CNN's Gupta: 'Some Analysts' Suggest ObamaCare Spiked Health Care Costs
When pressed to confirm that "some analysts" are blaming ObamaCare for higher health insurance costs, CNN's chief medical correspondent admitted that indeed they are "suggesting" Obama's Affordable Care Act is to blame.
Sanjay Gupta, once considered by President Obama for surgeon general, told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday that according to "some analysts," mandates from ObamaCare have been behind the recent spike in health care costs and premiums.
[Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
Blitzer asked him "Effectively, these people are at least blaming President Obama and the Democrats' health care reform law – it is now the law of the land – for this dramatic spike this year?" Gupta affirmed that premise. "That's what some analysts are suggesting, that when there's a bunch of things that are going to sort of take place next year."
He mentioned that, among other things, a mandate that insurance companies justify a 10 percent or more increase in premiums is contributing to the rise in costs. Also, employers are shifting more costs to the consumers in the form of higher deductibles and co-pays.
"Yes, that's what a lot of Republicans point out, this is discouraging big companies from hiring more people because of the costs of health care that are going up and up and up," Blitzer concluded.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on September 28 at 6:02 p.m. EDT, is as follows:
[6:02]
WOLF BLITZER: Effectively, these people are at least blaming President Obama and the Democrats' health care reform law – it is now the law of the land – for this dramatic spike this year? Is that what you're hearing?
SANJAY GUPTA: That's what some analysts are suggesting, that when there's a bunch of things that are going to sort of take place next year. One is that you have to justify increases in premiums of 10 percent or more, but they're also going to have to show as part of this that more of their health care dollars they're taking in are being spent on health care.
I think 80 cents on the dollar has to be shown proven to be spent on health care. And what's not being spent on health care, or matching that equation, has to be given back. One other thing, Wolf, you mentioned that there's about roughly $4,000 that individuals will pay or families will pay, even though the premium is $15,000. So employers are covering a lot of that.
But there's something else happening as well, there's a sort of cost shifting going on. So while your premium may not have gone up, you notice higher deductibles, you notice higher co-pays. And this is because employers are saying look, we don't want to cancel insurance outright, but we're going to cost shift more and more to the consumer and especially to those consumers who are using more health care.
So there's all sorts of different dynamics going on here, Wolf, but an increase in premiums overall as you said at the core of all of it.
BLITZER: Yes, that's what a lot of Republicans point out, this is discouraging big companies from hiring more people because of the costs of health care that are going up and up and up.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
I wouldn't let "Dr." Gupta put a band-aid on my left butt cheek
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 10:20pm.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Who are the "some analysts"
Submitted by rockyracoon on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 10:34pm.
Who are the "some analysts" you're referring to, Doc?
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
Let's default to the grand leader and man-child statement...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 10:55pm.
President Obama, March 8, 2010: "Our cost-cutting measures mirror most of the proposals in the current Senate bill, which reduces most people’s premiums."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/03/10/obama_says_health_prem...
I wonder how Sanjay, the almost Surgeon General" Pooper would spin that. He didn't get the job, yet he still defends the Liar in Chief!
"Sort of take place next year?"
1) Like the economy may sort of get better?
2) Like a female is "sort of" pregnant?
3) Why are all liberal positions/remedies/jobs plans always taking place in the "next year" or the "next ten years?"
his head is about to explode.
Submitted by WarEagle66 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 10:56pm.
his head is about to explode.
I think I understand his logic
Submitted by jpwcpa on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 11:34pm.
Dr. Gupta didn't take the time to find out what every analyst on the planet thinks is the cause of rising health care costs. He probably only checked a few, if any. Since he didn't bother to be thorough, he can legitimately use the term "some" instead of "all". Of course, he was deceptive for implying that some analysts might not think that Obamacare is the reason for rising health care costs.
Damn, I'm beginning to understand how liberals think. That scares me.
It's easy to understand how liberals think.
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 8:43am.
Just take a common sense, legal, logical or moral dilemna you are presented with, make a common sense, legal, moral, logical decision and a liberal will argue against it, based on how they "feel" and what is "fair" and "socially just".
Or, just listen to a 5 year old try to argue a point. No facts or logic, they believe they are right "just because".
But, but, but... It was supposed to work!
Submitted by fishwaltz on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 7:38am.
Calling Dr. Troll, Dr. Killzit, Dr. Goopta...
When the MSM wants to shine up the clean end of the turd,
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 8:37am.
or make stuff up, they attribute their lies to "some people say" or "according to some analysts", etc.
The "analysts" who are saying it work at Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 9:45pm.
They are seeing massive cost increases year over year not due to increased reimbursement for physicians, but instead dramatically increased utilization of services. Hospitals, physicians, pharmacies/pharmacists and other health care providers have almost zero ability to set the price for their services. The few cash-paying patients that are left out there are very, very wary shoppers for medical services. Almost every health care cost, with the exception of pharmaceuticals, is based on a multiple of what Medicare pays. If Medicare reimbursement goes down, so does commercial insurance reimbursement and the same with state Medicaid reimbursement. Pharmaceuticals are dominated almost entirely (in the branded sector) by rebate contracts negotiated with pharmaceutical manufacturers and pharmacy benefits management companies. When our billing department submits a claim (the process is all electronic with very few exceptions), the insurance company or government program can find the flimsiest excuse to delay payment and often does. The average payment time once a claim is submitted to any payer (government or private) used to be about 30 days. Now it is about 90 days. That means we wait over three months to get paid for a service we rendered, and if the claim is denied we go through more and more paperwork until the money is paid or not. If it is not paid, good luck getting it out of the patient.