Eliot 'I'm Not Biased' Spitzer: 'I Don't Think There Is Any Such Thing as Objectivity'
In an interview with FishbowlNY Wednesday, CNN's Eliot Spitzer dismissed any claim to objectivity in his reporting and answered "I don't know" when asked if he is a commentator or a journalist. This came after he recently told the Media Research Center's Brent Bozell "I don't have a bias," on his CNN show "In the Arena."
Spitzer told FishbowlNY that he doesn't know if he is a journalist or a commentator. "When the issue of objectivity comes up, I don't think there is any such thing as objectivity," he added.
"I don't mean to say you infuse everything with bias and don't try to be rigorously factual, but how you present every fact depends upon the prism through which you see it."
However, on the April 18 edition of "In the Arena," Spitzer hosted the MRC's Brent Bozell and offered a testy defense of his reporting on the budget battle, claiming no bias.
"How can you Eliot – how can you, with a straight face, go on this show and tell me you don't have a bias? That's what you were hired to have," Bozell challenged the former Democratic governor of New York. Spitzer was originally the co-host of CNN's prime-time show "Parker-Spitzer," where he played the liberal counterpart to "conservative" columnist Kathleen Parker.
The show's ratings plummeted, however, and after Parker's departure Spitzer hosted the revamped show, re-named "In the Arena." In response to Bozell's challenge, Spitzer told him with a straight face "I don't have a bias."
"And here's the point I tell people," he continued. "I have very strong views, and I hold everybody accountable. When we talk about the budget, when we talk about foreign affairs, we hold everybody accountable," Spitzer claimed before changing the subject.
Later on in the FishbowlNY interview, Spitzer reminisced about his days co-hosting "Parker-Spitzer," and provided quite a rosy view of things. "I liked Kathleen from the get-go," he said. "She is a real talent and we had loads of fun."
Reports from other news outlets provided a different picture, with stories of occasional squabbles between the two co-hosts. Parker eventually left the program in February, only four months after the show debuted to poor ratings.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
"No, don't take off the socks...."
Submitted by adamsmith on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 3:46pm.
This guy has no shame. Busting people for prostitution all the while being Customer #9. His narcissism knows no bounds. One of the biggest scumbags( among many) in American Politics.
Oh, There Is Objectivity
Submitted by rammingspeed on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 3:49pm.
Objectivity is a real thing. Few people are truly objective. We all have our own selfish interests, subtle thought they may be.
People are objective all the
Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:07pm.
People are objective all the time for college papers where they analyze historical events that are distant from them. Then, when they talk politics and current events, simply because they're emotionally involved and it suits them, they say objectivity doesn't exist.
The important thing to realize, at any rate, is that being objective doesn't mean you can never be wrong, and let your personal bias show.. it just means that you care about correcting your mistakes when they're pointed out to you. Saying 'there is no objectivity' is just an excuse for never correcting your mistakes.
Eliot who?
Submitted by ArchConservative on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:24pm.
Why should we even give this loser any ink at all on NewsBusters? This guy has like a 1.4 share if that. He has no ratings, no viewers, no moral compass, no sense of right and wrong, and no clue. I think it's humorous that those on MsNbc, CNbc, CNN, etc., continue to be taken seriously by anyone. Let's hope the future of liberal/MSM "journalism" lies in people like Sptizer. We can only hope our opposition is that stupid all of the time.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
Obama: Not my President. Ever.
Prism?
Submitted by Jaylouem on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:51pm.
..."how you present every fact depends upon the prism through which you see it."
And we all know what prism you're looking through, dirtbag.
Why should Spitzer be confused?
Submitted by Chris Norman on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 11:18pm.
"Spitzer told FishbowlNY that he doesn't know if he is a journalist or a commentator."
Of course you're not a journalist, Number 9. You offer strong (and veracity challenged) liberal opinion and commentary on your little show, which would make you a commentator (which is an overly dignified term for what you actually do). Of course, this also means that 99.99% of MSM "journalists" aren't journalists either, because they do almost the same thing as you...
He Finds Objectivity So Irritating That Only Bias Will Do
Submitted by Avitar on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 11:36pm.
This has been true in New York for over a century. Since the press barons in the ninetheenth century The New York Press can be described as Focused.