Joe Scarborough Lobbies Dick Durbin From the Left to End Wasteful Afghan 'War Without End'
MSNBC's Joe Scarborough left no doubts on where he stands on the conflict in Afghanistan Monday – but he also pressed liberal Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) to stand up to President Obama on the issue of troop withdrawal. "It's distressing to me to see how this war continues," Scarborough complained, noting that the deadline for troop withdrawal has been pushed back to 2014 and possibly even further.
He then asked Sen. Durbin point-blank, "When are you and other progressives in the Senate going to start pushing back on the administration, on the generals, and say 'Enough is enough. We can't waste $2 billion a week on a war without end'?"
Scarborough further clarified his opposition to continuing the war long-term, and wondered if President Obama wants to stay in Afghanistan merely to appease Republicans on national defense. "It seems like the President is just buying time because he doesn't want the Republicans to call him weak on defense," he speculated.
"I think Afghanistan and Pakistan and that whole part of the world literally broke Richard Holbrooke's heart," lamented Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal. She agreed with Scarborough that there is no exit strategy from Afghanistan, and any plan will be difficult to execute for the long-term.
Durbin asserted that he and fellow Democrats are aiming for the July deadline to begin bringing troops home from Afghanistan, but Scarborough continued to press him from Durbin's left. "Will you hold the President accountable if he does not withdraw a significant number of troops in 2011?" he asked Durbin.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on December 20 at 7:11 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Senator Durbin, I want to ask you about Afghanistan. It's distressing to me to see how this war continues, goes on and on. We've been fighting it for almost a decade, 2011 got pushed to 2014. We had a NATO conference where the administration official said "Well don't worry about that 2014 deadline, it's going to be pushed beyond that." When are you and other progressives in the Senate going to start pushing back on the administration, on the generals, and say "Enough is enough. We can't waste $2 billion a week on a war without end"?
Sen. DICK DURBIN (D-Ill.) And not to mention the lives that we've lost, Joe.
SCARBOROUGH: Most importantly, yes.
DURBIN: Yes, most importantly. Well the President's told us, by July of next year we're going to start bringing our combat troops home. Many of us believe that that is a realistic timeline to shift responsibilities to the Afghans. You know, we're not going to stay there until this is a peaceful, civilized, developed country. It is the kind of thing that's not within our grasp for control. We can't send in enough soldiers to do it. And many of us believe that that July deadline is critically important.
SCARBOROUGH: Will you hold the President accountable if he does not withdraw a significant number of troops in 2011?
DURBIN: The President gave his word, and I believe he should stand by it.
SCARBOROUGH: Peggy, Afghanistan is so depressing to me because I've yet to talk to a foreign policy expert, including Richard Holbrooke, off-the-record, that didn't know this was a losing proposition. And yet it seems like the President is just buying time because he doesn't want the Republicans to call him weak on defense.
PEGGY NOONAN: And that's an old theme in American foreign policy, as you know. I mean it's 75 years old. Look, I think Afghanistan and Pakistan and that whole part of the world literally broke Richard Holbrooke's heart. There's a sense of "No way out," there's a sense of "How can we do this?" there's a sense of "Can we turn Afghanistan around without turning its government around? Can we turn its government around? Can we make Kharzai different? Can we make their culture different?" The biggest thing I think we have learned, or I think among the big things in the last ten years, is that the minute you commit U.S. troops anywhere in the world, from that moment there are fifteen reasons those troops can never leave. And it's something we always have to remember in the future. The minute you go someplace, you can't get out. You better watch out where you go.
SCARBOROUGH: Better have an exit strategy out before you send the first troop in, and we've been there for a decade, and we've never had an exit strategy. Never.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Is Scaborough really that
Submitted by BD on Mon, 12/20/2010 - 6:42pm.
Is Scaborough really that desperate for a paycheck?
joe
Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 12/20/2010 - 10:05pm.
Acts like a simpleminded child on this issue - I always FF to avoid his faux righteousness on this issue
Ronald Reagan
The wasteful war without end...
Submitted by needle on Mon, 12/20/2010 - 10:47pm.
..is the Liberals’ perpetual agenda of tax and spend.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Before Senator Durbin gets us to cut & run.
Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 12/20/2010 - 11:36pm.
Could we get the Senator's opinion on where Bin Laden wants to build his victory mosque. Don't want to get into too much of a sticky situation like the 9/11 victory mosque. Maybe Bin Laden could build it right in the middle of one of our abandoned bases.
Joe the Buffoon Calls in His Alter-Ego Peggy
Submitted by Tenebrous on Mon, 12/20/2010 - 11:50pm.
I'm shocked that Joe and Peggy were able to be in the same room at the same time; I thought she was his female alter-ego. Maybe they got some of the creative "pay-go" accounting folks can do funny things with time and space as well.
Anyhow, Noonan of course, is her usual brainless self. I don't think we had a problem leaving Grenada, Peggy, or for that matter, Kosovo, or Panama. Let's try to scope our arguments a little, ok?
The thing that Joe misses is "having a timetable for withdrawl" is NOT an "exit strategy". An exit strategy states that certain things must be done before a withdrawl can take place!
And Joe signals his pessimism by stating that he hasn't talked to a single foreign-policy expert who thinks that Afghanistan can be won. I wonder if he has been talking to the same people who said the same thing about Iraq? I think that's a self-serving argument that reflects his paucity of contacts more than the reality on the ground. For instance, I wonder what John Bolton would say.
Joe is an idiot, and any one of us at our keyboards can do a better job than he does. Then again, we won't sell out our principles in exchange for MSNBC's money.
Visions and Principles blog
And Joe hasn't
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 12:04am.
talked to any military experts, because none of them would return his calls. Except Adm. Mullen, and all he wanted to do was talk about the repeal of DADT.
And, unfortunately, Joe makes Mika look intelligent, which says all it shoud about him.
joey remind me
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 12/20/2010 - 11:53pm.
Who was it that said Afghanistan was the right war? I can't hear you joey. Speak up joey.
It seems to me that the press
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:07am.
It seems to me that the press "missed" an important piece of information that duhbama put out about a month ago and that was we are in Afghanistan until at least 2014. Yet, not one reporter has questioned him publicly on this policy. There have been no lambasting article in the NYT, Huff n Puff, etc. Had President Bush still been in office, we wouldn't have heard the end of it. Yet, when duhbama breaks a campaign promise and makes a momentus policy shift in a prouncement, its crickets on the part of the "watch dog" press.
Meanwhile, dufus durbin, seemingly pretending not to have heard duhbama's prouncement says that withdrawal is months away.
On the other hand, the dimocrats have been talking one way and voting another since these wars began. When Presdient Bush was in office they would claw over each other to denounce the "nazi" for "lying to us and getting us into these wars." Yet, the very same legislators have had hundreds of chances in legislation directly and indirectly affecting the war over the decade to end them by defunding them.
Yet, everytime any legislation that directly or indirectly funds these wars comes up for a vote, they keep voting overwhelmingly to fund it. And, once again our "watch dog" press seems to always be so puzzled by these actions that they fail to report the incongruity of it.
Let's not wait. Let's begin planning now for the end of the duhbama regime and a majority of conservatives in the Senate in 2012.