CBS: Lisa Murkowski 'Not Beholden' to GOP 'Who Turned Their Backs on Her'
On Thursday's CBS Early Show, correspondent Nancy Cordes reported on Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski declaring victory in her write-in bid for reelection and portrayed her as a victim of the GOP: "[She's] in a very unique position, not beholden to the Republican leaders who turned their backs on her when she decided to run and not beholden to the tea party, which did everything it could to defeat her."
In reality, it was Murkowski who turned her back on the Republican Party after losing the primary and continuing to run against GOP nominee Joe Miller. Cordes sympathetically declared: "This was a huge uphill battle for Lisa Murkowski, who was urged by Republican leaders not to wage this campaign after she lost her primary bid....It was a risky bid and the risk paid off."
In addition, Murkowski's win was portrayed as a major defeat for Sarah Palin, as Cordes proclaimed: "It's a big blow for former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who backed Miller from the start." At the top of the show, co-host Harry Smith touted how Murkowski "beats Palin's tea party candidate" and later described how it "would be a significant loss for Sarah Palin, who tried to knock out her opponent and failed."
Following Cordes's report, Smith interviewed Murkowski and highlighted the Senator's attacks on Palin in a recent Evening News interview with Katie Couric: "...one of the things you said was you thought Sarah Palin lacked the intellectual curiosity to be a good presidential candidate and turns out Sarah Palin had a conversation with Barbara Walters yesterday and she said she thinks she can beat Barack Obama in 2012. Would you vote for her?" Murkowski replied: "I've already said that I would not."
Here is a full transcript of the November 18 segment:
7:00AM ET TEASE:
HARRY SMITH: Alaska showdown. In a new interview Sarah Palin says she can beat President Obama in 2012. While her former nemesis, Lisa Murkowski, beats Palin's tea party candidate to become the Senate's first write-in winner in more than 50 years. We'll talk with Murkowski about her surprising win and her words for Palin.
7:03AM ET SEGMENT:
SMITH: Now to Alaska's historic Senate race, with just a handful of votes left to be counted, Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski says she has won a new term. That would be a significant loss for Sarah Palin, who tried to knock out her opponent and failed. Before we speak with the Senator, let's get to the story from Capitol Hill, CBS News congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes there with the latest. Nancy, good morning.
NANCY CORDES: Good morning, Harry. This was a huge uphill battle for Lisa Murkowski, who was urged by Republican leaders not to wage this campaign after she lost her primary bid. She had to convince Alaska voters to write in her name, in huge numbers. And it appears she was successful.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Alaska Showdown; Murkowski Declares Win; Palin Says She Could Beat Obama]
LISA MURKOWSKI: And so, today, my friends, my campaign for Alaska's future begins.
CORDES: It was a risky bid and the risk paid off. The last successful Senate write-in campaign was more than 50 years ago. But Wednesday, Senator Lisa Murkowski announced she'd done it.
MURKOWSKI: We did it, we made history. Alaskans made history.
CORDES: With just 750 ballots left to count, Murkowski is leading her GOP rival, tea party enthusiast Joe Miller, by more than 10,000 votes. Miller is challenging more than 8,000 of those votes, especially ones that are misspelled, but that still gives Murkowski a 2000-vote lead. He may be trailing, but Miller isn't conceding.
JOE MILLER: It's not a question as to how I feel. It's a question as to whether or not the voters of the state of Alaska deserve to have a consistent standard applied in the future, whether or not they deserve integrity in the vote and those are questions that aren't answered yet.
CORDES: It's a big blow for former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who backed Miller from the start. In a new interview with Barbara Walters, Palin wouldn't say whether she'll run for president in 2012. But, she did predict what the outcome would be if she did.
BARBARA WALTERS: If you ran for president, could you beat Barack Obama?
SARAH PALIN: I believe so.
CORDES: Murkowski told Katie Couric this week how she feels about her fellow Alaska Republican.
MURKOWSKI: I just do not think that she has those leadership qualities, that intellectual curiosity that allows for building good and great policies.
CORDES: Murkowski will return to Capitol Hill in a very unique position, not beholden to the Republican leaders who turned their backs on her when she decided to run and not beholden to the tea party, which did everything it could to defeat her. Harry.
SMITH: Nancy Cordes on Capitol Hill, thank you. And Senator Murkowski joins us now from Anchorage. Good morning, Senator.
LISA MURKOWSKI: Good morning, nice to be with you.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Senate Shake-Up; Murkowski Declares Victory With Alaska Write-In]
SMITH: Talk about how important it is that people in Alaska knew how to spell M-u-r-k-o-w-s-k-i.
MURKOWSKI: We did the unprecedented, we made history. Over 100,000 Alaskans affirmatively said it's important to me and to this election to fill in the oval and spell out my name correctly. To see that recorded as part of the write-in and not know, 'Well, who did they fill in?' We've now learned – we've now learned that Alaskans have spoken and they've written it out, as well, it's pretty historic.
SMITH: Joe Miller is threatening to demand a recount. The Republican Party on the other hand is saying, 'You ought to concede.' Should he concede?
MURKOWSKI: Well, the numbers are just not there for him. And I think – I think that Mr. Miller recognizes that, as well. Right now, with all of the ballots that are in, we are significantly up, well over 10,000 votes, even if every ballot that the Miller camp had challenged throughout this write-in campaign, even if every one of them were tossed out, we would still be winning this campaign. And so, it just doesn't add up for him.
SMITH: Let's talk about things that add up come the new term in Washington in January. You are an old-fashioned Alaskan Republican, certainly a fan of earmarks. Earmarks have gone out of fashion just in the last couple of weeks. How are you going to fit in?
MURKOWSKI: Well, it's not all about earmarks. It is all about making sure that you do the best job that you possibly can to represent your state. It's going to be a different landscape as it relates to earmarks. I think we all recognize that. But, I will be insistent that as a legislator, as one who represents the interests of the state of Alaska, I'm going to make sure that Alaska's voices are heard.
SMITH: You talked to Katie Couric earlier this week and one of the things you said was you thought Sarah Palin lacked the intellectual curiosity to be a good presidential candidate and turns out Sarah Palin had a conversation with Barbara Walters yesterday and she said she thinks she can beat Barack Obama in 2012. Would you vote for her?
MURKOWSKI: I've already said that I would not. Obviously, 2012 seems like a long way for most of us, although those that are engaged in politics were gearing up yesterday. That's clearly the direction that things are taking. I think it remains to be seen who will step forward on the Republican side, but it sounds like things are getting – getting heated already.
SMITH: Senator Lisa Murkowski, we thank you very, very much for taking the time to be with us today. Thank you.
MURKOWSKI: Thank you. Good to be with you.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
My guess is that it was
Submitted by MidAmerica on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 12:53pm.
My guess is that it was democrats voting for her that put her over the top. This bitter old politician is a good fit for the democrat party.
Murkowski is just one of the RINOs who helped the far-left
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:02pm.
...push this nation to the very edge of its destruction.
This woman is too stupid to even realize what she has done.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
MURKOWSKI, Lost the republican primary!
Submitted by upcountrywater on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:12pm.
She takes what a million bucks that was donated to her by republicans.
Spends that money like it was hers, and uses that republican money against a republican? She owes republicans that pile of cash plus interest!
No big deal, she will pal up with dingy reid and learn one of those many get rich schemes as it's done in Washington.
You Didn't Build That.
hey now, by his own claims,
Submitted by sometimesright on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:36pm.
hey now, by his own claims, he got rich by investing smartly from the income he earned in the TWO(2) years he was a lawyer. we all know, 2 years in the legal field is more than enough time to accumulate enough wealth to retire.
My guess is she won't stray far from the GOP
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 5:25pm.
If she gets cozy with the Dems, she'll lose any influence she has if (when) the GOP finishes the retaking of the Senate in 2012.
If she crosses McConnell and the rest of the GOP fossils, there'll be hell to pay in 2013.
the Clinton Broadcasting
Submitted by sometimesright on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:20pm.
the Clinton Broadcasting Station just can't miss any opportunity whatsoever to bash Palin. who the heck is this story about anyway? the person who ran and won the election or a person who ENDORSED the opponent who ISN'T running for anything? give me a break, their motives are transparent, attack Palin and interview no dessenting views. then they pat themselves on the back for their "objectivity". and yes, if the GOP knew that she would use their monies to bring down another rep things would've been different.
Lisa got RNC funds all the way
Submitted by esperanza4 on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:30pm.
Uh, what? The RNC backed her Senate re-election campaign for what, a year....she got RNC funds. She had the major RNC figures backing her all the way. But, those pesky Alaskans who were not happy w/her, actually dared to say, we'd like another candidate choice. What do you know, the out of nowhere, lesser known, less well funded, Palin/Tea Party backed guy won. Fair & square, he won a tough election in the primary. The RNC did not back that guy, and Rove & others did all they could to derail him, like they did O'Donnell and Angle.
Moreover, Lisa was backed by the GOP Senators after she lost the primary....great.
Where exactly did the GOP turn their back on her? She lost the primary. She underestimated her opponent. She won by getting lots of Democrats to vote for her, and the DNC was happy to assist her formally and informally.
Alaska voted, she won. Palin lost - sorry, she did lose this one in her backyard. But, Lisa's family name is big in Alaska too. So, that's not a shock.
As for those upset Palin said she could beat Obama - if asked that question, any potential candidate better answer the same way, or why bother even setting up an exploratory committee? Heck yeah, I think I can win, why else would I run? She isn't my first or second choice, but, I do love how she irrirates the left, and the staid GOP leadership.
Miller should contest... get recount.
Submitted by humanzee on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:50pm.
Miller should contest the results and ask for a recount. He should force them to only count ballots with her name spelled correctly.
Something smells fishy about her lead.
1) She's well connected, comes from a powerful Alaskan political family
2) Democrats very badly didn't want a Palin endorsed candidate to win over her rival.
3) She didn't win her primary.
4) Lots of powerful interest groups want an Alaskan senator that will play 'ball."
How can someone win a write-in ballot that way?
If he contests ballots and demands a recount... Miller has a good change. it worked for Al Franken. Time for some payback!
R E C O U N T!!!
Only ballots where her name is spelled correctly should count... or else you'd count Mickey Mouse write-ins as hers as well.
I Agree. The Election Reeks of Corruption.
Submitted by Tenebrous on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 4:55pm.
Not only that, but last I heard they weren't counting any of the write-in ballots where voters wrote in Joe Miller.
But even if Miller relinqueshes this race, there's always the next battle. Look at Thune in SD. It took him a few tries, but in the end, he won and won big. By getting that RINO wench in there, all that the RINOs have done is painting an even bigger target on their backs. The war is ours to win.
Visions and Principles blog
Spelling
Submitted by Thunder Lizard on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 1:58pm.
Spelling Murkowski's name is a lot easier than it sounds - - - R.I.N.O.
How exactly did the GOP turn
Submitted by Martin2717 on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 5:15pm.
How exactly did the GOP turn their backs on her? She lost the freakin' primary. Shame on Alaska. How stupid are these idiots in the LSM? Let me answer myself..... VERY.
Go to Hell, Murkowski
Submitted by Benjamin on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 5:33pm.
The MSM is freaking crazy.
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 5:40pm.
The MSM is freaking crazy.