NBC: New Alabama Law Treats Illegal Immigrants 'Like Blacks of the Jim Crow Era'
Updated [13:06 ET]: More analysis and full transcript added.
On Monday's Rock Center on NBC, correspondent Kate Snow savaged Alabama's new immigration law, touting left-wing historian Wayne Flynt comparing it to the racism of the 1960s: "This is just mean-spirited. This is – this is finding the most vulnerable people within a society....it's like the blacks in 1963 who could not vote in Alabama." [Audio available here]
Snow followed by citing the plight of one illegal immigrant family operating a bakery in the state: "The Sanchezs agree. They feel like Alabama blacks of the Jim Crow era." Snow then turned to Republican Governor Robert Bentley and leveled a harsh accusation: "The woman who owns this bakery, she said the men who did this are racists. She was talking about you, sir."
As Snow made the "Jim Crow era" comparison, footage appeared on screen of blacks being sprayed with fire hoses and threatened with attack dogs during civil rights marches in the '60s. [View video after the jump]
Update:
Anchor Brian Williams introduced Snow's hit piece by declaring: "Tensions have reached a boiling point in the state of Alabama, which recently enacted the nation's toughest immigration crackdown, one that has sparked a big and ugly fight."
Talking about the Sanchez family – not using their real name – Snow explained: "They say they're responsible, church-going, tax-paying members of their community. And Maria Sanchez says she believes the charge of criminality isn't the real motivation for the crackdown." Snow wondered: "Why do you think this law passed?" Maria Sanchez ranted: "Because of racism, it's as simple as that....You have to look at the smiles on those people's faces when the Governor signed that law. Just look at that sinister smile. That's why I say it."
As the show went to a commercial break, Williams teased: "And when we continue, Alabama's governor answers that charge of racism, and the fierce criticism from farmers who thought he was on their side."
Following the commercial, before returning to Snow's report, Williams informed viewers: "The Obama administration is suing Alabama, along with Arizona and South Carolina, claiming the states have overstepped their authority to regulate immigration, traditionally considered a federal matter. But Alabama has a tougher fight, much closer to home..."
After demanding Governor Bentley respond to accusations of him being racist, Snow followed up: "Can you understand, sir, how this looks to people outside of Alabama? People think about Alabama and they think about the past, unfortunately." Bentley replied: "In the '50s and '60s, the federal government was trying to get Alabama to obey the Constitution. They were right and we were wrong in the South....Today what we're trying to do is we're trying to get the federal government to obey the law."
As proof of the supposedly racist nature of the new immigration law, Snow provided this anecdote:
The day after the immigration law took effect, the Sanchezs' daughter tried to carry on as she normally would, boarding the bus for school. From the bus, she sent us a text message saying that the driver had snapped "You're Mexicans, you're going to have to leave." Maria and Jose Sanchez were trying to get over the shock, as we walked through their neighborhood, already abandoned by many residents.
After Snow concluded her report, Williams remarked to her in studio: "We said at the top of the evening, this was getting ugly and it is." He later added that the story was a "powerful piece of work."
Here is a full transcript of the November 14 segment:
10:21PM ET
WILLIAMS: If you scratch the surface, most Americans admit to mixed feelings about illegal immigration. People who take a hard line against undocumented workers in this country are often unable to say exactly where our produce would come from without them. On the other hand, folks who are sympathetic to the plight of undocumented workers often ignore the strain they put on public services. These tensions have reached a boiling point in the state of Alabama, which recently enacted the nation's toughest immigration crackdown, one that has sparked a big and ugly fight. Kate Snow tonight reports on the state where if you're undocumented, help is not wanted.
KATE SNOW: It's a bitter harvest this fall on Chandler Mountain in Alabama's northern hill country. Farmer Ellen Jenkins couldn't find enough help to pick her tomatoes and now they're rotting on the vine. The Mexican workers who used to be here are gone. Ever since her husband passed away two years ago, she had counted on those workers. She says they helped her save her farm.
ELLEN JENKINS: They practically become your family when they start working with you. You can ask them to do anything in the world and they'll come to you. A lot of times you don't have to ask them. They see you doing something, they'll come and help you.
SNOW: And they did. Until that day in late September when Alabama's new immigration law, the toughest in the nation, went into effect. The law covers a lot of ground. Among other things, it prohibits employers from hiring undocumented workers, has police demand proof of legal residency when they pull someone over, and orders schools to gather citizenship information from new students. That last part was temporarily blocked by a court. It all proved too much for Jenkins' Mexican workers.
JENKINS: They just said, 'Well, we're going to have to leave.' And I said what have you got to leave for? 'Well, we don't want no problems.' The women were literally crying because they didn't know what was going to happen to their families.
SNOW: It's the same for undocumented families across Alabama. Like Jose Sanchez's family. He and his wife, Maria, say they risked everything to get here to open their own bakery. They asked us not to use their real names and hide Maria's face. They say eight years ago they were desperate to leave the violence of Mexico's Ciudad Juarez and that they tried and failed to get U.S. visas, so they decided to cross through the desert with their two children. Do you remember this journey? You were six years old.
MS. SANCHEZ [DAUGHTER]: Yeah, I remember.
SNOW: How hard was that?
MS. SANCHEZ: It was really hard because it was walking through the desert, not knowing if you're going to survive, if you're going to get sent back, if you're going to die like many people did, because while you were walking through the desert, you would see dead bodies. You would see poisonous animals.
SNOW: Do you think about it anymore?
MS. SANCHEZ: There's times where I have nightmares.
SNOW: Why would you take so much risk to come to this country?
MR. SANCHEZ [FATHER]: To have a better situation for my family, be able to live more freely, not go hungry, and to give them the opportunity to go to school. That's why we risked our lives, so they could live better lives than we did as children.
SNOW: In Alabama, the Sanchezs both worked full time and at night they baked bread and delivered it door to door.
MR. SANCHEZ: Sometimes we'd knock on 150, 200 doors.
SNOW: 200 Doors?
MR. SANCHEZ: Bringing bread. And that's how we became a very popular family.
SNOW: So popular that two years ago, they were able to open the bakery. The Sanchezs acknowledge that they broke the law when they entered the country, but now they say they'd do anything, pay any penalty, to become legal residents. But there's no way to do so, and things just got tougher.
SNOW: When you first heard about this new Alabama law, what did you think?
MR. SANCHEZ: That the sky was crashing down on us. Not just for me, but for everybody here, because these are people who came to work, really work. There might be some people who came with other intentions, but we're just here to work and offer our kids a better life.
SNOW: That better life may be ending. Because of the new law, they won't be able to renew their business license and will have to give up their bakery. That's all fine with Clarissa Winchester, whose father immigrated legally from Mexico, but whose opposition to illegal immigration is deeply personal.
CLARISSA WINCHESTER: Illegal immigration had cost our family member her life. That was at the point that I became angry enough to act on it.
SNOW: Winchester has been lobbying Alabama politicians for a crackdown since 2005, when her sister-in-law was killed by a drunk driver who was an undocumented immigrant. You started advocating?
WINCHESTER: Yes, Ma'am.
SNOW: What's the link between this one man who did this horrible thing to your sister-in-law and this entire pool of people that are here illegally?
WINCHESTER: Definitely for me the connection is the word "illegal." Many times people try to tell me, 'Well, you don't know so and so. This is my friend or this is my employer.' But it's really hard for me to hear anything else that they have to say when the first sentence out of your mouth was let me tell you about this great person that's a criminal.
SNOW: Not surprisingly, that's a description the Sanchezs reject. They say they're responsible, church-going, tax-paying members of their community. And Maria Sanchez says she believes the charge of criminality isn't the real motivation for the crackdown. Why do you think this law passed?
MRS. SANCHEZ [MOTHER]: Because of racism, it's as simple as that.
SNOW: So you think people here just don't like having Latinos around.
MRS. SANCHEZ: No.
SNOW: How do you know?
MRS. SANCHEZ: You have to look at the smiles on those people's faces when the Governor signed that law. Just look at that sinister smile. That's why I say it.
WILLIAMS: We're going to take a break in our story right here. And when we continue, Alabama's governor answers that charge of racism, and the fierce criticism from farmers who thought he was on their side. That's when Rock Center continues.
[COMMERCIAL BREAK]
WILLIAMS: Welcome back to Rock Center. Alabama is now the epicenter of this national argument over illegal immigration thanks to the state's new law that is the toughest in the nation. The Obama administration is suing Alabama, along with Arizona and South Carolina, claiming the states have overstepped their authority to regulate immigration, traditionally considered a federal matter. But Alabama has a tougher fight, much closer to home, and now Kate Snow continues her reporting.
SNOW: Since Alabama's strict new immigration law took effect, some farm workers have pitched in for one last harvest. Others are already gone, leaving behind rotting crops and desperate farmers. Farmers who were giving an earful to the legislators who voted for the law.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN [ALABAMA FARMER]: No farm workers, which is costing the farmer. Dead crops, spoiling crops is costing the farmer.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN [FARMER]: We need anyone that will listen that we are starving right now.
SNOW: The new law has pitted natural allies against each other. In the southeast corner of Alabama, we talked with four farmers, Amy and Lee Fitch, Jerry Danford and Todd Shelly, who have all seen the exodus of their workers. How many of you voted Republican in the last presidential election?
LEE FITCH: I did.
SNOW: Show of hands.
AMY FITCH: I would consider myself a Republican and normally vote that way.
SNOW: How many of you have ever voted for a Democratic president? Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton?
JERRY DANFORD: Huh-uh
SNOW: And Republican Governor Robert Bentley, who signed the immigration law, did you vote for him?
DANFORD: Yeah, I voted for him.
SNOW: How do you feel about that vote now, Jerry?
DANFORD: Bad. Real bad. It was an honest mistake. But, you know, I feel bad over it.
SNOW: One of the strongest veins of opposition to this law are Republicans. People who voted for you. Farmers.
ROBERT BENTLEY: That's right.
SNOW: This is Governor Bentley's first national TV interview on the immigration law. Diehard Republicans say this is the worst law that they've seen in a long time. It's going to destroy their business.
BENTLEY: If they are using illegal workers right now, will it hurt them? Possibly. Especially this first year or maybe the second year. But eventually it will not hurt them because we will get back to doing things the right way.
SNOW: As the Governor sees it, the flight of undocumented immigrant workers will put a dent in the state's nearly 10% unemployment rate. When they leave, the theory goes, legal residents will take their place. But all the farmers can see is a future without anyone to pick their crops.
TODD SHELLY: I probably can't find anybody else, so that would be it.
SNOW: What do you mean that would be it?
SHELLY: No more watermelons. Not on my farm. Or Lee's farm.
SNOW: But here's the counter-argument, if you paid more, if your hourly wage was higher, you could get Americans to do this work, Jerry.
DANFORD: I doubt it. Regardless of what you offered them within reason, they wouldn't put in the long hours. If they will find me a pool of labor, I will hire them. I'll do that.
SNOW: You just don't think that exists?
DANFORD: That don't exist.
SNOW: That's exactly what Ellen Jenkins discovered when she brought Americans to work at her farm after the Mexicans left. They just couldn't take the long hours of hard, physical labor. Most stayed a day or two. Only one lasted a few weeks before he quit. I'd like to play you a clip of a tomato farmer, if it's okay, that we met yesterday. We asked her directly what would she say to the Governor.
JENKINS: I'd just ask him why couldn't he at least come and see what it was all about before he, you know, jumped the gun. Before you sign a bill and destroy people's life. Why them? You know? You see anybody else that can come up here and work 14 hours a day and do this kind of work, I want to see them.
SNOW: What would you say to her?
BENTLEY: I mean I feel – I really do feel sorry for farmers, but here again, she understands that she is hiring people who are not legal.
SNOW: She's afraid her business is going to go under.
BENTLEY: And I understand that. I understand. And I feel sorry for her and her business, I really do. And we are working, trying to fit workers with jobs. And we're going to continue to do that. We eventually will be able to find workers that will do this job.
SNOW: It's not just agriculture. A new forecast out of the University of Alabama estimates the law will cost the state economy at least $40 million. Workers are fleeing construction companies rebuilding from last spring's tornados. And Latinos, both undocumented and legal residents, are abandoning Hispanic neighborhoods and businesses. The undocumented immigrant population in Alabama was never huge, only 2.5%. Yet as their numbers grew over the past decade, so did anti-immigrant sentiment. This law is popular, more than 60% support the law.
WAYNE FLYNT: Oh, absolutely. Oh, absolutely. There's no question.
SNOW: Historian Wayne Flint of Auburn University is the author of nine books about Alabama's history.
FLYNT: Anti-immigration is probably as popular a political issue as you can find in Alabama. I would remind you, however, that being against the federal government's integration policies in 1963 was equally popular.
SNOW: Are you equating those two things?
FLYNT: I am equating those two. This is just mean-spirited. This is – this is finding the most vulnerable people within a society, people who can't vote, most of them are women and children. They have no political power. And so in a sense it's like the blacks in 1963 who could not vote in Alabama.
SNOW: The Sanchezs agree. They feel like Alabama blacks of the Jim Crow era. And as in 1963, Alabama and the federal government are at odds over a racially charged issue. The woman who owns this bakery, she said the men who did this are racists. She was talking about you, sir.
BENTLEY: Well, that's – I am certainly not racist. I am not racist. In fact, that's insulting to anyone to think that I would be racist. I love everyone.
SNOW: The Governor says Alabama had to pass its law because the federal government wasn't enforcing its own laws on immigration. Can you understand, sir, how this looks to people outside of Alabama?
BENTLEY: I can.
SNOW: People think about Alabama and they think about the past, unfortunately.
BENTLEY: Well, but they shouldn't link it. In the '50s and '60s, the federal government was trying to get Alabama to obey the Constitution. They were right and we were wrong in the South. They were trying to get us to obey the law. Today what we're trying to do is we're trying to get the federal government to obey the law. So it's just the opposite.
SNOW: The day after the immigration law took effect, the Sanchezs' daughter tried to carry on as she normally would, boarding the bus for school. From the bus, she sent us a text message saying that the driver had snapped "You're Mexicans, you're going to have to leave." Maria and Jose Sanchez were trying to get over the shock, as we walked through their neighborhood, already abandoned by many residents.
MRS. SANCHEZ: I don't know where to go, what's going to follow this.
SNOW: What are you going to do, do you know?
MRS. SANCHEZ: We don't know. We just know we're going to go, but we have no idea where. One day, I'll be back with my papers, I promise it. If I came in through the back door before, I'll come in through the front door next time.
SNOW: But for the Sanchez family and others who came to this country illegally, that may be an unrealistic dream. And many won't even try to return.
JENKINS: Some of them said if Alabama didn't want them, then they're taking their whole family. They made it perfectly clear, we won't be back. And I believe them.
WILLIAMS: Kate Snow, we said at the top of the evening, this was getting ugly and it is. And let's all agree that farming is some of the hardest, most back-breaking, honest work in this country. And let's just cut to the economics of it. Aside from the human toll, am I correct in guessing that when more crops end up on the ground rotting and perhaps prices are affected and availability, that then more attention will be focused on this?
SNOW: Perhaps. And in the short term that's certainly true. The people in northern Alabama who love those Chandler Mountain tomatoes, they can't get those at the farmer's market right now. They're getting Tennessee tomatoes instead. However, the farmers did say to us that they will adjust, they'll have to. They'll probably have to plant more row crops coming in the spring because a lot of this law starts to really take effect come January 1st. The employment provisions, which by the way say that not only can you not hire someone who doesn't have the proper documentation, but you have to check every one of your existing employees. If you have more than one employee, you have to check your staff. If you want to hire your mother, you've got to check her paperwork and make sure, through E-verify system, verification system, that she's legit.
WILLIAMS: And more on the web of all those interviews you conducted.
SNOW: Including the Governor, who spoke with us at length, his first television interview on the subject. So there's a lot more of that on our website.
WILLIAMS: Powerful piece of work. Kate Snow, thanks for coming back.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Stop passport checks and visa requirements NOW!
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 10:53am.
I don't get it. If these "journalists" love illegal immigration so much, why don't we just drop the charade and stop checking people's passports when they enter the country?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
As someone who actually lives in Alabama...
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:20pm.
...that alleged journalist hasn't a clue.
Not even a wisp of a hint.
It isn't racist to think that people ought to be in this country legally--it's abiding by, and seeking to uphold, the rule of law.
Not the rule of emotions, or the rule of the Democrat party, but the rule of law.
Period.
--Mike
Blacks were citizens of this
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:00am.
Blacks were citizens of this country even in jim crow times. Jim crow laws were passed by democrat not republican legislatures. There is no comparison between how certain state govts treated law abiding black citizens and how we can treat illegal law breaking aliens in this country. Its likr saying we have to treat a bank robbers withdrawal of assets from banks the same as we treat depsitors' withdrawals of their own funds, otherwise we're "racist".
Thank you!
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:10am.
How can people be denied rights protected by citizenship when:
a: They are NOT citizens.
b: They broke a law, whether criminal or civil, to enter this country
the most vulnerable people...,
Submitted by CarlosS on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:22am.
"illegal immigrant family operating a bakery" This Sanchez family sound like rich 1% business owners to me
Seriously, though, I don't understand the mentality of someone who would go to all the trouble to come to this country and start a business knowing full well that it can be shut down any time (because they're here ilegally)
Careful reading will prevent embarrasment
Submitted by antiObamunist on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:05pm.
The article never states they started the business, merely that they "operated" it. This distinction is not minor and doesn't convey ownership. Its one of those weasel words often used by media to throw readers off track. Commercial property owners often use frontmen operators while retaining ownership of the business or franchise, thus avoiding inherent risk.
A more relevant question might be how did an illegal alien obtain proper businesses permits or why doesn't the IRS feel compelled to audit this business.
aO
Submitted by mom_rox on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 3:48pm.
Sounds like one or both of the Sanchezes owns the bakery.
When illegal aliens are given
Submitted by ant on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:38am.
When illegal aliens are given special rights over and above what the average citizen can expect, who is really being mistreated? A business run by illegal aliens is up and running but Gibson guitars gets raided.
How can
Submitted by ray johnson on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:39am.
a big time journalist be so damn dumb? To deliberately distort and mislead the viewer this way is truly journalistic malpractice!
I do not understand you question.
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:24pm.
The 'big time journalist' is operating at his/her peak efficiency and abilities.
These 'people' were not hired and put on the air because of their intellectual prowess, but rather for their unique ability to do what they are told, say what they are told and look incredibly stupid while doing so.
The fact that a great number of them hold college degrees does not speak to their intelligence, skills or any special abilities, but throws a giant shadow of doubt on the real world value of the institution that awarded them any type of recognition.
Why would any rational human being be in a hurry to get a 'higher education' when the end result seems to be nearly always a dumbing down?
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
"The Sanchez's agree"
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:02pm.
When asked, they said, "Sí".
The riots in the 60's
Submitted by jkwtrading on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:18pm.
The riots in the 60's occurred in the cities. The cities then as now voted Democrat. the racists they refer to must have been democrats.
now in this country the heavily populated areas are still democrat with the rural or country conservative. the current occupy wall street mobs are in cities or places all democrat. then as now its the Democrats who are fighting.
In our upcoming election I am looking for areas in Cities to "maybe" turn red or conservative, currently that isn't the case. What is clear is the vast majority of land in this country is colored conservative red and the cities are predominantly blue.
this idiot correspondent is actually condemning her own party.
Good morning jkw
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:31pm.
They are like the mother of the accused on the witness stand during the recent trial I served as a jurer. She cried and cried about how good a boy her son was. All he did was sell crack to a police officer the day after he shot his best friend in the back of the head during a drug deal.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
I generally expect we will
Submitted by jkwtrading on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 4:35pm.
I generally expect we will eventually label all liberals as a specie much in the same vein as a cockroach. I see them and remember the commercial from the 60's with RAID. RAID comes in and the cockroaches scramble. If the liberals keep up the constant agitation verbally, we the conservatives will be the can of RAID.
How odd
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:33pm.
Actually treating criminals as though they are ACTUALLY CRIMINALS... What will they think of next?
And the media declaring 'criminals' to actually be a Race of human beings.
Is an illegal from Poland the same race as an illegal from Nigeria or Honduras?
Is an illegal from England the same race as a person from London that came here LEGALLY?
I have a friend that LEGALLY entered this country from Brazil in 1992 who is now a Citizen. His brother came up several years later ILLEGALLY, and they are not of the same 'race'?
There certainly seems to be an awful lot of STUPID in the media lately.... Maybe stupid is a 'race' too, and large number of that 'race' put their faces on TV every night.....
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
Wow
Submitted by Djinn1975 on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:49pm.
Key points that are droned out by liberal talking points...
1) The laws of these United States are for the rights and protection of citizens of the United States.
2) Becoming a citizen would be child's play compared to opening and operating a business, give
all non-U.S. citizen members of the Sanchez family 180 days to complete citizenship and
naturalization proceedings or you're out.
3) It's disgusting that U.S. citizens and businesses are paying the price so people that enter our
country illegally and take advantage of our many opportunities.
4) We are a nation of immigrants, legal ones. Today's immigrants want a handout, yesterday's
immigrants took advantage of what it meant to become an American, huge mentality difference.
Fix immigration in three simple steps:
1) Build the fence, DOD provides the specs, each state responsible for their own section, four way
construction process, start at each end working to the middle, start in the middle and work
toward both ends at once
2) When the fence is done, deport all illegal immigrants in American prisons and jails. Come to
this country illegally AND commit a crime? Sorry, your out.
3) Implement nationwide Everify for any and all employers. All illegal immigrants receiving any
form of public assistance, housing, food stamps, disability, etc., will have 180 days to
complete citizenship and naturalization proceedings
Border patrol agents authorized to use any and all means to carryout their duties. National Guard to supplement Border Patrol during drills. Close the door, get rid of illegal immigrant criminals, and make it harder for illegals to get a job and we will start getting quality immigrants again, the legal, fruits of your labor opportunity seeking kind, contributors.
Every illeagl alien should be
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 1:18pm.
Every illeagl alien should be rounded up, put into a forced labor camp for five years. Any illegal alien who has committed a felony in the US should have their forehead tattooed for ready identification.
"This is – this is finding
Submitted by Bhaal on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 1:19pm.
"This is – this is finding the most vulnerable people within a society...."
If one is here illegally then you aren't part of the society. You are part of another society just working and living here. Once you are a citizen of the U.S then you are included in this society. Obviously this "reporter" has a one planet, one people, point of view.
Well?
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 1:29pm.
I should be able to enter NBC's studio and offices without any ID or proof of employment, if I follow this woman's thinking. If guards try to remove me, that's racist.
Here in Arizona
Submitted by MissMinPhx on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 3:26pm.
The media is ignoring the story about how SB 1070 had absolutely no effect on farming in Arizona.
Like Alabama, Arizona is also a huge farming state - cotton, corn, etc., and after SB 1070 passed, people were saying that it would hurt the farmers. It has not. Farmers are still doing quite well here.
It's funny that Ms. Snow would find any sympathy with the farmer anyway, because we all know it's not that the farmers can't find labor, what they can't find are laborers willing to accept a less than legal minimum wage - they simply don't want to pay going rate to their farm workers. Illegal immigrants are willing to accept a lower rate.
Farmers like Ms. Jenkins are exploiting the illegal immigrants, paying an unacceptable wage and to earn bigger profits, hire illegals over Americans.
I just don't understand why the media is so sympathetic to the illegal immigrants who undercut American laborers and cost us many legal jobs. It doesn't make sense.
I cringed throughout this whole story. My own husband is an immigrant. He immigrated here legally from a country much more poor, violent and disadvantaged than Mexico. He came here legally and believes so strongly that immigration must be upheld that he now works for Homeland Security. People can and do get immigration visas, even from Mexico - but the bottom line is that some do it the right way and others do not. Why the media sympathizes with those who do not follow the rules is beyond me. I just don't get it.
Of course...
Submitted by TempusFugit on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 5:49pm.
...it doesn't make sense to you because you're looking at the situation from a logical, rational viewpoint, instead of an ideological standpoint. Pretty much every reporter on broadcast network news shows is a political operative, intent on one thing only: furthering the liberal/socialist agenda. These people want to rule the country, not create well paying jobs. Illegal Mexicans or Hispanics make legal US citizens who will likely vote Democrat in future elections, thus furthering the Socialist agenda. Since they're born into poverty they'll likely stay poor and keep the cycle of social programs perpetuating. Makes perfect sense to them
Tennessee Tomatoes
Submitted by Schofield Kid on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 3:51pm.
Oh the humanity!!! Please tell me the good people of Alabama are not being forced to eat-gasp- Tennessee Tomatoes? Nooooooooo.
"People who take a hard line
Submitted by dscott on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 5:29pm.
"People who take a hard line against undocumented workers in this country are often unable to say exactly where our produce would come from without them."
So Mr. Williams is all worried about who is going to pick his lettuce and tomatoes for his salad otherwise he won't get his roughage? Really!
Because of the 300,000 migrant workers in ALL of the US, the Sanchez family who are probably not migrant workers should be allowed to break the law and take a citizen's job or draw government benefits? And we (the taxpayers) are racist because we expect the Law to be enforced and followed? PLEEZZZZZZZ So why again do we even need the government if no one is expected to obey the Law much less have them enforce it?
Tell us Mr. Williams, what is the morality and benefit in obeying the Law? Maybe I should start babbling in Russian or German when the police officer stops me for a traffic violation and not produce a valid drivers license... Or just use my neighbor's name when going to vote because after all it's racist to obey the law and an infringement of my human rights to live in defiance of the society I injected myself without their permission. I can dream can't I?
I live in a small town in
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 7:24pm.
I live in a small town in North Carolina named Southern Pines. To anyone familiar with it, they would know that it is "Horse Country." That is, it is a collection of small horse farms, a large tract of land held in trust for the specific pursuit of all to use in riding their horses, and an avid riding community.
In years past, poorer people and teenagers would do the work on the small horse farms that the owner either didn't have time to do or had enough money to pay someone else to do. Over the years, that has changed. Now, illegal aliens have taken over the labor market for this kind of work because they will work for one-third the cost of legal American citizen. The poor people are all on welfare or have moved on and the teenagers have a great deal of difficulty finding any sort of work.
The main benefit to this situation is that the small horse farm owners pay a fraction of what the true cost of this labor is if a legal citizen did it. While it is largely a conservative community on this one point you will get a lot people siding with the illegal aliens only because they are getting such a good deal on labor.
Meanwhile the rest of us are picking up the tab having to provide for those unskilled workers that can't find work in the community. And, it is difficult to inculcate in children the value of work, how difficult it is to earn a buck, and the shock of learning that their paychecks have been clipped by FICA, state and federal income taxes leaving their "take home" short about 25% on average! Valuable lessons that tend to take the liberal out of the child in a hurry.
Mostly now because they don't get their first taste of work until they are adults, they think that it is a fantasy how hard their parents work to provide for them, why they want less government, and lower taxes. It is only until you have to experience it yourself that you realize how the world works.
Here's a thought, jd...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 8:18pm.
How about the conservative community adhering to the law and not hire "illegal aliens" but instead employ the out-of-work teenagers, pay them a decent wage, and inculcate those solid conservative virtues like the value of work, self-discipline, pulling one's self up by the bootstraps, etc.?
Jer
And, wouldn't the ACLU then take up
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 8:41pm.
the cause and case of the "discriminated-against" migrants? After all, it's doubtful that the illegals are caucasian, right Jer? Aren't employers forbidden to ask about immigration status right now?
I agree completely Jer, no
Submitted by dscott on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 6:04pm.
I agree completely Jer, no one should be knowingly hiring an illegal much less in order to underpay wages. It seems more like some people have traded their values/integrity cheaply for saving a few bucks.
BTW - it is not a conservative position to knowingly break the law unless that law violates moral dictates. Crossing the border without permission is not a moral issue, it is a legal issue. I question the "conservatism" of anyone who knowingly hires an illegal.
WE ARE FINALLY WINNING? E-VERIFY IS GAINING MORE MOMENTUM.
Submitted by Brittanicus on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 9:03pm.
Phone the Washington switchboard at 202-224-3121 and they can direct you to all House Representatives responsible for moving Chairman Lamar Smith's ‘Legal Workforce Act’ (bill H.R.2885) to the House floor and enactment.
Stand with Arizona, Georgia, Alabama, Indiana and the State of South Carolina and be a voice against the overreaching Department of IN-Justice. If the DOJ can intimidate these few states, trying to stop the overwhelming encroachment of the federal government over state laws. If the federal government fails to carry out its responsibilities, then don’t condemn the states. It’s not American taxpayer’s job to supplement their own people, when we have accumulated our own poverty. Stand with the TEA PARTY as we represent the American people; not the special interest lobbyists, not the open border zealots, not unions, not the church, or radical majority groups.
E-VERIFY--Lamar Smith's Legal Workforce Act (H.R.2885) would require 100% of companies—large and small-- to use E-Verify for all new hires within 2 years. This bill would also require all federal, state, and local agencies as well as federal and state contractors/ sub-contractors and critical infrastructure sites to use E-Verify within 6 months; eliminating the majority of illegal alien workers from the 8.5 jobs they are holding in this country. Increase employer penalties and fines for knowingly hiring illegal alien workers. Require the Social Security Administration to send no-match letters to employers if existing employee's name and social security number don't match in their system. Require the Social Security Administration to notify owners of a Social Security number if their number is used multiple times.
Contact the ‘Ways and Means Committee led by Majority Speak John Boehner (R-OH) must adopt the Mandatory E-Verify Bill (H.R. 2885.) and should be under interminable flak of challenging voters, as never before. Reps. Chip Cravaack (R-Minn.), Tim Johnson (R-Ill.), Reps. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.V.) and Joe Walsh (R-Ill.), Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) John Sullivan (R-Okla.) Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Texas) and as of yesterday Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.) is now co-sponsoring House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith's Legal Workforce Act (H.R.2885.) New members are rapidly joining this marathon bill. But don’t expect Liberals or career Democrats to attach themselves to this law. Eventually it will be the fresh faces of the TEA PARTY leadership that will bring success.
ONLY 37 CO-SPONSORS TO GO, BEFORE THE E-VERIFY LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT BEFORE IT REACHES THE CHAMBER FLOOR.
Yesterday I watched a CNN cable discussion on voting rights of Democrats and Liberals. Democratic House members held a forum on Monday judgmental against states that have passed legislation that tighten voter registration laws, saying the move is a clear and deliberate attack on traditionally disenfranchised poor communities. This is garbage; it is to stop organizations as ACORN in subverting the ‘Rule of Law’ when it comes to voting. Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) cast doubt on GOP claims that fighting fraud is the objective of the new laws. In 2012 we have an historical presidential election, which must be honest and not fraudulently compromised by organizations as ACORN. Nobody is going suppress lawful registrations or absentee ballots. But the past has illustrated that Liberals Progressives have used any method to cheat the system.
State prosecutors are still unraveling the incidents of voter fraud in numerous states, as Democrats intentionally didn’t bother to check seriously flawed registration. We need to oversee every precinct polling station as in previous elections; illegal aliens have been voting and could certainly change the direction of a close vote. To reduce this fraud of our trusted Democracy, we must have a nationwide official picture ID. Statistics from Indiana, Missouri and Georgia, Wisconsin and South Carolina show that ID requirements work well and do not suppress turnout, as Democrats often claim. In all states the aim is to enact a mandatory photo ID, to restore Trust to the electoral process. If Democrats are so heavily disenfranchised by their states voting in a ID photo law, how do low income cash a check or pick up medicine?
just too many
Submitted by quipster on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 1:31am.
I don't want one more immigrant in this this country, legal or illegal especialy muslims! you all get the he!! out!!!!!
Thumbs down
Submitted by Unsane on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 7:57am.
As a child of a LEGAL immigrant, I thoroughly disapprove.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
no more immigrants?
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 8:28am.
I don't think you have fully thought this through. The US needs the new blood of people that believe in the American Dream. Look at the college campuses and the OWS mobs (can't call them crowds) - the American dream in our culture is something to laugh at so we need the ideas and passion brought to us from legal immigrants to fuel those beliefs.
Why not make a trade?
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 3:46pm.
We can accept the FREEDOM Loving People from communist dictatorships in exchange for the OWS movement that do not appreciate what they have here?
We can even throw in some Anti American politicians like peelousy, reid, barney, duddd, bydun and soetoro at no additional cost....
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?