Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matt Hadro's blog
  • MSNBC: Obama and Merkel Are the New 'Ronnie and Maggie'; Matthews Sees Conspiracy to Push Hillary 2016
  • NBC's Todd Excuses Obama's Poor Speech Performance: Crowd Too Small, 'It Was Hot'
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons

CNN Batters Joe Walsh, But Dem Opponent Gets Much Softer Treatment

By Matt Hadro | July 06, 2012 | 19:09

A  A

Is CNN campaigning for Rep. Joe Walsh's Democratic opponent? In a heated exchange with Walsh on Thursday, anchor Ashleigh Banfield rattled off a list of opponent Tammy Duckworth's accomplishments and admitted "she should get elected" if voters are pleased with her resume.

CNN gave much softer treatment to Duckworth on Friday. Host Wolf Blitzer did press her about controversial statements she has made, but also tossed her softball questions and gave her an opportunity to explain her stances on issues that matter to voters -- an opportunity CNN did not give Walsh.

Blitzer asked her softballs like "Do you have a problem that he [Walsh] never served in the military?" after Walsh had accused her of incessantly touting her own military service. [Video below the break.]

Meanwhile, this past Wednesday Blitzer did interview Walsh, but only to elicit the response he was looking for: Duckworth is a "true hero" for her service. He did not ask Walsh to expound on his political platform, talk about economic issues, or explain the difference between him and Duckworth.

Blitzer did ask Duckworth those questions on Friday, letting her explain her stances on the issues voters care about. "What's the biggest difference, in your opinion, constituents out there in Illinois should know about when it comes to economic policy, economic issues between you and Walsh?" Blitzer asked Duckworth.

 "If he [Walsh] is watching right now, is there anything you want to say to him directly?" Blitzer asked again.

If the media covers one specific House race out of 435, it probably has an agenda. CNN called the race between Walsh and Duckworth one of the "most watched and nastiest" in the country, but put most of its glare on the Tea Party congressman for his "nasty" comments.

On Thursday afternoon, an exasperated Banfield listed Duckworth's accomplishments on-air, in response to Walsh's question if voters should elect Duckworth purely because of her military service. "You know what? She should get elected if her voters like the fact that she has a list of accomplishments," Banfield said before listing Duckworth's exploits.

"[S]he has a list of accomplishments, when it comes to tax credits for Illinois businesses, she established the first veteran's caucus, she started up a...24-hour crisis hotline for veterans. She created the vets cash grant program. She established the nation's first health issue insurance program for vets. She created the GI loan for heroes," Banfield stated.

She went right after Walsh at the beginning of the interview, for his comments about Duckworth's military service. "Sir, you are taking it on the chin for this. Are you regretting making those comments?" she pressed him.

Meanwhile, Blitzer simply asked Duckworth to respond to Walsh's remarks, as his first question to her. "What do you say to his specific charge that the only thing you really want to talk about, Tammy, is your military service, you don't want to talk about the specific economic, social issues that are important to constituents out there?"

Blitzer did press Duckworth over comments she made about Walsh, and over her campaign tactics. However, given CNN's two interviews of Walsh and interview of Duckworth, it is clear that the Democratic candidate got the better treatment of the two.

"He's used some nasty words, but you've also suggested, among other things, that Walsh is an extremist loud mouth for the Tea Party. Back in April, you said there's not a crackpot Tea Party idea that he hasn't embraced. Is that appropriate to use that kind of language against a sitting United States congressman?" Blitzer asked Duckworth.

A brief transcript of the interviews, which aired on The Situation Room, is as follows:

CNN
THE SITUATION ROOM
7/4/12
6:31 p.m. EDT

WOLF BLITZER: (to Rep. Joe Walsh (R-Ill.)) Congressman, thanks very much for coming in. Do you regret what you said about your opponent, who lost two legs fighting for the United States in Iraq, that she's not, in your words, a true hero?

(...)

BLITZER: Let's just clarify, then, Congressman. Do you believe Tammy Duckworth is a true hero?

(...)

KATE BOLDUAN: But Congressman, you are a smart man. You have been in politics. You're finishing your two years in Congress now. You had to have known that, in questioning something that is beloved by so many Americans, military service, that this was a touchy subject, a risk. I mean, was that a mistake, because you are in a tough re-election battle here?

(...)

BLITZER: A lot of veterans do talk about their service. They are very proud of their military service. And I'm sure Tammy Duckworth is one of them, very proud of what she's accomplished.

(...)

BLITZER: We've invited, by the way, Tammy Duckworth to join us here in The Situation Room. Unfortunately, she couldn't on this Fourth of July, but she's got an invitation to come on, and we'll talk about some of these issues.

I'm glad we did clarify, Congressman Walsh, your point where you are saying right now, flatly, you do believe Tammy Duckworth, your opponent – you disagree with her on a lot of issues – but you do believe that what she did in Iraq as a U.S. military personnel, as a U.S. member of the U.S. military, that she is, in fact, a true hero.

(...)

CNN
THE SITUATION ROOM
7/6/12
4:25 p.m. EDT

WOLF BLITZER: One of this year's most watched and nastiest congressional races in Illinois where a Tea Party Republican incumbent faces a Democrat who's a veteran of the war in Iraq.

(...)

KATE BOLDUAN: And right now, the non-partisan Cook political report calls this the surest Democratic pick-up for House races across the country. So Duckworth is expected to win this one, Wolf.

(...)

BLITZER: (to Tammy Duckworth) What do you say to his specific charge that the only thing you really want to talk about, Tammy, is your military service, you don't want to talk about the specific economic, social issues that are important to constituents out there?

(...)

TAMMY DUCKWORTH: So he's trying to actually shift the focus away from his irresponsible actions as a congressman by attacking military service, and that's irresponsible in his words.

BLITZER: I don't know if he's attacking military service, but he's clearly attacking you. What's the biggest difference, in your opinion, constituents out there in Illinois should know about when it comes to economic policy, economic issues between you and Walsh?

(...)

BLITZER: He repeatedly says John McCain, a war hero to be sure, he never really spoke that much about his own personal experiences as a POW in Vietnam, for example. But that's all he says you talk about, your war experiences. You want to respond to what Walsh is saying?

(...)

BLITZER: Do you have a problem that he never served in the military?

(...)

BLITZER: I agree that the differences on substantive policy issues are what the two of you should be debating about. He's used some nasty words, but you've also suggested, among other things, that Walsh is an extremist loud mouth for the Tea Party. Back in April, you said there's not a crackpot Tea Party idea that he hasn't embraced. Is that appropriate to use that kind of language against a sitting United States congressman?

DUCKWORTH: I think it's appropriate against a gentleman who says that he wants to be the poster child for the Tea Party.

(...)

BLITZER: Do you have a problem – he says that you send – you and your campaign, I assume that's what he means – someone to videotape all of his speaking engagements, to watch him wherever he goes. Is that an issue as far as you're concerned?

(...)

BLITZER:  If he's watching right now, is there anything you want to say to him directly?

(...)

BLITZER: Are you willing, Tammy, to come on our show and debate him directly?
 

About the Author

Matt Hadro is a News Analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matt Hadro on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2012 Congressional
  • Joe Walsh
  • Tammy Duckworth
  • Wolf Blitzer
  • The Situation Room
  • CNN
  • CNN Newsroom
  • Matt Hadro's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

UpNorth2 & General Al

Submitted by DC2280 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:30pm.

Shame on you both. I don't know Ms Duckworth or her politics but she is a veteran who served her country with honor, at a huge personal cost. You are both despicable.

  • Login to post comments

Sorry DC*

Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:54pm.

The guys do have a point. I think it was courageous and great sacrifice that John McCain made for his country, but I dont like his political agenda regardless. Same as Ms Duckworth. Thank you for your sacrifice Ms D but no thanks to your whacky liberal hypocritical double standards.

Should we thank Charles Manson for his leadership skills? Should we thank the uni-bomber for his concern for the environment? Should we thank Nadal Hassan for his service?

We should never attack someone on their service but one who believes in the destruction of our constitution, our society, our liberties has become that individuals focus, then we deal with that agenda.

  • Login to post comments

Actually, DC2280; both General Al and UpNorth were ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 1:03am.

fairly benign with their comments - and pointed out that Duckworth is no more a hero than anyone else who served.

General Al even thanked her for her service.

You, however, continue to highlight your idiot ass with every comment you post .

You are a moron.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

And we got the This Ain't Hell... blog.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 6:58am.

So the idiot that claims to know nothing could have caught up in the same five minutes it took anyone else to look at the blog. Instead the idiot took a pass and said, "No thanks, I prefer being an idiot and posting idiot things in the face of a fact based headwind."

  • Login to post comments

Really?

Submitted by GeneralAl on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 8:49am.

"Shame on you both. I don't know Ms Duckworth or her politics but she is a veteran who served her country with honor, at a huge personal cost. You are both despicable" Really? GWB served his country, was he exmpted from criticism? McCain served his country, was he exempted from criticism? You show your ignorance in your first sentence" I don't know Ms Duckworth or her politics ". Miss Duckworth is a liberal Democrat puppet whose strings are pulled by David Asselrod and RamJob Emmanuel. This is her second try at Congress in a district where she doesn't even live. She joined the Army like so many others to get what she could out of it. She made a dumb mistake flying that chopper where she did. If you want to talk about huge personal cost, I've paid the price for 42 years! Still, I'm not, and don't claim to be a hero. However, if you think I'm despicable, so be it! I've been called worse in my lifetime!

"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!

  • Login to post comments

Like everyone said,

Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 10:36am.

click the link and educate yourself, DC. I'm "a veteran who served" my country, too. BFD, that and $2.50 will get me a cup of coffee. I didn't do it to get accolades, or to be shielded from criticism.
What's "despicable" is commenting on something where you are, self-admittedly, not equipped to comment intelligently.

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

I appreciated John McCain's service to the

Submitted by nolefan2 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 1:17pm.

country, but he proved to me that he didn't deserve to be president. I appreciate Ms. Duckworth's service, but would not vote for her with her ties to this administration. The fact that David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel are pushing for her to win is enough for me to avoid her like the plague. Would someone recommend that Nidal Hassan be elected to a government office because he "served" his country? I wonder how many votes he would get from his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood? Serving one's country gives you an opportunity to be a hero, but doesn't guarantee that you will BE one. Is Ms. Duckworth supposed to be one because she crashed a helicopter?

  • Login to post comments

Separation of service and state

Submitted by Galvanic on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 2:49pm.

While the leadership and management skills/experience one acquires in the armed forces can be valid qualifications for political office, military service alone does not automatically make one fit for public office. This is understood more by veterans than it is by non-veterans.

But both major political parties love to parade their veteran-candidates, especially if the opponent is a non-veteran. In the case of Duckworth, I'm sure the Axelrod/Emanuel types are trawling for a "Swift Boating" in order to hold her up as a modern day Joan of Arc and bash the whole GOP over the head with it.

Walsh's best bet is to get on stage and in front of cameras with Duckworth and debate the economic issues, away from all the MSM melodrama scripted by Blitzer and the like.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • NewsBusters Interview: Amity Shlaes on Coolidge, Media, and Neo-Keynesianism
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use