CNN Presses Conservative Blogger: 'Admit' that Wall St. Protests 'Resonating'
One day after lauding the persistence of the "Occupy Wall Street" protests, CNN's American Morning pressured conservative contributor Erick Erickson to "admit" that the protests are indeed "resonating," and that his own counter-movement is much smaller.
"You've got to – you've got to admit it. The 'Occupy Wall Street' folks are resonating," Romans insisted to Erickson. "I mean, we just had an ORC poll this week that showed that majority of Americans have heard of the movement. The 'We Are the 53' is much smaller." [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
The same ORC poll also showed that just over a quarter of Americans (27 percent) actually agree with the protest, with a majority (54 percent) still holding no opinion. Romans didn't make mention of that.
Providing some more positive coverage of the protests, Romans further explained the frustrations of protesters to Erickson. "I mean this other thing, this outrage at banks, outrage at income equality, outrage at the system and what it's done for the haves, have more, and the have nots, have less and the people in the middle – the middle's getting smaller, it's really resonated, Erick."
The segment could be contrasted with an interview of a protester from the previous morning on CNN. American Morning co-host Ali Velshi gave a soft interview to one of the "occupiers," thus giving a platform for the protest to get more of its message out.
Romans referred back to that interview on Wednesday. "I want to ask you about Priscilla Grim," Romans asked Erickson about the interviewee. "She's become a co-editor of the '99 percent' blog, after she gave this posting. She said, 'Single mom, grad student, unemployed, and I paid more tax last year than G.E. I am the 99 percent.' You know, what's wrong with this position, I guess?"
Erickson is leading a counter-movement of sorts to the Wall Street protesters' "We Are the 99 Percent" theme, with a tumblr blog titled "We Are the 53%." The name represents the 53 percent of Americans who pay federal income taxes.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on October 12 at 6:41 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
[6:41]
CHRISTINE ROMANS: The "Occupy Wall Street" crowd really has latched on to the idea that its supporters are the 99 percent of Americans toughing it out, either unemployed or working paycheck to paycheck to paycheck. The 99 percent who aren't the top 1 percent of earners that Washington, D.C. caters to. We talked about the "We are 99 percent" campaign yesterday.
We wanted to bring you a smaller countermovement, a new movement. It's for the 53 percent of Americans who say they work, pay their taxes – but they're not complaining about it. CNN contributor Erick Erickson, the editor-in-chief of RedState.com is a brain child of the "We Are the 53 Percent" movement and he joins us now live this morning. Good morning.
ERICK ERICKSON, CNN contributor: Good morning. I wouldn't say I was the brain child. A friend of my came up with this on Twitter and I just put up a picture, and the next thing I knew, other people started putting up their pictures as well.
ROMANS: Well, let's show me one of those. I mean, you – and you clearly, you endorse it and this resonates with you, what this 53 percent is trying to do or what the whole thing stands for.
I want to give you a quick example. This is somebody who put up this picture on the blog, that says, "My first job was a janitor. I paid for my master's degree with loans. I live within my means, so I can pay my bills. I would love a Lexus, but I drive a Saturn. I am the 53 percent." What are these people saying about the "Occupy Wall Street" movement or what are they trying to say about the other side of that?
ERICKSON: Well, they're trying to say, ironically, what a lot of these 99 percenters are saying about this, that these people don't – they don't speak for me. I'm supposedly in this 99 percent movement but they don't speak for me.
You know, life isn't fair. And what I hear from these guys on the "Occupy Wall Street" movement and where they do agree, and they're very different on what they agree on, but where they do agree seems to be that greed is bad and somehow or other we should legislate fairness. Well, you can't legislate fairness. I pay my taxes. I don't like to pay my taxes but I do, but I'm not asking government to punish someone to help me out.
ROMANS: They're resonating. You've got to – you've got to admit it. The "Occupy Wall Street" folks are resonating. I mean, we just had an ORC poll this week that showed that majority of Americans have heard of the movement. The "We Are the 53" is much smaller.
I mean this other thing, this outrage at banks, outrage at income equality, outrage at the system and what it's done for the haves, have more, and the have nots, have less and the people in the middle – the middle's getting smaller, it's really resonated, Erick.
ERICKSON: Well, yeah, it's always going to resonate – the other guy has it better than you. I mean, that's part of human nature. We're all individuals who wish we had it like the other guy. And that's part of why the 99 percent movement has resonated. That doesn't make it right, though, to bash the other guy just because he has a better life than you.
ROMANS: I want to ask you about Priscilla Grim. She was on the program yesterday. She's become a co-editor of the "99 percent" blog, after she gave this posting. She said, "Single mom, grad student, unemployed, and I paid more tax last year than G.E. I am the 99 percent." You know, what's wrong with this position, I guess?
ERICKSON: Well, you know, it's that she doesn't speak for me. I mean, you know, I believe she's the lady that reached out to me on Twitter last night and said that I don't speak for her and threw in a few other choice words. And my response back was – you don't speak for me either.
You know, for the people saying, well, I'm part of the 53 percent and you don't speak for me. Good. Speak for yourself. I mean, this group that's in New York and complaining, so life isn't fair. I looked up "life is fair" in the Constitution. It's not there.
ROMANS: (Laughing) I've got to tell you, though, for 20 to 24-year-olds, the unemployment rate is 14.7 percent.
ERICKSON: Oh, yeah.
ROMANS: Do you think these kids just don't want to work and they should just get a job and stop complaining? Or are you agreeing there aren't opportunities for people right now? This economy is not providing enough opportunity.
ERICKSON: Yeah, there aren't a lot of opportunities out there right now, but it's not Wall Street that's denying them their job. It's not Bank of America that's denying them their job. It's not entrepreneurs who are denying them their job. It's largely government policies that have been put in place over time that have hurt job creation of the country. They should be protesting K Street and Congress, not Wall Street.
ROMANS: Some of them actually are protesting K Street and Congress, to be quite honest. They're worried about the revolving door with lobbyists, and the fact that Wall Street and Washington have been in bed with each other for so long.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
No, you don't admit to
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 3:26pm.
No, you don't admit to something that isn't true. The idiots doing the "occupy __<*fill in the blank*>__" aren't resonating, aren't the 99%, and aren't in any sort of solidarity. They have no clue as to why they are even protesting. Even with the unions' involvement it hasn't resonated.
Agreed. And the fact that it
Submitted by okie-pastor on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 7:23pm.
Agreed. And the fact that it hasn't resonated really makes them mad!
Resonating?
Submitted by vividsign on Thu, 10/13/2011 - 12:25am.
Resonating?
More like... defecating, urinating, fornicating which leads to ejaculating, self medicating, irritating, aggravating... etc... etc...etc...
When talking about who has
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 3:59pm.
When talking about who has heard of OWS and who has heard of the "We are the 53% let's consider this:
How many stories have the media done on the Wall Street group? How many on the 53% group?
Here are the relevant searches on websites:
CNN.com:
Occupy Wall Street
We Are the 53%
Erik Erickson
(I included him here because CNN is actually telling him that his movement is a non-starter.
From ABC
Occupy Wall Street
We are the 53%
For MSNBC (which came up when I typed nbcnews.com
Occupy Wall Street
We are the 53%
Yeah, I skipped CBS; it seemed rather pointless.
Could this have something to do with why there is such a huge difference in familiarity between the two groups?
YA THINK???
Next they'll be doing stories about how the 53% group "can't seem to get any traction."
Lapdogs can't see
Submitted by KornKing on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 3:57pm.
It's resonating allright-some who have been disengaged are actually seeing what kind of idiots the other side has
Those were my thoughts. We
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 6:37pm.
Those were my thoughts. We see these people as idiots, slackers who only want to cause trouble.
"They're resonating. You've
Submitted by forest on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 3:59pm.
"They're resonating. You've got to – you've got to admit it. The "Occupy Wall Street" folks are resonating. I mean, we just had an ORC poll this week that showed that majority of Americans have heard of the movement."
The majority of Americans have heard of the Ebola virus too.
Yeah, but Ebola resonates
Submitted by pockets64 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 4:14pm.
Ebola has a point. It does its thing and moves on.
These folks don't have a point. My sledge hammer has a better point.
The only resonating with this mob would be if you put pots over their heads and started banging away with hammers.
Pockets, I think that
Submitted by Hunter12 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 9:23pm.
Pockets, I think that pots...heads thing is one of those Fruedian thoughts I've heard tell about? I saw the pictures with the homemade cigarettes and dirty people laying around doing nothing but smoking them. Here, I'll do one of those puns too. From the bowels of the earth this movement will rise to unplumbed depths.
I think Main Street has heard of the OWS, but they don't give a crap. What's there to respect?
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
america's education system failure
Submitted by kata on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 4:00pm.
The only people this is "resonating with" are the ones ignorant of how our government and economy works. All these counter-movements are silly. Shame doesn't work on the shameless.
It's hard not to laugh at the OWStreeters. But it's an uncomfortable, incredulous, embarrassed laughter. They are ignorant and naive and the methods to their madness only accentuate it. The longer I've witnessed it the more it just plain makes me angry and sad. The irrational expectations are absolutely breathtaking. This is what happens when you're fed nothing but Liberal Kool-Aid your entire life.
America's parents have failed to take part in one of the largest and most important processes their children face. Their education. And turned over their responsibility to the state and the popular media culture. I don't know if it's by ignorance or complacence but do we really want another generation of this?
How about : Occupy a school board meeting. Occupy a town hall meeting. Occupy a position on the PTA. Occupy your house when your children are home.
just my .02
This says it all
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 4:37pm.
Do they owe us a living? Of course they do!!
Sad.
Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 4:46pm.
What exactly did the parents and the educational system teach these kids? If I were a toxicologist, I would conclude brats like the one in the photo are so entitlement-poisoned that the prognosis is not good.
These kids have zero work ethic, zero talent and they voted for the big Zero. They got what they wanted - an incompetent, malignant narcissist who certainly changed the course of history. This NINJA (as I understand this: no income, no job or assets) generation was raised to feel entitled to getting everything without working for it. I question whether they are intelligent enough to realize at one point they will be paying the bills because they will be the adults (in the longevity sense, certainly not in the maturity sense).
I have on thing to say to
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 6:40pm.
I have on thing to say to this idiot and those like him. College of the Ozarks.
Do they owe us a living?
Submitted by Hog_Flambe on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 11:39pm.
Reminds me of Crass. Early 80's Brit " punk " band that had a tune titled the same as my subject line.
I thought that the following would be more appropriate.
Eve Libertine sings....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=u7D9aoq6wfc
#OccupytheWhiteHouse
Submitted by rwnewsnut on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 4:49pm.
I feel bad for these young kids. They've been indoctrinated their entire lives in the public school systems and now they are hopeless idealists. Those that have gone or are going to college hope for a better job. And if by some chance they were offered a job making $200,000 would they say, "Oh no, that's too much. I can't accept that. Let me share that salary with Lucy over here." No. They would shut their liberal mouths and take the $200,000 salary.
AMEN
Submitted by Emma Grump on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 9:09pm.
And they'd be the first ones to tell Obama, "Keep your greedy fingers off my 200K.
What really scares me...
Submitted by Rukus on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 6:16pm.
There are a lot of nutzoid fanatics out there (i.e.- muzzies) that would like nothing better than to slaughter as many 'infidels' as possible. These idiots in these big mobs are potential targets. All it's gonna take is one fanatic to stroll up into the middle of a crowd, occupying a suicide vest and pow! I don't put anything past those islamic freaks.
Of course, the media would find a way to blame it on Palin, or Cain, or conservatives, or the GOP, Bush, climate change, Wall Street, blah, blah, blah.
I sincerely hope nothing like that happens but nowadays you can never tell...
preoccupied media
Submitted by TerryWest on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 7:02pm.
The leftist media are hard at work shoving their desperate "America is resonating" agenda while the only thing really resonating with the people is all the news and reality's they refuse to cover while doing so.
The fact is the majority of Americans are not engaged in this scattered example of mass unemployment and idle time to camp out, they are still very focused on getting through the month and keeping what job they may have.
A Brilliant Idea
Submitted by Emma Grump on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 9:06pm.
Every week I read about all the companies that are hiring people, and a thought came to me - wouldn't it be a good idea if these companies set up job recruitment tables at the OWS sites? Put out a bunch of tables, have some Human Resource reps on hand to help the applicants fill out the job applications, explain their company's vision of the future, the opportunities for advancement, the benefits and perks of securing a good job with a successful American corporation. Seems like a win-win for everyone, doesn't it?
UNLESS, of course, these protestors don't really want to work. Ahhh - what are the chances of that? That would sorta look like they are protesting just for protesting's sake, and would make one think they like being unemployed and have everyone else provide for them, the little darlings.
I suspect that if you could
Submitted by Hunter12 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 9:35pm.
I suspect that if you could weed out the ones who started this from the 'joiner" type idiots, you'd find out that they do have jobs. They were paid by SEIU and those of similar ilk to do this crap. I heard today that they marched past the house of a billioniare who's made his money off of evil oil to protest at the house of some investment banker whose net worth was less than Matt Lauer's. The billioniare was George Soros.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
I saw the coverage of a job fair here
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 10:32pm.
last night. First off, it was only open to the seniors and graduates of the college letting the organizers use their space.
Two of the interviews were striking. The first was a female, with multi-colored hair, a ring in her nose and a stud in her left eyebrow. She couldn't figure out why she hadn't scored a job offer, or several interviews, at least. Then she opened her mouth, and she became a walking ad for reasons not to send your child to a public college. Her entire interview was full of "ya know", "like, I mean" and "uh, um".
The second young man spoke much like she did. His appearance left much to be desired, a sport coat 3 sizes to large for him, a tie that looked like it was tied by a drunk, and a tee shirt that rose 3 or 4 inches above his dress shirt collar.
And, these people wonder why they stand on the side lines of life, watching others enjoy what they earn for themselves.
UpNorth
Submitted by hydrodynDM on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 10:39pm.
So I guess you are saying we should only send out kids to private colleges?
hydro
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 10:52pm.
I think in selecting a college you should look carefully at the student body. The tour guide of one university was heavily tattooed and pierced. That is not the look of a professional, yet it was the look the college was presenting. From our experience, that was common in public universities.
My daughter's school is preppy. Very preppy. The rate of graduates securing employment or accepted into grad school is 97% at graduation. It's private.
I'm thinking there's a connection.
Radical1979
Submitted by hydrodynDM on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 11:12pm.
I actually agree with you.
But be careful what you say - some of the regulars here will label you an elitists.
I know I have for basically saying what you have.
Hydro, I was making a point on appearance, knowledge and
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 10:54pm.
common sense.
The young lady was a walking advertisement for what she didn't learn in high school and college. She couldn't construct a sentence, she had no idea that, just maybe, a business doing business with the public might not want someone with so little common sense that she appeared for a job fair, looking like an act from a sideshow.
The other young person gave the impression that he gave no care at all for his appearance. If he has no pride in himself, why would an employer take a chance on him? And his grammar was as bad as hers.
They were both graduates of a public university, one that's more worried about benefits for gay partners of faculty, and how many minorities they can attract so they can claim the mantle of "diversity", than they are in educating their students. So, at least in the case of this university, I'd say you're correct.
UpNorth
Submitted by hydrodynDM on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 11:08pm.
I get what your point was - I was just wondering why you specifically mentioned public colleges since the stuff you mention happens at private colleges/universities as well.
I know it does.
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 10/13/2011 - 11:28am.
I mentioned the public college, because they put the event on, they provided the students and grads who attended the job fair, and that was the point of the story. ___ ___ ___ University put on a job fair, and many students found there weren't jobs for them, was the meme of the report. I mentioned what I did, mostly to say that the schools, and their parents, had failed these two, in particular, because they didn't have the common sense to realize that appearances do matter, and you are judged by what people see and think of you. One may have degrees up the wazoo, but if you can't measure up to what many think are commonly held standards of appearance and speaking ability, you'll still be standing there, saying things like, I thought I'd, like, ya know, get the job, Dude.
Empty bells resonate
Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 10:03pm.
More people know about the Tea Party than the "Occupy" movement. I wonder if the MSM would claim that the TEA Party is also "resonating," and at a higher amplitude than the Occupy movement? Based upon the last few years of the negative MSM coverage of the Tea Party movement, I think that the answer would be "no."
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Media Pushing Their Agenda
Submitted by scottyusmc on Thu, 10/13/2011 - 7:24am.
Not the Peoples Agenda!!!
Anytime a newsreader brings
Submitted by FishFace222 on Thu, 10/13/2011 - 8:15am.
Anytime a newsreader brings up GE and Immelt, it needs to be pointed out that Obammy and Immelt are in bed together. Why does that not happen?