CBS: Financial Crisis A ‘Game-Changer,’ Obama ‘Surge’ in Polls

Photo of Kyle Drennen.

Poll Numbers, CBS At the top of Thursday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Julie Chen teased an upcoming segment on how the Wall Street financial crisis is affecting the presidential race: "Game-changer, as Wall Street falters, Barack Obama surges ahead in our latest CBS News poll." During the segment, correspondent Chip Reid declared: "...the new CBS News/New York Times poll suggests that momentum has switched back to Senator Obama after McCain's post-convention bounce. McCain led nationally by two points just one week ago, but the latest numbers show Obama holding a five-point lead over his Republican rival." However, Reid failed to mention the 3% margin of error in the poll, which could have only been briefly seen on the on-screen graphic.

Reid also cited poll data on McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin: "The new poll also suggests enthusiasm for Senator McCain's running mate Sarah Palin has softened. 33% of voters think she's qualified to be president, 62% voicing concern." While Reid spoke of ‘softened’ enthusiasm for Palin, he cited no previous poll date to demonstrate a loss of support. Instead, he criticized Palin’s performance at her first town hall meeting Wednesday night: "And she was not asked, nor did she offer, any specifics on foreign policy. Now the questions at that town hall last night and in a Fox interview last night were friendly and open-ended but the campaign understands that that will change and fast." Reid never showed any footage of FNC’s Sean Hannity interviewing Palin. Early Show co-host Harry Smith has interviewed Barack Obama eight times and only asked two questions on foreign policy.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Following Reid’s report, Smith talked with Michael Crowley, editor of the liberal political magazine, the New Republic. Crowley has been on the show numerous times to provide political analysis without a conservative counterpart. Smith began by citing yet another CBS News/New York Times poll that showed that among voters who think the economy is getting worse, 29% support McCain and 62% support Obama: " Look at this. Voters who think the economy is getting worse support, look at that. Obama is crushing McCain in that number right there." Crowley added: "Yeah. And, you know, what voter doesn't think the economy's getting worse? I mean, McCain may be romping with the voters who think it's getting better but the point is that on the issue that people are really focused on now, Iraq, unbelievably, basically out of the news for the moment. Obama is romping on that score and that's got to portend very well for how he does."

Smith then turned to the electoral map and focused on key battleground states: "Let's talk about a couple of western states and what could happen. New Mexico is red, four years ago, went to George Bush, right? Let's say that changes. Let's say that Colorado changes. Let's -- our other one?...And Iowa." Smith then outlined a winning scenario for Obama in which the Democratic candidate won all three states. Crowley then observed: "Just those three states. Colorado and New Mexico very close in the last election...Iowa was a red state but Obama – it launched Obama. Remember, he won the caucuses there, really got him started as an international phenomenon...And they really seem to still love him so he is very strong there and these states are a little closer."

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:00AM TEASER:

JULIE CHEN: Game-changer, as Wall Street falters, Barack Obama surges ahead in our latest CBS News poll.

7:07AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: How the race for the White House is being affected by the economy in a big, big way. The new CBS News poll shows Barack Obama is back in the lead. CBS News correspondent Chip Reid is in Grand Rapids, Michigan with more on that. Good morning, Chip.

CHIP REID: Well, good morning, Harry. Last night here in Grand Rapids, both John McCain and Sarah Palin were on stage but all eyes were on Palin because after three weeks this is the very first time she opened herself up to questions from the audience. In a marathon race that continues to twist and turn, the new CBS News/New York Times poll suggests that momentum has switched back to Senator Obama after McCain's post-convention bounce. McCain led nationally by two points just one week ago, but the latest numbers show Obama holding a five-point lead over his Republican rival. With Wall Street in crisis, Obama has repeatedly hammered McCain on the economy.

[ON SCREEN GRAPHIC: 09/08/08: Obama 44%, McCain 46%, Now: Obama: 48%, McCain 43%, Margin of Error: + or - 3%]

BARACK OBAMA: This is somebody who's been in Congress for 26 years. Who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign and now he tells us that he's the one who's going to take on the old boys network. The old boys network. In the McCain campaign, that's called a staff meeting.

REID: The new poll also suggests enthusiasm for Senator McCain's running mate Sarah Palin has softened. 33% of voters think she's qualified to be president, 62% voicing concern. McCain and Palin appeared together Wednesday night, displaying an easy-going give and take in their first joint town hall with the vice presidential candidate fielding questions from an audience for the first time.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: There has been quite a bit of discussion about your perceived lack of foreign policy experience, and I want to give you your chance.

SARAH PALIN: I think that I am prepared and if you want specifics with specific policy or countries, go ahead and you can ask me, you can even play 'stump the candidate' if you want to. But we are ready to serve.

REID: But at that point, McCain interrupted to talk about her knowledge of energy policies. And she was not asked, nor did she offer, any specifics on foreign policy. Now the questions at that town hall last night and in a Fox interview last night were friendly and open-ended but the campaign understands that that will change and fast. Harry.

SMITH: Alright, Chip Reid in Grand Rapids this morning. We want to go over to our big electoral college map and check in with Michael Crowley from the New Republic magazine. I want to look at one of the numbers out of the poll last night. We remember how famously Bill Clinton used to say it's the economy stupid, it's the economy stupid.

MICHAEL CROWLEY: Yes, absolutely.

SMITH: Look at this. Voters who think the economy is getting worse support, look at that. Obama is crushing McCain in that number right there.

[ON SCREEN GRAPHIC: Voters Who Think Economy is Getting Worse: McCain 29%, Obama 62%, Margin of Error: + or - 3%]

CROWLEY: Yeah. And, you know, what voter doesn't think the economy's getting worse? I mean, McCain may be romping with the voters who think it's getting better but the point is that on the issue that people are really focused on now, Iraq, unbelievably, basically out of the news for the moment. Obama is romping on that score and that's got to portend very well for how he does.

SMITH: And we look at those gross numbers in terms of the five-point lead that Barack Obama has right now. But that's irrelevant when it comes to the electoral college.

CROWLEY: Absolutely.

SMITH: Which is so, so close in so many different states. We're going to outline a scenario for you this morning that you may not have heard before. Let's talk about a couple of western states and what could happen. New Mexico is red, four years ago, went to George Bush, right? Let's say that changes. Let's say that Colorado changes. Let's -- our other one?

CROWLEY: And Iowa.

SMITH: And Iowa.

CROWLEY: Where Barack Obama is doing very well right now. Obama in New Mexico today, by the way.

SMITH: Yeah?

CROWLEY: So trying to push that one in the other direction.

SMITH: And what -- and just say, we take these couple western states and Iowa and what happens -- I'm upside down in Iowa.

CROWLEY: Right there -- your left foot. And that's seven, so you're -- right here that's 21 electoral votes-

SMITH: Right.

CROWLEY: -which would be enough to swing the difference of the election from the 2004 result.

SMITH: My goodness. Just these three states.

CROWLEY: Just those three states. Colorado and New Mexico very close in the last election.

SMITH: Right.

CROWLEY: Iowa was a red state but Obama – it launched Obama. Remember, he won the caucuses there, really got him started as an international phenomenon.

SMITH: Right.

CROWLEY: And they really seem to still love him so he is very strong there and these states are a little closer.

SMITH: Those are really too close to call?

CROWLEY: Yeah.

SMITH: But we're just doing a little bit of a 'what if' scenario. Okay, we always remember we need 270. You need 270 to win.

CROWLEY: That's right.

SMITH: Right, okay.

CROWLEY: And with these states he's got it, with this map-

SMITH: But what if he-

CROWLEY: -he's the president.

SMITH: But what if we took little New Hampshire here. Right? Blue last time. John McCain did so well there in the primary. They love him in New Hampshire.

CROWLEY: New Hampshire was red in 2000, went blue in 2004. Remember, this is the state loves McCain. He won the primary there in 2000 when he was running against Bush and it saved him in this -- in 2008 when it looked like he was dead.

SMITH: Romney spent all that money there, all those negative ads.

CROWLEY: Wasn't enough. A lot of independent voters who like that image McCain has of being independent.

SMITH: So just with the states that we played with this morning, what would the numbers end up?

CROWLEY: 269, 269. A tie! The nightmare scenario, some might say. For a political junky it's a fantasy, but it -- it gets really complicated after that.

SMITH: Yeah, goes to the House of Representatives and based on the election that happens this year goes state-by-state-by-state.

CROWLEY: State-by-state. Not one member, one vote, one state, one vote, delegation by delegation.

SMITH: Alright, Michael, thank you so much.

CROWLEY: Thank you.

SMITH: What a year.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The fix is in...

Not surprised that Obama is now ahead by 5 points in the CBS/NYT poll...the same poll gave Clinton a 70%-plus job approval rating right after he got impeached 10 years ago.

Do they think we are this dumb? Obama is damaged goods, and of course the mainstreams who RUN the polls are bragging about his surge which is manufactured, btw.

You can smell the double standard coming from the MSM here in the midwest...

Drill ANWAR

I was going to say that the

I was going to say that the CBS "poll" probably still has Mondale beating Reagan...

McNotObama '08

Game changers

This too shall pass.

What makes me laugh is that it takes a financial crash for Obama to get his mojo back. I'm afraid to let McCain get too far ahead, because who knows what catastrophe Obama will need to close the gap again?

And even though the public blames the GOP and Bush for the disaster, Obama only comes up with a single-digit bump. That's got to say something. To me, it says that Obama can't close the deal because he's got nothing to fight with.

Obama is now promising to fight back. He does so with juvenile distortions of Rush Limbaugh, harping on McCain's age, and similar adolescent stunts. That's it. That's all he's got. He's promising a firestorm and he delivers a couple of stray sparks. He's got nothing.

this crash leads straight

this crash leads straight to democrat doors

but good news for you lefties! something to cheer you up for a day or two - severe American problems to politically celebrate!!

now if you can pitch in and actually help out with the problems once in a while - that would be great too! no hurry tho

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

It could

this crash leads straight to democrat doors

That is true, but it doesn't matter if the press won't report it.  The fact is that Democrats blocked a bill that would have prevented all this.  Unfortunately, the press won't report it and McCain won't mention it. 

To quote McCain (again, I've been on this all day.  Sorry if it's getting reduntant):

I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190,
to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform
legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue
to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose
to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as
a whole.

"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."

--Ernesto "Che" Guevara

Precisely. There's McCain's

Precisely. There's McCain's idiocy coming back to haunt him. What an awful candidate- he could have been able to trash Obama on this issue, but is unable to because he was an idiot. Good going, McCain.

 

------------------------------------------------------------

"My morality is your morality."

Here's your answer, KC

I'm afraid to let McCain get too far ahead, because who knows what catastrophe Obama will need to close the gap again?

The Obama plan revealed

If the polls show I'm:

1% behind: Hide Michelle, deal the race card.

2% behind: Steal Palins personal e-mail and post on web, deal the race card.

3% behind: Need collapse of banking industry and stock market. Notify the correct people to make this happen. Claim republicans will use my race to scare white people.

4% behind: Call buddies at Area 51 to release the rest of the 'beings.' They are programmed to campaign for me, talk to pollsters, and continue as journalists at CNN and MSNBC.

5% behind: Have Ahmadinejad visit U.N. and trash Bush and McCain and America. Pay him the usual fee. Have Cafferty claim racism is the real reason white people won't vote for me.

6% behind: Take out a small city with the WMD I stole from Iraq just before the U.S. troops arrived. Blame Bush/McCain. Have surrogates make up stuff about Palin again. Blame Bush/McCain for allowing story to get in our hands.

7% behind: Fire all at the democratic party affiliates; CNN, MSNBC, and the alphabet networks. Tell Behar and the gals at the view, nice try, but you're all fired. Turn all the MSM studios and newspaper offices into  Starbucks. Move to Kenya.

Shhhh!

Mica, now come on, we don't want to give them ideas. Although the Area 51 thing is pretty good ... come to think of it, has anyone checked to see whether Olbermann sleeps in a pod?

Memo to CBS: "It's the economy stupid" won't wash anymore!

In 1992, when Bill Clinton was elected, there were very few options when it came to news: three networks, PBS, NPR, and little else.  Therefore, it was easy to use the mantra "It's the economy stupid" and get Mr. Clinton elected.  Now, in 2008, there are lots of options for conservatives, and the networks continue to shrink in credibility and ratings.  Therefore, CBS, your attempts to save Mr. Obama with the old "It's the economy stupid" mantra won't wash anymore!

This would be a game changer for Obama, if the MSM would

This, would be a game changer for Obama, if the MSM would simply ask Obama about - just one time.

Countrywide Financial - lead the way.

More on the connection to the Democrats:

Angelo's Friends - slide show

Angelo's Fannie Pac - Some former Countrywide cronies have found comfy jobs at Fannie and Freddie

Angelo's Many "Friends"

Right ...BHO can fix it . .wait till the Debates . .lets hear it

Wait till McCain refers to his Fha Fnmae Prediction of 2005 . . .Grab you Ankles BHO......it's coming

Middle America / Small town USA is no where to be seen in the polls.

The Republican Revolution will not be Televised

Excellent point

Nothing matters until the debates.  If it's this close going in, whoever wins the debates, wins the elections. 

 

"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."

--Ernesto "Che" Guevara

No polls asking if Obama is

No polls asking if Obama is qualified?  He has less experience than Palin, after all, and he's supposed to be the top of his ticket.

Problems

Name one issue the libs did not create.

Congress writes the egregious laws and defends them in the ensuing administration.

JDW


DAILY WAVE

RVs not LVs

One day poll (9/8/08) of registered voters, and only a 5%  (+/- 3%) lead in a CBS/NYT poll? If B. Hussein isn't up double digits, then he's probably pretty far behind; hence the emphasis on race-baiting. Insults are usually a good way to get people to vote for you.

Obama & Lobbyist $$$ blocked McCain's bill to save us.

Barack Obama - Fannie Mae Lobbyists' second favorite senator.

Despite this, he has recently started trying to blame McCain and the Republicans for the current problems in the economy and the failings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

He has also started saying that John McCain is too close with lobbyists. With more facts about Obama's acceptance of lobbyist money coming out each day, this line of attack seems more and more ridiculous.

Former CEO's Franklin Raines (ousted due to 6.3 billion dollar accounting scandal in 2004) is a former CEO of Fannie Mae and current economic advisor for Senator Obama. Raines was there when all of these sub prime rate loans were being handed out. The very root of the company's collapse.

Fannie Mae lobbyists have given Barack Obama $123,000 since 2004 -only 4 years. In Contrast John McCain has received only $19,000 in the past 20 years.

Furthermore, The Lehmann Brother's Global Investment Bank (recently went under) lobbyists gave Obama $365,922 since 1989 and gave McCain $115,800 in the same time period. It is amazing that Obama can blame McCain for the Fannie and Freddie crisis and then simultaneously take over $100,000 more money in 1/5 the time from those very same lobbyists. If Obama and McCain started in the senate at the same time this would equate to Barack Obama taking 32 times more lobbyist money than McCain.

If anyone should be criticized on lobbyist ties, it is Obama himself.

What has John McCain said about Freddie and Fannie dating all the way back from 2005 'Quoted from the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act - 'I Join as a co-sponsor of this reform act of 2005 to underscore my support for a quick passage of regulatory reform legislation. If congress doesn't act, American tax payers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and what they pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole.'

Not only did McCain recognize a problem with Freddie and Fannie 3 years ago, he put his name on the line and Co-Sponsored a bill attempting to reform regulation of these two companies. 

Who blocked the passage of the bill?  The Democrats in The Senate.

The reason that Freddie and Fannie and many other companies have now fallen so far so fast is that there has been almost zero governmental oversight or conversation with the American people about these company's poor business practices. Why is that?

It is likely that these company's strong lobbyists and their ties to certain politicians (Obama) caused certain people to look the other way or block reform. Judging by the money Obama has accepted from these lobbyists and his close ties with their former CEO's it looks this is one of the few places that the senator has shown strong leadership.

IF YOU ARE LOSING YOUR HOME OR YOUR SAVINGS, THANK OBAMA.

McCAIN-PALIN 2008 and HILLARY-ANYBODY 2012