CBS: Israeli Archeological Dig 'Indoctrination' for Expanding 'Jewish Encroachment'
On Sunday's 60 Minutes, CBS correspondent Lesley Stahl fretted over the possible expansion of Israeli settlements near an important archeological site in Jerusalem: "So archeology is being used as a political tool....indoctrination, almost." She claimed that "organizations that move Jewish settlers into Arab areas have infiltrated" the surrounding Arab neighborhood.
Stahl described the dig site: "...more and more Israeli settlers have moved east into the Arab-populated areas. One place where it's gotten especially complicated and volatile is the Arab neighborhood of Silwan. The complication in Silwan involves an Israeli archeological dig called the City of David." She worried about the religious implications: "It's controversial that the City of David uses discoveries to try to confirm what's in the Bible, particularly from the time of David, the king who made Jerusalem his capital....There's an implicit message that because David conquered the city for the Jews back then, Jerusalem belongs to the Jews today."
Stahl worked to dismiss the biblical significance of the site: "...archeologists tell us that no one has found any evidence that Abraham was ever here....for all the talk of King David, one thing is glaringly missing here at the City of David. There's actually no evidence of David."
After labeling the project as "indoctrination," Stahl focused on the Palestinian point of view: "Jawad Siyam was born in this very, very special place, and says he can trace his roots here back 930 years....he's become an activist leader in Silwan, where there have been a string of escalating confrontations. In this protest, at the City of David, Jawad got into a shouting match with a site-worker behind a gate." A clip was played of Siyam screaming: "And you will be the rubbish of the history! There is no proof that King David was here! You want to take our land!"
Stahl explained how "some of the incidents have become violent," describing an incident in which two Palestinian boys – who were throwing rocks at and running in front of passing cars – were hit by a car driven by the head of a Jewish organization backing the archeological exploration.
Stahl proclaimed: "There's a feeling of encroachment. The Arabs feel it....That feeling of Jewish encroachment has been heightened by the Mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat, who is doing all he can to make sure East Jerusalem remains under Israeli sovereignty." She noted how Barkat "wants to create a Bible-themed garden and turn it into a tourist park adjacent to the City of David....[which] requires demolishing 22 Arab homes in Silwan."
Speaking to the mayor, Stahl leveled the accusation that he was trying to force out Palestinians: "The European Union, the United Nations, has criticized this plan to get rid of these 22 homes. Public opinion, especially while the peace talks are under way, is – is looking at this and saying you're trying to get rid – move Arabs out of Jerusalem....why not wait till the peace talks are settled?" Barkat shot back: "Lesley, the facts are wrong. Those structures are illegal....get your facts right before you bash Israel, before you bash Jerusalem." Stahl later argued: "You say that Jerusalem must never be divided. But most of the rest of the world says that if you want peace that may be the price that you have to pay."
Stahl concluded the segment: "Meanwhile, in the City of David, the excavations are continuing in full force. You can say they're digging in. Settlements have been a stumbling block in peace negotiations of the past....[the City of David] could become the stumbling block again."
Here is a portion of the October 17 segment:
7:05PM ET
LESLEY STAHL: It's controversial that the City of David uses discoveries to try to confirm what's in the Bible, particularly from the time of David, the king who made Jerusalem his capital.
DORON SPIELMAN: People believe that when King David captured the city, he snuck underground through this tunnel, which led him underneath the city wall up into the city.
STAHL: Half a million tourists visit the site every year with guides who try to bring King David to life. There's an implicit message that because David conquered the city for the Jews back then, Jerusalem belongs to the Jews today. Today, I've seen scores and scores of soldiers coming through.
SPIELMAN: It's part of their cultural day to try to learn about what they're fighting for. And when we bring them here, they understand that they're not just fighting for today, they actually represent the return of the Jewish people to Israel after thousands of years.
STAHL: So archeology is being used as a political tool. I mean – I mean, I hate to use the word, but indoctrination, almost.
SPIELMAN: I wouldn't call it indoctrination. I would call it giving meaning to life, giving meaning to why we're here.
STAHL: But for all the talk of King David, one thing is glaringly missing here at the City of David. There's actually no evidence of David, right?
SPIELMAN: There's no doubt that this is the City of David from the Bible. There's no doubt that the Bible took place here. Proof of David himself, until we find the actual name, we can't say.
STAHL: Another problem is an inconvenient truth that biblical Jerusalem is not located in the western half of the city. It's right under the densely-populated Arab neighborhood of Silwan. And according to the Clinton parameters, Silwan should be part of a Palestinian state. To remedy that, organizations that move Jewish settlers into Arab areas have infiltrated Silwan. Under heavy security, a group of settlers live in this seven-story building. They've barricaded themselves in and refuse to leave. With some 450 Jews living among tens of thousands of Arabs, Silwan is now at the center of the battle to keep all of Jerusalem under Israeli control. So how does the City of David tie into this? Well, while a government agency oversees the excavations, the dig and the site are largely funded and run by something called El'Ad. Doron Speilman works for El'Ad, which claims they're not a settlers' organization, though, people we spoke to say they are.
SPIELMAN: I think that it'd be correct to call us an organization who believes deeply in the history of Jerusalem.
STAHL: So it's all archaeology?
SPIELMAN: Archaeology and rebuilding a Jewish neighborhood.
STAHL: So El'Ad is doing archaeology and settlements?
SPIELMAN: We are doing archaeology, and we are buying homes and buying land.
STAHL: But is it El'Ad's goal to ease the Arabs away from right where we are right now?
SPIELMAN: Put it this way, if there's a home that an Arab wants to sell and I have the money to buy it and I can move, enable a Jewish family to live there, and I can dig archaeologically underneath it-
STAHL: Mm-Hm.
SPIELMAN: -then I think that's a wonderful thing to do.
STAHL: The Arabs say it's a provocative thing to do. Devout Jews Yonatan and Devorah Adler live in one of the houses El'Ad bought. El'Ad has raised tens of millions of dollars, half from the United States, and buys these homes on land the Palestinians claim for a future state. The Adlers raise their six kids here, on the actual dig.
YONATAN ADLER: The City of David is where Jerusalem began. This is where prophets walked. This is where half of the Bible was written. This is what we're talking about.
STAHL: And yet when – when you see those maps, it's over in the Palestinian side?
ADLER: Yeah. Well, maps are written on paper, this is written on our hearts.
STAHL: But it is one of the proposals on the table?
ADLER: I'll tell you, Jerusalem cannot be divided. Jews would never allow it.
STAHL: The Adlers say they don't mind living behind gates and having guards on their roof. They would never consider leaving. But you're like a soldier on the frontline.
DEVORAH ADLER: I don't think we see ourselves as soldiers at all. We see ourselves as very much as regular everyday people, living in a very, very special place.
STAHL: Palestinian Jawad Siyam was born in this very, very special place, and says he can trace his roots here back 930 years. He's pessimistic about the Palestinians ever having their own state. What will happen to this village if there's a two-state solution?
JAWAD SIYAM: I don't think there will be a two-state solution. That's not possible to do it. Today, they – the settler groups are much stronger than before. The settler groups in Jerusalem, they are controlling.
STAHL: He's angry that El'Ad bought his grandmother's house and moved a number of Jewish families in, so he's become an activist leader in Silwan, where there have been a string of escalating confrontations. In this protest, at the City of David, Jawad got into a shouting match with a site-worker behind a gate.
SIYAM: And you will be the rubbish of the history! There is no proof that King David was here! You want to take our land!
STAHL: Some of the incidents have become violent, like this one just nine days ago. Boys were throwing stones at passing cars. Watch what happens next as two of the boys get hit by one of the cars. The driver was, of all people, the head of El'Ad. He later went to the police and said he hadn't stopped because he felt his life was in danger. Both boys survived, one with a broken leg. Fighting often erupts here with Israeli guards brought in to protect the settlers.
SIYAM: Clashes are daily inside Silwan between the villagers and settlers and the gun guards for the security there.
STAHL: The government pays for the gun guards?
SIYAM: It's tax money. It's – I pay it. Every – everyone who is paying taxes is paying it.
STAHL: You pay taxes and that money goes to pay for the guards to guard the settlers.
SIYAM: Yes, of course.
STAHL: So you're helping guard the settlers.
SIYAM: Yeah, I'm – I'm a fan of the settlers and the gun guards.
STAHL: Jawad says that El'Ad uses the dig's archeological prestige to hide its aim of moving the locals out. And he believes that the tunneling is a way for El'Ad to extend its reach deeper into Silwan. They think you're digging under their houses.
SPIELMAN: It does, at points, go underneath homes, deep underneath the ground, which is why we have these metal supports around us.
STAHL: But it's under Arab homes.
SPIELMAN: It's under Jewish homes, Arab homes, and a road. What concerns these residents, Lesley, is not the tunnel. It's where the tunnel's going. It's what the tunnel means that concerns them.
STAHL: Well, where's the tunnel going?
SPIELMAN: The tunnel, one day, will open into the Western Wall Plaza. Then you will have undergone an experience that shows the Jewish Temple was important 600 years before Muhammad.
STAHL: To understand why this is so explosive, you have to understand the geography. Silwan lies in the shadow of some of the holiest sites in the world – Judaism's Western Wall and Islam's Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa Mosque. There's a feeling of encroachment. The Arabs feel it.
SPIELMAN: There's no other place in the world that Jews want to live in more than here. The Arabs have Mecca, they have Medina, and they may also be interested in Jerusalem. But for the Jews, this is our only home.
STAHL: That feeling of Jewish encroachment has been heightened by the Mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat, who is doing all he can to make sure East Jerusalem remains under Israeli sovereignty.
NIR BARKAT: We have to maintain a United Jerusalem.
STAHL: The mayor brought us to a hilltop over Silwan to show us his latest project, called King's Garden.
BARKAT: This is the most important area in the world.
STAHL: In the whole world?
BARKAT: Definitely. And in the valley right there below us is where King's Garden was.
STAHL: He wants to create a Bible-themed garden and turn it into a tourist park adjacent to the City of David. But as with the dig, the local Arabs see this as another attempt to gobble up their side of Jerusalem. Building the Mayor's park requires demolishing 22 Arab homes in Silwan. If you began to demolish these houses, it would be explosive, wouldn't it?
BARKAT: That's why you have to be very smart and sensitive dealing with an area so important in the City of Jerusalem.
STAHL: He says that area is a slum in which the houses were built illegally, and his plan will fix that. But the locals want to stay in their homes. I heard you wanted to evict people. Where are – where are those houses?
BARKAT: That's – that's just not true. To accept-
STAHL: Well, wait, but if you make a park, then those houses can't be there anymore.
BARKAT: They mustn't have been there in the first place.
STAHL: Yeah, but so – so you will evict. You will evict.
BARKAT: Not evict. When you improve their quality of life, the right word to say is that you're dealing with improvement of quality of life.
STAHL: His park, he says, will upgrade the area, and he'll allow the people who'll be evicted to build new houses nearby. But locals tell us the only way to do that would be to build on top of other homes in Silwan. The European Union, the United Nations, has criticized this plan to get rid of these 22 homes. Public opinion, especially while the peace talks are under way, is – is looking at this and saying you're trying to get rid – move Arabs out of Jerusalem.
BARKAT: That's not true.
STAHL: But that's the way it looks. And why – my question is-
BARKAT: Well, the facts are-
STAHL: -why not wait till the peace talks are settled?
BARKAT: Lesley, the facts are wrong. Those structures are illegal. They're sitting on an area that the world – the world wants to be part of a city that is flourishing, that is clean, that is beautiful. So what I'm saying here is get your facts right before you bash Israel, before you bash Jerusalem.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
"So archeology is being used
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:29pm.
"So archeology is being used as a political tool....indoctrination, almost."
Is that something like "almost pregnant" or "almost dead" or "almost a journalist"?
or like Stahl, "almost Jewish"
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:35pm.
or like Stahl, "almost Jewish"
he is mad his grandmother
Submitted by dmaley1714 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:30pm.
sold her house. Sounds like a legal transaction with out any foricble removal. I find Stahl to be very racist that Jews cannot live in certain neighborhoods.
Practicing a bit of racism there, Lesley?
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:42pm.
I don't get it, Lesley. When ancient Jewish sites in "Arab" areas are undergoing an archeological dig, that's considered as a dileberate act of "almost" indoctrination and a pretext to expanded colonialism, but when the same thing occurs in Iraq, Afghanistan, Italy, France, England, America, Egypt, and any place else in the world where mankind tries to learn about our past, that's NOT "almost" indoctrination and there's no worry about increased colonialism? What's the difference, the fact that these "controversial" digs are about Jewish history? That reeks of Racism.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Jerusalem does belong to the Jews
Submitted by suburbanite on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:02pm.
God gave the land to the Jews in perpetuity. And let us not forget that the history being unearthed occured well before Islam even came into existence.
The sad thing is that if David wasn't part of Judaism and the Bible, and his biography was contained in secular sources, it would be accepted as fact. Look at Egyptian history. They seem to rewrite it every decade or so with scant evidence at best. Heck, they don't even know who's face is on the Sphynx.
It's your only way" Triumph
Every Jew knows that
Submitted by ricklail on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:29pm.
Every Jew knows that Jerusalem is just part of the land that was promised to Abraham. What is so hard to understand about that.
Great points.
Submitted by deerjerkydave on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 5:15pm.
Great points suburb.
------------------------
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James MadisonIt's clear that the only
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:06pm.
It's clear that the only reason that this leftist hates jews is that American's not only don't hate jews, but have aided and supported them since the late 1940's.
If tomorrow, we suddendly caste aside the Jewish state of Israeli and aided and supported < > fill in the blanks with the country of your choice, we would find our newspapers, magazines, and TV stations filled with hate filled diatribes like Stahl's.
Meanwhile, there is no way in hell that Stahl would ever premit herself to live under the Moslem's Suria law. She, for example, has and wants to keep her clitoris - something that is removed from women in many Moselm countries. She would want to keep her wealth - something that is not permitted in most Moselm countries. She does not wear a head covering - something that will get you a fine, then, arrested and finally jailed in most Moselm countries. Or course, there is the near complete lack of freedom to almost anything that we her in America take for granted and as our birth rite.
In other words, Stahl is embracing a completely alien and otherwise abhorrent culture so that she can thumb her nose at a people that the United States aids and supports. A people that live on a piece of land that takes a couple of hours to drive across by car it is so tiny. A country that is surrounded by 20 plus odd Moselm countries that want to push the jews into the sea and have in the past, do now and will in future attack them mercilessly. .
So stahl, this is Good indoctrination!!! Pinhead.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:14pm.
[...] workers from the Muslim Wakf began in August to dig a trench more than 400 meters long, without IAA supervision. Noted archaeologist Dr. Eilat Mazar noted with dismay that Israeli police officers watched without saying a word or taking action against Arab workers who indiscriminately tore up the ground without regard for priceless relics that lay beneath.
Mazar spoke with Arutz-7's Hebrew news magazine about the desecration. "Irreversible destruction is going on there," she said, adding that the site is only slightly above the original Temple Mount platform, which might contain remnants of the First Holy Temple.
A policeman trying to stop an Arab tractor engaged in illegal Temple Mount excavations was assaulted, one witness said - and the police chief who arrived on the scene arrested no one.
You Didn't Build That.
Bingo.
Submitted by Morganfrost on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:45pm.
I suppose the difference is that the Waqf isn't really doing archaeology. It's just working on destroying the inconvenient evidence that the Jewish were on the Temple Mount long before it was seized by the Muslims.
Sounds like the outrage is that Jews are using archaeological evidence of their historic claim on Jerusalem to bolster... their claim on Jerusalem. The Arabs, on the other hand, are simply working to destroy the archaeological evidence because they don't like what it shows.
How odd that the Jews are the ones tagged with making "political" use of archaeology!
...and for some mediatard to
Submitted by mattm on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 4:11pm.
...and for some mediatard to accuse Israel of indoctrination when it is the enemies of Israel who indoctrinate their children to hate Israel, to hate Jews and to believe they have just cause to kill, and destroy...
What I'd like to know is why the media takes the anti-Israel side? I have a couple theories - Israel represents evidence of the veracity of scripture; Israel is supported by most of the "religious right"; the media are afraid to appear to contradict the lies of the anti-Israel propaganda machine because they don't want their buildings blown up; pure ignorance and stupidity; blindness to the truth caused by a lifetime of leftist brainwashing and the confused logic that results from it...
I don't know...
Just have to throw in a shameless plug, here.
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:14pm.
If any of you haven't ever seen him, the Naked Archaeolgist is one of the most fun things there is to watch on TV.
2010 was the third season of this show. It's on a couple of channels...well worth a look see.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Lesley Stahl
Submitted by Herbster on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:19pm.
Another mediamoron sounding off with an anti-semitic / left wing diatribe. The woman ius both historically and biblically ignorant. You watch and listen to these people and they all sound the same - same old propaganda.....and they wonder why their ratings are in the toilet. "Jews bad, palestinians good. America bad. The rest of the world good. Christians and Jews bad. muslims good. cnn/msnbc/abc/cbs/nbc good. Fox News bad. Disagree with obama and you're a racist. Disagree with Bush and you're a patriot.
I find it interesting that this cretin with a bad hairdo is taken seriously by anyone with an I.Q. over 25. Palestinian? There is no such thing as a Palestinian. Hate to break the news to madame bleach. She should read the Bible and see what God had to say about Israel....."And I shall make thee a great nation," etc. Oh my, I forgot that these media types don't believe in God....that is, a God of Jews and Christians. Hmmmm. Wonder how they feel about mr. muhammad?
The biased media is a huge problem in our country. I have a feeling Goebbels is looking up from hell and smiling when he sees these repulsive media types spouting pure propagandistic drivel.
Herbster, I like you, was
Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:53pm.
Herbster, I like you, was seeing the anti-semitism in Stahl's interview. Historically this seems to be part of the liberal midset thru the ages (This does include that evil socialist Hitler).
Very one sided and racist, Ms. Stahl.
Submitted by c5then on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:42pm.
No mention of the Muslim construction on the Temple Mount that is proceeding without IAA approval (illegal in Isreal) and being accomplished using backhoes, bulldozers and other major construction equipment. The excavated earth is being dumped in a pile not far from the construction site. There is an ongoing archeological project to take the "refuse" and go through it as quickly as possible. They have already found priceless artifacts and heart breaking evidence that there were many many more artifacts that have been irretreivably destroyed by the excavation.
The Muslims do not even recognize or admit that there was a Jewish presence at the site in the past. Their religious ideology prevents them from seeing or speaking the truth.
With no mention of this, the story by Stahl is just another propaganda piece. Nothing more.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
I believe in biblical
Submitted by ricklail on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 4:20pm.
I believe in biblical prophesy. The Jews will rebuilt the Temple on the Temple Mount. That mosque will be gone. I really thought when Sadam was aiming scuds at Isreal one of them would have hit the mosque and blew it up. Something will happen-don't know what but before the end of the time the Temple will sit on the mount.
yes it does
Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:46pm.
There's an implicit message that because David conquered the city for the Jews back then, Jerusalem belongs to the Jews today.
Well, yes.... it does. So what's your point again...??
gee, Leslie
Submitted by spepper on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:47pm.
Gee, Leslie--
Climatology is used as a political tool, why not archaeology also?
Saw Lesli on Morning Joe -
Submitted by notinstl on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:48pm.
- She is barely coherent...and that thing on her head is terribly distracting........
I saw her on MJ as well
Submitted by bigtimer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:44pm.
I saw her on MJ as well yesterday, could not take it all, especially after she got to poor, poor, misunderstood Obama, he's like a burn victim...blah blah blah...I clicked it after that BS.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
...that thing on her head...
Submitted by cwcheese on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 5:41pm.
Isn't that hair? Or does she wear a wig?
History deniers
Submitted by nkviking75 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:27pm.
I guess if the loony wing of Islam can deny the Holocaust, an event still remembered by survivors to this day, they can deny that there was a King David. Stahl is afraid that archeology will verify the Jews' claim to Israel.
“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
She never goes away...so sick
Submitted by bigtimer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:37pm.
She never goes away...so sick of her...nothing much more to say with the exception of did anyone expect anything less..truly, agenda, agenda, agenda, it never ends with the leftist nit-wits.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
I should have said the enemy
Submitted by bigtimer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:40pm.
I should have said the enemy within above instead of Nit-Wits...ahh heck combine both of the descriptions of the left, it's fitting.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart