CNN's Kyra Phillips Alludes to Bachmann As 'Crazy'
ESPN's LZ Granderson labeled Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) as "crazy" Monday, and CNN anchor Kyra Phillips seemed to credit his judgment.
Granderson, a CNN contributor, said of a Bachmann candidacy that "the people aren't going to vote for crazy. And she [Bachmann] still registers as crazy with a lot of independents." Phillips immediately responded that "If you could go back decades, there's a lot of people who vote for crazy, guys."
[Video below the break.]
It seems that the running commentary on CNN is that conservative candidates like Bachmann or Texas governor Rick Perry are not only weak candidates but are repellent to independent voters. CNN contributors John Avlon, Will Cain, and Granderson all believe that the choice of Bachmann or Texas governor Rick Perry would prove fatal for the GOP in 2012.
Will Cain, who writes for National Review and who also criticized the Tea Party last week, surmised Monday that Obama would be happy with facing the current Republican field.
"We're messing around with the likes of Michele Bachmann, and Rick Perry and even Mitt Romney," Cain said, criticizing the Republicans. "Until a Chris Christie or a Paul Ryan comes around, I think the Obama administration remains a winner and remains pretty happy."
John Avlon ripped the Republican field in his latest CNN.com op-ed. "Bachmann makes Sarah Palin look like an eminently qualified statesman," Avlon wrote. "George W. Bush looks like Abraham Lincoln compared with this crowd."
"The thinking seems to be that they [the Republicans] can throw almost any base-pleasing, pledge-signing, ideological purist up and still win the presidency. But to win the White House, you need independent voters – and they are not only the largest but the least religious segment of the electorate."
A transcript of the segment, which aired on August 15 at 9:30 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
KYRA PHILLIPS: Meanwhile, the two of you agree on one thing, a mutual winner. And that is the President Barack Obama. L.Z., give us the 15-second why. I'll let Will do the same thing.
LZ GRANDERSON: Well, it's obvious, right? I mean, Michele Bachmann does not appear to be someone who can be a true candidate in a general election. So, as horrible as his numbers have been, his approval rating is, as horrible as what we saw on Wall Street was, he wins because if Michele Bachmann actually comes out ahead in this, the people aren't going to vote for crazy. And she still registers as crazy with a lot of independents.
PHILLIPS: Oh, I don't know. If you could go back decades, there's a lot of people who vote for crazy, guys. That seems to be part of the political norm. And, Will, you agree, President Obama coming out a winner as well?
WILL CAIN: Yeah. Look, I think if you were asking the Obama administration to lay out their probability chart, right now the Republican field is pretty high on the good side of their probability chart. I don't think they're excited about Rick Perry. But, look, here's the deal -- President Obama is an extremely talented politician. It's a liberal ideologue in my book. But he is so good at selling it, he's put forth a transformative health care bill. He's made this country transform in two years.
And what are we as conservatives doing? We're messing around with the likes of Michele Bachmann, and Rick Perry and even Mitt Romney. Until a Chris Christie or a Paul Ryan comes around, I think the Obama administration remains a winner and remains pretty happy.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Yes, she used "crazy" because
Submitted by balboa on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 5:40pm.
Yes, she used "crazy" because Granderson used it, and she actually seemed to be indicating that this wouldn't be a deterrent to voters.
OK, bal...Granderson said
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 6:03pm.
OK, bal...Granderson said Bachmann was crazy. Phillips was insulting the voters who would vote for Bachmann, even though she's "crazy."
Thanks for clarifying that. I'm sure Tim will get right on it and correct that.
No she really wasn't
Submitted by balboa on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 6:35pm.
No she really wasn't insulting the voters either. But don't let that get in the way of allllll the fun!
OOOOOOKay, bal....
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 7:20pm.
Saying there are a lot of people who vote for [whoever the elites decide is] "crazy" is not an insult.
In the twisted-rationalization world of balboa, I guess that's true.
Mrs. Bachmann seems to be one
Submitted by Rowane on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 5:40pm.
Mrs. Bachmann seems to be one of the more sane people I've ever seen in politics...She must really love the country to even WANT to associate with the crazies in the media.
You've got to stand for something, or you'll fall for anything. (Aaron Tippin)
The "crazy" line
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 5:49pm.
is all based on her unwillingness to raise the debt ceiling without more meaningful cuts- particularly ObamaCare. But they're all saying this as though had the debt ceiling not been raised, we would have defaulted on the interest payments; and we all know this is not true.
"The likes of Michele Bachmann or Rick Perry"....?
Submitted by NeoKong on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 5:52pm.
Perry is one the most successful Governors in the country right now. I guess that is now some sort of smear. He makes the Obama camp worry.
Will Cain is full of crap.
Yeah. Obama is running this
Submitted by rbosque on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 5:59pm.
Yeah. Obama is running this economy into the ground and the media loves him.
Bachmann wants fiscal responsibility and she's "crazy"?
What kind of a world do these people live in?
Who Is Crazier Than This Clown?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 6:04pm.
CNN's Ted Turner?
Who is watching CNN? Wolf Blitzer's mother and Christiane Amanpour's evil twin, Keith Richards.
Oh, and Ted.
This network has lower ratings than the Weather Channel.
You owe me. This non-network doesn't matter but it took me 39 seconds to state it.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Where...
Submitted by jimspice on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 6:31pm.
Where is she referred to as crazy? "(R)egisters as crazy," yes. But that's not the same thing. They're discussing perception of voters, not attributes of the candidate. And I'll tell you what; she sure registers as crazy with me! And I know I'm not alone.
As for the comments re: primary vs. general election voters and attracting the vote of independents and centrists, that's pretty much Poli.Ssci. 101 in a nutshell. So what part again are you complaining about?
OK, Jimmy
Submitted by Joe W. on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 6:57pm.
I'll bite, pal.....Give us ONE policy or position that Michele Bachmann takes that you consider "crazy".....Please.
"(R)egisters as crazy," yes.
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 7:28pm.
"(R)egisters as crazy," yes. But that's not the same thing.
Of course it's the same thing. It's just a new variation on their old tactic of "some say."
Some voters think Obama is a clueless incompetent; I don't see the media talking about that.
So the question becomes "cui bono?" when Bachmann is portrayed, albeit second-hand, as crazy?
Well of course she does, jimspice---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 7:31pm.
but that is likely because you are a liberal dork.
MD
WTF is National Review doing
Submitted by TE on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 8:48pm.
WTF is National Review doing with some dimwit like Will Cain working for National Review? I understand why CNN has him on its freakshow. It's the same reason that ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, NPR, CNN and A-Mess-NBC always have on "Republicans" like David "Gergen" Brooks, David Gergen, Kathleen Parker, Linsey Graham, John McCain, Michael Smerconish, Matthew Dowd, Mark McKinnon, et al., to wit: they all speak and "think" like Democrats.