Liberals Dominate 4 to 1 on Meet the Press Panel Praising Obama's Gay Marriage Support
On Sunday's NBC Meet the Press, American Conservative Union president Al Cardenas squared off against a group of left-wing pundits on the subject of President Obama announcing his support for gay marriage. The liberal bloc of guests included MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews, California Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom, and Washington Post columnists Jonathan Capehart and Kathleen Parker. [Listen to the audio or watch the video after the jump]
Parker cheered Obama's use of the word "evolving" to describe his flip-flop on gay marriage: "I think that's the perfect word to describe this conversation because the American people are evolving on this issue. And increasingly they're coming on the side of same-sex marriage being the right side of history..."
Cardenas challenged that assertion: "...but at the same time, young people have remarkably changed their points of view in life from the time they're in their 20s to the time they get to be 32 and have two kids at home." Parker dismissed him: "But it's the young people...in another generation, this is not going to be [an issue]." Newsom, who championed gay marriage as mayor of San Francisco, predicted that there would a "tidal wave" of support for the issue in a few years.
Matthews eagerly gushed over Obama's announcement:
...if you're a gay person, I don't see how you can not feel something strongly about this, because for the first time ever, the leader of your country, really the spokesman for your country, at an idealistic level....He's with you. And he's saying you're a human being with the same rights as all other human beings. That's a dramatic statement....I think it's almost up there with the first African-American president being president. It's a statement about who we are, ideally.
Newsom agreed and added: "...it's more than symbolic in that respect. The substance is millions of people's lives were affirmed. Not just gay and lesbians, but their loved ones. Their brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, and the like. So there was real substance there. Their lives were validated."
Moderator David Gregory touted Newsom's activism on the issue while hitting the President from the left for not going further: "You were mayor of San Francisco. We have the video, you were giving licenses to marry before...it was lawful. And so you believe in equality, actual marriage equality, not viewpoints here. Equality has not been advanced by him."
That teed up Newsom to demand action from the federal government: "But the issue of federal rights is important. Interracial marriage became federalized when the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously in '67 adjudicated in Levy vs. State of Virginia and threw out those 14 states that denied it. Ultimately that's where equality needs to go, federally, not state by state."
Later, Newsom continued the civil rights comparison: "70% of Americans opposed interracial marriage in 1967. You could imagine submitting the rights of interracial marriage to the ballot."
Near the end of the discussion, Newsom borrowed a slogan from MSNBC to praise the President: "...a history's going to be written on this. That's why it was a point of, from my perspective, political courage. But he's on the right side of history. He's leaning forward and we now have someone on the other side who's taking us back, who's even opposed to civil unions, in Mitt Romney."
Gregory gave the last word of the roundtable to openly gay columnist Jonathan Capehart, who proclaimed:
I think a lot of supporters of the President are buoyed by what he did. But let's remember, leadership is about doing the hard thing when it's neither easy nor convenient. This is not a slam dunk for the President, but siding with families, with gay and lesbian Americans....Their president, president of the United States, came out and said that he supports – he supports their right to wed. He supports their right to be fully engaged and involved in the American dream. And that's an important thing to – that we shouldn't forget.
When Cardenas attempted to respond to Capehart's fawning declaration, Gregory cut him off: "I've got to make that the last word, we're out of time." Cardenas remarked: "Oh, boy, how about that?"
Gregory only asked for input from Cardenas twice throughout the 15-minute discussion.
Here are portions of the May 13 exchange:
11:17AM ET
(...)
KATHLEEN PARKER [COLUMNIST, WASHINGTON POST]: I think everybody's made fun – or the people – Republicans have made fun of the word "evolving." I think that's the perfect word to describe this conversation because the American people are evolving on this issue. And increasingly they're coming on the side of same-sex marriage being the right side of history as it's been-
AL CARDENAS [PRESIDENT, AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION]: See, I don't necessarily agree, Kathleen, with that conclusion.
PARKER: But it's the young people. And by the way...
CARDENAS: Well, young people, but-
PARKER: ...in another generation, this is not going to be a-
GAVIN NEWSOM [LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, CALIFORNIA]: Tidal wave, the demographics are not on-
CARDENAS: Could be Kathleen, but at the same time, young people have remarkably changed their points of view in life from the time they're in their 20s to the time they get to be 32 and have two kids at home. Now-
PARKER: Not as for sure.
CARDENAS: So maybe. You might be right. But we'll see how this stands the test of time.
PARKER: But it has to do with exposure.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: I don't see how – if you're a gay person, I don't see how you can not feel something strongly about this, because for the first time ever, the leader of your country, really the spokesman for your country, at an idealistic level – I mean he isn't saying he can make this law. He is saying that he believes.
NEWSOM: Right, yeah.
MATTHEWS: He's with you. And he's saying you're a human being with the same rights as all other human beings. That's a dramatic statement.
NEWSOM: And Chris, I-
MATTHEWS: I think it's almost up there with the first African-American president being president. It's a statement about who we are, ideally.
NEWSOM: Well, Chris, and it's more than symbolic in that respect. The substance is millions of people's lives were affirmed. Not just gay and lesbians, but their loved ones. Their brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, and the like. So there was real substance there. Their lives were validated. And these are people that were afraid to tell folks who they love and who they are. Now they have a president that's behind them, and that's significant.
DAVID GREGORY: But, look, you are for marriage equality. You were mayor of San Francisco. We have the video, you were giving licenses to marry before...
NEWSOM: 2004. Right.
GREGORY: Yeah. Before it was lawful.
NEWSOM: Yeah.
GREGORY: Before it was lawful. And so you believe in equality, actual marriage equality, not viewpoints here. Equality has not been advanced by him.
NEWSOM: No. And you're absolutely right. Look, he's run – he's gone from the 90-yard dash, did a lot of things on Don't Ask Don't Tell and other things. Marriage equality was not there, but civil unions, he was there. Now he's gone 95% of the way. But the issue of federal rights is important. Interracial marriage became federalized when the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously in '67 adjudicated in Levy vs. State of Virginia and threw out those 14 states that denied it. Ultimately that's where equality needs to go, federally, not state by state.
[CROSSTALK]
GREGORY: Let me get in here for a second. We're going to get more on this, including the political impact. I've got to take a break here. We'll come back with our roundtable in just a moment.
(...)
11:24AM ET
GREGORY: The political impact of the gay marriage debate in the fall. This is not 2004, when the White House used it.
NEWSOM: ...2004 and it's a very different time. Right now, about 50 – I mean, we've moved, I don't know that there's another issue, generally, that's moved this fast in such a short period of time. The last 24 months, this has moved 10%. So it's a much safer time than in 2004.
MATTHEWS: Except at the ballot box.
NEWSOM: Except at the ballot box. But that's always the case when you subject the rights of the minority to the whims of a majority. Every single time the minority loses. And, by the way, I mentioned Levy vs. State of Virginia. 70% of Americans opposed interracial marriage in 1967. You could imagine submitting the rights of interracial marriage to the ballot.
GREGORY: Right.
NEWSOM: So this is tough in those swing states. There's still – a history's going to be written on this. That's why it was a point of, from my perspective, political courage. But he's on the right side of history. He's leaning forward and we now have someone on the other side who's taking us back, who's even opposed to civil unions, in Mitt Romney.
GREGORY: Jonathan, is this about getting back to hope and change in 2008 for those supporters for Obama who might have been disappointed?
JONATHAN CAPEHART: I think a lot of supporters of the President are buoyed by what he did. But let's remember, leadership is about doing the hard thing when it's neither easy nor convenient. This is not a slam dunk for the President, but siding with families, with gay and lesbian Americans, gay and lesbian Americans who are raising children across the country, who are doing so at a disadvantage because of the tax code, because of local laws, because of federal laws. Their president, president of the United States, came out and said that he supports – he supports their right to wed. He supports their right to be fully engaged and involved in the American dream. And that's an important thing to – that we shouldn't forget.
CARDENAS: David-
GREGORY: I've got to make that the last word, we're out of time.
CARDENAS: Oh, boy, how about that?
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
What world do these people live in.
Submitted by NeoKong on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:27pm.
Gay marriage just got destroyed at the ballot box in North Carolina.
It wasn't even close.
It has never won when put to a vote.
Why do these lefties insist on saying how much support it has when it loses every single time people are given the choice....?
What they are trying to doing here is shape opinion by saying how popular something is in the hopes that it will cause momentum for their agenda.
It's like how they keep telling us how cool Obama is.
It's like the way they kept telling us how much we liked Obamacare as they ignored the millions of people protesting.
Then the elections come and the truth comes out.
NeoKong
Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:58pm.
I agree they are trying to create reality, but I also think they misread the tea leaves. One on one, OK, we accept/are resigned to gay unions. Marriage to encompass that union? Not so much.
Ronald Reagan
Not only 4-1 but the four are
Submitted by John21 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:32pm.
Not only 4-1 but the four are all hard left Kool-aid drinking brain-dead Obamabots with little to no credibility or integrety but then it is sponsored by the administrations Public Relations firm NBC, so you can't really expect anything else.
It could be argued that it was 5-1
Submitted by Conservator on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:46pm.
Lest we forget that the moderator, David Gregory, is a lefty who also likes Kool-Aid.
Once again...
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:33pm.
... This ISN'T a civil rights issue. If the issue is going to be dominated by what the youngest generation thinks, then we're screwed... Because people grow up, and they mature, and as they mature, they begin to regret the things they have done earlier in life, or the positions they have taken. I myself was a flaming liberal... even when I was 30. I began to "evolve" after that. Those who remain a flaming liberal really hasn't grown up to full maturity, right Chrissy?
"If you're 20, and you're not a liberal, you have no heart. If you're 40 and you're not a conservative, you have no brain!"
So if we're going to let society be dominated by the will of the young without the temperment of experience, then we really are driving off the face of a cliff.
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Capehart's a whacko. How the H is Obama 'siding with families'?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:35pm.
"...but siding with families, with gay and lesbian Americans...." Notice he separates families and gays.
This may come as a shock to little Jonathan, but the vast VAST majority of parents would prefer that their children grow up to be normal, not to mention they would prefer to not have homosexuality shoved in their faces every five seconds.
There Is No 'Evolving' In Politics
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:38pm.
What The Obama really means is His position on gay marriage, as is the case with so many of His other positions, has been 'revolving'. Sometimes it is hard ta' clearly hea' what He says because He drops His consonants. It's a dialectical thing. Mumble jumble.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
You sure??
Submitted by KornKing on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:52pm.
6 or 7 years ago I might have read The Ditzer's column....
Gregory is the new Captain Kangaroo--as in kangaroo court.
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:40pm.
He specifically invited Cardenas on the show to embarrass the man and the people he represents. That ignorant swine Gregory had ZERO intent of letting him make any points beyond showing Cardenas as some kind of conservative token to check off the block in case NBC was accused of bias. Gregory didn't give a damn about giving Cardenas any time, and I don't know why he even bothered to show up on the program.
Capehart is an intellectual lightweight who could not tie down a debate without resorting to weepy emotional hysterics. Parker is just a wastrel who is too dishonest to admit she is a convenient idiot. Tingles could have books written about his stupidity. And Newsom? Good Lord...the man was a publicly elected official who openly defied the laws of the state in which he was mayor of a large city that has no independent legal authority to declare gay marriage legal. He broke his oath, suborned illegalities and purposefully flaunted it.
"... at an idealistic level..." Tingles Matthews Has a Brain...
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:46pm.
Wow.
What courage shown by Barry Blunder.
I was for it before I was against it.
Tingles Matthews is soiling himself again.
Capehart likes men.
and Gregory is the missing link with his cro-magnon forehead.
What a stellar crew!
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
I think what gets lost is
Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:51pm.
I think what gets lost is that one on one, people know gay people and have come to accept that they are part of our lives. Where gays go wrong is in thinking that one on one acceptance translates into we agree the word marriage is fitting for their unions.
Since gov't. took over marriage, I guess this is to be expected.
Personally, I think everyone is twisted. Gay, straight - there is no such thing as "normal" anymore, and fighting against the tide of "live and let live" is fruitless. Heh. A pun.
Ronald Reagan
Hilarious
Submitted by spepper on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 1:52pm.
Hilarious. They are falling all over each other to get to the microphone first, to praise the "Preezy" on his new "Gay-Lo". Caution: Obamabots At Work. SPEED UP, do not SLOW DOWN.
They must know how weak their
Submitted by Lakewood Ed on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:00pm.
They must know how weak their position is to have a five to one load.
No way Ed
Submitted by KornKing on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:53pm.
They're just dumb enough to think everyone thinks like they do
Gay-vin Newsom....
Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:03pm.
...former Mayor of "The City By The Gays", why is his opinion on this issue not a big surprise?
Competition of the perverts?
Submitted by Fredy on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:14pm.
In one corner, we have Elliot Spitzer, disgraced governor and prostitution enthusiast!
In the other corner, we have Gavin Newsom, former SF Mayor that forced his best friends resignation from city office by screwing his wife right out from under him! With friends like Newsom, who needs enemies?
Now, lets pretend these two sick perverts are among the best people in the country to talk about moral values and put them on TV!
What I do find funny is how the media has ignored, particularly during Newsom's last election, the sick depths of his personal perversions. This issue will never fly on a national level. In fact, if the Republicans had decided to place just a few ad's regarding Newsom's behavior, they could have already ended his 'career'.
How many people watch these
Submitted by felizagain on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:39pm.
How many people watch these shows? Or is this for the audience of only those who appear on the show?
Kathleen Parker....I am glad she continues to make money from being the female David Brooks....who like Mark Shields is in need of being replaced by a newer version............. Kathleen Parker and Alec Baldwin ,Kathleen Parker and Chris Matthews....I can see it now on PBS, at 80 yrs. old, and still saying, really, Obama was a moderate............
The issue is not about gay or straight. It is about a marriage license. A states rights, does that matter anymore?
A president changing the subject right now to suit his election year prospects, and the cash donations.
Why didn't the majority Democratic Congress (w/great power) do something about this then?
Do you evolve back to what you said in1996..............or did you retreat from that afterall?
Oh well.................
The 4 other people who saw this show, and Newsbusters........
Capehart praised Tamron Hall's bullying on twitter
Submitted by OxyCon on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 2:42pm.
WaPo should be ashamed employing someone like him.
How pathetic one's life must be if you need
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 3:05pm.
gub'mint to "validate" or "affirm" your existence...what claptrap.
Besides, gays already have the same rights that the rest of us have; I can marry a woman, so can a gay man. A lesbian can marry a man, the same as any other woman. The problem is, they want SPECIAL rights. And if anyone thinks that marriage is the end goal of the gay lobby, you're sadly mistaken. If you want to see how far the gay lobby has pushed SINCE they got gay marriage passed in Massachusetts, look here, if you have a strong stomach:
http://www.article8.org/docs/news_events/glsen_043005/black_book/black_b...
Wow what an interesting
Submitted by blbtampa on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 4:10pm.
Wow what an interesting Mother’s Day! We had a President come out again for States deciding the legal validity of Gay marriage
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-05-11/obama-equality-...,
we had a U.S. Senator suggest the perfect Mother’s Day gift would be a donation to the pro- choice Emily’s List
http://newsok.com/senator-for-mothers-day-fund-pro-choice-group/article/...
and News Week anointed our first “Gay” President who’s race is mixed http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-newsweek-cover-declares-obama...
and missed out on being the first “black” President because of President Bill Clinton
http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/clinton/morrison.html.
This in the same year a book documented the equivalent of the female population of the United States and Canada having been aborted because their gender was female. The book also suggest that the decision to abort a female fetus are made by the woman (mother?) or the mother’s in law
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230365740457636169116563136.... Imagine the discovery of a “gay” gene.
The reason we have mothers is women had children.
This is why we have Mother’s Day.
The vast majority of us are here because of hetero sex.
Happy Mother’s Day (Sorry mom late as usual)
I've been trying to choke MTP down with David Gregory....
Submitted by serious1 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 4:23pm.
but just can't do it. Since Tim's unfortunate passing (and I watched for many years) i put some effort into watching but no more. Now I go for George and it's a little better and once in a while Face the Nation. It might not be long and I'll booycott all three.
Al Cardenas probably thought he'd waltzed into Maher's show.
Submitted by Gary Hall on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:57pm.
"Liberals Dominate 4 to 1 on Meet the Press Panel Praising Obama's Gay Marriage Support."
AL CARDENAS [PRESIDENT, AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION]: Wait a second here; I must have opened the wrong door. I was looking for Meet the Press - how'd I end up on Bill Maher's show?
Oh, I forgot - Maher's show has a 5:1 liberal to conservative ratio.
(;~/ gary