Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 13, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Mark Finkelstein's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Clinton Doesn't Swing at Anti-Bush Softballs, But Says Tax Cuts Lower Living Standards

By Mark Finkelstein | September 16, 2005 | 06:50

Change font size:  A |  A

The Today show brought Bill Clinton in this morning to provide color commentary on President Bush's speech of last night. Bill wouldn't bite on the worst of Matt Lauer's attempts to have the ex-President condemn his successor.Right out of the box, Lauer tried to lure Clinton into criticizing the nation's lack of preparedness.

Lauer: "Were you surprised . . . that four years after 9/11 with so much time, energy and money spent on preparedness in this country that we seemed so ill-prepared to handle a catastrophe in a major American city?"

Clinton didn't swing at the softball, observing that "handling the aftermath of a natural disaster is different from preventing a terrorist attack." He observed that the federal government has been "quite good at [preventing terrorist attacks]" then curiously added "in spite of the breakdowns that led up to 9/11."

Clinton didn't specify just which breakdowns he had in mind. Could he possibly have been referencing the utter nonchalance with which he responded to the first Al-Qaida attack on the World Trade Center, in the very first year of his administration?

Lauer then played the race card:

"There has been a troubling question raised in the last three weeks. With so many of the people so dramatically impacted by Hurricane Katrina being poor and black, there are questions as to whether that influenced the federal response to this disaster. Some say if they had been white middle-class people it would have been more efficient and quicker."

To his credit, Clinton flatly stated: "I think there was no conscious racism and no conscious discrimination against the poor."

But then Clinton couldn't help himself. He added this zinger:

"If you're not attuned to what life is really like for people of color and for poor people generally, it was fine to tell everyone to evacuate, but there were many people who had no place to go and no way to get there."

Translation: "I was the first black president, and a good ole boy. I get it. Bush probably thought that by telling people to evacuate, they would fly off to their summer homes in Kennebunkport."

Clinton reserved his biggest guns for the Bush tax cuts. Queried by Lauer as to what sacrifices he would ask American people to make, Clinton replied:.

"I would repeal the tax cuts for upper-income people. I myself have gotten four tax cuts while young Americans have gone off to risk their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. We are borrowing the money [from a variety of foreign countries] to pay for the suffering of our people in the gulf area and to pay for the Iraq war pay and to cover my tax cut."

He continued: "we've made a decision to lower the living standards of our children and grandchildren and to soak other people around the world who don't have the money by and large to cover ourselves in indulgence, and I think it's crazy."

First note how Clinton twice adopted the liberal poltician's ploy of decrying tax cuts that he himself had received. This would seem to serve the dual purpose of inoculating himself from charges of class envy while offering a not-so-subtle opportunity to brag about his post-White House wealth.

Lauer never challenged Clinton on the logic that says that America is "soaking" countries like Saudi Arabia by letting them purchase our Treasury bonds in the free market. Nor did Matt find any flaw in Clinton's notion that making tax cuts permanent for subsequent generations somehow amounted to lowering their living standards.

Seems Matt agrees that our kids will be better off if big government gets to keep our money and call our shots.

Finkelstein has degrees from Cornell University and Harvard Law
School.He lives in Ithaca, NY where he hosts "Right Angle," a local
political talk show. Finkelstein specializes in exposing liberal bias
at NBC's Today
Show.

Share this

About the Author

Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters Senior Contributor. Click here to follow Mark Finkelstein on Twitter.
  • Hurricane Katrina
  • Matt Lauer
  • Today
  • Mark Finkelstein's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • At least Chris didn't ask
    1 hour 1 sec ago
  • Lied out his ace? Those are the words of a Bush hater.
    2 hours 16 min ago
  • Jerry Frey.....You are correct that President George W. Bush
    2 hours 27 min ago
  • UpN, SPOILER lololo , if that guy did that here instant 10 years
    2 hours 52 min ago
  • Pay no attention to Rachel Maddow? As far as I know...
    2 hours 53 min ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.