47 ET by general companyI use to admire ours. : [
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Matthew, why do you insist
July 2, 2009 - 00:09 ET by MikeBMatthew, why do you insist on calling what happened in Honduras a "military coup"? It was no such thing.
The president down there broke the law, their Supreme Court called him on it, he insisted on going through with what he planned, their Supreme Court ordered his removal, the military lived up to their oath of office and upheld their constitution. It was not a military coup. Yes, it was a forced removal from office, but the military did not take over the country. The next person in line for the presidency was sworn into office, and the country continues to be ruled by a civilian government. Please find a different term to describe what happened. Again, it was not a military coup.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan