MSNBC Praises Obama's 'Soaring' Speech, Calling On 'Wealthiest Americans to Pay Their Way'
On his 3PM ET hour show on MSNBC on Wednesday, host Martin Bashir enthusiastically reacted to President Obama's budget speech: "'We will invest in the future of America,' that's what President Obama just said in a much-anticipated speech on the budget....He offered a series of broad proposals and said it's time for the wealthiest Americans to pay their way and share in taxes."
Moments later, White House correspondent Mike Viqueira joined Bashir and proclaimed: "..the President's speech was part soaring, speaking to the aspirations and character of a nation, if you will." Bashir observed: "Mike, I don't want to sound as if I'm misrepresenting the President, but it appeared to me that he was suggesting that we can't be self-centered as far as fiscal policy is concerned. We can't simply slash programs everywhere without somehow expecting the wealthiest in society to contribute. Is that your impression?"
Viqueira agreed and reiterated: "Well, the President did reach for, as I said, that soaring sort of rhetoric that speaks to the basic aspirations of people and the beliefs of what America is. He said, 'It tells us' – the Ryan plan, talking about the Republican plan – 'It tells us we can't afford the America we believe in.' So the President sort of laid out his vision for America."
Near the end of the segment, Bashir remarked: "When I hear the current discussion about cutting spending, I'm reminded of what Margaret Thatcher in Britain during the 1980's, when she dismissed the idea of a civic society and she said that all she wanted to do was focus on individuals. Isn't that what we now have, a president who wants shared sacrifices, an opposition that's solely focused on cuts that would appear to hit the most vulnerable without any consideration for raising taxes?"
Viqueira replied: "And that's what the President did. He's done this before, quotes Abraham Lincoln, as he points out, the first Republican president, saying that the idea here for American government is to help those who can't help themselves. And they really are trying to encourage the coming battle to be fought on that – those grounds."
In addition to praising Obama's speech, Bashir also slammed Republicans for criticizing the President: "Republicans didn't even wait for the President to make his speech today before coming out with a scathing review of his handling of the issue....I'm curious about the reaction of the White House to entertaining a group of Republicans to morning coffee and then to hear them come out and immediately trash the President's speech even before he's delivered it."
Here is a transcript of the April 13 exchange between Bashir and Viqueira:
3:00PM ET
MARTIN BASHIR: 'We will invest in the future of America,' that's what President Obama just said in a much-anticipated speech on the budget and his plan to tackle the nation's mounting debt and deficits. He offered a series of broad proposals and said it's time for the wealthiest Americans to pay their way and share in taxes.
BARACK OBAMA: In December I agreed to extend the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans because it was the only way I could prevent a tax hike on middle class Americans. But we cannot afford $1 trillion worth of tax cuts for every millionaire and billionaire in our society. We can't afford it. And I refuse to renew them again.
BASHIR: Republicans didn't even wait for the President to make his speech today before coming out with a scathing review of his handling of the issue.
JOHN BOEHNER [REP. R-OH]: I have been pushing the President for months to engage in this discussion about our long-term fiscal mess. I'm glad that he's finally decided to engage in it.
ERIC CANTOR [REP. R-VA]: This is vintage obama. He's been standing on the sidelines expecting the rest of us to make the tough decisions to lead this country.
BASHIR: NBC's Mike Viqueira is live at the White House. And Luke Russert joins us live from Capitol Hill. Mike, can I begin with you? Before we discuss the President's speech, I'm curious about the reaction of the White House to entertaining a group of Republicans to morning coffee and then to hear them come out and immediately trash the President's speech even before he's delivered it.
MIKE VIQUEIRA: Yeah, well, you know, Martin, I have to say part of that is sort of a set piece. I thought an interesting portion of the afternoon had to do with the fact that Paul Ryan, you saw his picture there, in the chiron over your shoulder, was sitting in the front row and the President spent a good amount of time absolutely bashing the plan that Paul Ryan has constructed, the actual detailed piece of legislation that's going to be on the House of Representatives' floor tomorrow and Friday.
You know, the President's speech was part soaring, speaking to the aspirations and character of a nation, if you will. Part framework – and that word 'framework' should be emphasized, because White House officials on background have been using it over and over and over again today – it did not have sort of the granularity or details that would go with a legislative proposal.
And part of it, and a significant part of it, really setting the President and Democrats apart from what Republicans are going to be doing and proposing and debating over the course of the next two days in the House of Representatives, specifically when it comes to tax reform. The President obviously feels the Republican plan is tilted more towards the wealthy. And Medicare, the valued but costly program for elderly, that the President accuses Paul Ryan and Republicans of trying to privatize.
The President, again, a framework, he says $4 trillion in debt reduction over the course of the next 12 years, if these recommendations are followed. Reform of the tax code to make it simpler and fairer, not a great deal of detail, again, in a lot of these proposals. The White House does say that for every $3 in cuts there will be $1 in tax revenue. It comes with a fail-safe or trigger, if the ratio of debt exceeds a certain percentage of the Gross Domestic Product in this country. And it brings up an interesting point, too, Martin. Why are we having the discussion? Because the total national debt in this country, now $14.3 trillion, exceeds the yearly GDP of this country, $14.1 trillion. And that is part of what's driving the urgency of this discussion, Martin.
BASHIR: Mike, I don't want to sound as if I'm misrepresenting the President, but it appeared to me that he was suggesting that we can't be self-centered as far as fiscal policy is concerned. We can't simply slash programs everywhere without somehow expecting the wealthiest in society to contribute. Is that your impression?
VIQUEIRA: Well, the President did reach for, as I said, that soaring sort of rhetoric that speaks to the basic aspirations of people and the beliefs of what America is. He said, 'It tells us' – the Ryan plan, talking about the Republican plan – 'It tells us we can't afford the America we believe in.' So the President sort of laid out his vision for America and the sort of details, what we can afford, the percentage of the national budget that's devoted to things like Social Security, like Medicare, like Medicaid.
(...)
BASHIR: Mike, when I hear the current discussion about cutting spending, I'm reminded of what Margaret Thatcher in Britain during the 1980's, when she dismissed the idea of a civic society and she said that all she wanted to do was focus on individuals. Isn't that what we now have, a president who wants shared sacrifices, an opposition that's solely focused on cuts that would appear to hit the most vulnerable without any consideration for raising taxes?
VIQUEIRA: And that's what the President did. He's done this before, quotes Abraham Lincoln, as he points out, the first Republican president, saying that the idea here for American government is to help those who can't help themselves. And they really are trying to encourage the coming battle to be fought on that – those grounds.
You know, the interesting thing about it is, Martin, and we've seen this time and time again over the last 30 years, Republicans welcome the class warfare argument. They welcome that debate. They feel like they come out on top a lot. It's going to be extremely interesting to see over the course of the next couple of months as we inch up to this debt ceiling, lifting the debt ceiling in Congress, how this all plays out.
You know, the President is gambling here that he laid out just enough detail to satisfy the American public when they're comparing what he wants to do to the detailed legislative plan that's actually moving through Congress at the behest of Republicans. The gamble is here that the President has enough of a plan that the public is going to buy into and allow them to move forward without having to have a big fight around debt ceiling, raising the debt ceiling.
— Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
What a crock
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 3:41pm.
Calling on the wealthiest Americans to pay their way is akin to me requesting a meeting with Bill Gates asking him for a million dollars with nothing to return for it. What are the odds that I'll get laughed for that and then tossed out on my ass in the most embarrassing fashion possible?
-Jon
These Libs are mathematically challenged.
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 3:48pm.
Check out this calc and learn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=661pi6K-8WQ
That Link is terrific!
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:25pm.
Puts the problem in perspective.
I call on politicians to stop
Submitted by rbosque on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 3:48pm.
I call on politicians to stop blaming the "rich" for their spending habits and do their job.
Ha...
Submitted by retrocon on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:01pm.
What tools of the left!
"...without somehow expecting the wealthiest in society to contribute."
So, he's implying that the people who already pay for most everything are NOT contributing?
Tools, fools, & kool-aid drinkers.
And the answer to "how much
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:08pm.
And the answer to "how much should they pay?" is always "More."
He offered a series of broad proposals and said it's time for the wealthiest Americans to pay their way and share in taxes."
Translation: Nothing of substance, no actual solutions; just inflammatory rhetoric.
Taxes
Submitted by Dirjj on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:05pm.
There's no law against paying more in Taxes than you owe. The Left doesn't seem to get this. If they want higher taxes, then they can voluntarily pay more. That goes for you too Martin Bashir.
Maybe it's time to send these
Submitted by JeffC... on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:16pm.
Maybe it's time to send these useful idiots an envelope addressed to the IRS so they can pay more taxes. I'd even include a stamp.
That's what it's all about.
Submitted by Rackie on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:14pm.
Whenever the O-man starts moving his lips this starts playing in my head.
You put your right hand in,
You put your right hand out,
You put your right hand in,
And you shake it all about,
You do the hokey pokey
and you turn yourself around
That's what it's all about.
Rackie, as far as your hand....whenever O speaks,
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:23pm.
....you ought to be putting it over your wallet.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
With appologies to...
Submitted by Rukus on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 10:23pm.
the hokey pokey.
You put your left hand in,
You put your left hand out,
You put your left hand in,
And you shake the money out.
You do the hokey pokey
and you spread it all around
That's what Dem's are all about.
MSNBC?
Submitted by daveposh on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:17pm.
What else would you expect from "Media's Sick News Blather Consortium"?
Thanks God I think this B***
Submitted by Semus on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:25pm.
Thanks God I think this B*** S*** finally seems to be coming to an end. These people are ridiculous.
factually challenged class envy pimps
Submitted by wizardjr on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:25pm.
"If you repeat a lie long enough..."
'Nuff said.
SMOKING IN THE BOY'S ROOM
Submitted by Herbster on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:28pm.
What is this Bashir guy smoking....recycled cardboard? I found it interesting that when Bashir went to "Mike" and Luke ( the genius) Russert for comment.....the conversation was only between "Mike" and Bashir. Never heard from Lukewarm Luke. I guess Luke was doing what he does best....stand around with his thumb up his posterior. These folks are not to believed with the drivel they put out to the few people that watch their shows. Wow! I understand that the ED SHOW actually had an audience in double digits on Tuesday.....low double digits. I believe the actual number was fourteen........six of which were members of Mr. Ed's family who switched over to the Cartoon Channel after the phone call from Nielsen. The difference between the ED show and cartoons? Cartoons are funny while the ED show is a joke.
MSNBC Urging Wealthiest Americans to Pay Their Way?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:34pm.
They didn't spend the money.
MSNBC = More S--- from NBC
Is this the same MSNBC...
Submitted by jdripper on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 4:43pm.
that GE has a 49% share in and they refused to pay any taxes?
Jack
Man, this people are clueless!
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 5:03pm.
Man, these people are clueless! They keep making statements like "we can't slash programs without the Wealthy contributing,"" but just HOW do they want to the Rich to "contribute" to helping Obama "slash" spending? By paying more taxes, of course, as if that's going to, you know, actually slash spending.
Hay, Liberals, slashing spending means, you know, actually REDUCING it, not raising additional taxes. Here's what you seem to be forgetting: If spending IS reduced, then you won't NEED to raise additional taxes to, you know, "pay" for a reduction in spending. Only a moron would claim that you need additional money to pay for a spending cut.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
they are lying to get re-elected
Submitted by c5then on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 6:02pm.
The folks who make $200,000 or more already pay 50% of the income tax collected in this country. The federal government spends 30% more than they take in every year. Increasing the income taxes on "the rich" will not solve the deficit problem. How much can we increase the taxes? 10%? That, in the rosiest of scenarios, will increase the revenues by 10%. So now we will only be spending 20% more? That is not a spending cut.
Obama says that the $40 billion in recently agreed to spending cuts equal $750 billion over 12 years. I guess this proves he is a product of our very own public school system.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
delete
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 6:49pm.
delete
Let tax the "wealthy" on their
Submitted by Clutch1956 on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 7:00pm.
overall WEALTH not their yearly INCOME. How many of these millionaire liberals would swap parties in a heartbeat when their net worth was what was being taxed, not what their income was for the year? Hollyweird would turn conservative overnight!
Wealthy people do pay their
Submitted by mostlymoderate on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 9:15pm.
Wealthy people do pay their way. They consistently do so by "hiring" talent. From accountants, to lawyers, to gardeners, to waiters and waitresses at restaurants. Many own businesses that hire multiple employee's who feed multiple family members. Do these morons think wealthy people just sit on their money and do nothing with it? Many of us (who are not mega-wealthy but well-off) invest money in the stock market which helps up and coming corporations succeed with much needed capital. Will they come for us next?
What are we going to do if the richest Americans start moving to places like Switzerland? After all, if you are going to be paying high taxes anyway, might as well live in the most beautiful, non-crime infested countries of the World, right?
paying taxes for thee but not for me
Submitted by ladycatnip on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 10:04pm.
Wasn't almost everyone Obama appointed to his staff, cabinet, or czar position a tax evader? The libs are NOTORIOUS for tax evasion. When they talk about "fair share" it's really code speak for all Americans paying taxes so the libs can live the lifestyle - without paying taxes on it of course. Bunch of recycled Marie Antoinette's.
This says it all concerning the Obama sycophants..
Submitted by troxruss on Fri, 04/15/2011 - 9:57am.
"The voice from the telescreen was still pouring forth its tale of prisoners and booty and slaughter, but the shouting outside had died down a little. The waiters were turning back to their work. One of them approached with the gin bottle. Winston, sitting in a blissful dream, paid no attention as his glass was filled up. He was not running or cheering any longer. He was back in the Ministry of Love, with everything forgiven, his soul white as snow. He was in the public dock, confessing everything, implicating everybody. He was walking down the white-tiled corridor, with the feeling of walking in sunlight, and an armed guard at his back. The longhoped-for bullet was entering his brain.
He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."
1984 by George Orwell