CBS ‘Early Show’ Links Terror Interrogations to Abu Ghraib...Again

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Russ Mitchell, CBS In a news brief on Friday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Russ Mitchell implied a link between the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal and Bush administration approval of tough interrogation tactics on suspected terrorists: "Soon we will see more pictures of U.S. personnel allegedly abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan. The photos, like these from Abu Ghraib, are being released next month, following a suit by the American Civil Liberties Union. The group says it is proof that prisoner abuse was widespread. And high-profile Bush administration officials are being linked to those interrogation techniques."

Correspondent Thalia Assuras then reported: "Condoleezza Rice, as National Security Adviser in 2002, verbally approved the CIA's use of waterboarding, the earliest known green light according to a Senate account." Assuras then rhetorically asked: "But her decision alone?" A clip was then played of a so-called expert, Dan Guide, from the left-wing group Center for American Progress: "I don't think that we can identify individuals who are anymore or less responsible within the higher levels of the Bush administration. This was taken as a collective decision." Assuras never mentioned the political affiliation of the organization. Later in the report, Guide lamented limitations on prosecuting Bush officials: "The most significant constraint, at least in my view, is that this entire case would be conducted with classified information."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Assuras concluded her report by declaring: "But the entire controversy is not expected to go away any time soon. In fact, it may gain more momentum." On Wednesday, co-host Harry Smith suggested a connection between Bush administration interrogation guidelines and Abu Ghraib: "...a Senate Armed Services Committee report...suggests that the roots of torture, the roots of the idea of torture were being circulated in the Pentagon and the CIA as early as 2002...Is there a line...that goes from 2002 to Abu Ghraib to the hundreds of times waterboards were used in these cases of these few CIA cases?"

Here is the full transcript of the Friday news brief:

7:09AM SEGMENT:

RUSS MITCHELL: Soon we will see more pictures of U.S. personnel allegedly abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan. The photos, like these from Abu Ghraib, are being released next month, following a suit by the American Civil Liberties Union. The group says it is proof that prisoner abuse was widespread. And high-profile Bush administration officials are being linked to those interrogation techniques. CBS News correspondent Thalia Assuras has more.

THALIA ASSURAS: Condoleezza Rice, as National Security Adviser in 2002, verbally approved the CIA's use of waterboarding, the earliest known green light according to a Senate account. But her decision alone?

KEN GUIDE [CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS]: I don't think that we can identify individuals who are anymore or less responsible within the higher levels of the Bush administration. This was taken as a collective decision.

ASSURAS: Lawmakers from both sides are also getting heat, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, one of four congressional leaders from both parties, briefed around the same time. Her response Thursday:

NANCY PELOSI: We were not, I repeat, we -- not told that waterboarding, or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods, were used.

ASSURAS: Meantime, analysts predict prosecution of any senior officials would be very difficult.

GUIDE: The most significant constraint, at least in my view, is that this entire case would be conducted with classified information.

ASSURAS: But the entire controversy is not expected to go away any time soon. In fact, it may gain more momentum. Thalia Assuras, CBS News, Washington.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Soros and Co. are

Soros and Co. are breathless with the anticipation of these releases...

If I expressed how I really feel about all of this, I would never be allowed here again.

I do not think they understand the silent majority one iota.

Fight these people who hate this country and have the very intention of destroying what is left of the Constitutional Republic all the way, we cannot tire until this is done.

My anger is immense.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

The very UN-American Civil Liberties Union

Is anyone going to address the issue of the very UN-American Civil Liberties Union? When do they actually do anything in favor of America? It's as if they agree with Islam that American is the Great Satan. I have yet to hear of anything close to torture. As opposed to what liberals and the ACLU is in favor of, the torture of abortion. That they will defend.
I still don't know what was wrong with Abu Ghraib. These people cut off other people's heads and we are supposed to feel bad that they were humiliated? Sorry, I just can't muster that up.
I was originally against releasing information, but now I don't know. It may be that if we can truly get 'ALL' of the facts and pictures out the liberals are going to stink to high heaven over this and may ensure their great loss in the next election. This train is already out of the gate, so one can only hope .
I also don't believe for a minute that Obama was not in favor of this. His goal is the destruction of the American Republic. Not its protection.
Does anyone remember the movie 'Man On Fire' with Denzel Washington? Creasy really knew how to take care of terrorists. However that was torture, whether you are for or against it. Waterboarding is not.
TSF Protests!

ACLU

What exactly does the ACLU have to do with Foreign Prisoners? They're not Americans.

The Marxist are taking

The Marxist are taking complete control of our government. 

Do not think this is happenstance.  obama was suckled on the teat of Marxism.  It defines who he is.  There is no politician in Washington with the strength to call him out on this.  There is no one in Washington who wants to be pointed out as the one who goes on television and says what is really happening. They are worried about re-election, about loss of stature, and being embarassed to boot. No spines.

That is because the MSM is no better than Pravda of the Soviet Union.

Don't forget, most of these in the media grew up thinking America has always been the bad guy.  Most of them were teenagers when real men were fighting undercover against the Soviets to keep them from propagandizing more then what the Soviets did.

It appears to no effect.  These are lost souls occupying politics and the media.  We who know better, it appears, are on our own. 

But, resist we must.  I am getting at a loss as to how.  But ultimately, we all know what it will and must come to.  To save our free country.  Free men will know what to do when their lost freedom is staring them in the face.  Stay tuned.

Now who is lying?

From this article Nancy Pelosi claims that in 2002, “We were not, I repeat, we -- not told that waterboarding, or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods, were used.”

But according to Glen Thrush’s Blog at Politico.com, dtd 04-23-09, there was a 2007 Washington Post story, whose authors wrote, “In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.”

Now who is lying?

Guess the big push in the MSM is now to smear Gitmo operations as the same as Abu Graib abuses.

I wonder how far the Republicans will get...

It seems to me that the Republicans, who were there, can tell what was said and what wasn't.  If there's a liar, you can bet it's a Democrat.

Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.  

I'm wondering how long it

I'm wondering how long it will be before stills from Platoon, Casualties of War (not to mention Roots and Mandingo) are entered into school history books as historical documentation of American atrocities in our up and coming Idiocracy.

Actually, something like the account of the Sand Creek Massacre from Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee would be perfect fodder and is historically accurate, but these 'historians' are so clueless.   Also, that would incriminate President Lincoln by proxy so they can't have any of that.  But, if I were writing that book, I'd also include accounts of what the Sioux did to white folks in Minnesota in 1862.  Man's inhumanity to man and even usually decent people make mistakes and commit atrocities would be my theme.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).