Frank Rich expends his 1,500-words today ripping into Sarah Palin. Into John McCain for picking Sarah Palin. Into any members of the press who might not rip into Sarah Palin. What's got Rich so riled up? Cut to Frank's final line: "they just might pull it off." With props to the late Robert Palmer, Frank's got a bad case of not-loving Sarah Palin—but he's badly worried America will find her simply irresistible.
We've had fun with this kind of thing before, so let's ring up the curtain on Rich, Fisked: Act II.
Rich's headline is "Palin and McCain’s Shotgun Marriage." He later describes McCain's process of picking Palin as "speed-dating" and writes of his "embrace" of her. My, my. Sexualizing a woman politician in order to diminish her? Isn't that just the kind of thing that would normally be condemned by, say, a liberal columnist of the NY Times?
[T]he speech’s central argument, that the 72-year-old McCain will magically morph into a powerful change agent as president, is a non sequitur. In his 26 years in Washington, most of it with a Republican in the White House and roughly half of it with Republicans in charge of Congress, he was better at lecturing his party about reform than leading a reform movement. G.O.P.
So Rich admits that McCain was a voice for reform who bucked his party, but complains that he didn't always succeed in bringing about change. Sounds to me like a perfect reason to run for president, where he would have the power to do more. Compare and contrast with Obama, whose idea of taking tough stands is voting "present," and who never uttered a peep as he sat for 20 years in Rev. Wright's pews.
In the G.O.P., Bush love is now the second most popular love that dare not speak its name.
Unlike your brave boys Kerry and Edwards, who didn't hesitate to speak its name in 2004 when they were running against . . . Mary Cheney.
The "last-minute embrace" of Palin proves McCain's claim to being a maverick is "fraudulent."
So instead of making a bold choice—a wild-'n-crazy guy like Romney or Pawlenty—McCain-the-non-maverick went with the safe and predictable pick of Palin. Right.
America loves nothing more than a new celebrity face, and the talking heads marched in lock step last week to proclaim her a star.
The talking heads who wondered whether she would neglect her Down syndrome child and speculated endlessly about the impact of the pregnancy of her 17-year old daughter? Those talking heads?
[Palin] defends her own pregnant daughter’s right to privacy even as she would have the government intrude to police the reproductive choices of all other women.
Got that? Unless, like Barack Obama, you support a woman's right to end the life of her unborn child at any stage and using even the most heartless of practices, you sacrifice any claim to privacy about your own family.
Americans vote for the top of the ticket, not the bottom.
He hopes.
She had never issued a single command as head of the Alaska National Guard.
The article Rich links to reveals that, like a good leader, Palin delegated authority. This is presumably in contrast with the saber-between-the-teeth Barack Obama during his Supreme Allied Commander years.
He wanted to choose the pro-abortion-rights Joe Lieberman as his vice president. If he were still a true maverick, he would have done so.
New definition of maverick: picking a VP who disagrees with you on a fundamental matter of life and death, tearing your own party to shreds in the process. Then again, McCain would have gotten Lieberman's electrifying oratory skills in the bargain, instead of the bland and uninspiring Sarah Palin.
By hurling charges of sexism and elitism at any easily cowed journalist who raises a question about Palin, McCain operatives are hoping to ensure that whatever happened in Alaska with Sarah Palin stays in Alaska.
Got that? Frank Rich's colors don't run . . . no matter how much trouble seeking to destroy Sarah Palin causes him with his editors at the New York Times!
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I listed all the
September 7, 2008 - 13:13 ET by ThisnThatI listed all the anti-Palin NYT columns yesterday, and wondered out loud if it could get any worse? Yep. Just wait till Sunday.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
she terrifies them
September 7, 2008 - 13:13 ET by wizardjrand I'm lovin' every minute of it
mf -- Rich fiskings
September 7, 2008 - 13:22 ET by Jack Bauermf -- Rich fiskings indeed.
Like shooting moose in a barren landscape.
...
September 7, 2008 - 13:28 ET by Jack Bauer...
i just love it !
September 7, 2008 - 13:27 ET by larry on LIsarah palin is on the scene for less than two weeks and all the lefties catch a case of the red ass.
"He wanted to choose the
September 7, 2008 - 13:31 ET by ckc1227"He wanted to choose the pro-abortion-rights Joe Lieberman as his vice
president. If he were still a true maverick, he would have done so."
I guess to Frank Rich, for McCain to be a true maverick, he has to be against everything Republicans believe in.
Hey Frank, we don't call that being a maverick, we call that being a Democrat.
That's the Dims' mantra --
September 7, 2008 - 13:45 ET by ThisnThatThat's the Dims' mantra -- bi-partisanship means never having to say Republican.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Right, TnT....and a
September 7, 2008 - 13:54 ET by motherbeltRight, TnT....and a leftist's prescription for how a Republican can succeed is always "Be more like a Democrat."
“If he were still a true
September 7, 2008 - 15:28 ET by Newsbusterbrown“If he were still a true maverick, he would have done so.
If he were a true idiot, you mean.
There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
I guess
September 7, 2008 - 17:27 ET by 10ksnookerWe know what the leftists drive by media was doing all these months, Stroking Joe to McCain -- Setting up the fall.
Oops, McCain didn't listen ...
questioning obama's judgement for vp
September 7, 2008 - 18:13 ET by right of wayif lieberman was such a great choice for vp, why didn't obama pick him? you have to question obama's judgement for not picking hitlery as his vp. it makes more sense than picking biden. she got 18 million votes, (some from operation caos), biden 9,000. yeah biden has foriegn policy experience, but so did neville chamberlin! bottom line, give the edge to mccain for vp pick.
Frank Rich, True Wimp
September 7, 2008 - 13:34 ET by rammingspeedFrank Rich is displaying all the wimpy leftist traits when they're challenged. He approaches this election with the same heart that liberals have when dealing with national defense...scared to death. It's fun to watch.
Sorry Franky - the media didn't proclaim her a star
September 7, 2008 - 13:44 ET by Dee Bunkthat's what they did to Obama. We heard so much daily about the crowds he drew - are we hearing about the crowds she's drawing in the same way? No. From Obama's first speech at the 2004 DNC convention - the media has never been critical of a single speech of his. Even the ones who admit that Palin's speech was well delivered have all kinds of criticisms about it.
Palin is a star despite the media's obvious try at destroying her and making her into a trailer trash caricature. She's a star despite them - Obama is only a star because of them.
The facade is coming down and people are wising up to the media and their motivations. We can only hope that the American people don't revert back to being influenced by this highly partisan media
I can't say I'm not nervous about how Palin will do in the debates, but she can't do as badly as Obama did in his debates with Hillary or at Saddleback. The ABC debate was the only one where he was asked any remotely difficult questions in the primary and he flopped big time. He also flopped at Saddleback where the questions were as easy as they come if a candidate wasn't worried about putting on a facade.
This campaign is going to come down to the debates and the McCain campaign better not stand for only allowing liberal journalists to do the questioning. At each and every debate, there needs to be one liberal and one conservative with possibly one who is in the middle (the only balanced one I can think of is Chris Wallace) .
Dee, someone on this board,
September 7, 2008 - 13:56 ET by motherbeltDee, someone on this board, in another thread, said he had seen Palin in debates in Alaska and she was great.
So I felt better about it.
MB - I'm sure hope so - I think she needs to demand a bipartisan
September 7, 2008 - 14:13 ET by Dee Bunkpanel. No Keith Olberman or Chris Matthews without a Shawn Hannity and no Tom Brokaw or Charlie Gibson without a Brit Hume, No George Stepho without Karl Rove.
Enough is enough with this bias and Republicans need to start demanding fairness.
If it's a fair panel, I'm sure she will do pretty well. I'm a little worried about foreign policy issues. If she were debating Obama I wouldn't be worried - I'm sure she knows as much as he does. Biden has huge mistakes on foreign policy and I hope she is well versed in those.
Dee, I truly think she's
September 7, 2008 - 14:29 ET by ThisnThatDee, I truly think she's smart enough to deal with a stacked deck. She knows she's not speaking to those bozos asking the questions, and all she needs to do is to talk to the country.
And I don't think she will do poorly with the foreign policy questions -- as long as she doesn't feel the need to over play her hand. Trying to play up experience she doesn't have won't do it. But being knowledgeable about what's going on in the world would. If she sticks to that, and gives as good as she did during her acceptance speach, she'll win over the public.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
TNT - you are probably right
September 7, 2008 - 14:54 ET by Dee BunkIf they are too stacked against her she'll be able to turn it around on them. It was so obvious in the one debate where they tried to trip Hillary up by asking her to name the new Russian Leader and then asked the same thing to Obama after she had already answered correctly. It was a joke. They never once tried to trip him up.
Most people don't care if she knows the names of leaders in every small country. The main areas are Iraq, Iran, Syria, Russia, Cuba, North Korea and China. Of course she also needs to be well versed in the Israel/Palestinian conflict.
Just like the RNC convention, the VP debates will have the highest viewership ever - so her performance will have a big impact.
delete double
September 7, 2008 - 14:37 ET by motherbeltdelete double
ignore FACTS to make your point, frank
September 7, 2008 - 14:06 ET by sawing battafrank,
your logic on the 'shotgun wedding' is flawed. I heard an ARCHIVE from February of this year on friday's Limbaugh of him discussing a new name on the scene and a new member of the mccain 'short list'. FEBRUARY, frank. 6 mos ago - not really shotgun material - or perhaps you didnt do you homework to be in the know....
Leaving this important fact out helps your article sound interesting, but it also makes you either dishonest or ignorant and negligent. Neither of which should be characteristics of the once great NYTimes.
yes, it's a 'shotgun wedding', but not for mccain. It is a shotgun for you and the political press. You didnt do your homework and now you look illprepared, scared and desperate.
The Press must have been too caught up in obamessiah to spend much time on this afterthought, mccain. but to now stoop to misleading articles, frank, is a new low.
Be a man, tell the truth, frank.
oh, and congratulations on further diluting the brand of the nytimes to tabloid rag status. genius.
Frank is projecting again,
September 7, 2008 - 14:55 ET by dscottFrank is projecting again, he is just mad that Obama didn't have the sense to put Hillary on the ticket to make this a horse race. The shotgun wedding he had in mind was between Barack and Hillary with the party elders holding the shotgun. Problem for the Dems is they don't believe in guns and so Obama picked a loser.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Can anyone
September 7, 2008 - 16:22 ET by NorthCoasterpronounce "MISOGYNIST"?
undermimhg America
September 7, 2008 - 18:02 ET by germacFrank Rich is a secular Jew with no allegiance to anything but instant gratification Like most of his ilk, his goal is to undermine the culture in anyway he can Read Dennus Prager on this.
Once again, you guys need a special medal.
September 7, 2008 - 19:19 ET by JWFI got the Wall Street Journal 2 years in a row for $90. Now they want $250 for another year.
$250 for something that carries Frank Rich. Oh you must be high! If I were to spend $250 for a newspaper, I am going for something with some class like Investors Business Daily.
Dude you must be high, I
September 8, 2008 - 08:16 ET by dscottDude you must be high, I get WSJ for free...those airline miles, next time you get that notice in the mail trading airline miles for subscriptions to various magazines sometimes they have it as an offer.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
That is how it started!
September 8, 2008 - 19:37 ET by JWFI got it with points too. Then I renewed with real money. Now they want $250.
My faith in you has been
September 8, 2008 - 20:47 ET by dscottMy faith in you has been reaffirmed, just wait for another one of those offers, in the meantime read it for free online. <sarcasm>
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.