Is Mika Brzezinski Auditioning for Robert Gibbs' Job?
The White House is opening a press bureau in New York City at 30 Rock – or so it seemed with MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski parroting the administration's talking points, one after the other, on today's "Morning Joe."
Brzezinski has mentioned in the past that the White House e-mails her during segments, and she seemed thoroughly briefed by the middle of Tuesday's show.
When Politico's executive editor Jim VandeHei explained that frustrated big business donors have been giving to the Republicans under a cloak of anonymity thanks to the Citizens United ruling, Mika retorted with the White House's argument.
"Jim, what the White House will say, though, is that the reason why the big business is hostile at this point is because they've taken them on, and they've put some rules in place that they're maybe not that comfortable with," Mika answered. "[They will say] this White House has done something actually to try and fix the system."
When Joe Scarborough argued that the Democrats have been playing by the same campaign finance rules as Republicans, Brzezinski simply responded with more White House talking points.
The White House is simply trying to add transparency to the debate, Mika insisted. "What you'll hear from the White House is that this fits well within the narrative of hope and change and trying to fix Washington." If transparency was introduced, she added, everyone would see that the money "came from big business, from Wall Street, and from all the same entities that perhaps got us into the mess in the first place.
And what about the Obama campaign in 2008 setting up a system allowing more anonymous donors to give to the campaign? "What the White House would respond to that is that in September they tried to pass the Full Disclosure Act, and they tried to get something through that would promote transparency across the board," Mika responded.
What of Obama's record amount of donations in 2008? "They say they'll tell you where all that money came from," she insisted.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on October 19 at 6:27 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
JIM VANDEHEI, Executive Editor, Politico: Republicans were able to tap into real discontent in the business community. A lot of those big business donors have gotten out of the big money game over the past six or seven years because they were frustrated and felt that their investments were not paying dividends. Now they feel that Obama's so hostile to them, they were willing to pony up big time just as the courts were making it easier for them to do it anonymously. So I guarantee in the next campaign Democrats will copy what Republicans are doing, because there's nothing new in politics. You just take it to the next level.
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Jim, what the White House will say, though, is that the reason why the big business is hostile at this point is because they've taken them on, and they've put some rules in place that they're maybe not that comfortable with, and that this White House has done something actually to try and fix the system, as opposed to others which –
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Well make that argument instead of acting like – acting like it – it's – this has never happened before.
(Crosstalk)
The White House insults our intelligence when they come out with phony stories about foreign money. They come out with phoney stories about these third party groups that have never existed before. They come out with phoney stories acting like Citizens United is a radical revolutionary deal, when, if you read Politico today in my wonderful column, you will find out that actually professors from Columbia, Yale, you name it, are all saying the same thing – this is much ado about nothing.
(Crosstalk)
TINA BROWN, Editor-in-Chief, The Daily Beast: Well, don't you think the Democrats anyway have really – certainly the White House has really been handling its donors pretty badly all the way through the last two years; I mean, one the one hand, they bash business all the time and then go to Wall Street for money, and on the other hand, they really don't look after their donors. I mean, the Clinton machine was brilliant at just kind of keeping their arms around their donors, and if you speak to anyone within the big business community, they used to shell out – they basically feel completely stiffed. I mean –
BRZEZINSKI: What you'll hear from the White House is that this fits well within the narrative of hope and change and trying to fix Washington, and that this is exactly about who they are, and that trying to make some transparency when it comes to campaign contributions would make the process fair, and that we don't know where all this money that the Republicans are pulling together comes from, and if you did, you'd see it came from big business, from Wall Street, and from all the same entities that perhaps got us into the mess in the first place.
SCARBOROUGH: What about the Washington Post story, Mika, that we talked about yesterday, where the Post reported at the end of the campaign that Obama's team set up deliberately – deliberately – and it's the Washington Post saying this – deliberately set up a system that would allow more anonymous donors to give money to Obama.
BRZEZINSKI: And what the White House would respond to that is that in September they tried to pass the Full Disclosure Act, and they tried to get something through that would promote transparency across the board, and all Republicans, all Republicans –
SCARBOROUGH: 2008?
BRZEZINSKI: I believe it was a few months ago.
SCARBOROUGH: Because it's funny that when he was running for President, the guy that received more money than everybody else in the history of the planet, and the guy that –
BRZEZINSKI: They say they'll tell you where all that money came from.
SCARBOROUGH: – deliberately put in place – deliberately, according the Washington Post, put in place a system that would allow more anonymous donors to give money to them. Suddenly there's a – listen, I'm not offended by this. I am offended, though, that when the White House acts like foreigners are trying, Willie – foreigners are trying to steal this election –
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Robert Gibbs....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:40pm.
Baghdad Bobby is at least occasionally entertaining. The only scenario I can imagine worse than having Mika the Press Sec. would be waking up next to her.
Mika the Parrot
Submitted by cobokat on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:44pm.
Isn't it amazing that BHO received almost half a billion dollars and expected the public to believe it came from small internet donors?!!
Even her daddy knows...
Submitted by TexasMom0517 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:51pm.
That Mika is not too bright, but is distinctly judgmental and arrogant. I'd LOVE to see her as WH Press Secretary and watch her purse her lips at the press corps and scold them. It would be hilarious. ROTFLMAO
I always wondered if Mika was as clueless as her daddy
Submitted by TheHistorian on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:55pm.
Mika sure seems to like to kiss up to Jimmah Carter II the same way that Zbignew did to her daddy. She also is obviously as well informed by her White House as he was by his. Maybe next she'll tell us that the Iranian students want to release the hostages to us, or that we could rescue them in a military mission run on the cheap.
Hope she goes to work for the WH. Liar and clueless when she and Obama appear together. You choose which one is which; they'll probably swap roles frequently..
Dennis Prager
Bubbles the Blathering Bimbo~
Submitted by bigtimer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:00pm.
Bubbles and her Blathering...endless.
She gets invited to WH important stuff dontcha know...she is important, just ask her!
Silly little Bobble-Headed Bimbo.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
messages from WH
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:01pm.
She already gets her text messages form the WH, so might as well be spokesman.....person...whatever the hell it's called for them. She already is.
-Jon
come on now jon_torlin*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:18pm.
There is a name for women who sell their soul in exchange for money and favors. I believe you know that word.It has been bantered about a lot lately.
In fact, I think that is what I will start calling Bretner...Mika.
cajun isn't that word only
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:18pm.
cajun isn't that word only for libs to use? I think it's hate speech when applied to them, even if it is the truth.
forgive me Rad*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:23pm.
Maybe I should have said it in French?...;-)
Ragin Cajun
oui oui. And that's it for
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:37pm.
oui oui. And that's it for my French!
MIKA = TED BAXTER IN-A-BRA
Submitted by Sgthulka on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:30pm.
She 's being considered for the White House PS?
Was Contessa Brewer busy or something?
That's a perfect description
Submitted by bigtimer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:42pm.
That's a perfect description of Bubbles....and what did ever happen to Brain-Dead Contessa...Jansing take her place?
Seriously, I don't care, don't watch it that much at all anymore.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Bias, nah, no bias here.
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 8:17pm.
Matt, yesterday morning on the show they TWEETED her after she said that "The Democrats/Oweblamo have gotten a million or so dollars this same way" and they sent her "a statement" saying that was false and she read it on the air.
Imagine if you will....... a sequence where Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or Beck did this, BIG FN STORY.
YOU BETCHA...
I would give up my next two PAY checks if that would help her become Press secretary, would also stock up on popcorn, it would be awesome.
nobody has any shame anymore
Submitted by michiganruth on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 8:24pm.
I remember when we first discovered that Mika was getting emails from the WH during the show. I thought that was pretty shocking. but this is amazing.
seriously, she just kept saying "well the White House would say that ..." over and over? without even a pretense of this being her own thoughts?
incredible.
people...we only have 2 weeks left. we MUST NOT LET THE MSM AND THE DEMOCRATS WIN! do everything you can to help...make phone calls, get your friends to vote, give money...whatever you can do to help combat people like Mika and the rest of the blithering idiots of the MSM.
Shame means nothing to newer generations.
Submitted by samhermanmd on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 8:28pm.
In the day when 20-somethings and younger are posting their dirty laundry like garage sales flyers, little or nothing surprises me. Shame is a much underused thing to these kids and to Democrats.
Willie Geist and Scarborough
Submitted by Texndoc on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 9:55pm.
After a little discussion the other day about Geist I watched his show this morning - it was crisp and he's got this sarcastic humor that doesn't offend. And he's clean and in a suit and jacket. Then I watch Scarborough and he shows up (late) in a sweat suit jacket and was eating and talking with his mouth full while interviewing a guest. Very classy.
Politics vs. Skill Set
Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:14pm.
While Mika's politics put her right in line as a possible Gibbs successor she lacks a certain element needed for consideration. . . . . intelligence. Much as we don't like him, Gibbs is no dummy. Mika is dumb as a board.
Gibbs is no dummy? That's
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 7:34am.
Gibbs is no dummy? That's debatable.
It will be a toss-up between
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 7:34am.
It will be a toss-up between Mika Brzezinski and George Stephanopolous for "Baghdad Bob" Gibbs' job.