Soledad O'Brien Implies That Santorum Lost Catholic Voters by Attacking JFK
John F. Kennedy may be a hallowed name within Democrat circles, but CNN's Soledad O'Brien seemed to argue Wednesday that he is revered among Catholics too, so much so that they won't vote for a candidate who attacks him.
After Tuesday night's Michigan GOP primary, O'Brien tried to get Rick Santorum's press secretary to admit that the candidate lost Catholic voters in the state because he attacked former President John F. Kennedy for saying the church had no role in the policy of the state. [Video below the break. Audio here.]
Though there may be many reasons Michigan Catholics voted for Mitt Romney over Santorum, O'Brien chose to hammer the point that perhaps Santorum suffered for picking on Kennedy, a Catholic Democrat who insisted his religious views were "a private affair." The CNN host gave no specific evidence for the validity of her question, however.
"When you look at the exit polls, Catholics went for Mitt Romney," stated O'Brien. "Do you think that had something to do with his comments about JFK and saying I threw up...when JFK was talking about the role his faith played in how he would govern? Did that hurt him with Catholics?" she asked.
When her guest gave a neutral answer, O'Brien repeated her question. "So looking back would you say, that was a bad strategy, we alienated Catholics potentially by attacking JFK? Maybe we should change things? Is that what you would be considering?"
O'Brien had begun that portion of the interview asking about Santorum's declining polling in the state, but then moved from the general to the specific reasons of why he lost voters. She pressed the secretary on his remarks against contraception, on separation of church and state, and on college education, and the loss of votes he suffered.
"So, was that shift saying, wow, that's a mistake. Our poll numbers are coming down when we go that direction. We're carving a narrower niche of people who that message is resonating with?" she asked.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on February 29 on Starting Point at 8:26 a.m. EST, is as follows:
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: Let me ask you a question about some polling, because just two weeks ago, you were actually ahead a lot in the polls. And then, over time, up to just a couple of days ago, you know, that lead really narrowed, and then you had what was in certain – in overall voters a loss. What do you think accounts for that declining polling that was happening?
ALICE STEWART, Santorum 2012 campaign national press secretary: Well, a lot of it has to do with the big-money Romney machine steam rolling in here and putting up quite a bit of ads, and being able to have a much bigger staff. He had certainly a lot of surrogates come in here. He and himself, as well as members of his family coming here in their own home state, and that's to be expected. You know, we came in here two weeks ago –
O'BRIEN: How much do you think it had to do with the conversation over the weekend that really focused on college education and connecting that to snobbery and contraception and separation of church and state, because that was really the topic of conversation over the weekend and then into Monday?
STEWART: Well, I can assure you, as Rick went around to several events over the past several days and weeks, the thing that resonated with the people and what they connected with him were his views and his statements that he made about things that are of interest to them. And that is jobs and the economy. And the past few days, he's talked quite a bit about energy and national security.
Those are the issues that people listen to. Those are the things that they're concerned with. And that is what helped him to come in a virtual dead heat with Mitt Romney in his own home state. And he's connecting to people, as he said –
O'BRIEN: I'm just wondering if you think it was a mistake to have conversations, because the topic of conversation, right now, closer to primary day, the shift was back to jobs and economy, but, over the weekend, it really wasn't. Over the weekend, it was JFK, and it was First Amendment, and it was separation of church and state, and it was contraception, and it was calling the President a snob about thinking that everybody should go to college.
So, was that shift saying, wow, that's a mistake. Our poll numbers are coming down when we go that direction. We're carving a narrower niche of people who that message is resonating with?
STEWART: Well, I can assure you he spent the bulk of his time out there on the stump talking about jobs and the economy and national security. The issues that you talked about are things that were played out in the media. And, specifically on the college issue, he was referring to the fact that college is not the right avenue for every single person in this country.
Trade schools, technical schools, and other training programs that will equip people of this country for manufacturing jobs, which is key, and he sees as a corner stone for helping the economy. That's the point he was trying to make. But it's the message that connected with the people here in Michigan in terms of his 100-day plan for igniting our energy resources here, repealing Obamacare, tax cuts for families.
Those were the issues that connected with people, and as he said in the tape that you played, he got into the hearts of people of Michigan, and they responded very well.
O'BRIEN: Let me ask you a question about the robo calls. Was it a mistake?
(...)
O'BRIEN: Why do you think he lost Catholics? When you look at the exit polls, Catholics went for Mitt Romney. Do you think that had something to do with his comments about JFK and saying I threw up when I, you know, was basically talking about the role – when JFK was talking about the role his faith played in how he would govern? Did that hurt him with Catholics? In the state?
STEWART: In terms of how the votes break down, we'll look at that over the next few days and look at how we need to move forward on that.
O'BRIEN: So in that one I can tell you. In that one I'll tell you, because he lost Catholics, so that's how the vote went down for him. So looking back would you say, that was a bad strategy, we alienated Catholics potentially by attacking JFK? Maybe we should change things? Is that what you would be considering?
STEWART: No. What we do is reach out to the evangelical community across the state and we appealed to them and the hearts and minds of the evangelicals and received a great reception. We had a tremendous event yesterday. Quite a bit of members of the faith community came out and as I said, he reached into their hearts and they responded accordingly. And they appreciate his views and his values on faith and family and the pro-life issue and that's what we're going to continue to do, reaching out to evangelicals, people of all faiths and certainly conservatives across this country.
Particularly we're doing very well in Ohio. We had a great event in Ohio yesterday. We'll also reach out in Tennessee and Georgia and Washington state. We'll continue his message as the consistent conservative and we'll continue to win voters across this country one person at a time.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
yeah right.... JFK the good Catholic (laugh)
Submitted by MidAmerica on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 8:37pm.
My 36 year old Catholic daughter-in-law has said more than once "How can a faithful Catholic vote for someone who supports abortion?".
As a lifelong Catholic I'll make things real clear for Soledad:
Submitted by lsudolemite on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 8:54pm.
I couldn't give less of a ____ about JFK, nor what Santorum said about him.
It's the old liberal tendency to pigeon hole human beings
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 9:26pm.
To them, if you're Catholic, you must revere the Kennedys. If you're a woman, you must prefer Hillary Clinton.
Remember when they asked the black Tea Partier if he was uncomfortable among so many white people?
It's no wonder that someone as shallow as O'Brien makes such stupid observations, especially since Santorum -- a Catholic -- made statements in alignment with RCC doctrine.
Gee, then I guess the Democrats lost a lot of Jewish votes . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 9:08pm.
. . . when they kicked Joe Lieberman to the curb in favor of a rich non-Jewish guy.
Was the MSM offended?
That ship has sailed
Submitted by MidAmerica on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 9:29pm.
JFK died 49 years ago so anyone who actually remembers him is retired or nearing retirement age. Ask the young people if JFK inspires their life. They will probably only know about Marilyn Monroe.
I went to the Book Depository
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 9:41pm.
A few years ago, walked around the Grassy Knoll. The thing that struck me the most was all the folks dodging traffic to get their photo taken with a great big smile standing on the X
A friend of mine
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Wed, 02/29/2012 - 10:18pm.
was in Dallas last year and posted a picture of himself standing on the X. I should ask him if he had to dodge traffic.
He said he was surprised at how close the shot was. It had seemed farther to him until he was there. I've gone to street view on Google Maps and "driven" through the area. Seemed very weird.
You're right, Mid-America
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 12:07pm.
JFK is a small dot in the rearview mirror, and, if my 27 year old son and 25 year old daughter are a typical sample, the younger generations could care less about them.
But I expect that in November 2013 (the 50th Anniversary of the assassination), the media will be bombarded with shows and tributes to JFK and Camelot-Lost.
Well, considering that Rmoney and Santorum split the delegates,
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 2:18am.
it would seem that the results in Michigan were a tie. And, if you look at the map showing the vote in Michigan, when you take away Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties, Saginaw County and a few of the other more Dem counties, Rmoney didn't win over a lot of the conservatives in Michigan.
So, Rmoney still has the problem he's always had with conservatives, most of them don't believe him.
Strangely, O'Brien is not
Submitted by big.league.slider on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 3:33am.
Strangely, O'Brien is not troubled by the prospect of Obama losing Catholic votes by attacking the church.
intern
Submitted by sngnsgt on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 11:45am.
Would O'Brien let her daughter be one of JFK"s interns? Would she consider that "Taking one for the team"? What a bunch of liberal crap!!!
What did the exit polls say?
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 3:01pm.
How interesting, she refers to the exit polls for who voted for whim, but not why, when those exit polls ask you why you did or didn't vote for someone. I guess the answers don't mesh with her perceived reasons.
Of course, the real question is: why does she even bring up that question? Does she really think that Republicans, even "Catholic" Republicans, will base their decisions on who they will, or will not, support by what is said about a Democrat who has been dead for almost 50 years now?
I mean, really, Kennedy wasn't that popular 50 years ago, when he barely won the election! His popularity hasn't grown since then, outside of the MSM who have have elevated him to Saint status, anyways (mostly so they can keep reporting on the grandeur of Camelot. That's the thing about "journalists," they just can't resit grandeur, even if they have to create that grandeur themselves, just like they did with JFK.) The rest of America couldn't care less about JFK, especially amongst the Republicans.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.