NBC's Todd Grills Victorious Walker: Do You 'Regret' Going for 'Political Kill' of Unions?
Following his resounding victory in Wisconsin's recall election on Tuesday, Governor Scott Walker appeared on Wednesday's The Daily Rundown on MSNBC, where host Chuck Todd wondered if Walker's signature achievement was also his biggest regret: "Looking back, do you have any regret of going at the issue of collective bargaining itself?...any regrets on that front?"
Despite Walker's push for fiscal restraint in the state having been vindicated, Todd fretted over the Governor's success: "Because there are still Republicans who say, you know what? You poked a tiger that maybe looked like you were going for a political kill rather than focusing on the policy."
Todd must have forgotten that reforming collective bargaining rights, which is exclusive to salary negotiations, re-induced economic vigor into the state. Not to mention the fact that unemployment in Wisconsin is down to 6.7%. A rate that is well below the national average.
Walker responded, on the June 6 show, by highlighting what his reforms have achieved and offered some areas where he could have improved in terms of presenting his agenda:
No, I think in our case the product itself was positive – and we've documented more than $1 billion dollar with the savings, in fact, for the first time in twelve years property taxes went down on a median valued home and statewide we went from a $3.6 billion dollar deficit to a $154 million dollar surplus.
I think though what I would do differently is I would spend more time last January and early February talking about what we're doing instead of rushing out to fix it. If I mentioned, for example, last January that before our reforms, most school districts in our state had to spend tens of millions of dollars more than they needed to because they couldn't bid their insurance out because of collective bargaining. I think most people would have said fix it. If I said in the case of the city of Addison because of collective bargaining and overtime abuse, a bus driver there makes over $150,000 dollars, most taxpayers, be they Democrat of Republican, would say fix it.
Pushing Democratic spin that the race was manipulated by outside money, Todd grilled Walker: "Are you comfortable with all the outside money that came in? Most of it benefitted you – yes there outside money on the other side, but in this case you were the prime beneficiary. You comfortable with all that outside money that came in and frankly, overwhelmed TV stations?
Does Chuck forget the Obama outspent Hillary 3:1 in ads in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey in 2008 and lost all three primaries? Meg Whitman spent $150 million of her own money of California's gubernatorial race and lost. Linda McMahon spent $50 million of her own money in her failed Senate bid in Connecticut. Money doesn't always translate into votes.
Walker highlighted the frustrations that Wisconsonites have with the recall law and the "permanent election cycle" in general:
Well, we've got to change the recall process overall I think most people in my state today wake up saying they don't want to go through this again be they Democrat or Republican. I think recalls, for most of us here, we think should be about misconduct in office and not just open ended and that would change the process because the recall law itself and the portion of the constitution that enables recall really allowed for that kind of money to come in.
Remember, you know it's a year and half worth of an assault that started last February against me and it started out with the national special interest on the left and it finished off with every special interest, right or left in America, seemingly involved in the state. I think now that those interests and those people have moved on to Florida, Ohio, and those other states. We got to get focused on fixing things in Wisconsin but I think there is just no doubt in the future people in Wisconsin want to change the law – they want to change the constitution so that recalls if any here are rare, if ever, used in the state of Wisconsin that are used for things like misconduct that would change the money that would change the focus and for most of us that would end these permanent recall elections – permanent election cycles – that I think most are sick of.
- Matt Vespa's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I might be wrong ,
Submitted by nixon on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:06pm.
But wasn't it the unions that started this ,and got slammed ? Karma is a harsh mistress .
you're not wrong Tricky Dick
Submitted by Cappmann1962 on Thu, 06/07/2012 - 11:22am.
The unions picked a fight in which they VASTLY underestimated both their opponent and the mood of Wisconsonites. And they got bit right square in the a$$ in front of the entire world. Wonderful thing to see.
Come On UpChuck...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:12pm.
....One of your favorite current presidents, who went from first (black after Clinton) to worst (Carter is a happy guy), once said, "Elections Have Consequences"...
Lean Forward UpChuck, grab your ankles, and take it like a Madcow...
Unions would better serve
Submitted by kg on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:14pm.
Unions would better serve their membership if they got out of politics and actually served their membership in a constructive way.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
Walker
Submitted by bobsmom on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:19pm.
is a class act, were it me? I'd have belted out a whole chorus of "My Way". And as I said on a couple of other threads, Dems, you chose this battle, and you got beeyatch slapped. Go away, lick your wounds, and figure out the real lesson in all this. Hint: the people have a voice, and they used it. And we will continue to.
WHAT??
Submitted by Winghunter on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:21pm.
No Liberal media drool asking if the Commie/bankrupting Unions are 'dead'??
Here
Submitted by grammajane on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:49pm.
we go again. These Conservative Leaders insist on going on these bias and bashing radical liberal shows. Why, I ask. Williams and his son Todd were whiny and crying tonight because the only reason Walker won was because of the cash spent. No credit to the voters just bashing of donations. Wish Conservatives would stay away from the most un-honest media in history who only blab their personal agendas and report zero worth listening to
Thank you....
Submitted by American.Patriot on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 7:10pm.
LMAO
Very disappointed to see Walker on MSNBC
Submitted by Texndoc on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 7:11pm.
Dude, you were treated like **** 100 percent of the time by them. 100 percent.
Class vs no class.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 7:42pm.
Remember the liberal replies to questions in the not-to-distant past?
John, I won.
We have to pass the bill in order to find out what's in it.
blah, blah, blah, I ordered the Seals, blah, blah, blah, blah. Therefore, I blah, blah, blah. My administration blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. blah, blah, blah, ME! and on and on and on.
Walker, a conservative says, " I think though what I would do differently is I would spend more time last January and early February talking about what we're doing instead of rushing out to fix it."
Very gracious answer, but I think he's wrong. He could explain Shiite to liberals all Fluking day, and they would STILL fight him tooth, nail, and dagger.
There is NO COMPROMISE with these commie bastards.
Walker was still classy to give the answer that he did.
Hey F. Chuck Todd..
Submitted by PA Conservative on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 8:14pm.
Do you "regret" waking up every morning and still being a D-Bag?
Todd must of also forgotten
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 8:44pm.
It was the dimwits who started this crap.
Chuck you ignorant slut!
Submitted by vote24 on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 9:35pm.
Smack 'em down on live TV. That's the way to go with this batch of weasels. America IS with you if you do. Let 'em squeal for a while, then they'll realize no one cares about their plight. They are rogue journalists turned activists. The better activist they are, the faster they rise in their circle. Jerks. It hasn't yet (for some reason) dawned on the leftist Wac-job media. But they have become as transparent as glass, and real folks are onto them about progressing their agenda at EVERY possible moment, gag. And yet no real conservative move has been made to counter and dominate the media landscape. If we had Trump TV, Limbaugh TV, GBTV, Tea TV... the entire current media becomes 47% by tomorrow. And dwindles as a whole beyond that due to content and low ratings. The market is there waiting to be served and it won't be. In a free enterprise system, that should not happen.
They are really starting to panic, and its showing....
Submitted by seen the light on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 9:57pm.
this is really getting palpable. I am happy with Walkers response. However, i would like to see some planning here. I would like to see our Repubs plan ahead and call them out live. We all know how predictable they are. They are using the liberal line, so we know what they are going to do. Why not prepare, and ask questions like, "so, why didn't you ask Barack Obama, or Mayor Barret, how about the outside money he used, the (exact dollar figure) union money, etc? Does that only apply to republicans"? I mean, really put the media on the spot. They are so lazy they are predictable. We know what their damage control tactic would be, and they did indeed use it. Outside money, etc etc.
Thoughts?
Asking the questions
Submitted by ronljl on Thu, 06/07/2012 - 1:58pm.
Light, I'm in agreement with you on this. But, you and I (along with the rest of our readers) know that it would be simply a waste of breath. The comment/question would end up on the cutting room floor even if the reported did have the honesty to answer such a question. Most likely though you would hear obfuscations and accusations thrown back - you dared ask an intelligent question. And reporters don't answer questions they simply ask, remember, they're impartial observers.