Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matt Hadro's blog
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend
  • Hearing on IRS With Lerner Taking the Fifth? Newspapers Had No Front Page Story Thursday
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'

CNN Deflects Scrutiny Away From Rapper's Violent Lyrics, Dismisses Controversy Over White House Invite

By Matt Hadro | May 12, 2011 | 17:00

A  A

On Thursday morning, CNN largely dismissed the controversy over the White House invite of rapper Common, using talking points from the White House and Comedy Central's Daily Show to marginalize conservative critics.

Anchor Carol Costello deflected attention away from the rapper's violent lyrics by quoting a rap of his that has a pro-life message. She quoted none of his violent lyrics, however. Common has composed work in the past praising cop-killer Assata Shakur in "A Song for Assata," and has also ranted "burn a Bush" in rapping about the former president.

Conservatives were outraged over the artist's invite to the White House for an evening of poetry and song. The White House did condemn his violent lyrics "that has been written about" press secretary Jay Carney clarified, but did not renege on Common's invitation.

(Video after the break.)
 

"He's a complicated guy," Costello offered on CNN's 10 a.m. EDT news hour Thursday. CNN correspondent Jim Acosta agreed, and noted his "G-rated" performance at the White House. Then CNN played a clip from the Daily Show criticizing Fox News's scrutiny of the invite, and Acosta essentially used left-wing comedian Jon Stewart's rant as a buttress in support of Common's invite.

"You can't really throw stones at glass houses when it comes to poetry and rapping and music, especially when it comes to entertainers at the White House. They come from all stripes, Carol," Acosta preached.

Acosta then added White House talking points to the argument, quoting White House press secretary Jay Carney who "describes Common as a socially-conscious guy who has done other things. You know, he's been in a movie with Queen Latifah, so he's a little bit more than the caricatures that have been presented about him in the last couple of days."

A transcript of the segment, which aired on May 12 at 10:58 a.m. EDT, is as follows:

CAROL COSTELLO: Conservatives are slamming the White House's decision to invite the rapper Common to join in last night's poetry event. Critics point to the violent lyrics in a couple of his songs, but check out this line from "Retrospect For Life," where Common criticizes abortion.

This is the lyrics: "Musta really thought I was God to take the life of my son. From now on, I'm using self-control instead of birth control, because $315 ain't worth your soul."

He's a complicated guy. CNN's Jim Acosta joins us from Washington. Jim, what was last night's performance like?

JIM ACOSTA, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well Carol, as you just mentioned just a few moments ago, this is a rapper who is a bit more complicated than the charges that have been levels against him in the past couple days. Take, for example, his performance last night at the White House. It was considerably more G-rated.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

STEVE DOOCY, Fox News anchor: Some of his lyrics, they are raunchy, they are rough, they are raw.

KARL ROVE: Yes, let's invite a misogynist to the White House.

(LAUGHTER)

(END VIDEO CLIP)

ACOSTA: Okay. Well, and then Comedy Central had some fun with the -- with some of the conservative attacks against Common last night. The Daily Show pointing out that even though folks like Karl Rove have come out against Common, that conservatives have also been, you know, on camera, and celebrated other recording artists out there, Carol, who have also said some controversial things in the past.

So, there's – you can't really throw stones at glass houses when it comes to poetry and rapping and music, especially when it comes to entertainers at the White House. They come from all stripes, Carol.

COSTELLO: They do. But he did read the poetry last night. He's not really prominently featured on WhiteHouse.gov as other --

ACOSTA: No, that's true. That's right.

COSTELLO: But the president does thank him at the end. So, we found that interesting, too. Jim Acosta -

ACOSTA: Yes.

COSTELLO: Oh, go ahead, Jim.

ACOSTA: No, I was just going to mention that Jay Carney was asked about this at the White House briefing yesterday, and describes Common as a socially conscious guy who has done other things. You know, he's been in a movie with Queen Latifah, so he's a little bit more than the caricatures that have been presented about him in the last couple of days. But the conversation will go on, as you know.

COSTELLO: Yes, there's controversy in everything, isn't there?

About the Author

Matt Hadro is a News Analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matt Hadro on Twitter.
  • Culture/Society
  • Carol Costello
  • Common
  • Jim Acosta
  • CNN
  • CNN Newsroom
  • Video
  • Matt Hadro's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

This is really not a

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 6:18pm.

This is really not a controversy at all, just something drummed up.

  • Login to post comments

balboa

Submitted by well99 on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 12:02am.

You right...just what we need in the WH a poet that supports cop killers.

  • Login to post comments

He doesn't support cop

Submitted by balboa on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 10:53am.

He doesn't support cop killers. He wrote lyrics about ONE person who was convicted of killing a cop, despite no evidence of her having shot a gun on that day.

  • Login to post comments

Balboa

Submitted by well99 on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 12:32pm.

Oh really

"As the controversy flared online, conservative outlets reported that Common has voiced support for cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal. In his rap, “God Is Freedom,” he declared that “flyers say ‘free Mumia’ on my freezer.” Mumia Abu-Jamal was sentenced to death for the 1981 murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner. In an unfortunate coincidence, Common’s appearance at the White House event coincides with National Police Week."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi6tatSEaas

Guess you missed that one.That is ok.The left seems to idolize cop killers.As in Media Matters and the rest of those Soroites.

  • Login to post comments

OK, TWO people, both with

Submitted by balboa on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 12:55pm.

OK, TWO people, both with controversy surrounding their convictions. Neither of which he "celebrated."

This is no way indicates that he thinks killing police is a good idea to be celebrated.

  • Login to post comments

balboa

Submitted by well99 on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 1:47pm.

Oh how many does it take?Controversy according to the Msm maybe or the left.They were convicted.

  • Login to post comments

Yes they were, and we all

Submitted by balboa on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 1:49pm.

Yes they were, and we all know that courts never make mistakes.

  • Login to post comments

balboa

Submitted by well99 on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 2:11pm.

Well we will just have to agree to disagree.As far as courts OJ is proof of that.Doesn't mean it happens every time though.

  • Login to post comments

Yup. I just think he's being

Submitted by balboa on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 2:23pm.

Yup. I just think he's being broadly characterized as someone who hates cops, likes to seem them killed, which seems unfair and reactionary.

  • Login to post comments

balboa LIES again.

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:07pm.

balboa the crypto-dummy: ...despite no evidence of her having shot a gun on that day.

She did not NEED to shoot a gun to be convicted and sentenced to life you LYING SNOT.

Shakur was convicted on all eight counts: two murder charges, and six assault charges.[6] The prosecution did not need to prove that Shakur fired the shots that killed either Trooper Foerster or Zayd Shakur: being an accomplice to murder carries an equivalent life sentence under New Jersey law.

WHY IS THE RETARD BALBOA CONSTANTLY LYING AND HARPING ON WHETHER CHESEMER SHOT THE TROOPER?

On March 25, 1977, back in Middlesex County, Shakur was convicted as an accomplice in the murders of New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster and Zayd Shakur and possession of weapons, as well as of assault and attempted murder of Harper

She was convicted as an ACCOMPLICE.

YOU LIE AGAIN FREAK SHOW. You don't need to shoot a gun to be an accomplice.

YOU LIE.

YOU LIE

YOU LIE.

Must be a day that contains 24 hours, balboa is posting Stupid again.

  • Login to post comments

Why don't you LIE to us some more balboa?

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:29pm.

Yeah, you just a little jovial dummy posting here. Iz not liez mizzer. Honext. Cross both trollie hearts.

the lying balboa crypto-dummy: ...despite no evidence of her having shot a gun on that day...

The mean word bully Veet juz a posting nuttin' and lyin' about innocent jovial dummiz.


Accomplice Liability in New Jersey


In New Jersey, people can be subjected to a criminal charge even though s/he did not actively participate in an offense.
The criminal code in New Jersey establishes standards for accountability for not only an individual’s own conduct but also the actions of other people. An individual is responsible for the conduct of another person where the defendant:

• causes an innocent individual to commit the criminal act;
• is an accomplice in the commission of the crime; or
• conspires with another person to commit the criminal offense.

SHE WAS CONVICTED AS AN ACCOMPLICE YOU LYING SNOT.

Don't believe me. As usual, you will just claim the word bully said, did, proved, linked, sourced nuttin' cuz you get butt hurt by word bullies.

BELIEVE HER LAWYER --

However, Assata was not convicted of firing the shot that killed Trooper Foerster. She was convicted as an accomplice to his murder under New Jersey’s “aiding and abetting” statute. Under New Jersey law, if a person’s presence at the scene of a crime can be construed as “aiding and abetting” the crime, that person can be convicted of the substantive crime itself.

Now tell us all how innocent and stupid you are and how aw shucks you right wingers, iz just stupid and rilly done no nuttin', iz cant ivin reed like gude trollie.
 

  • Login to post comments

See this time, as opposed to

Submitted by balboa on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:31pm.

See this time, as opposed to the previous incident, you actually provided something of worth, a link that added something to the discussion.

Kudos.

  • Login to post comments

Pack sand Retard.

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:39pm.

I ain't your buddy. I caught you in a lie. Just like I predicted. Play it off like iz juz jovial stupid and we iz all buddiez. When all you do is walk around dismissing everything I post until you are caught so dead to rights it is impossible to squeeze out. Then suddenly it is, hey buddy, good job, love you. Kizzezz and huggiez diapers! Piss off. LIAR.

 

Kudoz. iz buzted lie again. Kudoz.

 

Pack sand. Pack it tight. Pack it hard. Pound it smooth.

 

LIAR.

  • Login to post comments

Still struggling with that

Submitted by balboa on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:42pm.

Still struggling with that definition of lying, I see. Give it time.

I dismissed what you posted before because it was worthless. This link isn't. Even though you didn't bother to follow the argument, I admit that I misspoke when I said she was convicted of shooting the trooper.

  • Login to post comments

Whatever.

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:51pm.

Sit here and LIE for 2 days telling us how innocent poor Joanne was cuz she dint fire no guns.

No. You don't have to explain why YOU LIED at all. Turn it back on the guy that caught you in a flat out LIE. It is all the word bulliz fault you misspoked an allz. I admit it now. I lied through my teeth to gain sympathy for the cause and play the whole thing like it twaz nuttin' big rilly. Juz misspoke. Just threw crap out there without knowing whether it was false or true. Just threw it out there knowing the stupid idiots on this site would not check. Your fault word bully. You did not fact check me earlier. Your fault. Your links. Your fault. I iz not lie. I iz just want a woman to be released from prison based on a lie I did not know was a lie. Free Assliea! Free Mumia. He is innocent too. I will pull that right out of my ass just like I do everything else. Free Asslamia! Now! Is got no gun. Iz shoot no one. Facts? Who needs facts in a court of law? Iz proud iz crypto-dummy!

  • Login to post comments

The Lying crypto-dummy walks back a LIE.

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 6:02pm.

The Lying crypto-dummy balboa: ...ONE person who was convicted of killing a cop, despite no evidence of her having shot a gun on that day.

The Lying crypto-dummy balboa: ...controversy surrounding their convictions.

The Lying crypto-dummy balboa: ...convicted of killing a cop even though it was never proven that she shot a gun that day, and might not have been actually guilty

The Lying crypto-dummy balboa: I admit that I misspoke when I said she was convicted of shooting the trooper.

Now that you admit you brought a LIE here. Tell us all what the CONTROVERSY is. Tell us how she MIGHT NOT EVEN BE ACTUALLY GUILTY.

Or are you misspoking about that as well.

Tell us Retard. You gonna walk it all back?

  • Login to post comments

How much more are you gonna walk back crypto-dummy?

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 6:19pm.

Kingfish17: Do you think that Mumia and Assata are innocent of the crimes for which they have been convicted?

the crypto-dummy balboa: I think there's a possibility, from what I've read.

So tell us about the controversies and possibilities when you can't even get what she was convicted of correct? Do tell us crypto-dummy. And by all means, make it as cryptic as possible and blame it all on the word bully for reading the poor trollie all wrong.

the crypto-dummy balboa: Have you read about either case?

Come on. You are the expert. Even though you whine that she did not shoot anyone. Well thank GAWD for that because she was not convicted of shooting anyone.

So tell us all how she is innocent of being an ACCOMPLICE TO MURDER even though she did not fire a gun.

 

  • Login to post comments

Oh crypto-dummy. Where did you go? Why run off?

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 10:51pm.

balboa the admitted Liar: ...I admit that I misspoke when I said she was convicted of shooting the trooper.

Hey, you ran off and started posting somewhere else before you could tell us all about the controversies and possibilities and the might not even be guiltyings. Come on crypto-dummy. You owned up to your LIE. Now tell us what other controverspossibitings there are. WE ARE WAITING.

Once you are done with Joanne, you can move on to Mumia and how it is not possible for him to be guilty when he was found at the crime scene with a bullet from the gun of the dead Police Officer in his gut and a few of the bullets from his registered gun in the back of the dead Police Officer, you know, the gun the was sitting right there in arm's reach of him at the crime scene. Tell us how it was all a miscarriage of justice. WE ARE WAITING.

Hello. Where are you. It was so much fun insulting and harassing me for 2 days. Now tell us.

  1. What is the controversy about the conviction of Joanne Chesimard? YOU SAID THERE WAS ONE.
  2. What is the possibility of Joanne Chesimard being innocent? YOU SAID THERE WAS ONE.
  3. How is it that Joanne Chesimard might not be guilty? YOU SAID SHE MIGHT NOT BE GUILTY.

Waiting on you. I only have so much patience here. If you have the right to lie and then run. I have the right to follow you and remind you of your LIES.

  • Login to post comments

1. Read about the case. 2. I

Submitted by balboa on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 10:22am.

1. Read about the case.
2. I don't really know. Seems to be some discrepancies in how the shooting occurred, lies were told and then recanted by the other trooper on the scene. She might be guilty, as she was found guilty, but Common obviously thinks she's innocent.
3. See no. 2.

The point to all of this is that Common is not glorifying cop killing, as most people on the right are quick to say. He does not advocate killing cops, he's not justifying killing cops.

Now, have a bran muffin.

  • Login to post comments

Not about Common, now is it.

Submitted by The Vet on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 1:00pm.

It is about you lying. Now. repeating that there is controversies, possibilities and not guilties, in addition to the expansion of your story of now sayinng there are discrepancies is the issue here.

You have already recanted YOUR LIE. Reading the case will do nothing to get you to explain the AGAIN controversies AGAIN possibilities AGAIN might not be guiltinesses. YOU. YOU crypto-dummy MADE THE ACCUSATIONS. BACK IT UP. I am not your little slave. I have the LAW on my side. SHE WAS CONVICTED BY A JURY OF 12 PEOPLE. You say they are wrong. PROVE IT.

Common did not bring AGAIN controversies AGAIN possibilities AGAIN might not be guiltinesses. YOU. YOU crypto-dummy MADE THE ACCUSATIONS. YOU BROUGHT IT HERE.

Back it up, proven liar. Or back it down.

  • Login to post comments

I'm not backing down on

Submitted by balboa on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 1:37pm.

I'm not backing down on anything. If you could stop working yourself into a crazed lather for a few seconds, you might understand things better.

  • Login to post comments

You play your little troll games.

Submitted by The Vet on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 9:03pm.

You call me names. Insult me. Accuse me of every little act you want. I WILL NOT SHUT UP.

Now. I asked you a question.

So let's hear it. What lies were told and recanted by the surviving trooper? Were they recanted before or after the trial? Did they have a material effect on the case? Were they brought up during the appeal? Did the recanted lies of the trooper unshoot the shot troopers? Were the lies about Joanne Chesimard? Where is the appeal based upon recanted lies?

  • Login to post comments

Hahaha! I insult you?! Well

Submitted by balboa on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 9:50pm.

Hahaha! I insult you?! Well hello there pot. That is rich.

  • Login to post comments

Ha Ha Ha. Oh wait. Not.

Submitted by The Vet on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 11:35pm.

Back it up known LIAR.

So let's hear it. What lies were told and recanted by the surviving trooper? Were they recanted before or after the trial? Did they have a material effect on the case? Were they brought up during the appeal? Did the recanted lies of the trooper unshoot the shot troopers? Were the lies about Joanne Chesimard? Where is the appeal based upon recanted lies?

You ain't playing stupid this time by distracting with minutea. You are a LIAR that hides behind playing stupid when called out.  You made an accusation. BACK IT THE FRELL UP.

  • Login to post comments

Let's hear it.

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 9:44pm.

You told me to read the case and yet you can't even get the charges right.

So let's hear it. What lies were told and recanted by the surviving trooper? Were they recanted before or after the trial? Did they have a material effect on the case? Were they brought up during the appeal? Did the recanted lies of the trooper unshoot the shot troopers? Were the lies about Joanne Chesimard? Where is the appeal based upon recanted lies?

Since you have read about the case and know about recanting lies, give me a link to read about the case from a disinterested party with court transcripts.

  • Login to post comments

balboa LIES again.

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 12:11am.

  Or is it just another mispeakin' again.

balboa:  ...lies were told and then recanted by the other trooper....

Under cross-examination at both Acoli and Shakur's trials, Trooper Harper admitted to having lied in these reports and in his Grand Jury testimony about Trooper Foerster yelling and showing him an ammunition clip, about seeing Shakur holding a pocketbook or a gun inside the vehicle, and about Shakur shooting at him from the car


This is clearly a case of the defense team twisting Harper’s testimony and written report out of context. Harper testified that Chesimard shot from the car. How did he know that? Did he see it? Well, no, he did not see her shoot (as he was distracted with the fight with the others outside the car), but he concluded that she did as he knew that shots came from the car and Chesimard was the only one in it. Completely circumstantial, but very strong (as circumstantial evidence goes).


The defense spins it to the jury as a “lie” and the prosecution spins it as a “clarification”, but its up to the jury to decide if the testimony is credible, which they did in this case.

There is your trooper lie. The trooper said Chesimard shot from the car. As the other 2 people were outside involved in the firefight, he knew it was her rather than seeing her physically.

The jury did not think he lied, oh wait mispoke is the new word for lie around here.

ANOTHER LIE FROM BALBOA.

  • Login to post comments

"Trooper Harper admitted to

Submitted by balboa on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 8:23am.

"Trooper Harper admitted to having lied in these reports and in his Grand Jury testimony about Trooper Foerster yelling and showing him an ammunition clip, about seeing Shakur holding a pocketbook or a gun inside the vehicle, and about Shakur shooting at him from the car."

That is what I referenced. Does it mean she's innocent? No. Could it give people --such as Common -- reason to believe that maybe she was wrongly convicted? Along with the testimony that Shakur was shot with her hands up? Obviously, since he thinks she's innocent.

  • Login to post comments

balboa LIES again.

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 8:56am.

You reference what LIAR? Who are you quoting? Huh, LIAR? Who? Tell us. YOU LIE AGAIN. What is the status of the APPEAL if he lied under oath? Huh?

SOURCE IT YOU VICIOUS LYING SNOT.

We don't even have to wait for the LIAR to answer. The entire source of the trooper lies comes from Evelyn Williams, Joanne Chesimard's aunt, and an attorney for the Black Liberation Army. She had some kind of bullbalboa Statement of facts baloney that looks to have been created in 2005 and gets spammed into the comments of any website that mentions the name Joanne Chesimard. It is nothing but a bunch of biased bull that gerber propaganda babies lie balboa suck up with a straw.

  • Login to post comments

"You reference what

Submitted by balboa on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 9:32am.

"You reference what LIAR?"

Text from Wikipedia.

"Who are you quoting? Huh, LIAR? Who? Tell us."

Wikipedia

"YOU LIE AGAIN. What is the status of the APPEAL if he lied under oath? Huh?"

I don't know. I assume that the jury determined the contradictory statements didn't change their minds overall.

"SOURCE IT YOU VICIOUS LYING SNOT."

Wikipedia.

"We don't even have to wait for the LIAR to answer. The entire source of the trooper lies comes from Evelyn Williams, Joanne Chesimard's aunt, and an attorney for the Black Liberation Army. She had some kind of bullbalboa Statement of facts baloney that looks to have been created in 2005 and gets spammed into the comments of any website that mentions the name Joanne Chesimard. It is nothing but a bunch of biased bull that gerber propaganda babies lie balboa suck up with a straw."

If you say so.

  • Login to post comments

enjoy your wikipedia crypto-dummy.

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 12:29pm.

Sources from the article -

1, NYT - Mark Lewis Taylor - article His source? An interview with Joanne Chesimard. Oh and he says this --

The police claim they stopped her and her friends on the turnpike because she was wanted on bank robbery and murder charges.

LIE. The police claim they stopped the vehicle for a broken tail light. He could not even get that tiny fact correct.

2. Kirsta, Alix. (May 29, 1999). "A black and white case – Investigation – Joanne Chesimard". The Times. --- Anyone seen hide nor hair of this article DESPITE being published in the internet era? Source for this article? Unknown.

3. James, Joy. (1996). Transcending the Talented Tenth: Black Leaders and American Intellectuals pp. 202–203 --- On Amazon --- 202 does not list. here is what it says at the top of 203 --- "admitted during cross examination to having lied under oath; in retraction he admitted that he had never seen Shakur with a gun, and in fact she had not shot him."

Again, the trooper CLARIFIED his reports. He knew it was Chesimard because the other 2 were outside. SHE WAS THE ONLY ONE IN THE CAR. It does not take a rocket scientist to tell who it was shooting from INSIDE THE CAR. He did not have to see who it was shooting as everyone else was OUTSIDE.

There are no court transcripts published. The police reports and statement of the surviving officer is not available. The surviving officer does not do interviews. The prosecution does not do interviews.

ALL WE HAVE ARE THE WORDS OF JOANNE CHESIMARD AND HER Contempt of Court Aunt.

UP YOURS YOU LYING BULLBALBOA ARTIST.

There is no controversies. There is no possibilities. There is no might be not guilty.

THERE IS ONLY THE WORDS OF A COVICTED CRIMINAL THAT ESCAPED JAIL AND FLED TO CUBA, AND HER PROPAGANDISTS. THIS NOW INCLUDES THE BULLBALBOA ARTIST BALBOA.

 

YOU LIE.

  • Login to post comments

Well you be sure to tell

Submitted by balboa on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 3:00pm.

Well you be sure to tell Common that the next time you see him. Tell him in all caps, too.

  • Login to post comments

Ah good. I actually look things up. All you do is taunt

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 9:28pm.

Needle and taunt. I actually research. You NEEDLE and TAUNT me.

Yes. That is how it works huh? I find out the truth. You think it is funny to taunt and needle. Then you have the gall to whine to others how crazy and mean and what a bad word bully I am. I am sure you even send PM's to the admins. Look at the mean word bully.

 Izza juzza big dummy. no unnerstan why word bully pick on big dummiz. Pliz adminz, ban word bulliz.

Oh, pliz. word bulliz complainz. He siz namez. sunonez estop word bulliz.

In the meantime, did you answer ONE QUESTION? YOU made the ACCUSATIONS. NOT Common. Not Common. Not a single other person here. You did. Then went straight into taunt and needle mode just like you do. And when others get sick of your needling and taunting. Why then it is time to go into juzzastupid mode just like you do every single time. hey wurd bulliz, iz not bite uze honext

 

 

 •What is the controversy about the conviction of Joanne Chesimard? YOU SAID THERE WAS ONE.
• What is the possibility of Joanne Chesimard being innocent? YOU SAID THERE WAS ONE.
• How is it that Joanne Chesimard might not be guilty? YOU SAID SHE MIGHT NOT BE GUILTY.

Waiting for you to stop tauniting and needling and start telling the truth for once. 

  • Login to post comments

Wow... 1. Read. 2. I don't

Submitted by balboa on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 10:48pm.

Wow...

1. Read.
2. I don't know. This is an opinion held by Common. I don't know if she's innocent or not.
3. I don't know. This is an opinion held by Common.

AS I'VE SAID OVER AND OVER AGAIN, I WAS EXPLAINING WHY COMMON MIGHT HAVE THIS OPINION, WHY HE ISN'T GLORIFYING COP KILLING. I DON'T REALLY CARE IF SHE'S INNOCENT OR NOT.

  • Login to post comments

Lying is not proving your case.

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 11:32pm.

balboa: He wrote lyrics about ONE person who was convicted of killing a cop, despite no evidence of her having shot a gun on that day. --- Common did not say there was no evidence. YOU DID.

balboa: OK, TWO people, both with controversy surrounding their convictions. -- Common did not say there was controversy here at NewsBusters. YOU DID.

balboa:  ...even though it was never proven that she shot a gun that day, and might not have been actually guilty... --- Common did not say she might not be guilty here at NewsBusters. YOU DID.

Kingfish17: Do you think that Mumia and Assata are innocent of the crimes for which they have been convicted?

balboa: I think there's a possibility, from what I've read --- Common did not say there is a possibility she is innocent here at NewsBusters. YOU DID.

You were talking for yourself. Not Common when you made every one of those statements. You did not say Common feels or thinks this. You EXPLICITLY jumped down someone's throat when they tried to say Common thought something.

Now, make your case.

  • Login to post comments

I am not your buddy. Do not PM me.

Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 1:16pm.

There is nothing personal to be said between us.

"I never said the killers should walk free. I never said I thought I was better than 12 jurors. I never said the evidence is wanting. I said that there appeared to be some controversy about the conviction--WHICH THERE IS. Whether anyone chooses to believe it or not, it's still there. The trooper changed his story. He said he saw Assata shoot a gun, said his partner pulled a clip of ammo out of the car and yelled to him. Then later said that didn't happen. Assata was shot with her hands up and once in the back. According to the only evidence I have read about, she could not have shot a gun after being shot. That appears to be enough of a controversy for Common and others to think she's innocent. I don't know if she's innocent. Don't care. Now go away. I am done with this issue. I have explained my opinions. And don't dare to act so polite when you've been nothing but a complete and utter nutjob towards me. "

As I have stated, passing on the LIES of Joanne Chesimard and her crazy aunt is NOT evidence.

  • Login to post comments

And we all know that

Submitted by NC Cop on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 9:30pm.

And we all know that Wikipedia never makes mistakes.

  • Login to post comments

Yes Sir.

Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 1:32am.

And this is clearly a case of wikipedia not getting the story properly sourced. The 3 sources I have shown all get their stories from the convicted murderer or her aunt. There is no court transcript released to date. The prosecution, witnesses and surviving Police Officer don't do interviews nor have they written any books. So all we have is one side releasing a bunch of propaganda with no counter and wikipedia prints it as if it is all true, hiding behind biased sources.

And balboa the crypto-dummy repeating it all as though it were the Gawd's honest truth then hiding behind his aww shucks I is just sayin' what Common might be thinkin' iz all. Shucks. When he crawled up some guys butt for doing the very same thing --

balboa: Nowhere in the link is there any proof that Common believes...

balboa: Could it give people --such as Common -- reason to believe...

balboa: ..I WAS EXPLAINING WHY COMMON MIGHT HAVE THIS OPINION...

  • Login to post comments

No Controversy?

Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 2:08pm.

Surely you jest. Even our cousins the Brits think it is.

President Obama and wife Michelle faced a storm of protest after they played host to a rapper who praised a convicted cop killer and a poet who condemned inter-racial marriage.

Police officers and politicians voiced their disgust at the bizarre guest list for the racially charged event at the White House celebrating America poetry, which included rapper Lonnie Rashid Lynn Jr who called for the burning of George Bush.

The First Lady also welcomed controversial poet Jill Scott who declared her opposition to marriage between black and white people, saying it made her ‘wince’.

 

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Complete.

Submitted by bob loblaw on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 8:48pm.

Complete. Nonsense.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-may-11-2011/tone-def-poetry-jam
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-may-11-2011/tone-def-poetry-jam---...

  • Login to post comments

To round this out

Submitted by BosTarus on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 9:03pm.

I concur!

  • Login to post comments

And whoever said that liberals---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 9:09pm.

think alike?

bal-bob-bos

Too funny !

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

I hate these "controversies"

Submitted by OffTheLows on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 11:11pm.

I like Common, he's a popular rapper that's liked across genres, especially with younger people. This dumb exercise by O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck and others is just the thing younger voters disturbed by liberal economic policy recoil from and make harder to flip over to the conservative side. Stop the behavior that plays into the angry, white old man stereotype and concentrate on more tangible issues.

  • Login to post comments

You've got to be kidding

Submitted by ArrowSmith on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 11:14pm.

I'm sure standing up for thug-rappers who defend cop-killers is real popular.

  • Login to post comments

Rappers who write about one

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 11:19pm.

Rappers who write about one specific person convicted of killing a cop even though it was never proven that she shot a gun that day, and might not have been actually guilty, that might strike a chord with young people.

  • Login to post comments

Also

Submitted by BosTarus on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 1:15pm.

Can we stop calling him a "thug rapper". It basically betrays your ignorance of the genre altogether if you feel Common; the white-bread, vanilla rapper; is a "thug". I'd imagine you might call all rappers "thugs"?

Also, it's demeaning to the rappers who actually work very hard to cultivate the image of "thug"... they work very hard at it, and they'd hate to be associated with someone as tame as Common. Show some respect for actual thugs!

  • Login to post comments

Vanilla Rapper?

Submitted by 1dottiemarty on Sat, 05/14/2011 - 11:41am.

White bread, vanilla rapper? That's funny......I thought he was AGAINST interacial dating. Take it he doesn't care for the white folks much. Same with Jill Scott also invited to the White House. She is sickened by interacial dating. That's funny......I thought white people were the only ones who could be racist. You would think President O would be a little offended by that considering his mother was white. However, he is too busy trying to be cool and have celebrity friends rather than be bothered by their ridiculous views. (Of which many he agrees, I'm sure) I would say that a rapper who sings about burning Bush and carrying guns on him to put the police to sleep.........not exactly Wonder Bread, vanilla thoughts and principles. So, thug rapper? If it quacks like a duck. Pointing to other rappers who are worse does not make this man any less of a crapweasel.

RYAN/RUBIO 2012!!!!!!
  • Login to post comments

What's funny...

Submitted by BosTarus on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 2:22pm.

Is the blatant misinterpretation of a single poem from his entire decades-long catalogue of work. No one finds it suspect that all of the offensive lyrics quoted are from a single work? AND that everyone is ignoring the final verse of said work, which refutes the statements made earlier in the same work.

So, yes; when you cherry pick offensive lines, out of context, you can indeed make him seem like an insane radical. Pretty easy to do actually.

You can probably do it to every artist who has a substantial body of work.

  • Login to post comments

How many times is the LYING crypto-dummy gonna repeat this lie?

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 5:11pm.

balboa the LYING crypto-dummy: ...even though it was never proven that she shot a gun...

She was convicted as an ACCOMPLICE to the murder of a Police Officer. ACCOMPLICE.

  • Login to post comments

OffTheLows---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 05/14/2011 - 6:39pm.

How about you stop judging other's behavior based on your stereotypes?

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Yes, because we all know that

Submitted by NC Cop on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 9:35pm.

Yes, because we all know that if Bush had invited a singer who sang about slavery to the White House, nobody would care..............right? The hypocrisy of the left is simply stunning.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use