CBS Early Show Ignores Rangel Censure, ABC and NBC Are Sympathetic to New York Democrat
On Friday, the CBS Early Show failed to make any mention of New York Democratic Congressman Charles Rangel being censured by the House of Representatives on Thursday for 11 ethics violations. ABC's Good Morning America and NBC's Today did cover the historic punishment, but adopted a very sympathetic tone toward Rangel.
In a slightly extended news brief on Good Morning America, co-host George Stephanopoulos described the censure as "an unusual moment," seeming to lament that Rangel "had to accept the punishment." Correspondent Jonathan Karl remarked that Rangel "was defiant right to the end" and "told reporters this was a very political vote." Stephanopoulos concluded the report by praising such bitterness: "That's right. He fought it. He tried to get an alternative passed. But in the end, handled that apology with real grace."
On Today, correspondent Kelly O'Donnell declared that "This is the kind of history making moment that makes everybody around here sad." Later, co-host Matt Lauer spoke with Meet the Press anchor David Gregory about the issue and wondered: "...you look at this scene on the House floor yesterday, did anybody feel good about that?" Gregory replied: "Nobody did, there's no question about it....this was a bipartisan vote, a painful vote. Nobody likes to see it. Nobody likes to stand in judgment in such a humiliating way of their colleague."
Here is a transcript of the December 3 Good Morning America report:
7:05AM ET
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Meanwhile, there was quite an unusual moment on the floor of the House yesterday, when Congressman Charles Rangel, long-time veteran of the House, former chairman of the House Ways and Committee [sic], was censured for various ethical violations. That's the first time in 27 years that's happened to a member of Congress. He had to accept the punishment. He then went to the floor to apologize.
CHARLES RANGEL (D-NY): But, I'm going to be judged by my life, my activities my contributions to society. And I just apologize for the awkward position that some of you that are in. But at the end of the day, as I started off saying, compared to where I've been, I haven't had a bad day since. Thank you.
KARL: Such an extraordinary moment, George. Not only because of its rarity, as you mentioned. Only 23 members have ever had this happen. We haven't seen it for three decades. But also because just a little over a year ago, Charlie Rangel was one of the most powerful political figures in Washington. And I have to tell you, he was defiant right to the end. After that, he told reporters this was a very political vote.
STEPHANOPOULOS: That's right. He fought it. He tried to get an alternative passed. But in the end, handled that apology with real grace.
Here is a transcript of the Today report:
7:10AM ET
MATT LAUER: Now to politics and a rare scene on Capitol Hill on Thursday. Congressman Charles Rangel censured on the House floor for violating ethics rules. NBC's Capitol Hill correspondent Kelly O'Donnell has more on this. Kelly, good morning to you.
[On screen headline: "Sorry Charlie, House Censures Rangel For 11 Ethics Violations"]
KELLY O'DONNELL: Good morning, Matt. This is the kind of history making moment that makes everybody around here sad. For the first time since 1983, the House censured one of its own, finding that New York Democrat Charlie Range was in violation of 11 ethics rules. A tense and dramatic ritual on the House floor.
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Will the gentleman from New York, Mr. Rangel, kindly appear in the well.
O'DONNELL: As Speaker of the House it was Nancy Pelosi's duty to formally admonish her longtime friend and ally.
PELOSI: Resolved that Representative Charles Rangel of New York be censured.
O'DONNELL: This public shaming ended a two-year bipartisan investigation.
REP. ZOE LOFGREN: We found that Representative Rangel engaged in misconduct in four areas.
O'DONNELL: Among the violations, Rangel failed to pay some taxes and report income and misused his office to raise millions for a college center in his name.
REP. JO BONNER: Regretfully this is a day that did not have to be.
O'DONNELL: The Ethics committee argued that Rangel deserved a serious punishment because he had been in charge of the powerful tax writing committee.
REP. MICHAEL MCCAUL: Most egregiously the committee found that Mr. Rangel failed to pay his income taxes for 17 years.
O'DONNELL: Rangel expressed sorrow-
REP. CHARLES RANGEL: Let me apologize to this August body for putting you in this very awkward position.
O'DONNELL: -acknowledged he broke rules-
RANGEL: I have made serious mistakes.
O'DONNELL: -but then Rangel and his supporters argued for a lesser sanction, saying censure had been used for congressmen convicted of crimes or sexual misconduct. New York Republican Peter King argued censure was too severe.
REP. PETER KING: If expulsion is the equivalent of the death penalty then censure is life imprisonment.
O'DONNELL: But overwhelmingly the House chose censure.
UNIDENTIFIED CONGRESSMAN: On this resolution the yays are 333, the nays are 79.
O'DONNELL: Later, Rangel's tone turned more bitter, saying past defenders brought more dishonor to the House.
RANGEL: I think history would show that a different standard has been used in this case where I did not curse out the Speaker, I have not tried to have sex with minors, I did not steal any money.
O'DONNELL: And Rangel repeatedly pointed out that the committee did not find his mistakes were about trying to advance some personal gain, but still this was a very serious punishment. But it ends here, there are no outside criminal charges pending and Rangel will be sworn-in for his 21st term in January. Matt?
MATT LAUER: Alright Kelly O'Donnell on Capitol Hill for us this morning. Kelly, thanks very much. David Gregory is moderator of Meet the Press. David, good morning to you.
DAVID GREGORY: Good morning, Matt.
LAUER: You know in Washington there, there is often no love lost between the two parties, the Republicans and Democrats, oftentimes they seem to take delight in the shortcomings of the other. And yet you look at this scene on the House floor yesterday, did anybody feel good about that?
GREGORY: Nobody did, there's no question about it. And it was frankly more Democrats who voted for the censure resolution than Republicans. So this was a bipartisan vote, a painful vote. Nobody likes to see it. Nobody likes to stand in judgment in such a humiliating way of their colleague. But this was something that's been dragging on for a while and Charlie Rangel talking about the standards being used and whether it should have been a reprimand versus a censure. So fighting all along the way which, along the way, made it more difficult for Democratic leaders.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
remember the Rosie ODonnel days?
Submitted by SouthJersey1953 on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 1:04pm.
Remember a while back (a year or so ago) when NB had a Rosie ODonnel 'stupid thing of the day' when she was on the View? It seems now we are given the treat of Georgie's stupid thing of the day.
Every day I just want to say "SHUT UP GEORGE!"
Amazing
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 1:04pm.
They don't care whose butt they kiss as long as it's got a D on it.
Oh, please!! To pretend that
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 1:41pm.
Oh, please!!
Censure without consequences is meaningless. It's being convicted and then allowed to go free.
To pretend that this "censure" [and yes, I think the quotes are appropriate] means anything, that is is either painful or humilating or that it is something that Rangel "handled with grace" is just B as in B, S as in S!
Does Rangel, in that press conference after his "humiliation" seeme either humiliated, or chastened, or gracious, to anyone???
<sound of duct tape ripping off roll>
I have to stay away from Rangel threads for a while, or my head WILL explode!
I'm sure the FCC will be all
Submitted by Walker01049 on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 1:55pm.
I'm sure the FCC will be all over this.
What did FCC Commissioner Michael Copps say to the BBC.
"We are not producing the body of news and information that democracy needs to conduct its civic dialogue."
Rangel should get the same justice that Dan Rostenkowski got.
Except for the fact
Submitted by okiehawk44 on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 1:56pm.
Except for the fact that Charlie Rangel is a black man and a Democrat what is there in 2010 to validate his actions? Is it once heroic war service 60 years ago in Korea? Our service gives all of us veterans a lifetime of passes? No it does not. Not for any of us veterans. Not for me, not for Duke Cunningham or Timothy McVeigh and not for Charlie Rangel.
Last night he and his supporters -- more than there should have been -- praised his 40 years as a congressman on the one hand and then on the other used his 40 years as a congressman as an excuse for his actions saying he became comfortable doing things in a certain (illegal) way for so long he became used to it. This reminded me of the young man accused of killing his parents standing before the judge pleading that he was an orphan.
Charlie Rangel did this to Charlie Rangel.
Period.
He broke the law (ELEVEN TIMES AT LEAST)
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 2:15pm.
You or I would be breaking rocks and making license plates. Charlie got scolded. Wow now that's reasonable, NOT!
I did not steal any money
Submitted by Model850 on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 4:24pm.
Rangel: I did not steal any money.
Oh, really? Not paying taxes for 17 years is not stealing money? What's the "it only works for Congress" euphemism for it then?
Given the Dems obsession with needing more and more taxes I'm pretty sure they'd say I was "stealing" from the government if I didn't pay mine.
CBS....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 5:28pm.
CBS (with hands over eyes): If I didn't see it, it didn't happen!
The only excuse I can figure out
Submitted by TheHistorian on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 5:29pm.
for the media to excuse Charlie Rangel is that he should get a pass because he is liberal, or some other such nonsense. My guess is liberal, because we all remember the pass that Daschle and Geithner, who are two other tax cheats that work for Obama, one as Sec Treas and the other as an "adviser". Why don't these liberals just take up a collection and pay the tax bill for these cheats? The answer is that they want it out of MY pocket; theirs is sewn shut.
Dennis Prager
I wonder......
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 5:29pm.
If I cheat on my taxes for the next 17 years, I'll be as old as Charlie is today. What do you think will happen to me when I tell the IRS, "Hey, I'm a Viet Nam Veteran!"
I/m sure they would be
Submitted by Cowboy on Sat, 12/04/2010 - 8:19am.
I/m sure they would be equally sympathetic to a Republican for the same things...
They always have been...