CBS Food Police Go After 'Cereal Offenders,' Fret Over Cartoon Characters 'Targeting' Kids
On Tuesday's CBS Early Show, contributor Taryn Winter Brill touted a new University of Pennsylvania study on the influence of breakfast cereal cartoon characters on children: "Previous research has shown how these images influence children's selections, but now a new study reveals they also influence how the kids think the cereal actually tastes."
In the report that followed, Brill described how marketing campaigns "target" kids to sell unhealthy sugary cereals: "Breakfast cereal is a $10 billion a year business and competition is fierce...especially among children's cereal....They target kids with cartoon characters, in commercials and on boxes, that practically reach from store shelves to grab your kid's attention." The headline on screen during the segment read: "Cereal Offenders; Cartoon Images Affect Kids' Taste Perception."
During the report, a sound bite was featured of Kelly Brownell, Director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, who declared: "The cereal manufacturers spend more than $150 million a year just targeting kids." On its website, the Rudd Center emphasizes the importance of using broad public policy to force people to change their eating habits:
Public policy, such as local, state or federal legislation, is an efficient way to help the greatest number of people make positive changes in their lives. Rather than focusing on changing people’s behavior one person at a time, effective public policy makes positive changes in the environments in which we live. Practicing more healthful behavior becomes the "optimal default" — that is, choosing a more healthful behavior becomes easier, if not automatic.
In another sound bite in Brill's Early Show report, Brownell lamented how cereal characters like Frosted Flakes' 'Tony the Tiger,' "go back decades and persist today....Kids recognize them very early in life and it has an impact on what they choose to eat."
Brill explained findings of the UPENN study: "It turns out that those loveable creatures make kids think their cereal tastes better....In a recent study out of the University of Pennsylvania, children were asked to use smiley faces to rate the taste of cereal. Researchers found children awarded more smiley faces to the cereal from boxes with cartoon contact characters than the ones without, even though the cereal itself was the same."
At the end of her report, Brill concluded: "Children's food choices are influenced as much by the characters they see as by the taste in their mouths....experts we spoke with say most of the cereals featuring cartoon characters are, in fact, the least healthy ones."
Here is a full transcript of the March 15 segment:
8:08AM ET TEASE:
ERICA HILL: Just ahead here on the Early Show, we are going cereal shopping to show you how cartoon characters really do affect your children's choices on what they eat. And, boy, are those characters doing a good job winning over your kids.
8:11AM ET SEGMENT:
HILL: In this morning's 'Health Watch,' cartoon characters and cereal. Some estimates say the average preschooler sees more than 500 breakfast cereal commercials a year and there are plenty of characters in those ads, characters which carry a lot of clout. As Early Show contributor Taryn Winter Brill found out, or as any parent knows when they go down the cereal aisle in the supermarket.
TARYN WINTER BRILL: Exactly. Good morning to you, Erica. Well, any parent who's walked down the cereal aisle with kids knows the magical allure of cartoon characters on boxes. Previous research has shown how these images influence children's selections, but now a new study reveals they also influence how the kids think the cereal actually tastes.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Cereal Offenders; Cartoon Images Affect Kids' Taste Perception]
Breakfast cereal is a $10 billion a year business and competition is fierce.
TONY THE TIGER: They're great!
BRILL: Especially among children's cereal.
KELLY BROWNELL [DIRECTOR, RUDD CTR. FOR FOOD POLICY & OBESITY]: The cereal manufacturers spend more than $150 million a year just targeting kids.
BRILL: They target kids with cartoon characters, in commercials and on boxes, that practically reach from store shelves to grab your kid's attention. It's an age old tradition. Tony the Tiger made his debut in the 1950s.
TONY THE TIGER: They're great!
BROWNELL: Characters go back decades and persist today. They're very important icons. Kids recognize them very early in life and it has an impact on what they choose to eat.
BRILL: Not just what they choose to eat, but how they think the cereal tastes. It turns out that those loveable creatures make kids think their cereal tastes better.
MATT LAPIERRE [UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA RESEARCHER]: When a character was on the box, children said that they enjoyed the product more.
BRILL: In a recent study out of the University of Pennsylvania, children were asked to use smiley faces to rate the taste of cereal. Researchers found children awarded more smiley faces to the cereal from boxes with cartoon contact characters than the ones without, even though the cereal itself was the same. I want you to scream if you like to eat cereal.
[CHILDREN SCREAMING]
We rounded up six young cereal lovers to see if we could get similar results in an unscientific taste test. We put the same common breakfast cereal into two containers, one plain, the other decorated with popular cartoon characters. And we let the kids slurp and crunch away. So I want to know which cereal you liked better. If you liked this cereal better, raise your hand. One, two, three, four, five. Five out of six liked the one with the cartoon character. But listen to why. You raised your hand that you liked this one better. Why?
UNIDENTIFIED GIRL: Because it's more sweeter.
BRILL: Why did you like this one better?
UNIDENTIFIED GIRL B: Because it was sweeter.
BRILL: Remember, they were comparing the exact same cereal. We repeated the experiment with two more cereals, healthy or sugary, it didn't seem to matter.
UNIDENTIFIED BOY: It tasted better.
BRILL: It tasted better. What mattered most was the container the cereal came from.
UNIDENTIFIED BOY B: It's my favorite TV show stickers on it and it looks more crunchy.
BRILL: Unscientific or not, the results were the same. Children's food choices are influenced as much by the characters they see as by the taste in their mouths. Those kids were so cute, I love that hat. Incidently, experts we spoke with say most of the cereals featuring cartoon characters are, in fact, the least healthy ones. The experts say the reason for that is kids tend to overeat sugary cereals specifically, Erica, sending mom and dad back to the store for more sugary cereals.
HILL: How about that? And let me tell you, you turn and you read the box in the aisle, which is really, you know, the onus is on us as parents to do that. It's obvious that most of these are the least healthy.
BRILL: Yeah.
HILL: They looked, though, too, at certain words, 'healthy' and 'sugar,' and how did kids react to those words? I can guess.
BRILL: Right, this was fascinating. Because believe it or not, the cereal didn't change. That remained the same. What changed only was the name on the cereal boxes. The kids were introduced to two cereals, one was called 'Healthy Bits' and one was called 'Sugary Bits.' And when they asked the kids which they liked better, of the Healthy Bits or the Sugary Bits, without cartoon characters, overwhelmingly they liked the Healthy Bits.
HILL: Really?
BRILL: Yeah, isn't that shocking. However, then they introduced the cartoon characters on to the sugary bits and the response changes dramatically. The kids all of the sudden liked the sugar cereal better, saying that the cartoon characters take precedence over the name of the cereal.
HILL: So we know the cartoon characters carry weight, I wouldn't have thought that the word 'healthy' would carry weight over 'sugar.'
BRILL: Right. And the researchers were surprised by this, too. They thought immediately they're going to go to the sugar cereals, right. But instead, they went to healthy cereals. And they say that I guess nowadays children are told commonly stay away from sugar, 'Sugar is bad, you want to go to the healthy cereals.'
And I actually brought some cereals to show you that the names of the cereals over the years have changed because cereal marketers have sort of picked up on this trend. So take a look at what we have in front of us. Corn Pops, believe it or not, Erica, used to go by Sugar Corn Pops. There's the original logo. Golden Crisp, that originally went by Super Sugar Crisp. Gosh, I haven't seen these boxes in a long time. Frosted Flakes, my favorite of all, used to go by Sugar Frosted Flakes. And finally, Honey Smacks, can you take a guess, before it comes up?
HILL: I'm going Sugar Smacks.
BRILL: Sugar Smacks. And Sugar Smacks I recognize, but ver the years, they just – they eliminated the word 'sugar,' tapping into this idea that sugar is bad.
HILL: Funny how that changes. You could also, sort of, go totally rogue, if you will – which some parents I know, may have been know to do – buy one box of a certain cereal and then you just keep putting in the bag of the healthier one in the box. They don't always notice.
BRILL: Unscientific experiment in and of itself.
HILL: Yeah. This is really great, though. Great information. And eye-opening for a lot of parents. Taryn, thanks.
BRILL: Thanks, Erica.
— Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Oh please!
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 12:53pm.
We grew up eating Frosted Flakes, Fruit Loops...and does anyone remember the best of all....Count Chockula?
These hippy dippy liberals want it both ways. Free love, man....but don't you dare eat sugar or salt! Sheesh.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
True Blonde*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 12:59pm.
But can't you see that liberals are so caring and concerned about important things.....
while Rome burns..
Yeah, Oh please! Aw come on...
Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:04pm.
For over 50 years cartoon characters have been used to sell cereals...and so? Remember Sugar Pops?My favorite as a kid was
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 3:02pm.
My favorite as a kid was Captain Crunch with Crunchberries. Got a box a couple of years ago to try them again and they aren't nearly as good as they once were.Liberals Reject Parenthood
Submitted by HockeyKid on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 12:59pm.
They don't accept the authority of parents to raise their kids, to teach them, to feed them. It stems from the fact that they themselves have not grown up, and do not have the wherewithal to take on that responsibility. So they blame others for their failure, and insist that "experts" (read "liberals who have substituted degrees for children") know better than parents.
That's why liberals hate the Duggars. Their success is every liberal's failure.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Children do not buy cereal
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:28pm.
The producers certainly market to them knowing that many of the kids will whine to their parents until they get some, but kids have no resources to buy it on their own. Therefore, it doesn't matter what's on the box, or what's on the advertisement.
What the Left is fretting over is the reluctance of many parents to say "No!" They want parents to be relieved of the burden of having to instill self-discipline in their children.
The advocates of the nanny state know how to raise your children better than we do.
Another Dictat!
Submitted by krig on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:00pm.
We can have just plaine brown cardboard boxes filled with gruel. The commissars would love this.Parents
Submitted by jcrapes4 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:02pm.
Funny I thought parents ie adults bought the cereal.No...that's not how it works in liberal land
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:05pm.
....the parents give the kids a credit card, then the kids can order pizza, fried chicken balls, and gooey chocolate lava cake on the internet, much to the horror and consternation of the parent!!!! It would be so much better if the government just took care of all this pesky parenting crap. Just ask Mika.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Thrusting the point home!
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:24pm.
As a former collegiate saber fencer -- TOUCHE!!!
Mika Mouse, roaring at the indignity of her own lapse in Uber-controlling Nanny Parental Oversight (so in her guilt-induced rage she takes it out on the rest of the nation like any goooood Lib would).
Sheesh.... We already have Captain Crunch running our counter-pirate efforts, Count Chocula with his fangs sunk deep into the financial lifeblood of the country sucking it dry, and our whole Administration totally Koo-Koo for Cocoa Puffs, and for anything else they can be kookoo about.
They're all running around like sleep-deprived, sugar-empowered toddlers screaming "NO!" to every adult (e.g., Conservative) in sight while they bounce off the furniture, into the nearest wall and skitter back across the floor bumping into each other.
"twould be funny to behold if it didn't endanger the future (and present) of our nation...
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
Coo Coo for Cocoa Puffs!
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:45pm.
I just have to wonder how horror-stricken Mika must be several days after one of her galactically stupid comments????
Even Mika the Twit must realize how idiotic her whole little diatribe sounded (she didn't know what her daughter was ordering...and how did it get in the front door or past the nanny, surely she doesn't leave her twelve year old alone?). It would be one thing if Mika were talking about something stupid she'd done after too much of her favorite libation. But no. She makes these idiot comments when she's (apparently) perfectly sober.
The NB staff didn't dub her "Bubbles" for nothing. Yet she continues this ridiculous diatribe against everyone else's eating habits, when she's not even the boss of her own 12 year old (to paraphrase that other liberal icon of chattering long-in-the-tooth news babes, K-K-K Katie).
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Or sometimes they use their
Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:09pm.
Or sometimes they use their cell phone to order.→ Spare me!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:03pm.
What about a Wookie hawking celery sticks? Same diff.ROFLMAO
Submitted by ant on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 8:56pm.
Good one, Cool! Yeah, kids like cartoon characters, who knew!? It reminds me though of the Newsweek story from last year about how children are actually racists as soon as they're born ( especially white ones, and coincidentally this research came to light at the same time Teapartiers were being called racists, how convenient). I am still trying to figure out how children are so judgemental or bigoted of those different from them but, somehow, are in love with animals, cartoons, puppets, etc., in every conceivable color,shape, and form. So technically, by their own lib-logic, this cannot be true, children will only like cereal if the picture on the box looks just like them, not some tiger or chocolate vampire.Yet these people have no
Submitted by kareling on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:10pm.
Yet these people have no problem with the Left using cartoon characters to scare kids into thinking Republicans are going to kill them by cutting funds to PBS.Oh, good grief!
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:14pm.
This is the equivalent of Mika's fit over Domino's pizza!
Heaven forbid a parent should have to say NO!
I used to take my two boys shopping with me when they were pre-schoolers (twins) and let them each pick one box of cereal. BUT I had the final say. I just wouldn't buy the worst of the sugary cereals and they knew it!
I sure wish all those cereals had been outlawed so I wouldn't have had to tell them NO.
How on earth did they survive such a trauma!!
The real question is....
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:49pm.
How did you survive such a trauma?
That's what the liberals are worried about, sparing a parent the trauma of saying no. Just take away all of those pesky (sugary and delicious) consumer decisions, and voila, trauma spared!
It's for your own good, motherbelt. Quit yer bitchin!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
OH MY! THE EVILS OF CEREAL!
Submitted by Herbster on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:25pm.
According to her bio, this empty skirt is GMA's "Ambassador of fun." I'll bet she does a great job under the desk. Obviously, they give her all the important stuff to do. ......like the movie studio exec telling the young star struck girl that he has a BIG part for her in an upcoming picture.....just hop on this couch....... Libtwits, good! Cereal, bad! Good thing GMA is covering the important things in life. Those who the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.So what?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:27pm.
So what?
Who buys the cereal for the kids?
Parents. Grand-parents. Guardians.
What a waste of air time.
We were allowed any cereal
Submitted by Pickles and Peppers on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:27pm.
As long as the ingredients didn't start with sugar. These days the cereals are boasting nutritional information. Did you know Corn Pops is a good source of fiber?Troll broods are huge. 8 to 10 per litter.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 12:30am.
Of course mumzie and duddie troll would not allow sugar. Trolling websites don't pay all that much when the work is good. Poor butt hurt Angry Black nwahs. All he got for breakfast was pampas grass and bear snot for breakfast. Same as the rest of the troll brood.The Vet
Submitted by ant on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 12:40am.
Too funny!! I'm still laughing!Smart parents
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:30pm.
Dictate what shows the kids can watch. Smart, tricky parents buy a box of Frosted Flakes and slip a bag of Cheerios in the box before feeding the kids breakfast and keep the Frosted Flakes for their own late night snacking.So are we also to go after
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:52pm.
So are we also to go after the Jolly Green Giant, the Vlasic Stork, and the Gorton's Fisherman, too? How about Mr. Clean and Speedy, the Alka-Seltzer kid? The Aflac Duck? The Michelin Man? Morris the Cat? The St. Pauli Girl? Mrs. Butterworth? The Scrubbing Bubbles? Frank Bartles and Ed Jaymes (okay, that one is dated)? Buster Brown? Smokey Bear? Nipper the Dog?
Where does it end with these nanny-state libs?
All products will feature a
Submitted by ant on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 8:58pm.
All products will feature a picture of Big Brother Obama, including your monthly ration of chocolate.I'D go after the St Paulie
Submitted by irishguy on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 7:50am.
I'D go after the St Paulie Girl ;-)Tony and Me
Submitted by jaywl on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:49pm.
This brings up old memories. My Mother, bless her, didn't "believe in" giving us sugared cereal. She wouldn't buy Tony the Tiger Flakes, Sugar Smacks and such. The other kids laughed at us. We didn't get the free decoder rings. I had to read how Shredded Wheat was made instead of reading about Lash LaRue or doing the maze after emptying the box into a big bowl. Finally I took a newspaper route and used the money to buy boxes of Sugar Crisp and Sugar Pops and Sugared Rice, anything with sugar. I began hiding a stash, lying to Mom, being selfish to Sister. I began buying more, not paying for the papers, lying to the route manager. Now here I am, after beginning a life of crime because of these cartoon characters, in Prison. I am trying to shake the sugar, as they say, but even here there is an underground economy in the small individual boxes of Frosted Flakes. Odds are I won't make it as long as the guards bring the stuff in. Remember that study about sugar and criminal behavior, how it affects kids? Well, here we are. The proof is in my fellow cons and the (sugared) pudding. Power to the Libs, Save our Kids!So sorry for your dilemma
Submitted by Seashell on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 2:02pm.
Sounds like you need SCA (sugary cereal anonymous)! ;-)Last time I checked,
Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:53pm.
it isn't the kids "vulnerable" to cartoon character marketing who are paying for the cart of groceries (unless maybe we are talking about Mika's minors).
"Public policy, such as local, state or federal legislation, is an efficient way to help the greatest number of people make positive changes in their lives."
Marx, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler and Mao all thought the same thing. Remember folks, Obama's second selection for the Supreme Court wouldn't say that government is not empowered to decide for us what we eat and what we do not eat.
We have got to stop this madness!
I remember whining for those cereals when I was a kid...
Submitted by optimist on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 2:03pm.
...and my parents said no. And then I whined some more, and they said no again. And then I whined yet some more, and I got smacked. Then one day, I didn't ask for that stuff anymore. Amazing.
My parents said no a lot and for good reason and guess what, I grew up and I understood why they stood firm. I also don't hate my parents like many of the "spoiled" types seem to.
So bottom line, toughen up, parents, and stop enabling all these control freaks to fulfill their weird fantasies. You can be your child's friend when he/she grows up.
I still, on occasion, buy a
Submitted by Seashell on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 2:23pm.
I still, on occasion, buy a box of the sugary good stuff for my kids (who are older now). It's funny though. In the morning, even with the sugary good stuff there, they still go for the healthy cereal. They usually have the other as a snack later on in the day. This is because they have been TAUGHT that the sugary stuff is not that good for them, especially on an empty stomach in the morning. Funny thing that. Teaching your own kids actually works. Libs can't seem to grasp that concept at times.Advertising vs Your Kids: Whose Side Are You On?
Submitted by Adela Rogers on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:13pm.
If you don't think that the preferences of children affect their parents' purchasing decisions, then the billions spent on Madison Avenue by marketers of products targeted to children are spent on "nothing."Advertising and it's bedfellow, propaganda, has been around for centuries because it works. And if anyone can read, they can tell from ingredients listed in the labeling of most "kid-targeted" breakfast cereals, that they are mostly UN-nutritional and contain enormous amounts of sugar. In fact, more money is spent on the marketing and packaging of these edible "toystuffs" than the actual food portion of the product. Does that sound like something you want to feed your kids?
Since most children's taste buds remain undeveloped until after adolescence, they are greatly swayed by sugary or sweet drinks and foodstuffs. Not only are they defenseless against the growing invasion of persuasive and fanciful commercials that tie harmful foods to kids' favorite cartoon characters, they also lack the aptitude to understand nutrition and its long-term effects.
Unfortunately, many parents of all political ideologies take a "short-term gain" approach to managing their children by acquiescing to their shrill demands spurred on by the promise (to kids) of fun, entertainment, and approval (through the use of icons and "heroes") in exchange for brand affinity. They figure it's a small battle in the big war of life where paying the bills and keeping the peace take priority. But just as stationing the kids in front of the boob-tube is easier than encouraging and participating in imaginative play, feeding them garbage in exchange for a giggle and a smile, is selfish as well as irresponsible-- or just plain ignorant.
The only ammunition parents have against the assault of marketers on your pocketbook is knowledge. It would be great if some of the almost $160 million spent last year on just the insurgence of television advertising on children by General Mills, Kellogg's, and Post Cereals alone, went toward educating parents about nutrition so they could make smarter choices for their children by providing them the healthier products made by these very same companies. But evidently it's easier to conquer and loot those who remain unaware.
So what you're saying is that
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:16pm.
So what you're saying is that Big Cereal, like Big Tobacco, should be forced to spend their money "educating" parents out of buying their products?
And you really think that "education" is the key? that those parents who buy the stuff think that it's nutritious? Because they can't be bothered reading the box, right, and seeing that the first ingredient is sugar? So they need to be educated?
With all due respect, wake up and smell the coffee. Parents are not unaware. The ones giving in to their kids know it's junk, but it's easier than arguing, and they figure at least the kid is eating breakfast. Likely the same parents are bringing home Taco Bell for supper or serving up pre-packaged stuff like Hamburger Helper, also loaded with salt and sugar, instead of cooking from scratch, because they're too tired.
One little point that the
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:31pm.
One little point that the reporterette missed is that fictional mascots for commercial products which evolved into animated characters were for products aimed at adults rather than children. Case in point: Bibendum, better known today as the Michelin Man...first seen in 1894.(Raises hand)
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:35pm.
Helllloooo. I'm one of those mean moms who was able to say no to my kids. They didn't usually shop with me, but they knew darn well if the answer was no, and the question was asked again, the answer would be an even firmer no. You know what else? I didn't need the government or General Mills to tell me what decisions to make. Kids are going to see a LOT of things that are bad for them. I'm a lot more worried about the influence of sexuality without consequences that teens and preteens are exposed to on t.v. and music. THAT is irresponsible.Typical, self-important,
Submitted by fitzfong on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:41pm.
Typical, self-important, academic class, "know-it-all" hysteria from an obviously over-educated, under-experienced, ivory tower snob. People like you are dangerous because your "education" and arrogance belies your ignorance, yet your ilk is able to lull a significant-enough portion of the electorate into accepting that our money is better spent in your hands. I would sooner trust the judgment of an under-educated parent under the influence of advertisers than an overly-educated blowhard using government to influence others...at least the "victims" have the power to reject advertisers."I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Where have you been Mr. Fong?
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:47pm.
I've missed that tag line of yours...and of course, your comments, too!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Aw, thanks, Blonde! Been
Submitted by fitzfong on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 6:48pm.
Aw, thanks, Blonde! Been swamped lately. I still visit just about everyday, but don't usually get the opportunity to respond much. But every once in a while, I'll drive by a "those who can't, lecture" windbag...and I can't help myself. :)"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Hey, nosy busybody...
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 8:55pm.
I am wondering how the hell I survived to my adulthood, in a state where I am far healthier than my peers, with all the evil cereals my parents bought for me when I was a kid.
And believe me, there were no more informed parents than mine, who basically were and are amateur dieticians. Yet, they let me eat all sorts of cereals that would make you, the nosy busybody, scream with horror.
Why do you have to be a nosy busybody? Why do you have to make government into a nosy busybody?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Education, as you put it, for
Submitted by ant on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:17pm.
Education, as you put it, for adults, is simply a matter of curiousity. Anyone who wants to "educate" themselves can do so easily without 'shaking-down' companies to do so. Furthermore, if you're content with MO feeding your child 1.5 oz. of protein and a spat of cottage cheese, noone is stopping you. Just don't be surprised when your child has a hypo-glycemic fit on the playground. You remember playgrounds, don't you? That was something else libs determined dangerous and unneccesary.Thanks for visiting NB, Moochelle
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 12:03am.
So, when your trophy hubbie Obama finally does away with cash, and everybody is forced to buy groceries and gas with a debit or credit card, exactly what penalties do you propose be levied on parents who exceed what you consider to be acceptable limits?
Fines? Imprisonment?
What?
What will be the panalties for that extra box of brownie mix?
What will be the penalties for that family Sunday drive in the country?
Do you see where this BS is leading?
I seriously doubt that you do.
Then again, useful idiots are usually the blindest of the bunch.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Many Saturday mornings with Mr Cap'n Crunch
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 3:02pm.
I would like to RE-INTRODUCE MYSELF, I guess I am a dying or dead breed of person, I am a parent that tells my child NO from time to time and I make the decisions of what is bought, worn, viewed and is funny (THAT WOULD BE ME, MR. FUNNY).......
Do I allow a box of cocoa puffs from time to time, damn straight and with strawberries, wheat toast and a glass of BING CROSBY endorsed fuddy duddy Minute maid, we manage to survive another day as Daddy, Mommy and children,
On the weekends we have gassssssssssssssssp, bacon (low salt) and egg beaters (no cholesteral) and Thomas's English muffins (Whole wheat)........ AGAIN WE LIVE TO SEE MONDAY...................................
All the above is true and is part of BEING A PARENT, I signed onto this a dozen or so years ago and in spite of me, my CHILDREN are OK and still walking and talking like normal people....
BUT Please don't tell the teachers, shhhhh, we are Conservative you know.................
Cartoons on cereal boxes bad.
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:02pm.
Cartoons on cereal boxes bad. Homos on TV good.Knock, knock on the heads of
Submitted by Miss_Me_Yet on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:09pm.
Knock, knock on the heads of the left wing loons. Tony the Tiger has been hawking ' Frosted Flakes ', because they are Great to America's children since 1951, following me still?
We haven't had an explosion in obesity, especially in children for pretty near that whole time.
Come the invention of the cell phone, lap top computer, video game consoles, Kindle, cable TV, not to mention no more physical in Physical Ed. because we wouldn't want anyone poking fun at the fat kid.
So now we've made every kid fat and or lazy, while at the same time instilling a passion for whining in them that would make Anthony Weiner and Debbie Wasserman Schultz proud.
My actual point is that it's not the cereal's, a McDonald's Happy meal, or Little Debbie's fault America is fat. It's all the stuff ( 21st century gadgets ), at a cost of approximately $300.00 monthly fees for the average family, we've convinced ourselves we simply cannot live without that are killing us dead.
Today there's an ap for just about anything. God forbid you'd actually have to lift your head to read the signs, those business's paid a fortune to display, to find a Chinese restaurant when you can sit your fat ___ down in your car and let your phone suggest a place for you, preferably one with a drive up window, so you don't have to walk the 20 feet between the parking lot and front door.
I'm just waiting for the first Michael Moore follower to sue Blackberry and Verizon for directly contributing to his / her high blood pressure and type two diabetes.
Personal responsibility has sadly joined God, Christmas, family values and so many other American as apple pie, taken for granted stuff that made America the greatest place on earth since the beginning of time, only to be replaced by cynicism, despair and the first generation born, in our countries history, that will be worse off than the one before.
Again, this is not the fault of food, God or the Republican party, but rather fault lies with the current resident of our White House and his equally depraved democrat party in concert with the MSM constantly bombarding the most vulnerable among us with false promises and filling their heads with hatred for anyone better off than themselves.
" GOT MILK "
I could go for some ' SUGAR CRISP ', now renamed ' Golden Crisp '. Sort of like they're in the sugary cereal ' Witness Relocation Program '.
Liberals ... we can't live with them, they couldn't survive without us ...
You forgot the "Super"
Submitted by Pickles and Peppers on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:15pm.
I swear it used to be Super Sugar Crisp.You're absolutely right, I
Submitted by Miss_Me_Yet on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:36pm.
You're absolutely right, I just looked it up.
Liberals ... we can't live with them, they couldn't survive without us ...
I'll take it!
Submitted by Pickles and Peppers on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:40pm.
I finally got something right! Might even be the last time. Who knows?Gotta get me some of those Golden crisps.......
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 6:08pm.
I had to look this up....
Golden Crisp has undergone drastic changes in marketing over the years, including changing the name from Sugar Crisp to Super Sugar Crisp to Super Golden Crisp (during a time when many cereals dropped the word "Sugar" from their titles) to the current name. The focus of advertising shifted from targeting children to including parents, by downplaying the sweet taste (and associated sugar content).
In the late 1970s, there was a short lived variation on the original Sugar Crisp, called Super Orange Crisp, which had orange-flavored O's in it.
The product is still sold as Sugar Crisp in some areas, mainly in the Canadian market. In Canada, the box still displays Sugar Bear, whose jingle was always "Can't get enough of that Sugar Crisp." The brand name "Golden Crisp" is not used in Canadian markets.
As of two weeks ago they were
Submitted by Miss_Me_Yet on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 6:09pm.
As of two weeks ago they were still selling as ' GOLDEN CRISP ', but with Michelle Obama hot on their, sugary delicious, trail anything is possible.
Liberals ... we can't live with them, they couldn't survive without us ...
The Queen and her lectures
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:14pm.
The way I see it, Queen Michelle has NO business lecturing other people on their health and what they eat.
Unless of course, She, with all cameras rolling, with many many witnesses, decided to run for 50 years.
I'm betting She doesn't finish 25 of them before passing out.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Honorable Military Record
Submitted by Metsie62 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 8:00pm.
Captain Crunch has enjoyed a more honourable military record than our Commander In Chief....whose wife by the way is known in breakfast cereals as "The CrunchBerry Beast"Dave grew up eating Frosted Flakes, Cap 'n Crunch, Cocoa Puffs..
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:21pm.
...Sugar Smacks, Sugar Pops, Super Sugar Crisp, Lucky Charms, Apple Jacks, and probably a few others I have long forgotten.
LOL - And I turned out okay, didn't I?
:-)
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Good evening Dave
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:41pm.
I'm happy that at least one person thinks you're OK. Well, two ,becauwe Jesus loves you. Why He does I have no idea.Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
coco,
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:47pm.
LOL - Neither do I, because I am such a mess.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
By the way Dave
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:59pm.
Did you hear that Tony the Tiger.Sugar Pops Pete. Captain Crunch, Snap, Crackle and Pop were all found murdered? Seems they were all shot with a Quaker Oats gun. The police are looking for a cereal killer.Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
coco,
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 12:17am.
ROFL!
Yeah, those Quakers are murder.
:-^)
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Boo Berry
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:52pm.
Alas my metabolism can't handle the sugar any more.
Cereal and Pop Tarts
Submitted by Unsane on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 10:47pm.
The funny thing is that as much as my mother TO THIS DAY will crow about how she never put sugar in my cereal or otherwise exposed me to sugar (to the point where my having sugar at home happens about once in five blue moons), she bought all those cereals you note there for me. By the ton. My siblings and I got all these fine cereals and then some.
And the Food Police will pry my Pop Tarts FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS.
Thanks for the stroll down Memory Lane...
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Guess You Forgot The Christian Boycott Of "Mighty Mouse"...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:15pm.
From Wikipedia's page on Mighty Mouse: The New Adventures (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mighty_Mouse:_The_New_Adventures#Controversy):
During the production of the episode "The Littlest Tramp", editor Tom Klein expressed concern that a sequence showing Mighty Mouse sniffing the remains of a crushed flower resembled cocaine use. Bakshi did not initially view the footage; he believed that Klein was overreacting, but agreed to let him cut the scene. Kricfalusi expressed disbelief over the cut, insisting that the action was harmless and that the sequence should be restored. Following Kricfalusi's advice, Bakshi told Klein to restore the scene, which had been approved by network executives and the CBS standards and practices department. The episode aired on October 31, 1987, initially without controversy.[8]
On June 6, 1988, Donald Wildmon, head of the American Family Association (AFA), alleged that "The Littlest Tramp" depicted cocaine use, instigating a media frenzy. Concerning Bakshi's involvement with Mighty Mouse: The New Adventures, the AFA claimed that CBS "intentionally hired a known pornographer to do a cartoon for children, and then allowed him to insert a scene in which the cartoon hero is shown sniffing cocaine." Bakshi responded, "You could pick a still out of Lady and the Tramp and get the same impression. Fritz the Cat wasn't pornography. It was social commentary. This all smacks of burning books and the Third Reich. It smacks of McCarthyism. I'm not going to get into who sniffs what. This is lunacy!" [8]
Bakshi defended the episode, saying, "I despise drugs. I would be out of my mind to show a cartoon character snorting cocaine in a cartoon.",[14] and stating that Wildmon had interpreted the scene out of context.[15] "Mighty Mouse was happy after smelling the flowers because it helped him remember the little girl who sold it to him fondly. But even if you're right, their accusations become part of the air we breathe. That's why I cut the scene. I can't have children wondering if Mighty Mouse is using cocaine." On CBS's order, Klein removed the sequence from the master broadcast footage.
Wildmon claimed that the edits were "a de facto admission that, indeed, Mighty Mouse was snorting cocaine".[8] Bakshi agreed to the removal of the offending 3½ seconds from future airings of the episode because of his concern that the controversy might lead children to believe that what Wildmon was saying was true. Wildmon's group then demanded the removal of Bakshi, but, on July 25, 1988, CBS released a statement in support of him.[16]
Guess it isn't just liberals who hate cartoon characters as well.
Really? A Christian boycott?
Submitted by ant on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:58pm.
Really? A Christian boycott? or one fool's over-reaction? There is a difference you know. You're right though, those damn Jesus right-wingers always bossin' people around and gettin' their way!!!! Like when they made abortion illega....oh, wait, it's legal. Well, it's like how they got rid of pornograph....oh,no, bad example. Well, look how successful they were at punishing those blasted cigarette smoke....oh, wait, that was libs....what about when they formed that group the PMRC to control/ban certain music they considered bad....oh, shoot, that was libs too. I got it! Remember how they got that friggin' Christmas Nativity scene put up at the....oh, darn, they usually always lose that battle..... but the bastards did prevent those tolerant folk from tearing down the cross out at that war memorial place....until some lefty decided he didn't like the Court decision and stole it anyway. Serves 'em right too, damn Jesus freaks putting up crosses at the burial sites of dead Christians. Go back on your meds, asshole.Cutting 3.5 seconds out of a cartoon is the....
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 7:06am.
same as the third reich? A bit far-fetched, I think.Don't consider Donald Wildmon
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 9:57am.
Don't consider Donald Wildmon representative of all Christians. I, for one, remember this incident and recognized Wildmon's over zealousness (and procrastination). He was way off-base and at the time was desperate for publicity. Any publicity. His credibility wasn't much before the New Adventures of Mighty Mouse debaucle and it delined subsequently. Although his heart is in the right place IMHO his methodologies and choices of what he attacks sometimes does more damage to his organization. His son now has taken over.Well, my Mom, bless her soul, ....
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 7:10am.
didn't give us sugar to put on our cereal, but most of the other kids did. So it would come out the same. Insofar as the taste is concerned, I recall research decades ago indicating that the vision infuenced taste. And if the characters make the cereal taste better, so what? (Said the man with no television.) Frankly, the mission statement of that organization sounds a bit fascist.punishing success
Submitted by Zepppo on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 8:18am.
Just another example of liberals attacking success, in this case successful marketing. Next thing they will be attacking buxom girls in ads geared at men. Oh, I guess not because that would be like attacking sex and they want to promote that with free condoms and sex classes in colleges.So Tony the Tiger is another Joe Camel?
Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 9:12am.
According to the Food Police, Tony the Tiger is just as offensive as Joe Camel! Oh, give me a break! These clowns wouldn't be happy unless we eat ONLY fresh vegetables (not canned - too much salt!) and water. We wouldn't be able to add salt, pepper, sugar, ketchup or any other condiments. Yecch! I only have this to say to Michelle and her nanny state busybodies: BUZZ OFF!C.B.S
Submitted by Patriot II on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 12:00pm.
stands for "continually broadcasting shyt!!!!! These people need to get into the real world and get their respective heads out of their asses.....how freaking stupid can this get?