Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 22, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • MSNBC’s Schultz Admits He Doesn’t Know Much About ObamaCare, Still Fawns Over Law
  • Veteran Journalist Brit Hume Condemns FBI Investigation Of Fox’s James Rosen
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About

NBC's 'Today' Helps Sell Government Gimmick to Show Obama 'Gets It' On High Gas Prices

By Kyle Drennen | May 26, 2011 | 17:52

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

On Wednesday's NBC Today, co-host Matt Lauer invited on Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to tout federally mandated stickers that detail the fuel efficiency of new cars: "Another way to save money is to buy a fuel efficient car and today the federal government is unveiling new fuel economy labels that you soon will be seeing on all new cars."

Lauer asked LaHood, "$3.81, the average for a gallon of gas right now across the country. How much pressure on the administration to get that price down?" LaHood used the opportunity to cheer the new labels: "Gas prices are killing family budgets. The President gets it. This is part of the President's plan – these new labels – part of the President's plan to help people save money at the pump....The President gets it. This is part of our plan here."

Urging LaHood to make the administration's pitch, Lauer declared: "This new sticker even looks different. We're going to see these on 2013 model years. Jump right in. Tell me what's different about the label." LaHood replied: "It tells you immediately what kind of miles per gallon you're going to get, how much you will save over five years and the annual cost." Lauer helped promote the White House talking points: "You want consumers to make smarter choices and you want to help them do that."

The problem with telling people how much money they'll save on gas in years to come is that gas prices continually change. If the price per gallon suddenly skyrocketed, the numbers listed on the labels could be rendered meaningless.

Lauer and LaHood specifically pushed American-made hybrid vehicles, with a Ford Focus and Chevy Volt displayed on Today's plaza. Lauer proclaimed: "Now let's take a look at this car here that's electric and gasoline, this is the Chevy Volt. And look how this [fuel efficiency label] jumps up right here." LaHood responded: "Absolutely. People are really looking at their opportunities for electrified, for hybrid cars. The Volt is a hot-selling car because people can save a lot of gasoline. This tells them the equivalent of the electric – using an electric-powered car, how much they will save."

The Chevy web site shows the Volt "starting as low as $32,780." By comparison, a conventionally powered vehicle like the Chevy Cruze is listed at half the price, $16,525. Perhaps the Volt isn't quite the money-saver LaHood claimed.
                                            
Lauer did point out some trouble with hybrid vehicles: "You want people to buy these cars. Isn't the reality, though, when gas prices are high there's interest in cars like these and when those prices come down that interest wanes?" LaHood countered: "Well look it, we want gas prices to come down but while they're as high as they are and with summer season coming on, we want people to have this opportunity."    

At one point, Lauer wondered: "How did the auto industry feel about coming along on these things?" LaHood argued: "You know, they're coming along, Matt. They understand that people want to know how much they're going to be able to save and they want to be able to advertise that. These new stickers really tell people quickly how much they're going to save. Either electricity or on gasoline."

As the segment concluded, LaHood made sure to tell viewers one more time who to thank for the new labels: "The President understands that high gasoline prices are killing people's budgets. And this is part of the President's plan to really give people the options."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of the May 25 segment:

8:19AM ET

MATT LAUER: Another way to save money is to buy a fuel efficient car and today the federal government is unveiling new fuel economy labels that you soon will be seeing on all new cars. Ray LaHood is the Secretary of Transportation. Mr. Secretary, it's great to have you here. Good morning.

RAY LAHOOD: Good morning, Matt. Thank you.

LAUER: Talk about this label in a second. $3.81, the average for a gallon of gas right now across the country. How much pressure on the administration to get that price down?

RAY LAHOOD: Gas prices are killing family budgets. The President gets it. This is part of the President's plan – these new labels – part of the President's plan to help people save money at the pump, Matt. That's what people want to do. These gas prices are killing people. The President gets it. This is part of our plan here.

LAUER: This new sticker even looks different. We're going to see these on 2013 model years. Jump right in. Tell me what's different about the label.

LAHOOD: Well, it's very easy to understand. It tells you immediately what kind of miles per gallon you're going to get, how much you will save over five years and the annual cost. Very quickly you can read. If you have a smart phone, you click on this little thing here, this, and you can also see how much you can save over a long period of time.

LAUER: You want consumers to make smarter choices and you want to help them do that.

LAHOOD: Absolutely.

LAUER: This is the Ford Focus, right?

LAHOOD: That's the Ford Focus.

LAUER: Now let's take a look at this car here that's electric and gasoline, this is the Chevy Volt. And look how this jumps up right here.

LAHOOD: Absolutely. People are really looking at their opportunities for electrified, for hybrid cars. The Volt is a hot-selling car because people can save a lot of gasoline. This tells them the equivalent of the electric – using an electric-powered car, how much they will save.

LAUER: How did the auto industry feel about coming along on these things?

LAHOOD: You know, they're coming along, Matt. They understand that people want to know how much they're going to be able to save and they want to be able to advertise that. These new stickers really tell people quickly how much they're going to save. Either electricity or on gasoline.

LAUER: When you look at these numbers, these are great. You want people to buy these cars. Isn't the reality, though, when gas prices are high there's interest in cars like these and when those prices come down that interest wanes?        

LAHOOD: Well look it, we want gas prices to come down but while they're as high as they are and with summer season coming on, we want people to have this opportunity. The President understands that high gasoline prices are killing people's budgets. And this is part of the President's plan to really give people the options.

LAUER: And again, you're going to start to see these stickers on 2013 model year cars, which is really not that far. It's just down the-

LAHOOD: Exactly.

LAUER: It's just down the bend.

LAHOOD: Thank you, Matt.

LAUER: Mr. Secretary. It's great to have you here. Thank you very much.

LAHOOD: Thank you.

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Oil & Gas Prices
  • Regulation
  • Ray LaHood
  • NBC
  • Today
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Amazing, I have been a

Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:17pm.

Amazing, I have been a mechanical engineer for 35 years and never knew that a tire pressure gauge and decal were the answer to fuel efficency, who knew? Obama knew, that's why he is the smartest man on earth.

Non, je ne regrette rien. "You aren't angry because I might be a racist, you're angry because you know I'm right".
  • Login to post comments

smartest man on earth

Submitted by russedav on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:56pm.

like algore inventing the internet and who knows how many other egotistical narcissistic lies that were made up.

  • Login to post comments

The problem with a decal is,

Submitted by ThisnThat on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 8:03pm.

that our public-educated new-car buyers can't read or comprehend it.

__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court

  • Login to post comments

Obama gets it.

Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:43pm.

It's the same "Let them eat cake" response he had a few months ago: "Buy a more fuel efficient car." And it's never been cheaper to buy a $40,000 car what with all the extra disposable income from the high cost of gas.

This is kind of like the Home Game version of Cap and Trade. Push people to the more costly option by making what was more affordable on its own, unaffordable.

  • Login to post comments

Exactly, Obama got stung with

Submitted by dscott on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 4:07am.

Exactly, Obama got stung with his smart alec insensitive remark about buying another more fuel efficient vehicle when people complained about the price of gasoline. LaHood now has come back to try to get everyone to agree that Obama was speaking truth to power. The fact still remains that Obama and liberals in general are insensitive to the effects upon the economically challenged by their agendas with their flippant attitudes. Liberals speak and therefore we must all pay for their vision of the future irregardless of the cost. That is the essence of their arrogance. Never do they consider that fuel efficiency for the sake of efficiency is sometimes in itself is not sustainable.

Liberals never seem to get that people make choices based upon economic factors, they buy a car because it gives them the ability to work a higher paying job, go to stores that have better prices, live in locations that are cheaper for them, etc all of which determines their standard of living. When you raise the price of fuel you hit them where it hurts, their standard of living. Living in a city may give you access to public transportation but that comes at a great sacrifice in the standard of living. The point which liberals simply don't seem to get is the more that's left over determines what you can afford. That is why poor people drive old gas guzzling beaters, take that away and you LOWER their standard of living.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
  • Login to post comments

Horrifying!

Submitted by Diesel on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:39pm.

If the country is as retarded as these retards think we are, we're in deep $hit!

  • Login to post comments

retardation and deep $hit

Submitted by russedav on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 7:03pm.

As our Founding Fathers warned us, without God and the Bible this kind of retardation and deep $hit for the historically and especially Biblically illiterate are inevitable, and inevitably fatal, no matter the delusions of "conservative" secularists to the contrary, whose only hope is the Christian faith. As one has said, Christianity hasn't been tried and found wanting (something bogus clever but ultimately Biblically illiterate fool Bart Ehrman pretends), rather it's been left untried.
With modern secularists there is ultimately little difference in actual practical effect between the "liberal" and "conservative" since both deny and reject "in practice" and "at a practical level" requisite fundamental basics of how one lives and acts in a truly truly God fearing, thus civilized, society. Only God can save us now

  • Login to post comments

A lot of ifs here

Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:42pm.

If you are out of work (just over 2 years here), you're probably not looking to buy a car to save on gas.
If you are working, and trying to 'save', you're not going to 'buy' a car to 'save' money.
If you live in an apartment complex, like I and millions of others do, you're not going to buy a plug in electric, ever.
And if you want to save on gas, and live and commute in town, why not a scooter that gets 50-100 MPG? Or even a motorcycle that gets 35-60 MPG. How come they never mention them?

Americans keeping their own earnings is a Civil Right! Demand your Civil Rights!
  • Login to post comments

Don't waste your time

Submitted by russedav on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:54pm.

You're thinking rationally. Stop it right now! That's something these deranged fascist clowns can't comprehend.

  • Login to post comments

Maybe they should add in the

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 7:19pm.

Maybe they should also provide an estimate of the yearly payments on the new car, to get a better idea of how much you can save (or not) by trading in.

  • Login to post comments

"stickin'" it to us again

Submitted by russedav on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 6:52pm.

And how many millions did these fools spend on those stickers to put on over-priced cars those who can't afford gas can't afford to buy? Typical for the clueless lawless fascist Demoncraps and the obamanation. These deranged clowns should be in prison for grand theft at their own expense.

  • Login to post comments

Stickers my a$$

Submitted by Demonhunter on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 7:12pm.

Ooh, I have an idea. We can all wear buttons that say WIN for Whip Inflation Now.

Or, maybe DUPE; Don't Use Petroleum Excessively.

Breitbart is here
  • Login to post comments

Second time today I'm calling Bull$h!t

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 7:11pm.

LaHood: The Volt is a hot-selling car......

Hot-selling?  

Oh, yeah!!

  • Login to post comments

Oh, Mother

Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 7:33am.

There you go with your pesky facts. Why do you have to ruin the upcoming Utopia?

Americans keeping their own earnings is a Civil Right! Demand your Civil Rights!
  • Login to post comments

Bad news for everyone

Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 8:14pm.

Anyone connected with the Chairman and his bogus administration is automatically bad news. So really, there was really no point in listening to what The Hood has to say.

It's ridiculous to suggest people really want hybrids, personally, I think they are ugly as crap, and anyone driving those things should be made to pay extra taxes on them because of the environmental hazards they present because in a nutshell, they are made of hazardous materials.  Just like the CFL bulbs are hazardous, so are the hybrids.

The Hood is as much a danger to this country as Sebelius, Salazar, The energy secretary that's supposed to be a nobel prize winner, but anyone who is a "winner" of one of those hates the US anyway, and on and on, not the least Janet Nappy of DHS which has been corrupted beyond belief.

So even buying one of these cars won't help with high gas prices, because now you're paying a car payment AND high gas prices.  It's not that nothing's changed, it's gotten worse.  And those batteries in the hybrids last about 3 years, depending on the usage.  So what happens, you gotta replace them, how much do they cost.....around $4000 or so.  I replaced my truck battery for $80.

So anything these governmental dictators are suggesting as "good" really just isn't.

Come on, America, get your heads out of your asses and get these fools out of the WH and out of our lives ASAP.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

So then...

Submitted by g00se99 on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 8:46pm.

When people have a car that is, lets say 8yrs old and they need to replace the batteries and decide to scrap it how good is THAT for the environment? Now we will be back 30 or 40 yrs again with cars that don't stay on the road for 10 yrs or so like today.

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." - Frederic Bastiat
  • Login to post comments

Try again

Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 11:31pm.

That didn't make a whole lot of sense unless you're referring to the C4C program that did all that.

Was that what you were referring to?

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

I think jon

Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 10:32pm.

Might have been a reference to the near future when you have to replace very expensive "green" car batteries compared to today's normal car's that don't last as long as say, a 67 Nova SS, or a 69 Camaro etc... At least I think...

_____________________________________________________________ I'm not too drunk to dance! It's just that people keep stepping on my hands!
  • Login to post comments

Rocket Science

Submitted by IrateNate on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 8:57pm.

Do these people think we are complete morons? The sticker says I will save $3500 over 5 years, compared to driving an "average" vehicle. What does that mean? And has anyone actually gotten the gas mileage the window sticker claims? If you only drive down hill and down wind, you might get close.

One thing I do know is that if I buy a $40,000 Chevy Volt at 2.9% for 6 years, I will pay nearly $3500 in interest. Whoops - there goes all those "savings" unless I pay cash. Anyone who can pay cash for a new car certainly shouldn't be worried a few extra dollars a gallon.

I also know that the electricity to power my 40-miles of driving per charge is still being generated by the burning of coal, and is less energy efficient than just burning the gasoline. Yeah, it's all about giving the consumer more choice - the problem is, the choices Washington offers are crap and more crap. What an idiot - I'm surprised LaHood hasn't been taken out back and beaten with an ax handle.

  • Login to post comments

The Hood is doing this also

Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 12:11am.

Since we're talking about The Hood of the DOT, this is somewhat relevant since they want to force these lame cars on us....

Some vehicles have their own factory versions of EDR, Event Data Recorders, basically black boxes.

Apparently the Department of Transportation is pushing to have their own version in all vehicles regardless if a passenger vehicle came equipped. 

Mandatory black boxes

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Leftist idiots love their

Submitted by ant on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 2:08am.

Leftist idiots love their labels! They label people, they label food, why not label everything!? Friggin' retards. Lord, we must keep them from anything close to the driver's seat of anything important from now on.

  • Login to post comments

They keep insisting that "the

Submitted by WarEagle66 on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 9:56am.

They keep insisting that "the President gets it"...but the more they tell us he "gets it"....the less inclinced I am to believe them.

  • Login to post comments

Why the Volt isnt worth it..

Submitted by b4m4wy on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 10:01am.

$40,000 for a car. What a rip. Here are some quick calculations. Assuming a person drives 15,000 miles in a year, gas at $4.00/gallon, and 33mpg. 15,000/33 = 454.5 gallons used per year. 454.5 x $4.00=$1818 spent every year on gas. I buy a brand new Honda Civic for $20,000. It gets 26mpg in the city. 15,000miles/26 mpg = 577 gallons per year. 577 x $4.00 = $2308 spent on gas per year. $2308 - $1818 = $490 difference per year. Considering that $20,000 difference in the cost of the cars, it would take $20,000 / $490 = 40 years to make up the difference.

Now how long do you think those batteries are going to last? Who's going to replace them? How much will that cost?

"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." G. K. Chesterton
  • Login to post comments

liberals lies

Submitted by jessieH on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 11:00am.

There is a madness to their methods. With their reasoning, only the rich will be driving anywhere. I thought they hated the rich, want to spread the wealth? If they weren't so full of crap, they would realize that all that stimulous money wasted on cash for clunkers, auto bailouts, bank bailouts, they could have bought every one of us a "green" car. Makes me wonder if they are telling the truth. I have noticed that the liberals pushing "green", are all well off, drive nice cars, eat better than most and have cushy jobs. Two-faced liberals.

                                                                                                                                                                    

  • Login to post comments

Hating the rich

Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 12:00pm.

It's hating the rich that hate them.  Otherwise you got the Off-Their-Rocker-feller/Buffett/Soros types that are socialists and support socialist ideals.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use