CBS's Smith: Do ObamaCare Opponents 'Have A Legal Leg to Stand On?'
On Tuesday's CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith seemed skeptical of the legal reasoning of a federal judge who ruled part of ObamaCare was unconstitutional: "The thing that he objects to most strenuously is this idea that everybody has to be insured. And the Republicans are jumping up and down, they're ready to have a party. Do you think they have a legal leg to stand on?"
Smith directed that question to Illinois Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, who used the softball setup to declare: "I think the law is sound, and when Eric Cantor on the Republican side says, 'Let's repeal ObamaCare,' he wants to repeal the protection Americans want against the discrimination against them for pre-existing conditions. I think that's a losing political position."
Smith could have come back with the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll that shows support for ObamaCare at a new low, instead he gave Durbin another opportunity to tout the legislation: "The White House says it's going to go ahead and continue with implementation of the law, of the entire health care system, while all this legal wrangling is going on. Should it proceed?" Durbin responded: "Absolutely. Let me tell you, there are people who will see the protection of health insurance for the first time in their lives. Over 50 million Americans have no health insurance. 60% of them will receive health insurance protection."
Durbin added: "If the Republicans want to repeal the reach and protection of health insurance, it's a great issue, but I'm afraid it's not going to be very kind to the people who are being discriminated against today." Smith didn't challenge that assertion but simply went on to ask about the tax deal.
No Republican guests or sound bites were featured in the segment. In a report prior to Smith's interview with Durbin, congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes did repeat a quote from the GOP: "Republicans, who universally oppose the health care law, praised the Virginia ruling. In a written statement, incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said, 'Once the new Republican majority assumes control of the House in January, we will pass a clean repeal of ObamaCare.'" She quickly added: "The White House argues the insurance mandate is critical to the success of health care reform. Because getting everyone insured is key to bringing down costs."
Here is a full transcript of the December 14 segment:
7:00AM ET TEASE:
HARRY SMITH: Hit and miss. As President Obama's tax cut compromise is about to pass the Senate, a federal judge throws a curve ball at his health care reform law, deeming it unconstitutional. So what's the next step for the President and the Democrats? We'll ask a top senator in an exclusive live interview.
7:05AM ET SEGMENT:
SMITH: Now to politics. The tax cut compromise that President Obama worked out with the Republicans is one step closer to law. But the President's signature, health care reform, is running into trouble in court. CBS News congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes is on Capitol Hill with the latest. Nancy, good morning.
NANCY CORDES: Good morning, Harry. Republicans vowed to fight the health care bill in court, and they scored a big victory yesterday. While here on Capitol Hill, the tax cut deal passed its first major hurdle, with bipartisan support.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Tax Cut Showdown; Will House Dems Stop From Passing]
By a commanding margin, 83 to 15, the Senate voted to push ahead on a bill drawn up by Republicans and the White House. It would prevent a January 1st tax hike and keep jobless benefits from running out for the long-term unemployed.
BARACK OBAMA: The United States Senate is moving forward on a package of tax cuts that has strong bipartisan support. And this proves that both parties can, in fact, work together.
CORDES: While President Obama was celebrating, a Virginia judge was handing the White house a potential setback. Ruling that parts of the massive new health care law were unconstitutional. In his decision, Judge Henry Hudson said Congress overreached when it mandated all Americans must buy health insurance. 'The Constitution,' he said, 'does not allow that kind of unchecked expansion of congressional power. It's about an individual's right to choose to participate,' he wrote. Republicans, who universally oppose the health care law, praised the Virginia ruling. In a written statement, incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said, 'Once the new Republican majority assumes control of the House in January, we will pass a clean repeal of ObamaCare.' The White House argues the insurance mandate is critical to the success of health care reform. Because getting everyone insured is key to bringing down costs.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Healthcare Law Rejected; U.S. Judge Rules It Unconstitutional]
ROBERT GIBBS: I think it's constitutionally – constitutionality will be upheld.
CORDES: All these legal challenges to the health care bill could and most likely will end up at the U.S. Supreme Court. While the tax cut deal, which passed that first vote yesterday, could hit final passage in the Senate today, and then it heads to the House. Harry.
SMITH: That's Nancy Cordes on Capitol Hill. Thank you very much. Also on Capitol Hill this morning, to talk exclusively about the tax compromise and other issues, is the Senate's number two Democrat, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin. Senator, good morning.
DICK DURBIN: Good morning.
SMITH: I'll tell you, every single paper that I pick up this morning, 'Health Law Loses In Court Challenge.' 'Core of Health Care Law Is Rejected by U.S. Judge.' And the thing that he objects to most strenuously is this idea that everybody has to be insured. And the Republicans are jumping up and down, they're ready to have a party. Do you think they have a legal leg to stand on?
DURBIN: Harry, and now for the rest of the story. This was the third court ruling, and the first one that overturned that provision. The first two said it was fine. It was constitutional. So clearly there's a difference. Even among the Virginia federal courts, and we're going to move forward to an appellate level, perhaps even to the Supreme Court. I think the law is sound, and when Eric Cantor on the Republican side says, 'Let's repeal ObamaCare,' he wants to repeal the protection Americans want against the discrimination against them for pre-existing conditions. I think that's a losing political position.
SMITH: The White House says it's going to go ahead and continue with implementation of the law, of the entire health care system, while all this legal wrangling is going on. Should it proceed?
DURBIN: Absolutely. Let me tell you, there are people who will see the protection of health insurance for the first time in their lives. Over 50 million Americans have no health insurance. 60% of them will receive health insurance protection. Imagine, Harry, if you and I had to go a week without health insurance protection. There are millions of Americans who do it every single day. If the Republicans want to repeal the reach and protection of health insurance, it's a great issue, but I'm afraid it's not going to be very kind to the people who are being discriminated against today.
SMITH: Well, let's continue on to the tax cut deal, and to the implementation, then, of the extension of unemployment benefits. This really looks like it's going to finally actually sail through the Senate. Will it get through the House?
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Tax Bill Debate; Senate Set to Pass, Will House Revolt?]
DURBIN: Well, I can tell you that that vote last night in the Senate was overwhelming. When over 80 United States senators of both political parties support a measure I think the House takes notice. Let me say, I understand the resistance in the House among some Democrats. You know, this bill, I think gets high marks for economic stimulus moving us forward and out of this recession. But in the spirit of the season, it does say, 'God bless Tiny Tim and Donald Trump.' It gives the wealthiest in America a tax break at a time when they don't need it, shouldn't have it, but it was part of the compromise the Republicans insisted on.
SMITH: But in the end of the day, will the House go along? It's clear that the senators are on board. Will the House do this? And will it get done by Christmas?
DURBIN: I think it will be done by Christmas. I think there may be several stages in this debate. But ultimately, those who oppose it will have their day.
SMITH: Senator Dick Durbin, we do appreciate your time this morning. Thank you very, very much.
DURBIN: Thank you.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
SMITH: "The thing that he
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 1:36pm.
SMITH: "The thing that he objects to most strenuously is this idea that everybody has to be insured. And the Republicans are jumping up and down, they're ready to have a party. Do you think they have a legal leg to stand on?"
Correct Answer: Yes
Dick Durbin is no constitutional expert but instead is a liberal political hack willing and able to spin anything the Obama way.
Yes, comrade Smith, we do
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 1:37pm.
It's called the 2nd Amendment.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
We also have the 10th. What
Submitted by ricklail on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 3:44pm.
We also have the 10th. What the judge said to me was that this use of the commerce clause was BS. It all goes back to FDR and his stacked court that had many rulings, albiet wrong, on the commerce clause.
If people would read this book, The Dirty Dozen: How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom by b by Robert Levy of the Cato Institute they would better understand why the judge would call BS. I bet he read it.
Turban Durbin
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 1:42pm.
Still spouting the lies of the number of people needing coverage....26 million....36 million....50 million.....38 million.....42 million......on and on and on.
I'm with Dave about the second amendment, but it's also the Constitution including the Bill of Rights, that's our legal leg which they choose to not just ignore but to infringe on at their peril.
I really have to watch myself, but if I'm not careful, this makes me angry to popping when I see these commie bastards continue their games regardless of what anyone tells them.
-Jon
jon, My bad
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 5:20pm.
I failed to mention that that is what we have to fall back on should the government fail to uphold the Constitution.
Like they are failing to do right now.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
No, I got it
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:39pm.
I understood where you were coming from. Just saying that it angers me when someone tries to usurp the Constitution. I didn't want to give away anymore details of what I would do just like your reference to the 2nd.
I was brought up to believe in the Constitution.
-Jon
Go ahead
Submitted by Iron Tigers Vet on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 1:49pm.
Let the remaining House and Senate Dems make the wrong decisions. This will lead to more jobs gone in 2012 and help push the current POTUS out of the spotlight.
These liberals will do everything possible to screw up what they can before Jan. 3 and beyond.
That's my senator!!! I'm so
Submitted by Hunter12 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 1:55pm.
That's my senator!!! I'm so proud???? Cherry-pick one provision out of 2000 plus pages of bureaucracy and hang your hat against Republican objections: "he wants to repeal the protection Americans want against the discrimination against them for pre-existing conditions. I think that's a losing political position." Dick, get a clue. It's all the partisan BS and the provisions to institute Democrat strangleholds through the health care process to which we object. Having a community organizer housed in a clinic making sure someone who is sick gets registered to vote isn't going to do anything to make that person healthy. The death panels that will rule on elder care (yes they are in there) will probably decide for those who are staunch political allies and allow people who may vote against a party to die. And finally, the collapse of available doctors, when no one is getting paid, will lead to rationing. Look at the healthcare system in England to see what happens after 60 years of socialized medicine. We don't want it. Democrats better get their heads out into the real world. Carville's 40 years of Democrat control has gone away after 4 years of abuse. Nancy and Steynie won't be the one's voting to fill those boards and panels anymore. It's now going to be John and Eric. The Democrats better get organized to get Obamacare repealed now before the Republicans get around to the thinking that they can fill those seats with their cronies and set up their own regime control.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Keeping up the lies
Submitted by phryingphish on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 1:58pm.
Keeping up the lies about how many need "free" health care and about what the American people want:
"...when Eric Cantor on the Republican side says, 'Let's repeal ObamaCare,' he wants to repeal the protection Americans want..."
With support for Obama's healtcare in the toilet this only shows that, dispite the "shellacking" they took last month, the Democrats still don't get it.
"A December 13 ABC News/Washington Post poll found Barack Obama's health law at a new low in popularity, but Monday's World News and Tuesday's Good Morning America offered only meager coverage of the development."Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2010/12/14/abc-poll-finds-health-care-law-massively-unpopular-network-offers-sc#ixzz186rw3wXw
After Nancy's "We have to
Submitted by Hunter12 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:17pm.
After Nancy's "We have to pass it to find out what's in it" has come to pass and people are finding out what is in it, they're finding out it sucks. 200+ waivers and counting. Dims are sticking with it because the institutionalization of access to healthcare may be the only way they can regain control. This is another weapon in their arsenal to get low income workers and the illegals to vote for them. There's nothing in this bill to stop illegals from getting healthcare. Wilson was right. Obama did lie. If they can hang on to healthcare and get the Dream act passed, they may be able to regain control in 2012. You're looking at about 40 to 50 million dependent and/or new voters getting free healthcare and amnesty from one party. With the MSM running coverups, that may be all it takes.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Harry, thank god they extended unemployment...........
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:07pm.
I have actually heard Cantor and MANY Republicans state that they AGREE with the pre-existing conditions provision so Turban Durbin is just lying.
Thank God Harry was there to correct him..........
Or at least mention the recent poll that says we think this over all plan sucks....
My bad, so sorry he is losing his job NOT.
Last Gasp
Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:12pm.
Let's remember that Harry and his entire entourage are being replaced as of Jan. 3, 2011. Essentially, their ratings suck and their lefty politics haven't been able to help them attract any viewership. Even though I'd like to feel sorry for him, I can't.
Legal leg? The US district court answered that question
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:23pm.
It's not difficult to understand the issue that the commonwealth of Virginia has raised on behalf of its citizens, even if one does not agree with the judge's ruling.
Not difficult, that is, unless your Harry Smith.
Tick, Tock, Tick, Tock
Submitted by Utherpend on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:50pm.
Harry is that a countdown clock I hear counting in the back ground. Not much time left before you are put out to Liberal Pasture along with your other Low Rating's Co-Host's. With cutting edge news like this story who can blame CBS for dropping this anchor to thier ratings.
smith/durbin
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:50pm.
Of course, these are Harry Smith, esq and Dick Durbin, esq...right? WRONG!...so, with no educational/credentialed bases, they make legal judgements...give me a break; it is called "invincible ignorance."
JD-Georgetown
Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 2:57pm.
Durbin has a law degree from Georgetown and practiced in the public sector. That may not qualify him to be dog catcher, but he put in his time. Harry Smith has a bachelor's degree in communications and theater
and there you have it...
Submitted by Iron Tigers Vet on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 3:13pm.
Harry is "acting" like he knows what he's talking about...
not a lawyer
Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 6:54pm.
Harry Smith is not a lawyer but he plays one on TV.
Question for Smith and Durbin
Submitted by Model850 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 3:52pm.
If ObamaCare is such a wonderful gift to the citizens of this country, why have so many waivers to its provisions been sought -- and granted? Hmmmmmm?????
All the news that's fit to omit
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 4:15pm.
222 at last count, story NOT at 11:00.
Harry's just auditioning for
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 5:24pm.
Harry's just auditioning for a job in the Obama administration once the guards escort him from the property next month.
Barack_Must_Go.....
"He wants to repeal the
Submitted by TerryWest on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 10:14pm.
"He wants to repeal the protection Americans want against the discrimination against them for pre existing conditions." Is that the only part of the bill this guy read or what? or is this just more insult to injury towards Americans who are contrary to popular elite belief very aware of what they will be appealing and replacing and why!.It must be very hard being
Submitted by Semus on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 9:22am.
It must be very hard being Smith. Every morning making certain his head is placed firmly up his rear end.
Hey, Harry!
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 9:31am.
Ask "Dis" Durbin about the severability clause in the ObamaCare law. Oops! What, no severability clause? That was the only legal leg the Dems might have had--you should have Mark Levin on and ask him about it. He's forgotten--since breakfast--more about Constitutional law than Durbin ever knew.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me