On Thursday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Maggie Rodriguez described the Catholic Church’s refusal to allow filming on Church property of a movie prequel to "The DaVinci Code," starring Tom Hanks, this way: "...the battle between Tom Hanks and the Vatican. You know he's in Rome filming the prequel to 'The Da Vinci Code,' 'Angels and Demons,' and the Church there is up in arms, they're barring them from filming in churches. They believe the film, like the book, is sacrilegious."
On Wednesday, ABC’s "Good Morning America" featured a story on the controversy in which correspondent Nick Watt declared: "When the might of Rome clashes with a literary behemoth, expect some colorful language. 'An offense against God,' is what a diocese of Rome spokesman just called this book." Watt then later proclaimed: "The Dan Brown express will not be stopped," to which GMA co-host Diane Sawyer replied: "Yes, Nick, I mean that's the irony, isn't it? The more the Church complains, probably the better it is for the business."
Meanwhile, on Thursday’s "Early Show," correspondent Allen Pizzey explained: "Fans of the book, 'Angels and Demons,' keep streaming into the churches in Rome where the plot unfolds. But the film crew turning it into a movie has been banned from them and any other Church property. The plot is not overly anti-Church, but some of the most graphic scenes are not something with which the Church wants to be associated."
Pizzey then played a clip of a priest describing one of those "not overly anti-Church" scenes: "I mean it's kind of hard to get permission to film two murders, especially when the two victims are Cardinals and one dies by having earth stuffed in his mouth and the other one is set on fire hanging above the altar with the sanctuary lamps."
After describing "one of a string of glaring errors" in the ‘Angels and Demons’ book, Pizzey remarked that: "But it is the book and movie of 'The Da Vinci Code,' rather than the errors in 'Angels and Demons' that seems to be the unforgivable sin. A Vatican spokesman said that author Dan Brown had quote 'turned the Gospels upside down to poison the faith.’"
Pizzey also highlighted a tour guide in Rome, Angelo Esposito, who brings tourists on an ‘Angels and Demons’ tour. According to Esposito, "You never get a priest coming up yelling at you 'get out you heretics,' sometimes they might be a little bit edgy because they know it's 'Angels and Demons.' But at the same time, I think they're aware that's, you know, a work of fiction and it's bringing people into they're their churches."
At the end of the segment Pizzey concluded: "And it's a fair bet that those who see them in the movies won't know they aren't looking at the real churches. Whether the Vatican likes it or not."
The Media Research Center’s Tim Graham conducted a study in 2006, entitled "The Trashing of the Christ," contrasting the positive media coverage of "The DaVinci Code" with the negative coverage of "The Passion."
Here are the full transcripts of the "Early Show" and "Good Morning America" segments:
THE EARLY SHOW
06/19/08
7:02AM TEASER:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: We have a lot coming up on our end as well, including the battle between Tom Hanks and the Vatican. You know he's in Rome filming the prequel to 'The Da Vinci Code,' 'Angels and Demons,' and the Church there is up in arms, they're barring them from filming in churches. They believe the film, like the book, is sacrilegious. So ahead this morning we will take you to Rome to get the scoop.
7:47AM SEGMENT:
JULIE CHEN: Tom Hanks has run up against his biggest challenge yet -- the Vatican. We went to Rome to get the latest on the dispute over his latest film, 'Angels and Demons.' Here's CBS News correspondent, Allen Pizzey.
ALLEN PIZZEY: Fans of the book, 'Angels and Demons,' keep streaming into the churches in Rome where the plot unfolds. But the film crew turning it into a movie has been banned from them and any other Church property. The plot is not overly anti-Church, but some of the most graphic scenes are not something with which the Church wants to be associated.
GREG APPARCEL: I mean it's kind of hard to get permission to film two murders, especially when the two victims are Cardinals and one dies by having earth stuffed in his mouth and the other one is set on fire hanging above the altar with the sanctuary lamps.
PIZZEY: That takes place here in the Church of Santa Maria Della Vittoria, which the book puts in the wrong piazza, one of a string of glaring errors. The novel has the sculpture on one of Rome's most famous fountains, the four rivers in Piazza Navona representing Europe. In fact, they denote the Danube in Europe, the Nile in Africa, the Ganges in Asia, and the Plate in South America.
TOM HANKS: Symbols are a language -- dear God.
PIZZEY: But it is the book and movie of 'The Da Vinci Code,' rather than the errors in 'Angels and Demons' that seems to be the unforgivable sin. A Vatican spokesman said that author Dan Brown had quote 'turned the Gospels upside down to poison the faith.’ And that it was unacceptable to turn churches into sets for what he called 'mendacious films.' Nonetheless, this guide says he takes at least a hundred tourists a week on an 'Angels and Demons' tour and no one objects.
ANGELO ESPOSITO: You never get a priest coming up yelling at you 'get out you heretics,' sometimes they might be a little bit edgy because they know it's 'Angels and Demons.' But at the same time, I think they're aware that's, you know, a work of fiction and it's bringing people into they're their churches.
PIZZEY: And it's a fair bet that those who see them in the movies won't know they aren't looking at the real churches. Whether the Vatican likes it or not. Allen Pizzey, CBS News, Rome.
GOOD MORNING AMERICA
6/18/08
7:31AM SEGMENT:
DIANE SAWYER: But first, let's turn to the Vatican taking on Hollywood, banning a new Tom Hanks movie from filming inside Rome's churches. He's starring in the film adaptation of Dan Brown's popular book "Angels and Demons," the prequel to "The Da Vinci Code." But church officials are saying the movie is an offense against God. Why? ABC's Nick Watt has more from London. Nick?
NICK WATT: Good morning, Diane. Well, this is a small victory for the Catholic Church in its long-running battle with Dan Brown. They can't stop him writing books like "Angels and Demons," but they can stop film crews from trudging all over their sacred turf. When the might of Rome clashes with a literary behemoth, expect some colorful language. An offense against God," is what a diocese of Rome spokesman just called this book. "Angels & Demons" sightseeing tours of Rome are very popular these days but if you're Ron Howard and Tom Hanks, you can't get in to some key location with a camera.
FATHER JOHN WAUCK (Professor, Holy Cross University): It would be a bit like someone coming up to you and saying, we're going to make a movie that presents your family as evil and ridiculous. Can we film in your house?
WATT: "Angels and Demons" is set during a conclave to choose a new pope. Four cardinals are murdered, apparently by an ancient and secret society. Producers wanted to shoot at two churches, one where Robert Langdon finds the body of a cardinal, another where he finds a cardinal burning to death. Access, denied. "Normally we read the script," said Monsignor Marco Fibbi. "This time it was not necessary." "The name Dan Brown was enough." They remember "The Da Vinci Code." They hated the movie and urged a boycott. When the book hit stores, this happened. [Video of protestors.] A phantasmagorical cocktail of inventions was what Cardinal Bertone called the book. Church leaders were aghast that Brown's suggestion that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had children. In 2004, the author gave ABC's Elizabeth Vargas a rare interview about "The Da Vinci Code."
ELIZABETH VARGAS: Why do you think your book has touched such a nerve?
DAN BROWN: The mysteries of spirituality, the Holy Grail, the origins of our religions, these are topics that resonate in a deep, deep spiritual level, really at the core of the human psyche.
WATT: Will the "Angels and Demons" controversy hurt? Unlikely. Despite the Catholic outrage, "The Da Vinci Code" did all right. The book has sold 80 million copies and the movie grossed $500 million. Now, no comment this morning from the studio. No doubt they'll just re-create those churches on a lot in Hollywood. The Dan Brown express will not be stopped. The movie "Angels and Demons" due out May, next year. Diane?
SAWYER: Yes, Nick, I mean that's the irony, isn't it? The more the church complains, probably the better it is for the business. Who knows? Anyway, thanks so much to you.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Essentially
June 19, 2008 - 15:43 ET by sentforth5I am against organized church governments, but in this case I say 3 cheers for the Vatican! One of the other posts said it was "too grave to be forgiven"...well, it is Christ Jesus who does the forgiving,and it is wrong as the day is long to say anyone is going to perish in hellfire, I mean, Jesus forgave Judas Iscariot, so who are we to say who can or cannot be forgiven...........oh, and the unforgiveable sin; blaspheming the Holy Spirit, can only be comitted by one of God's Elect, and only when satan is here with us DEFACTO. So, as always with the MSM, Biblical ignorance shines like a beacon. Anyhoo, hooray for the Catholic church!
sentforth - bravo to you seeing as you are not Catholic
June 20, 2008 - 10:46 ET by Dee Bunkbut can still realize the harm that the media does to all Christians with their continued mis characterizations of all Christian faiths.
The article linked to above by Tim Grahm called "The Trashing of the Christ" Says it all. I never saw that one before. It's good and needs some updating with all this latest baloney.
They really thought they
June 19, 2008 - 15:54 ET by NewsbusterbrownThey really thought they were going to be allowed to film on Church property? How dumb can one get?
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
They can get pretty darned
June 19, 2008 - 16:11 ET by celatorThey can get pretty darned dumb. ;+}
Here's the analogy for me: Tom Hanks and company comes to your house and says to you that he wants to make a film about your family. He tells you that he's got a script that describes that as far back as he can tell, your family has lied, cheated, murdered and defrauded everyone and everywhere. Now he demands to use your house to film some scenes for the movie, and you say, "Er, I think not."
So then Hanks calls up all his press people, makes a scene, cries foul to make you look like a fool for not "cooperating" with him in his work of art.
And he still can't figure out why you won't cooperate with him.
One bone of contention, I
June 19, 2008 - 17:34 ET by balboaOne bone of contention, I don't think Hanks demanded anything. I'm sure they knew getting approval was a long shot, but asked anyway.
I don't think Hanks
June 19, 2008 - 17:48 ET by general companyI don't think Hanks demanded anything. I'm sure they knew getting approval was a long shot, but asked anyway
And then went public with it, no of course not, he didnt demand anything? What BS
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
general company, as far as I
June 19, 2008 - 18:02 ET by balboageneral company, as far as I can tell, this news originated in an Italian magazine, and it's Monsignor Marco Fibbi who is quoted, not Tom Hanks, not Ron Howard, not the studio. So it seems that it was the church that went public with it.
BS, unless they asked the
June 19, 2008 - 18:15 ET by general companyBS, unless they asked the Vatican via the Italian media, as classless as that would be in itself. They asked, were denied and then decide to air their objections through the media. I absolutely would not put it pass them to have even used it as a threat. This is despicable, it is more malice from the self appointed elite that will go unoticed.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
OK, so please show me where
June 19, 2008 - 18:19 ET by balboaOK, so please show me where the article is where they're airing these grievances? I only see the quotes from the Vatican. I don't see Hanks or the studio or Howard quoted anywhere.
Do you?
June 19, 2008 - 18:34 ET by general companyI only see the quotes from the Vatican.
Where? Even if there are, they probably are just trying to stave off more bad publicity.
Couple of questions:
How many people/groups do you think ask for access to the Vatican? How many do you think are denied? How many stories do you here about them? Now I dont follow the Vatican much, but the hollywierdoes I cant aviod, and I know who gets my benifit of a doubt, and now I know yours. If these guys had any class, you would'nt even know they asked.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Father Marco Fibbi,
June 19, 2008 - 18:50 ET by balboaFather Marco Fibbi, spokesman for the diocese of Rome, said: "Normally we read the script, but this time it was not necessary. The name Dan Brown was enough."
I don't know how the hierarchy works. Is he considered part of the Vatican? And I still don't see any proof of Hanks or Howard releasing this story, or making this story public in any way. They're not quoted in anything I've seen, nor the studio.
I'm sure there are many such requests, but none of them are from a group that already made a controversial movie based on the church, none of those groups have big Hollywood names associated with them, thus they're not of interest to the Italian magazine, which then attracts the attention of the AP.
Hey, Bal! This is pretty funny...
June 19, 2008 - 19:57 ET by Indiana JoeCheck out this post. One of you MUST be wrong! But I think I know who it is. ;^)
LMAO
Well, of course I'M right,
June 19, 2008 - 20:18 ET by balboaWell, of course I'M right, right? :-)
I don't think the Vatican is complaining. They said "Nope, you can't film here" and clarified their position when asked. Seems reasonable.
Nope, not a complaint
June 19, 2008 - 21:03 ET by Indiana JoeRegarding the other, if you have to ask.....
;^)
I saw that, and
June 20, 2008 - 08:52 ET by general companyI would not expect the Vatican to complain, only to offer what they new about the request and that they turned it down. Still doesn't explain how anyone knew to ask the question, I fine it hard to believe the Vatican is offering information just because?
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
The problem here isn't the
June 20, 2008 - 09:29 ET by lotrThe problem here isn't the Vatican vs. "Hanks Tom," He Said, She Said gossip. The problem is the media portrayal of it. What the hell kind of head line is "no angels allowed"? What the hell kind of editorial commentary is "the more the Vatican complains, the more [WE, the MSM make it sensational, and] the movie sells"? (parenthetical comment mine)
The MSM is anti-Christian and are quite blatant about it. This is another example.
You have it exactly right lotr
June 20, 2008 - 10:40 ET by Dee BunkThat is the main problem.
Yeah, I get that, lotr. I
June 20, 2008 - 11:36 ET by balboaYeah, I get that, lotr. I was addressing what I think is inaccurate assumptions that it's Hanks making a stink about this. I haven't seen any evidence of that. I don't think the Vatican is either, frankly. The media is taking this and running with it.
bal
June 20, 2008 - 11:46 ET by lotr"The media is taking this and running with it."
I think we see eye to eye -- imagine that! I recommend seeing KC's comment below. That guy has some great behind-the-scenes insights.
I think if a crew was to
June 19, 2008 - 16:15 ET by Dan The Man 2I think if a crew was to film a movie depicting CBS as a casa nostra type organization and the plot is one of the anchors along with a complicit CBS tries to influence and election of a President then they would be reluctant to allow filming inside their buildings. I don't know if such a movie is possible since it is fictional.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
"The more the Church
June 19, 2008 - 16:29 ET by Chris Norman"The more the Church complains, probably the better it is for the business."
Oh, I get so sick and tired of hearing this contrived, tired, and cliched observation. Why aren't observations like this never offered when it's a politically correct group complaining about some transgression in popular culture? What Diane really wants is the church to shut up, roll over, and let themselves be villainized by pop fiction.
Bravo!
June 19, 2008 - 16:35 ET by NorthCoasterThe Church is standing up against popular "culture". What a novel approach instead of rolling over and playing dead.
Yeah, they should just lay
June 19, 2008 - 16:41 ET by Chris NormanYeah, they should just lay there and let themselves be viciously kicked - it'll go easier for them than if they try to fight back...
Who's complaining?
June 19, 2008 - 16:42 ET by WingletDriverI noticed that not a single Vatican official was quoted. The only folks complaining are the media.
WD... Working hand in
June 19, 2008 - 17:52 ET by bigtimerWD...
Working hand in hand with La-La-Land....
The more attention this brings for the movie...why it's just free box-office press for their trash.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
You might want to check out
June 19, 2008 - 19:59 ET by Indiana JoeYou might want to check out this post. You can't BOTH be right.
That quote falls short of "complaining"
June 19, 2008 - 20:42 ET by WingletDriverDenying a schmuck the use of your facilities is not complaining.
True
June 19, 2008 - 21:01 ET by Indiana JoeI just fixed on your saying not a single Vatican official was quoted.
I should've said. . .
June 19, 2008 - 22:11 ET by WingletDrivernot one Vatican official's complaint was quoted.
Business
June 20, 2008 - 01:35 ET by KC MulvilleCome on, people, let's put two and two together. On the one hand, you have a film crew show up and "ask" for permission that they know they're never going to receive. On the other hand, stories about the refusal appear rather quickly, as if they were ... planned ... where the media starts talking about the movie. I'm sure they already have the trailers planned: "this is the second movie that the Vatican doesn't want you to see." And the media happily goes along for the ride.
I've never seen anyone exploit the church with so little class as Dan Brown. And then Ron Howard and Tom Hanks join the fun. What do you call it when rich and famous people mock others, precisely because they know the targets won't retaliate? We used to call such people cowards, cheap shot artists, and euphemisms for female body parts.
Once again, I suppose, we have to remind ourselves that Ron Howard is a Hollywood player, and not Opie Taylor. Tom Hanks is not Forrest Gump. These are people at the pinnacle of a profession where pretending to be someone else is the most marketable skill.
KC
June 20, 2008 - 09:32 ET by lotr"I'm sure they already have the trailers planned: "this is the second movie that the Vatican doesn't want you to see." And the media happily goes along for the ride."
Precisely. Smells like more corruption to me. :-)
This is ridiculous... and insulting
June 19, 2008 - 16:43 ET by Indiana JoeWhere was all this commentary and analysis over the Danish cartoons? They were "offensive to Muslims," and that's all we needed to know. Riots and death followed, but was "understood," since they were so offensive. The American MSM wouldn't even print them, out of <ahem> "respect" for diversity.
But Catholics are not only supposed to "get over it," they're expected to be complicit in aiding a movie series that slanders their Church, and mocks their scripture and beliefs.
No bias there, huh? Maybe if Catholics started bombing busses and buildings and beheading people, they'd get a little of that "respect."
Joe,The irony is, that when
June 19, 2008 - 18:03 ET by Chris NormanJoe,
The irony is, when radical Irish Catholics were blowing up busses and shooting people in Northern Ireland, the media did give their "cause" a lot of sympathetic coverage. Notice a pattern developing here?
Pattern "developing?"
June 19, 2008 - 19:54 ET by Indiana JoeIt's OVER-developed to the point it's a white-out (or maybe white-wash?). The pattern being, of course, leftist thugs good, traditional institutions and values bad.
Che Guevara poster on the judge's wall? No problem. But if it had been a portrait of the Pope... whooo-eeee!
I like to employ the
June 19, 2008 - 20:06 ET by Chris NormanI like to employ the understatement on occasion. The only good Catholics are the ones who strongly and publicly disagee with Vatican teaching or who have turned into terrorists.
Yeah, the Vatican needs some new PR people
June 19, 2008 - 20:19 ET by Indiana JoeThey need to trick out the Pope-mobile and bust a few caps in some punk-ass Quakers. Yo, yo, yo!
THEN they'd get some props!
Gee, I'm surprised.
June 19, 2008 - 17:42 ET by Saint ZeroIt's openly critical of the Catholic Church but is surprised they won't let him film a couple of gruesome murders? What planet is he from?
I am not a huge fan of the
June 19, 2008 - 18:06 ET by mostlymoderateI am not a huge fan of the Catholic Church but I DO respect their decision in this case as well as in others. Hollywood has nothing but contempt for the Catholic Church and Christianity in general so Tom Hanks and the Hollywood crowd can go straight to hell (literally).
I agree. I also wan to know
June 19, 2008 - 20:15 ET by mjgI agree. I also want to know what would happen if they decided to film in a Mosque or Synagogue, would they complain as loudly as they are doing about the Church, if they were denied access. I doubt that. I concur that Tom and the hollywood crowd can go straight to hell. I'm sick of them bashing my religion.
I'm not Catholic
June 20, 2008 - 00:07 ET by jefflebowskiand don't agree with much with the church but I believe that they have every right to not allow access to a movie that they feel is harmful to their religion.
That being said, I enjoyed the book Angels and Demons and can't wait to see the movie...wherever it is filmed. Dan Brown can tell a story.
Jeff Lebowski
www.angrywhitedude.c...
Surrender, cop it sweet and things will be better for you.
June 20, 2008 - 02:55 ET by LaValletteCome on people!!! Why can't we all get along!!! There will be so much less trouble if you just give up your dignity and integrity and surrender to us. I mean look how much trouble was created by the Europeans by their resistance and fight back and not just accepting to live under the great civilization of Islam in the middle ages: I don't know : things like the Crusades, the Inquisition and all those wars against the Ottoman Empire's efforts to spread civilization into the dark corners of Europe and loosen the dark grip of supersitious Christianity and its priestly cast over the people who were deliberately kept in ignorance. After all the Moslems only wanted to bring into Europe Algebra and astronomy and new ways of gardening and replace the Latin numerals for the Arabic ones. And of course the Arabic language to displace the babel that the dead language Latin had been corrupted to as the lingua franca. Moral of the story: dont fight back and things will be better for you e.g.<p>
SAWYER: Yes, Nick, I mean that's the irony, isn't it? The more the
church complains, probably the better it is for (Browns) business. Who
knows?<p>
So just shut up and cop it sweet, and you wont be hurt.(s/-).
Memo to Tom Hanks
June 20, 2008 - 10:29 ET by CobraManMemo to Tom Hanks: You work in Hollywood, so just build a set! After all, you didn't actually film Apollo 13 in space, right? So, build the set and stop annoying people.
Look at it this way: You'll give American union carpenters needed income and you'll reduce your Carbon footprint by not having to fly hundreds of people to Rome. That's a win-win-win situation, wouldn't you agree?