On Thursday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Harry Smith talked about race in the Democratic presidential campaign with Republican Ron Christie, author of "Black in the White House," and the Politico's Mike Allen, who declared that: "...there's a certain percentage of what Geraldine Ferraro said that's simply factual, and that is the pioneering nature of Senator Obama's candidacy is clearly part of his appeal. But there's a certain part of it that's very dark, right, the Archie Bunker side."
Just prior to this odd comparison, Allen explained that: "Until now, we had been looking at the historic side of race and gender in this race. But with this episode, these clips we just saw, we're seeing the dark side of it." Allen’s analysis of Ferraro’s "Archie Bunker dark side" followed yesterday’s "Early Show" coverage, which fawned over Obama while interrogating Ferraro.
Allen was not done yet, when asked by Smith, "...is there any safe harbor here?" Allen responded by observing: "One of the most interesting discoveries in exit polls, is among voters for whom race is most important, they're voting for Senator Clinton. That shows you something very ugly is going on out there."
For his part, Ron Christie was unusually cordial toward Obama:
Well, I think there's no question that Barack Obama – Senator Obama has been a phenomenon on the political forefront now. And people have been looking at his candidacy, looking at his character, looking at who he is as an individual. And I think the Senator's clip from a few moments ago summed it up. First he wasn't black enough, then he's too black. And I think there are a lot of Americans who are grappling with his candidacy. But candidly, Harry, I think he is a change agent, he is one who's been very inspirational, one who's gotten so many young people out. His race is but one part of his candidacy that we're looking at.
Reacting to Allen’s Archie Bunker reference, Smith asked Christie, "is this the kind -- a public conversation now of the private thoughts of so many Americans?" To which Christie replied:
I think it is. I mean, I think, again, Senator Obama is black. There's no question about that. There's no reality of it. But I think that the reality of it is, Harry, that people have looked beyond of color of his skin and are looking inside the content of what does he stand for? What are his positions? He's so articulate. He has such a motivating factor of getting young folks and people who traditionally would vote for someone like Senator Clinton. I think that's the real story of why are so many people drawn to Senator Obama.
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
8:06AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: You know, we've been having this conversation for a month or two now about race and gender and how it's playing out on the Democratic side of this political campaign year. Well, it seems to be heating up again. Let's take a look.
GERALDINE FERRARO: If Barack Obama were a white man, would we be talking about this as a potential real problem for Hillary? If he were a woman of any color, would he be in this position that he's in? Absolutely not.
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I said yesterday that I rejected what she said. And I certainly do repudiate it. And regret deeply that, you know, it was said. Obviously, she doesn't speak for the campaign. She doesn't speak for any of my positions.
BARACK OBAMA: First was I black enough. Then am I too black. I don't know what exactly the margin of black vote is that is the optimal, not too black, but black enough. But that's not the approach that we've taken in this campaign.
FERRARO: It wasn't a racist comment. It was a comment, a statement of fact. And for the campaign to take that and spin it and attack Hillary and me as being racist, I have to tell you, it is just appalling.
SMITH: Joining us now are Mike Allen of politico.com and Ron Christie, author of "Black in the White House." Good morning, gentlemen.
MIKE ALLEN: Morning.
RON CHRISTIE: Morning Harry.
SMITH: It's so interesting to see this. Because this conversation was going on for a couple months, it seemed to be quieting down, and now it's exploded all over again. Ron, how do you account for it?
CHRISTIE: Well, I think there's no question that Barack Obama – Senator Obama has been a phenomenon on the political forefront now. And people have been looking at his candidacy, looking at his character, looking at who he is as an individual. And I think the Senator's clip from a few moments ago summed it up. First he wasn't black enough, then he's too black. And I think there are a lot of Americans who are grappling with his candidacy. But candidly, Harry, I think he is a change agent, he is one who's been very inspirational, one who's gotten so many young people out. His race is but one part of his candidacy that we're looking at.
SMITH: Yeah. Mike, on the other hand, you look at what's been written over the last couple of days, women are coming to the rescue of Hillary Clinton. Women who, for years, maybe did not agree with her, but say 'she's one of us.' Is that not a phenomena we're witnessing here?
ALLEN: Well now, Harry, that's part of the phenomenon of this. Until now, we had been looking at the historic side of race and gender in this race. But with this episode, these clips we just saw, we're seeing the dark side of it. Now, with these women coming to the rescue of Senator Clinton, and to some degree, Geraldine Ferraro, there's a certain percentage of what Geraldine Ferraro said that's simply factual, and that is the pioneering nature of Senator Obama's candidacy is clearly part of his appeal. But there's a certain part of it that's very dark, right, the Archie Bunker side. This is the -- this is the queen side of Gerry Ferraro.
SMITH: Right, of Gerry Ferraro, right --
ALLEN: And that's why it's so hard for these campaigns to respond --
SMITH: Ronny let me ask you --
ALLEN: Clinton can't go hard --
SMITH: Hang on. Ronny let me ask you, is this the kind -- a public conversation now of the private thoughts of so many Americans?
CHRISTIE: I think it is. I mean, I think, again, Senator Obama is black. There's no question about that. There's no reality of it. But I think that the reality of it is, Harry, that people have looked beyond of color of his skin and are looking inside the content of what does he stand for? What are his positions? He's so articulate. He has such a motivating factor of getting young folks and people who traditionally would vote for someone like Senator Clinton. I think that's the real story of why are so many people drawn to Senator Obama.
SMITH: And very quickly, Mike, is there any safe harbor here?
MIKE ALLEN: Well there's not. And Harry, you talk about private thoughts. One of the most interesting discoveries in exit polls, is among voters for whom race is most important, they're voting for Senator Clinton. That shows you something very ugly is going on out there.
SMITH: There you go, Mike Allen, Ron Christy, thanks for your time this morning and your thoughts.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Archie????? The only
March 13, 2008 - 14:25 ET by marpelArchie????? The only similarity to Archie Bunker is that Gerry Ferraro has some cast iron cajones just like him. LOL
Archie
March 13, 2008 - 16:24 ET by easygoerGeraldine Ferraro resembles that remark!!
Archie Bunker; the real King of Queens.
This is so rich!
March 13, 2008 - 14:31 ET by Mark_for_SenateThe irony here is so fabulous. Hopefully through all of this, the American people will finally see that EVERY racist, bigot, homophobe and 'corrupt' behaviour label the Dems have been attributing to only Republicans/conservatives is at least 10 times worse in their own Party and bastion of liberal MSM! Buy stock in popcorn, this is going to be entertaining!
To know and not do, is to not yet know
Why is it not racism when it's against whitie?
March 13, 2008 - 14:37 ET by ArcherBSo, it's*UGLY* people that consider race to be the most important factor if, and only if, they are voting for Hillary?
The fact that some people consider race the most important factor is ugly in itself, regardless of who they voted for. It's just as racist to vote for Obama because he's black than it is to vote against him for the same reason.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara
Racism
March 14, 2008 - 00:08 ET by merlin61Blacks are bragging about their voting for Obama,
but this is not racist. The MSM is making it about
racism, not the Republicans. Also, when they keep
saying that Obama is articulate, what are they
talking about? I haven't heard him come up with
one solution to any of the problems that will face
him if he becomes president. All he keeps
talking about is Hope, Change, Change, Hope.
Tax the rich. Bring the home the troops
immediately. Nothing solid concerning the
reality of anything He's blathering and the
press is idolizing him. They have him on a
big, big pedestal, but sooner or later, that
pedestal will fall, and down will come
Bammy, charisma and all. Can't wait.
Whoa!! Back the truck
March 13, 2008 - 15:03 ET by motherbeltWhoa!! Back the truck UP!!!
The Politico's Mike Allen says
One of the most interesting discoveries in exit polls, is among voters for whom race is most important, they're voting for Senator Clinton. That shows you something very ugly is going on out there.
Is he a pollster? Did he do this first-hand? They don't ask him where he got his numbers? No demographics on the voters who were supposedly asked? How many black voters said race was important and they were voting for Obama? And it doesn't occur to Allen that black voters might not want to admit they voted for Obama because he's black?
He just makes a judgment and a statement that something very ugly is going on out there.
And Harry Smith has nothing to ask or add. "There you go!" he says. The gospel according to Mike.
Sheesh.
Hey mb... ROFLMAO! I
March 13, 2008 - 15:11 ET by bigtimerHey mb...
ROFLMAO!
I just got back inside from grabbing the mail, sat down read this article, didn't look at the comments yet, posted right below you here and all I can say is GMTA!
Since I have commented
March 13, 2008 - 15:09 ET by bigtimerSince I have commented about this all regarding Ferraro and such for a few days now and how I feel about it.... I just like this here....
"One of the most interesting discoveries in exit polls, is among voters for whom race is most important, they're voting for Senator Clinton. That shows you something very ugly is going on out there."
Very ugly indeed!
ROFL!
GMTA!
March 13, 2008 - 15:24 ET by motherbeltYes, I agree, bt!
»→ Sure it's racist
March 13, 2008 - 15:28 ET by Cool Arrow90% of African Americans are voting for Obama.
Racism is strong in America.
♣ a seal
I commend Ferraro for
March 13, 2008 - 16:46 ET by mostlymoderateI commend Ferraro for speaking the obvious truth. Visit ANY liberal blog and you will realize the vehement hatred many liberals have toward white-males. It is no secret that Obama's black side gives him an advantage with these liberal white-male haters. This is why Edward's didn't have a chance in hell from the get-go.
Yeah right Gerry...Obama's
March 13, 2008 - 17:03 ET by goldbarYeah right Gerry...Obama's lucky because he's black and because he's black that means he'll be the next president?? I guess the proof of this is the fact that we've had sooo many black presidents. Last I checked there were more whites in the U.S. than blacks so race isn't the main factor that Obama has Hillary outnumbered in delegates.
WRIGHT WILL SINK OBAMA
March 13, 2008 - 17:36 ET by reelman46WRIGHT WILL SINK OBAMA (aka the Candyman)
Here
it is, March 13 of 2008. The voters have learned that leading democrat
presidential candidate B. H. Obama has been in a Church for 20 years
with a radical preacher (Wright) who still thinks its 1960 and inflames
the congregation with the stale angry crybaby rhetoric worthy of a Klan
member.
There is no misunderstanding about Wright’s agitating intent. The video
is there for all to see. Wright is wrong to also do personal political
endorsements from the pulpit with impunity. We see the large
congregation smile, cheer and move to this divisive radical’s rants. He
is s serial offender in these areas.
So what could very well happen?
It appears that if any non-black harbored (even remotely) thoughts that
many “blacks want a strawman forever, are spoiled ungrateful
unforgiving racists and live in Grandpa’s time politically to get
preferences and taxpayer checks”… the preacher Wright and Obama’s meek
repulsion of this radical race hustler have given millions of voters an
excuse (or reason) to believe these unsavory points are indeed very
true. To give millions that “pause” is a fatal political cancer. The
sure backlash will deny Obama ANY national office. It will certainly
polarize plus distract from the voting record of Obama which should be
the daily topic.
The libmedia has known this but still sits on the story (because he is
a black liberal democrat of course). If McCain’s preacher was spewing
Klan-like rhetoric… would it be so trivialized or spun or ignored? You
know the answer. There can be no “passes” for any candidate because of
gender or race or chosen social circles. Isn’t that what equality is
about?
The only way Obama can shed this stain is to leave this church with a clear strong statement repudiating Wright.
Want to bet on that happening this spring?
Is this how democrat Obama “brings us together”?
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)
Rod Parsley and John Hagee
March 13, 2008 - 17:46 ET by goldbarRod Parsley and John Hagee will sink McCain.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3548250.ece
No chance, leadbar,
March 13, 2008 - 17:59 ET by R D HelmHaving differences of opinion on religious matters is one thing, but that is a far cry from being a stark-raving, America-hating, freedom-loathing, racist hatemongering and Marxist/Leninist like the "Rev." Wright.
If anyone sinks McCain, it will be McCain.
BTW-Better say your prayers for the "messiah."
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
RD... I was going to say
March 13, 2008 - 18:00 ET by bigtimerRD...
I was going to say the same thing earlier, but decided not to play gb's game, since you did I say ...
Hear! Hear!
bt,
March 13, 2008 - 18:11 ET by R D HelmI've seen enough of this clown's posts that I am pretty comfortable pegging him as an anti-Christian bigot.
And, given that we are here in the US of A, he has every right to be, honestly. I just hope he isn't surprised when he gets called out for it.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Rev. Wright has to be
March 13, 2008 - 18:07 ET by goldbarRev. Wright has to be delusional to say the United States is controlled by "rich, white men". I mean, really! And Jesus was black!? Give me a break, he was worse! He was probably an A-rab!
Hey RD- We agree!
March 13, 2008 - 18:15 ET by goldbarHey RD-
We agree! McCain will sink McCain. Well said!
I'll bet he keeps it quiet these days...
March 13, 2008 - 18:05 ET by sarcasmoBut you should see what Rev. Parsley says about the Federal Reserve & paper money when he's talkin' Bible instead of politics...Obviously, he and I are both raving loons who should be locked-up forthwith for this sort of thoughtcrime against the dollar!
JMR
A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.
If you go to church, white
March 13, 2008 - 18:31 ET by goldbarIf you go to church, white or black, you're going to hear a lot of crazy talk. If your white, and have belonged to the church for awhile, it may be a little harder to recognize. I don't agree with everything my pastor says and he's saltine white and yes, some of what he says is a bit crazy. If you're white and go to ANY black church, you're going to see a little different type of crazy. Which is what you get with Rev.Wright. Is he right on all counts? Of course not! All pastors get SOME things wrong. In the end it comes down to dramatics. Everyone has their own ideas about everybody elses religion, so you'll never get total agreement about scripture interpretation. And you'll get some wacky talk on both sides. That's just the way it is.
I noted earlier that being
March 14, 2008 - 11:09 ET by docbI noted earlier that being raised Southern Baptist- I have seen the 'preachers' say crazy things to keep their flock in the fold--- Mostly because the goal is to get the MONEY to fund the dogma of that particular faith. This is just Show Biz on the local level. This particular clip is all an attempt once again by the clinton campaign with the aid of MSM to distract Obama from message.
Hillery won Florida because of Name recognition only. Ohio was won on sympathy from women and fear in the white male demo. Clinton is playing that up with G Ferraro comments , Bill's 'kid and fairtytales' and her 'not that I know of'.
Someone might want to ask how many of the 200,000 JOBS hclinton has delivered, as promised, to her upstate New York voters? Or how many of the 350 million dollars in earmarks from clinon have gone outside of Manhattan--$1.4+million went to a Baptist Church in Harlem and in Harlem there are 60+ districts not counted correctly from the primary?
Additional questions to clinton would reference her tax returns and what lunch-bucket voters would think of those, her logs and what it might show of presumed experience, her earmark requests and how they impact the vote?