NBC: Kardashian Flour-Bombed is 'Terrifying'; GOP Candidates Glitter-Bombed a Campaign Gaffe
On Friday's NBC Today, news anchor Natalie Morales worried about the safety of reality star Kim Kardashian after a "nasty surprise" at a red carpet event: "...a woman threw white powder on the starlet. Paramedics were called to the hotel, but Kardashian refused treatment....The woman who allegedly threw the so-called flour bomb was detained but later released."
The same concern was never extended to Republican presidential candidates who endured glitter-bomb attacks from radical gay activists at campaign events. In fact, NBC actually depicted those incidents as gaffes and stumbles for the candidates.
Back in May of 2011, after Newt Gingrich had glitter dumped on him, then-Today co-host Meredith Vieira touted the assault as another problem for his campaign: "Newt Gingrich's presidential campaign off to a shaky start. Just this week he has upset conservatives, refused to talk about owing the high-end jeweler Tiffany's as much as half a million dollars, and then this – why a protester showered the former House Speaker with glitter."
In a later report, correspondent Andrea Mitchell declared: "Topping off a bad day, the Gingrich's book signing in Minneapolis was briefly interrupted by a glitter attack. Activists said it was a gay protest."
On the February 2 broadcast, correspondent Peter Alexander described a similar glitter attack on Mitt Romney as another "distraction" for the campaign: "He was greeted in Minnesota by a pair of glitter bombs from gay rights protesters."
Notice the lack of concern for the candidates and the promotion of the childish actions as a form of gay rights protest.
In contrast, on Friday, with Kardashian in the line of fire, Morales described the incident as "very scary." Co-host Ann Curry agreed: "Yeah, because you don't know what it is at first." Morales added that it was "frightening," while fill-in co-host Willie Geist remarked: "Easy to laugh after the fact, but in that moment, that's kind of scary." Weatherman Al Roker chimed in, "that's terrifying."
The Washington Post reports that the flour-bombing of Kardashian was also a form of protest, by an anti-fur activist.
Here is a transcript of the March 23 report on Kardashian:
7:00AM ET TEASE:
ANN CURRY: And flour bombed. Kim Kardashian walking the red carpet one moment, then this:
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN [DUMPING BAG OF FLOUR ON KARDASHIAN]: ...you fur hag!
CURRY: Her assailant detained at the scene and the reality star is laughing the whole thing off.
7:19AM ET SEGMENT:
NATALIE MORALES: Kim Kardashian got a nasty surprise on the red carpet, as we showed you, last night when a woman threw white powder on the starlet. Paramedics were called to the hotel, but Kardashian refused treatment. Instead, she took the incident in stride, dusting herself off, getting cleaned up, and returning to the event.
The woman who allegedly threw the so-called flour bomb was detained but later released. Kardashian told deputies she did not want to press charges. Joking about the incident, Kardashian said, "I told my makeup artist I needed more powder." It is 7:19 right now. Let's turn it back over to Ann, Willie and Al. Still, very scary.
CURRY: Yeah, because you don't know what it is at first.
MORALES: Yeah, absolutely.
CURRY: You're not sure if somebody let her know that it was flour at the beginning.
MORALES: But it's – yeah, frightening.
CURRY: But it sounds like she handled it with aplomb.
WILLIE GEIST: Easy to laugh after the fact, but in that moment, that's kind of scary.
ROKER: Yes, that's terrifying.
CURRY: Yeah, exactly.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Too Funny
Submitted by KevinB on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:13pm.
wait...wait...
don't say anything....
I want to enjoy this moment....
(looks at kim kardashian covered in flour)
(dead silence)
hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
put that on your reality show :)
Biased liberal media desire something thrown on them?
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 12:01am.
What would be most appropriate for being misleading liars? BS? Bucket-O-mud? They need to be fair, if not, they should be held accountable. Not endorsing, but seems appropriate for betraying an entire Nation and the Constitution.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Kim's always looking at new ways to make "Bread"...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:05pm.
....a little flour, a little yeast....
Eh. White powders have become
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:34pm.
Eh. White powders have become a lot more sinister in this day and age, so I can see SOME concern at first.
Whereas glitter...not a whole lot sinister about glitter.
Yes, I'm sure someone is
Submitted by ant on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:43pm.
Yes, I'm sure someone is going to throw a bag of Anthrax into the air mere feet from where they are standing. It's worth the risk, as Kim Kardashian, is of vital importance to National Security and the war on terror.
Sorry, NB, just by typing that sarcastic remark, I've probably drawn attention from master-crime fighter Napolitano. If she ain't too busy frisking a 3-year old caucasian with a broken leg right now.
Spoken by someone who has never had a stranger
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:41pm.
rush toward him and throw an unknown object at him.
How do you know what has or
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:00pm.
How do you know what has or hasn't been thrown at me?
Well, bal, I have seen a lot of common sense ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:04pm.
thrown at you.
Apparently none ever hit you.
MD
No, I catch that. Sometimes
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:23pm.
No, I catch that. Sometimes it is common sense, sometimes it isnt. Usually depends on the thrower.
Catching something, bal, by definition, is ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:42pm.
on the catcher, not the thrower.
You appear to be saying that whether or not something is "commonsensical" depends on your interpretation of it.
MD
Bing. O.
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:54pm.
Bing. O.
Ahh, the lib approach, indeed, bal. It matters not ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 9:17pm.
if a statement is one of common sense; what matters is whether or not you feel it is.
If you don't, it ain't.
Sure must make it easy to live a worry free life.
MD
That's not it at all. I find
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 9:30pm.
That's not it at all. I find that people's definition of common sense varies greatly.
bal, the definition of common sense is not variable; ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 9:45pm.
it is what it is.
People 'defining' common sense in 'various ways' are off track because they are mixing their own twist or spin into the equation - thereby distorting the issue into nothing more than one presenting their own personal perspective.
MD
I simply gave you credit for realizing that if you had
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:53pm.
experienced a stranger rushing at you to throw an unknown object at you, you would find it frightening. I would imagine more so if you were a public figure.
I won't make that mistake again.
I'd agree, absolutely.
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:55pm.
I'd agree, absolutely.
Unless
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:52pm.
....it's thrown in one's eyes.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
J, There you are
Submitted by upcountrywater on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:59pm.
Did you see this video? Maybe add it to your collection.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=erYpXzE9Pxs
You Didn't Build That.
Thanks, BK
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:10pm.
I'm really rackin' up the hits this week. I added 2 earlier this week, and 2 more this morning.
I'll add yours in a bit, here.
Mucho gracias!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
thanks upcountry*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 9:24pm.
Now that was interesting. Wonder why no American media pundit picked up on that?.....duh
Yeah, caj....that's a great video
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 9:38pm.
I added 6 new gaffes to my hit list this week.
Obama's the gift that keeps on giving in the stupidity department.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Very true. But at first
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 7:57pm.
Very true. But at first glance, I'm likely to be more wary of an unidentified white powder than glitter.
Glitter Kills
Submitted by SamC on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:32pm.
Glitter kills and I've got the proof. When I was five years old my sister had a bunny. Just playing around, I sprinkled some glitter in it's cage. The bunny was dead later that same day. I've never heard of a bunny being killed by flour. Well, maybe in cartoons.
Fact is, it really doesn't matter what is being thrown at these people, it's wrong and dangerous for many reasons. Unfortunately, it won't be condemned in the media again until another leftist gets the treatment.
Flour, too, can be an instrument of death.
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 1:04am.
At least according to family lore, my granddad's younger sister pulverized her pet hamster with a 5-lb sack of Gold Medal All-Purpose flour. We all agreed it was wrong.
Jer
Well, Jer, it was, after all, ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 4:39am.
"All-Purpose" flour. :o)
MD
I stand
Submitted by SamC on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 4:53pm.
I stand corrected, sir - as I'm sure your grandfather was no cartoon.
Poor little hamster. I bet he thought it was wrong too :)
Jer I too offed my sisters, hamster when I was 5.No bags used
Submitted by upcountrywater on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 5:28pm.
Paper or cloth?
What they used way back when, it happened, to your Grandaunt pet? ..
You Didn't Build That.
Thank God it wasn''t Baking Soda!
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 12:47pm.
I agree, Bal! Who knows what large quantities of dangerous, toxic, white powders are available to the common citizen these days? It could have been, gasp, baking soda!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Let's take a little quiz, Bal...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:54pm.
Which of these two could severely damage your cornea?
a) flour
b) glitter
I know you like to keep things short, so it's OK to answer with simple a or b.
NBC, Wake UP!
Submitted by kg on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 7:20pm.
The left throw the glitter in people's faces. Glitter in the eyes can be very harmful and severely damage the eyes.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
Ignore balboa the crypto-dummy as usual.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 12:42am.
If it ain't lead being thrown at cops at a high rate of speed, he really has no knowledge on the subject.
She was called a fur hag,
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 2:41am.
She was called a fur hag, which means the thrower was probably a radical leftist, the kind obama is in love with.
Yep
Submitted by ant on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 8:52am.
Probably donates to PETA, which kills 85% of the animals left in it's care within 24 hours. Getting fish to be named 'sea kittens' is a higher priority.
Staged
Submitted by Eric the Fred on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:43pm.
the indicators are that this 'incident' was staged. A way for the K 'Klan' to distract from their quickly dwindling popularity and keep themselves in the limelight.
EtF, Hummm maybe, also not filing a police report?
Submitted by upcountrywater on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:56pm.
Kim, was wearing her usual $50,000.00 worth of clothes..
Won't look the same after dry cleaning, as if she wears the same thing twice.
You Didn't Build That.
there's video of it
Submitted by Eric the Fred on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 6:01pm.
on TMZ and elsewhere (*hangs head in shame for knowing such things*). She smiles after it happens. Yes, plus the 'perp' got by security just a tad too easily. I wouldn't put anything past this 'family' especially the mother to stay in the limelight and in the money.
Flour....
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 5:56pm.
....Power.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Starlet???
Submitted by Chaitealover on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 6:57pm.
The term "starlet" usually refers to a young actress. Kim Kardashian is neither young nor an actress, so please call her by her rightful name. I believe it starts with a w.
Chai
Okay, apologize!!!!
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:11pm.
And you can suspend yourself on Monday, along with Rush!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
⇒ Blonde
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:19pm.
I bleieve the "w" to which Chai referred stands for "Woman famous for being famous"
Oh.
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 8:39pm.
Never mind!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Kim
Submitted by mmilesll on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 7:30pm.
This idiot should be glad anybody even cares. What a total waste.
Oh dear
Submitted by CO2Maker on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 7:57pm.
The agony of a paper cut. Terrorized by 20# bond!
Willie PolterGeist
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 9:06pm.
Am I the only one here that thinks that Willie PolterGeist needs to get the crap smacked out of him? He thinks he comes across as funny but he is really a smug, arrogant punk.
BTW, if someone did that to Moochelle Antoinette the media would want that person charged with Domestic Terrorism.
Again just what claim to fame
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 6:42am.
Again just what claim to fame does Kardashian have?
Green protest
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 12:39pm.
What's so "scary" about flour? It, unlike the glitter that they love to chuck, is, at least, biodegradable! Heh.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
It's terrifying!
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 12:53pm.
"Yes, that's terrifying."
Yea, Al, it's terrifying! After all, 5 pound bags of, say, anthrax, is widely available everywhere.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.