NBC's Gregory Claims Bachmann's Support of Waterboarding Goes Against 'Most Generals'
On Sunday's Meet the Press, host David Gregory grilled Michele Bachmann about her advocating the reinstatement of waterboarding terror suspects: "...you understand that puts you at odds with most of the generals, okay? The former Republican nominee of your party John McCain, General Colin Powell, you realize you're on the opposite end of what they believe. Do you not trust them and their views?"
Gregory provided no source for his proclamation that "most of the generals" in the military oppose waterboarding as an interrogation tactic. Bachmann fired back: "But I'm on the same side as Vice President Cheney on this issue, and others, as well. Because, again, what we're looking at is what will save American lives."
Earlier, Gregory played a clip of Bachmann from Saturday's CBS News foreign policy debate in which she criticized Obama's war on terror strategy: "It is as though we have decided we want to lose in the war on terror..." Gregory sounded like a White House spokesman as he demanded from the Congresswoman: "Did you feel that way after he killed Osama Bin Laden, ordering that raid? Did you feel that way after he ordered more drone attacks on terrorists in Pakistan than the previous administration?"
Bachmann replied: "...the strategic blunders that this administration has made have had profound consequences....We are conducting a war on terror. But what we have – we have no jail for terrorists. So what this means is either we kill them, or we release them." Gregory argued: "But that's not true, Congresswoman....We have Guantanamo Bay. We have some secret prisons that have remained open....and there are other ways that they can actually be held for some smaller determined period of time on ships, on navy ships in the region, as well."
Bachmann pointed out: "We all know that that isn't a long-term solution to this problem. We aren't adding any new terrorists to Guantanamo Bay."
Earlier, on Sunday's Today, Gregory praised the President's foreign policy as being "very successful" and not something that would make him vulnerable to Republican criticism. Back on the October 24 Today, Gregory declared that the "lack of understanding in foreign policy" among GOP candidates has been "stunning to a lot of people."
Here is a transcript of Gregory's November 13 exchange with Bachmann:
10:50AM ET
(...)
DAVID GREGORY: So let's take a few minutes and talk about a few quick issues. Foreign policy was the topic last night at the debate. You said you would reinstate waterboarding in terms of how detainees, terror detainees, are treated when they are in – held captive, held prisoner. You went on to say the following here about the President's foreign policy. Watch.
MICHELE BACHMANN: Today, under Barack Obama, he is allowing the ACLU to run the CIA. It is as though we have decided we want to lose in the war on terror under President Obama. That's not my strategy.
GREGORY: That the President almost wanted to lose the war on terror. Did you feel that way after he killed Osama Bin Laden, ordering that raid? Did you feel that way after he ordered more drone attacks on terrorists in Pakistan than the previous administration?
BACHMANN: Those are good tactical moves that were made. And those, I think all Americans would agree with. But the bigger picture, the strategic blunders that this administration has made have had profound consequences. And this is what we need to understand. We are conducting a war on terror. But what we have – we have no jail for terrorists. So what this means is either we kill them, or we release them.
GREGORY: But that's not true, Congresswoman-
BACHMANN: We also have no ability-
GREGORY: We have Guantanamo Bay. We have some secret prisons that have remained open. That's simply been looked at and found to be not true. They have – and there are other ways that they can actually be held for some smaller determined period of time on ships, on navy ships in the region, as well.
BACHMANN: We all know that that isn't a long-term solution to this problem. We aren't adding any new terrorists to Guantanamo Bay. We only have Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the admitted mastermind of 9/11, who is at Guantanamo Bay, and others as well. But we don't have a place to put al Qaeda when we pick them up. It's either catch and release. Which is a terrible idea. Or we have to kill them. What we need to win this war on terror is interrogation. This is where my comment about the ACLU comes in. Because today, the CIA is no longer able to go through the interrogation that yielded such profitable information that saved American lives. That's what I'm interested in, David.
GREGORY: But you realize-
BACHMANN: Saving American lives and winning the war on terror.
GREGORY: Understood. You say that-
BACHMANN: And so this is – this is a real difference. The only thing – let me add this.
GREGORY: Yes.
BACHMANN: The only thing that we have available to us today is the Army Field Manual. That's online. So, terrorists can go ahead and read ahead of time what will happen to them when we capture them. And it's really, effectively, when we capture them today, it's a slap on the wrist. I want to save American lives, and that's why I want the CIA to have every interrogation tool available to them so that we can win the war on terror.
GREGORY: One more on this. Congresswoman, one more on this. You say the ACLU is taking over the CIA, run now by General David Petraeus. You understand-
BACHMANN: Their philosophy. Their philosophy. Yes, I agree-
GREGORY: Okay, I understand that. I understand that's what you meant. No, no, let me just make the point. Your view that waterboarding should be reinstituted, you understand that puts you at odds with most of the generals, okay? The former Republican nominee of your party John McCain, General Colin Powell, you realize you're on the opposite end of what they believe. Do you not trust them and their views?
BACHMANN: Well, but – but I'm on the same side as Vice President Cheney on this issue, and others, as well. Because, again, what we're looking at is what will save American lives. And that's what the most important thing is. We've got to decide that we want to defeat the terrorists. And when we make that decision, we need to – we need to employ the methods that will best help us to defeat them. And President Obama is not doing that.
Again, President Obama was given a war that is won in Iraq. And he's choosing to lose the peace. That's a desecration of the memory of 4,400 Americans that gave their lives to liberate Iraq. And also, it's over $800 billion that we have expended. I believe that Iraq should pay us back for the money that we spent, and I believe that Iraq should pay the families that lost a loved one. Several million dollars per life. I think at minimum. This is a terrible situation that the United States – that the President has left the war on terror in.
GREGORY: Alright. We are going to leave it there. More discussion to come. Congresswoman, thank you.
BACHMANN: Thank you.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Colon Powell was why we had to fight Iraq twice.
Submitted by wizardjr on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 1:09pm.
Powell is who convinced Bush to stop short of destroying the Republican Guard and demanding that Sadly Insane himself sign the surrender.
No, you are mistaken, George H.W. Bush said a UN RESOLUTION
Submitted by lrgon on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 2:47pm.
stopped him from moving into Baghdad.
George H.W. Bush senior gave a speech at the UN telling the world via a televised speech why he sided with the UN versus an American GI General. He said it would give us a "chance at a New World Order," and the war was to reinvigorate the UN. In other words he used American GIs to boost the UN's image to "fulfill the mission of the UN's founders." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g
Bush knew that the "UN's founders" had been communists and members of the left wing Council on Foreign Relations; that this war was not for "freedom" but for boosting the vision and the goals of the "Un's founders." But Bush gave no honor or respect to the founders of the American Republic that advised the nation against what Bush was praising in his New World Order speech!
Bush senior's order to Schwarzgopf was in tune to the UN charter not to the Constitution which he swore to uphold and deserved to be impeached.
Same old story of another US president in the fifties that paid more respect to an alien UN directive than to the US Constitution. Truman halted General MacArthur from destroying the Red Chinese Army during the Korean war. In the eighties Reagan bowed to UN pressure and put all US diplomatic might behind the effort to force the Israeli army from finishing off Yasser Arafat's terror organization, the PLO.
Obama is using the UN charter as his guiding document, and conservatives that should know better, cheer his illegal escapades in Libya and cheer for war with Iran.
Or...
Submitted by MightyMouth on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 4:57pm.
The evil HW Bush (knowing his son would some day be president) purposefully left Saddam in power so that more than a decade later, he could torque off nimrods like you with another Bush invasion of Iraq! Hey.. it worked!!
No, Powell recommended stopping the war
Submitted by merly1 on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 5:12pm.
Moving on Baghdad was the last of our worries.
There was still a target rich environment in southern Iraq, indeed all of Iraq, and Powell wimped out before finishing the job. One more week may have been plenty to drain Hussein's military resources to where an uprising would have succeeded.
Perhaps his own military for that matter,,,,,
The way it ended meant the Iraq rebels got slaughtered.
Huge blunder.......
Mr. Obamabot Gregory
Submitted by John21 on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 1:21pm.
Mr. Obamabot Gregory would not have a clue what they generals think. He only repeats whatever the current DNC talking point is, and has proven to be able to change as the talking points do, sometimes in mid-sentence.
His capability for delutional thought is only surpassed by his lack of natural intelligence, which is why he is a liberal, a journelist (not a reporter), a talking head, and a Democrap.
The "Grand Wizard" must be
Submitted by d1carter on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 1:59pm.
The "Grand Wizard" must be speaking to Gregory on a regular basis...
Yes, how does he keep his job after that blunder?
Submitted by merly1 on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 5:13pm.
Unbelievable......
Gregory
Submitted by grammajane on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 2:01pm.
is so against water-boarding where info is given to capture terroists but, reports zero on the rapes, killings, drug over-doses, human filth, anti-Jews, destroying cities and costing millions to protect the protesters that has been going on for over a month here. Get your priorities straight, Mr. love of Barry
DNC playbook broadcast
Submitted by Djinn1975 on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 2:25pm.
Oblammy's definitive single handed execution of justice for Bin Laden and Gadhafi.
16 hours of deliberation that should have went more like this, 'We know where he's at and have seal team six in striking distance? Go, like yesterday.'
And Libya, and impeachable endeavor, that NATO led, and rebels ultimately meted brutal justice out.
I do love the hawk party growing, but they are over a decade late, more than a few bucks short, and their distaste for the dirty work is drowning everything else. Neither they, nor their idol, have done any. They are riding the coattails of those who have and taking all the credit because it's the only thing he hasn't bent over the bathroom sink.
Oh, and don't forget the trusty standby when everything else fails, or you need a little 'pop', RACIST!!
Gregory's Grand Wizard and Maher's Planet of the Apes are absolutely priceless, unguarded, unintentional, oh sh!t did I just really say that out loud and on national TV?, looks into how the Dems view their base.
Accusing someone of something over and over and over again to hide the fact that you are that same thing has a name that we've seen here before, cognitive dissonance, it's psych 101, and more glaring with each passing day.
Waterboarding and Gregory's ATM PIN
Submitted by libBuster on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 2:56pm.
I wonder if some ex-military on here would like to opine about how many minutes of waterboarding it would take to get David Gregory to disgorge his ATM Pin.
It would take the time to put a wet rag on his face.
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 4:10pm.
After that, his interrogator would have his name, SSAN, home address, all of his credit card numbers, his PIN number, his driver's license, the account #'s and pass word to all of his online banking accounts, the keys to his Audi, his house, his dressing room and his safety deposit box, the cell #'s to everyone on his smart phone and his dogs names.
IOW, about 5 seconds.
Do you not trust them and their views?"
Submitted by MightyMouth on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 3:58pm.
The quick answer to that question is "No, I don't"
The long answer is: McCain is senile and Powell is a back stabbing traitor to his party. So.. No I don't"
So exactly how much is the Islamist enemy paying this guy?
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 4:36pm.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November