CNN Spins Gingrich's 'Edgy' Words on Low-Income Students (Updated)
Apparently, Newt Gingrich wanting to employ students from poor neighborhoods and teach them job skills means that he believes they possess "no work habits." CNN obliged to put words in the candidate's mouth during Friday's 1 p.m. news hour as its headlines slammed Gingrich's "controversial" statements.
Anchor T.J. Holmes admitted that the candidate "tends to say some pretty edgy things every now and again," and CNN headlines blared that Gingrich's "controversial" talk "could become a campaign liability," and that his statement "targets children in 'poor neighborhoods'." [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
From a video CNN provided, Gingrich's actual words concerning the students from poor neighborhoods are thus:
"It would be great if inner city schools and poor neighborhood schools actually hired the children to do things. What if they cleaned out the bathrooms and what if they mopped the floors? What if they, in that process, were actually learning to work, learning to earn money? They had money on their own. They didn't have to become a pimp or a prostitute or a drug dealer."
Apparently, this statement meant that he thinks that "poor kids have no work habits." And the network made sure to headline Democratic consultant Ed Espinoza's spin that the candidate is "out of touch" and "Scrooge-like."
UPDATE: In Des Moines on Thursday, Gingrich did say "really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working." CNN should have run that clip for viewers. He said:
"Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working, and have nobody around them who works. So they literally have – they have no habit of showing up on Monday. They have no habit of staying all day. They have no habit of I do this and you give me cash – unless it's illegal."
A transcript of the relevant part of the "Fair Game" segment, which aired on December 2 at 1:32 p.m. EST, is as follows:
[1:32]
T.J. HOLMES: We'll go to the campaign trail. And anything a candidate says is "Fair Game," of course. And Newt Gingrich has been saying a lot – tends to say some pretty edgy things every now and again, like this comment about poor kids and developing a work ethic.
[HEADLINE: "Newt's Controversial Words: Could Become a Campaign Liability"]
(Video Clip)
NEWT GINGRICH, former House Speaker, Republican presidential candidate: It would be great if inner city schools and poor neighborhood schools actually hired the children to do things. What if they cleaned out the bathrooms and what if they mopped the floors?
[HEADLINE: "Gingrich: Poor Kids Have No Work Habits: Targets children in 'poor neighborhoods'"]
GINGRICH: What if they, in that process, were actually learning to work, learning to earn money? They had money on their own. They didn't have to become a pimp or a prostitute or a drug dealer.
(End Video Clip)
HOLMES: Oof. Let me bring in Will Cain, a CNN contributor, he's in New York for us, and also Ed Espinoza, Democratic political consultant, joining from us Austin, Texas.
Ed, let me start with you. Did he have a point? Did he have another big idea and he just didn't phrase it the right way?
[HEADLINE: "Newt's Controversial Words: Could become a campaign liability"]
ED ESPINOZA, Democratic political consultant :Well, look, it's appropriate it's December because Newt Gingrich is having his Ebenezer Scrooge and Tiny Tim moment with this right here. He needs to pick on someone his own size. If he wants to talk about jobs, that's fine. But don't pick on poor kids. The way to do it is to advocate for President Obama's jobs plan. That's something that's tangible and on the table, and let's leave the kids out of it.
[HEADLINE: "Gingrich: Child Labor Laws 'Truly Stupid': Says Poor Kids Should Work as Janitors"]
HOLMES: OK, Will, will you please talk some sense into Ed over here? He just said Gingrich was going to advocate for President Obama's jobs plan.
(Laughter)
WILL CAIN, CNN CONTRIBUTOR: No, he's not going to do that. Um, and I'm afraid my friend Ed is indulging a little more – indulging being enraged over this issue much more than being logical about this issue. Look, I have many, many harsh words for Newt Gingrich and his substantive policies.
[HEADLINE: "Gingrich Words Draw Critics: Espinoza: "out of touch, Scrooge-like"]
CAIN: But my friend Kevin Williams, at National Review, put this best. Newt Gingrich has a habit of putting his foot in his mouth while putting his finger on the issue.
[HEADLINE: "Gingrich: Put Kids to Work: Or they could become 'drug dealers'"]
CAIN: Look, the bottom line is this. Unemployment is higher in poorer neighborhoods, right? That means in poor neighborhoods there are fewer people trekking off to work every day and the kids in those neighborhoods are not seeing people developing work habits or emulating – they don't have work habits to emulate on such a high degree. So I don't know why that is so offensive. It's simply a string of logical conclusions. Would it be helpful to do something in those neighborhoods? Yeah, it might be.
By the way, if it offends you that he suggests we should do away with child labor laws in response to that, well then I just have to say to you, look, the higher barriers you place to work, the lower participation you're going to have in it.
HOLMES: Alright, it looked like you wanted to respond there for a second, Ed. Do that for me quickly so I can move on to the next question here. But go ahead.
ESPINOZA: Okay well see, the problem is it's not that he's talking about kids not having work eth – it's a problem to assume that poor kids have any worse of a work ethic than kids who come from well-off communities. But when you make comparisons saying they're automatically going into drugs or pimping or anything else like that, that's too far. He is a public leader. He shapes public opinion. He needs to be more careful with his words.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
this is getting old
Submitted by Kuso Jiji on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 7:59pm.
the "leftwing can't even call it media anymore" working every angle they can to manipulate the upcoming election. they will do everything in their power to misinform the public in hopes there are enough stupid people to vote for obama again. what will it take for them to play it down the middle? i don't know, maybe need to see how them muslim fanatics scared the press into submission.
nothing wrong with work experience
Submitted by MidAmerica on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:08pm.
Back in the sixties when I was growing up I hired out to area farmers as a teenager. In eighth grade I was already running big tractors working fields alone at night.
Controversial - Conservative: Entry Work gets Minimum Wage
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:13pm.
Mainstream (Media) - Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Communists: Everyone gets a living wage at the maximum rate, entry level people straight from the womb until death gets the salary of a CEO for learning nothing, not working, protesting, gets free health care, gets free this, free that, free education (subsidized by the taxpayers so it ISN'T FREE).
And you wonder why the rest of the world thinks this country is a joke. I have had enough of this progressive garbage. It is time to shut these liberals down at the voting booths and take this country back in 2012.
And don't mention the
Submitted by GregE on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:27pm.
And don't mention the Constitution to these people. Talk about edgy, that gets their brain moving as straight as the flight of a butterfly.
Gingrich
Submitted by Curly on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:28pm.
He didn't say that but that is the case - ZERO work ethic!!
What planet is this guy on?
Submitted by GregE on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:35pm.
ED ESPINOZA, Democratic political consultant :Well, look, it's appropriate it's December because Newt Gingrich is having his Ebenezer Scrooge and Tiny Tim moment with this right here. He needs to pick on someone his own size. If he wants to talk about jobs, that's fine. But don't pick on poor kids. The way to do it is to advocate for President Obama's jobs plan. That's something that's tangible and on the table, and let's leave the kids out of it.
I see, the way to talk about jobs is to support and push the Obama plan. There is no other real jobs discussion to be had, other than the ideas of perfection that emanate from the mind of the liberal messiah.
Meet Ed Espinoza
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 10:13pm.
http://laist.com/2009/01/06/meet_ed_espinoza_las_superdelegate.php
Ed Espinoza: Democrat Superdelegate from Los Angeles, Mexifornia.
Found this on the link.......
Submitted by GregE on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 12:12am.
How do you rate the Democratic party's utilization of the Internet on a scale of 1-10?
Espinoza: I give it an 11, it's great! One of the things Obama is good at is constantly feeding people information.
Ed, it's not information, but it's true that he is good at constantly feeding it to us.
Amazing, huh?
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 1:18am.
I think that "interview" was even softer than the whole peestream media gave Barack Milhous Nixon from 2004 until now. If this is what is in the mind of a superdelegate, God help us all.
And after all this 'partisan
Submitted by ant on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 10:20pm.
And after all this 'partisan public watchdogs' blasting Gingrich out of context, they went straight to the video of the urban black woman with 15 kids screeching, "Somebody gotta pay for my kids!", right? No? Gee, wonder why?
So we should rnd job training
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 10:37pm.
So we should end job training in minority neighborhoods as that is racist controversial and edgy. Thanks libs for your budget savings suggestions.
Building skills and working....
Submitted by GregE on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 12:18am.
.....to be self-sufficient, is something the liberalism will not tolerate.
More 'Dog Whistles'
Submitted by ChrisNH on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 11:17pm.
Clearly, Leftist media hacks are incensed at the thought that their beloved OBAMO could lose. Which means they'll do anything and everything--including inventing imaginary 'dog-whistle' comments--to help their Dear Boy stave off defeat.
EVERYONE knows this to be true.
→ Scrooge and Tiny Tim
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 1:44am.
Yeah, that's the moment Newt is having if by "Tiny Tim" you mean a vulnerable child left in the care of Mark Sandusky because Jenny Crack-Core (and you don't care) ain't got no man to teach the boy manly skills. "Tiny Tim"
Or is yet another "uncle" upstairs visiting mom, so the kids need to stay outside for awhile. Sure could put a heck of a drain on a society if stuff like that really happened,
Blatant misrepresentation by the media..
Submitted by greggy on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 4:43am.
but Newt's actual phrasing was pretty bad and poorly considered. I don't care for Newt, and personally I'm still disgusted from when he tried to throw Paul Ryan under the bus.
For a fair and accurate criticism of Newt, as opposed to the Democrat media complex, see any of George Will's recent comments, such as on Laura Ingraham's show yesterday (excerpted here): http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/12/02/george_will_wisdom_is_...
or previously:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/20/george_will_on_newt_gi...
Will's not too hot on Romney, either.
Me, I'm really dissatisfied with the whole Republican field.
If George Will would enter the race, I'd give little pieces of my heart and soul to see him elected. The best thing Obama's got going for his reelection chances, is the Republican field. It blows my mind that we can't field better candidates than this.
Most of them make me want to try hard to tolerate some of Ron Paul's views - given that he'd never get his actual agenda enacted, but might still succeed in dragging the nation toward a somewhat more Constitutionally sound government.
Very disappointed in the Republican field..
George Wil?
Submitted by TheHistorian on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 3:12pm.
He's never run anything except his mouth. If you are dissatisfied with the Republican field, maybe you should get into the Democrat primary and do a write-in for Hillary? After all, then you WILL do the Republican line-up some good rather than being disappointed with people who range from inexperienced to too-experienced, and from conservative to liberal (Romney).
Thanks for the links. I will read them.
Dennis Prager
George Will..
Submitted by greggy on Sun, 12/04/2011 - 4:55am.
has a better command of the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, et al than any candidates with the possible exception of Newt, or Ron Paul, and they could only hope to equal Will in this respect. Will is tremendously well versed in most any matter of policy, and he has had the Tea Party's back since Day One. He's also highly adept at articulating the folly of Obama's policies and some of his demagoguery. No candidate currently running for the Republican nomination is Will's equal across these 4 metrics.
Let's be candid about the field as it stands - the core problem isn't about inexperienced vs. too experienced - it's about deficiencies in quality, or integrity/credibility, or consistency, or professionalism. As in, for examples, Perry/Bachmann/Cain, quality, Gingrich/consistency and integrity, Romney consistency.
Gingrich's problem isn't that he's "too experienced", it's that he's inconsistent, untrustworthy, and too self-interested/Machiavellian/Clintonian. For example, that crap he pulled against Paul Ryan, was classic Clinton-era triangulation. And so what if Paul Ryan is a bold, savvy, brainy leader and one of the faces of Republican leadership in the years to come? If Newt Gingrich thinks there's something to be gained for himself, he's perfectly willing to throw Ryan under the bus (and anyone else). The distrust between a President Gingrich and a Republican Congress would be palpable. The Dems will have a field day with his hypocrisy over taking big money from Fannie and Freddie, and his dubious claim that he wasn't functioning like a lobbyist, but like a "historian". They'll hang that around his neck like a millstone, and the worst part is - it's a valid charge of hypocrisy.
Hate to tell you this, but Newt did mean that
Submitted by TheHistorian on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 3:08pm.
and for good reason. The generation to generation participation on welfare is so high that these kids are learning to shun work. A program like Newt espouses would have to teach these kids to work first. One of the reasons they don't get educated is that they have not learned to work and to read, etc. These are all the endemic problems that will need to be fixed before you can deal with the implanting of job skills.
Dennis Prager
That's not the problem..for me, anyway..
Submitted by greggy on Sun, 12/04/2011 - 4:56am.
it's the whole "they don't need to become pimps and prostitutes". That's not helpful..