Tom Brokaw Praises 'Non-Ideological' Christie For Not Using 'Tea Party Playbook'
Discussing the possibility of Chris Christie entering the presidential race on Wednesday's NBC "Today," Tom Brokaw praised the New Jersey Govenor as a moderate: "He's not an ideologue.... he played outside the ideological lines that have been drawn in the Republican primary."
Co-host Matt Lauer said of Christie, "...a lot of conservative Republicans, while loving the fact that he's a fiscal conservative, perhaps aren't going to like his stand on some other issues..." Brokaw saw that as a positive: "The question is, who's going to run the Republican primaries? Right now, the dialogue is being dominated by the Tea Party but there are a lot of other Republicans who say, 'We've got to play outside of the Tea Party playbook and this is a guy who can do that.'"
On Tuesday, fill-in co-host Lester Holt worried about Republicans being "forced to play to hardcore elements of their base."
Prior to Lauer's discussion with Brokaw on Wednesday, chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd reported on Christie giving a speech at the Reagan Library on Tuesday and declared that all the speculation about a potential Christie candidacy "couldn't come at a worse time for Republicans actually running trying to raise money because everything is now frozen."
Lauer picked up on that point with Brokaw: "...what would it be like to be one of the declared Republican candidates now, a Mitt Romney or a Rick Perry, or Ron Paul, or you pick it, and hear this constant deafening drum beat for someone else to run?"
Here is a full transcript of the September 28 exchange between Lauer and Brokaw:
7:16AM ET
MATT LAUER: NBC's Tom Brokaw is here with his take on the state of the presidential race. Tom, good to see you, good morning. Wow, he's good. I mean, when you listen to the way Chris Christie answers those questions, when you hear it coming from the heart, it sounds spontaneous, he's funny, he's charming. Is that why people like this guy so much?
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Courting Christie; How Does NJ Governor Change 2012 GOP Race?]
TOM BROKAW: And he's not an ideologue. And he's not a blow-dried candidate, there he is, the heavy-set guy with a New Jersey accent. A lot of this started last summer – and I'm not, this is not an advertisement for myself – I interviewed him at the Allen Conference in Sun Valley, it was all off the record in terms of what he had to say. But I've been doing this a long time and I've rarely seen a candidate light up a room, which included a lot of Democrats, and it was because he was candid and self-deprecating and he played outside the ideological lines that have been drawn in the Republican primary.
LAUER: Except a lot of people will talk about how funny he is, how charming he is, how spontaneous he is, but according to some articles that have been written in the past week or so, a lot of conservative Republicans, while loving the fact that he's a fiscal conservative, perhaps aren't going to like his stand on some other issues, like immigration, and gun control, and education reform. Have they taken a close enough look at this guy?
BROKAW: Well, I do think that that is an issue. The question is, who's going to run the Republican primaries? Right now, the dialogue is being dominated by the Tea Party but there are a lot of other Republicans who say, 'We've got to play outside of the Tea Party playbook and this is a guy who can do that.'
LAUER: Chuck brings up an interesting point at the end of his piece there, where he says, Wait a second, what would it be like – and I was thinking this, too – what would it be like to be one of the declared Republican candidates now, a Mitt Romney or a Rick Perry, or Ron Paul, or you pick it, and hear this constant deafening drum beat for someone else to run?
BROKAW: Well, you know, this has been going on all summer long. Before Perry got in, there was that same drum beat, 'How can we get him in?' Then he loses the Florida straw poll to Herman Cain and a lot of people were beginning to have doubts about his ability to handle himself in a lot of the positions that he's taking. This is not unusual at this stage. You know, four years ago, we had Hillary Clinton way out in front of Barack Obama, but he was coming up fast on the inside track. We're in what I call the pre-Super Bowl scrum at the moment.
LAUER: Yeah, and you talk about four years ago, in 2008, in this stage of the race, Rudy Giuliani was the front-runner.
BROKAW: And Fred Thompson-
LAUER: Was in second. John McCain, who eventually got the nomination, was in third. Real quickly, David Axelrod, the President's campaign strategist and senior advisor, has now said that the President is facing, a quote, "titanic struggle," end quote, to get reelected in the face of this economy. Is he stating the facts or is he trying to make Barack Obama an underdog?
BROKAW: No, I think he's stating the facts. I was in another seminar over the weekend and we all agreed that the referendum next year will be on Barack Obama and the issue of jobs and the economy. It's not getting better at a pace that everyone expected it to. A lot of people are worried about a real double dip and what's going on globally and it all comes down to the desk in the Oval Office when you go into an election after you've been in office for four years. So he's got a very tough road ahead of him, Matt.
LAUER: Tom Brokaw. Tom, good to see.
BROKAW: Always good to see you, Matt.
LAUER: You, too.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Back, meet knife!
Submitted by Fredy on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 12:46pm.
Too bad, so sad.
I like Christie - he's good for our state, but...
Submitted by SouthJersey1953 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 12:51pm.
He is not good for the Presidency. He is too moderate in several areas.
Just the fact that BroKaw and Lauer like him should be a HUGE danger flag to any Repub thinking of talking him into running. If the liberal press like him, then he is bad for the country.
With all that said; he is great for NJ. He is just what we needed (and we need him to stay as Gov until he finishes fixing NJ)
Another NJ guy concurs
Submitted by freecitizen on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:07pm.
As another NJ guy, I agree. He's good for NJ because when it comes to Republicans in NJ you take what you can get. But on the national level we can do better.
Never so true than these days
Submitted by theduck6 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:26pm.
If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all.
although by arithmetic law
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:53pm.
zero times two is still zero.
Sorry Tom
Submitted by kg on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 12:52pm.
That IS the Tea Party playbook. Sheesh
"DumbAssity of Dope"
You've got that right!
Submitted by gobnait06 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:04pm.
Tom Browkaw, self-appointed elder statesman of MSM, has revealed his true colors and they ain't pretty.
It sure would be helpful, Tom...
Submitted by ontheright on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:25pm.
...if you would call out by name those "...a lot of other Repulicans...", so we cann vote them out in 2012. Because if you are siding with them, they are not the leaders that We the People need in charge so we can regain control of our beloved Constitutional Republic.
It sure would be helpful, Tom...
Submitted by ontheright on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:24pm.
...if you would call out by name those "...a lot of other Repulicans...", so we cann vote them out in 2012. Because if you are siding with them, they are not the leaders that We the People need in charge so we can regain control of our beloved Constitutional Republic.
Ooops, sorry for the dupe...
Submitted by ontheright on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:25pm.
Ooops, sorry for the dupe...
From what I've seen, the true
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:34pm.
From what I've seen, the true conservatives on the Republican side are Bachmann, Santorum, and Gingrich. Of those three, I think only Gingrich could actually stomp Obama in a debate.
But according to the popular wisdom, Bachmann's too "flaky," Santorum comes across as wanting a theocracy, and Gingrich has marital and divorce issues. So the "electable" candidates are pretty much Perry and Romney.
I'm not shilling for anyone, but I'm just wondering just what the heck it is that conservatives want in a candidate.
About Newt
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:59pm.
He is the most qualified of all the candidates and would crush Obama in debate. Unfortunately he has a problem with his zipper. Check out this anonymous post suggesting what he needs to do:
Newt's Message
Newt would make minced meat
Submitted by texasborngranny on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 2:31pm.
of ANY lib in a debate.
My biggest prob with Newt is not his zipper, it's that he is TOO "moderate".
Too much old RINO blood for me.
I agree with "anonymous." I
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 3:38pm.
I agree with "anonymous."
I think he should also add that the voters in this country didn't seem to think that a married prez diddling in the Oval Office ( and reportedly WHILE conducting the country's business on the phone) was a big deal.
Of course, liberals will play the "hypocrisy" card....because, unlike liberals, conservatives profess to believe in fidelity.
Someone left the door
Submitted by Bodini on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 4:32pm.
to the Rubber Room open ... AGAIN!!! Maybe they'll get Tommy locked up again ... before he hurts himself.
Does these morons even know what the Tea Party playbook is?
Submitted by Phryj1 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:00pm.
Here's the full Tea Party playbook, in all it's glory:
1. Keep gov't power within constitutional limits
2. Balance the budget without overburdening taxpayers
Wow! That's some serious far-right radical extremism!
I'm guessing Brokaw and Lauer's idea of moderate is slightly to the right of Stalin and Mao, and as far as they're concerned, there's no such thing as too far left.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Thank you Matt Lauer
Submitted by Djinn1975 on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:05pm.
For showing yours, and the MSM's game plan, and giving us a concrete answer to the question, 'What's with the Palin Derangement Syndrome?'
Lauer picked up on that point with Brokaw: "...what would it be like to be one of the declared Republican candidates now, a Mitt Romney or a Rick Perry, or Ron Paul, or you pick it, and hear this constant deafening drum beat for someone else to run?"
Distraction and misdirection, a winning combo for the dummed down.
Øbama
Bear in mind where that
Submitted by Reaver on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:59pm.
Bear in mind where that drumbeat is coming from, it’s deafening to Matt because he is standing next to the drum.
conservatives are not friends, they're food.
Submitted by kata on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:10pm.
Sam Donalson was on my AM newsblurb this morning discussing Christie. He said : what will conservatives think when they discover Christie's stance on immigration and global warming?
Discover? DISCOVER? (note the date and political leanings of these links) Apparently Sam Donalson (and Tom Brokaw) think conservatives live under rocks.
I like Christie. I can't understand Ann Coulter's obsession with the guy but I like him, But it doesn't matter because he IS. NOT. RUNNING.
Several months ago, when Christie was bad mouthing teachers unions he was the devil incarnate. So the lesson here is : If you're a mouse and the cats are discussing which one of you is the most appetizing... that's bad because no matter what, you're all still food.
Brokaw, a legend in his own mind.
Submitted by OldmanRick on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:14pm.
Broke-cow is way past his prime. Dementia has set in.
Shut up Brokaw!
Submitted by rbosque on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:21pm.
Shut up Brokaw!
I've said it once and I will say it again:
Submitted by ljacone on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:25pm.
Why does Tom Brokaw have a job?
simple
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 1:27pm.
because he supports the liberal agenda.
Christe is...
Submitted by NVRAT on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 2:08pm.
not my choice for president, he is way to moderate for me. I still support the TEA Party concept, it has been proven that the process that DC is using to govern the country is destructive. The government is way to big and overpowering its time we start being conservative in our spending and reduce those agency's that have to much power over the people. If we don`t the US dollar will no longer be the world`s standard currency and we will fall into the category of Europe with inflation that is beyond comprehension.
I like the no more tax agenda
Submitted by jkwtrading on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 2:36pm.
I like the no more tax agenda and would like even more NO tax at all agenda.
The Press and those politicians whom side with the press must decide and soon, we the American people decide how we want to spend our money...not them..
The direction country has
Submitted by Semus on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 2:45pm.
The direction country has been heading for a very long time is going to require some very practical decisions to be made and practical means conservative. This ex quasi news presenting left wing liar doesn't seem to think Marxists/Communists are ideologue, to him they're mainstream, or at least that's what he and those like him want people to think.
Someone should ask him were the Marines on Guadalcanal ideologues.
winning the presidency
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 2:58pm.
"The direction country has been heading for a very long time is going to require some very practical decisions to be made and practical means conservative"
Remember this can't happen with a mixed Congress or any thing less than what the nation handed President Obama in 2008. Just like the Republicans in Congress now are slowing down the Obama agenda and forcing him to EOs any win for the Democrats and the best that can be done is a slow reversal of programs and EOs. Even that will come under the constant criticism of the media that will make sure that every bad policy of the last four years and the resultant failures are blamed on the Republicans in general and the TEA party Conservatives directly.
I have a lot of sympathy for our next President - it is going to be a rough ride into the WH.
Tom Brokaw's always been a liberal hack
Submitted by Marcus Porcius on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 3:20pm.
http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/2003/fax20030903.asp
'nuff said.
"Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." G.K. Chesterton
www.theconservativereview.com
What kind of Republican is acceptable to Brokaw?
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 4:09pm.
Christie, because Christie is a Giuliani-type Republican -- tough on crime; liberal on social values. Christie may be a Tea Partier in the sense that he is trying to bring strong fiscal discipline to New Jersey's deficit and debt mess, but he is not a strong conservative.
And that's why Brokaw perfers him.
Another kiss of death. First
Submitted by Thoreau on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 8:05am.
Another kiss of death. First for Huntsman, and now Christie. Christie is in fact a fiscal conservative- which is to say that he's not insane. But, when it comes to gun Rights, he is nowhere to be seen except banning them. I get the sound bite fervor around him. I just don't see why Ann Coulter, of all people, would be so pro-Christie when she's packing a AR-15 on her website.