CNN Rehashes Kathleen Parker: Gingrich Getting Support 'Against All Reason'
Was Soledad O'Brien trying to hit two candidates with one stone? The CNN host combined negative poll results for Mitt Romney with a "conservative" criticism of Newt Gingrich in her tough question to Romney on Wednesday.
O'Brien quoted so-called conservative Kathleen Parker of the Washington Post, who questioned Romney's appeal to voters when "far less perfect" Newt Gingrich is still garnering support "against all reason." O'Brien pressed Romney "How do you fix that?" [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
CNN recently caught an earful from GOP Senator David Vitter, who asserted that "the good news is" Republican voters and not CNN will determine the party's nominee for president. The fact that CNN quotes criticisms like Parker's in live interviews insinuates that the network is branding certain candidates, like Gingrich, as losers when most of the states haven't even held primaries yet.
Before she quoted Parker, O'Brien cited a Pew poll that had asked participants if a candidate was "understanding the needs of average Americans." Barack Obama was rated at 55 percent, while Mitt Romney fell behind at 39 percent. O'Brien used that statistic to buttress her question about Romney's appearance to average voters.
A brief transcript of the segment, which aired on February 1 at 7:22 a.m. EST, is as follows:
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: (to Mitt Romney) Let me ask you a final question. And there's a poll that came out of Pew that says "understanding the needs of average Americans." And President Obama rates at 55 percent in this polling. You come in at 39 percent.
And the conservative writer, Kathleen Parker, wrote about, you know, it's that Romney can't connect with the people as has been – "It isn't that Romney can't connect with the people as has been pronounced repeatedly. It's that the people cannot connect with him. This also explains why the far less perfect Newt Gingrich can attract support against all reason." How do you fix that?
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
It's......
Submitted by helomech on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 4:27pm.
Soledad Obrien-need anyone say more? The black/not-so-black MTV host that is..
46 states to go and they're already declaring who has won and lost? Nice...are independant/Conservative/Republican voters not allowed to take their time and choose who THEY want to choose?
She is correct on Newt
Submitted by cbeyer on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 8:52pm.
He has an endless freight train of baggage with more to follow. NEWT would become the topic of the election...not Obama. Newt is a very smart guy but he has been all over the map on policy.
Why Rush likes him so much is beyond me. Newt has stated support for Cap and Trade, Bashed the Ryan plan as right wing extremism, blasted capitalism and is proposing what amounts to amnesty for aliens.
Newt is out for newt. This meglomaniac would be a disaster!
CNN
Submitted by rusino on Thu, 02/02/2012 - 12:27am.
Need more be said?
MITT versus NEWT the real diff
Submitted by reelman46 on Thu, 02/02/2012 - 8:27pm.
The real difference between Mitt and Newt....
when Mitt got political power he built a moderate record to get along with democrats...
(thus the excuses/flips; he socialized medicine and he left rated very low)
when Newt got political power he built a conservative record 2nd to none despite
a "slick" democrat president...the dimdems were so enraged they made up 84 charges!
(83 dismissed of course, other a technicality)...remember the libmedia hate..."Newt as Grinch?"
(90% lifetime conservative rating, Welfare Reform, more jobs, historic Contract With America)
There is also a huge difference when describing OzBama as "In over his head" (Mitt) vs
"He is an Alinsky radical"
(Newt)...thinkers know which one nails J. Carter OzBama and which is the usual Dole/McLoser
sissy approach to the socialist apostles (aka democrats).
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish<