At the top of Monday’s CBS "Early Show," newly appointed co-host, Maggie Rodriguez, teased an upcoming segment on race in politics in the aftermath of Barack Obama’s Iowa victory: "But besides the knock-down, drag-out political fighting in New Hampshire, we're asking the question this morning on everyone's mind, is America finally color-blind?" This just days after the "Early Show" declared that Obama’s success in Iowa meant that "history has been made."
Later in the 8am hour of the show, co-host Harry Smith led the segment with guests Joe Watson, a diversity expert, and Jon Meacham of "Newsweek." Smith began by asking a similar question as Rodriguez:
When Senator Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses, he became the first presidential candidate of color to achieve a significant victory in the race for the White House. Is America turning color-blind? Ready to elect its first African-American president?
Smith asked for Watson’s reaction to Obama’s success and Watson declared, "I think it's a magnificent moment for America." Smith then turned to Meacham and gave this thoughtful insight on race and politics:
Jon Meacham, I was on the bus with Barack Obama a week or two ago in Iowa. We're driving along in the bus and the snow outside is as white as that state is, as white as New Hampshire is, what is -- what is going on here? Are people seeing past color? Is that possible?
Smith's December 18 Iowa interview with Obama was a particularly glowing one. Meacham then responded to Smith:
This is about Barack Obama, and I think we shouldn't take anything away from his achievement. This is a very young man, 46 years old, who has, in a way, slain the goliath of the Clinton machine in Iowa. What -- if, in fact, we make a lot more history this year, this week, this year with Senator Obama, it's going to be a tribute to him and to his ability to convince Americans that he is the man for the job and the fact that he is a candidate of color will have an enormous historical impact.
Smith and Meacham continued to praise Obama, while examining America’s racial guilt:
SMITH: We still live in an America where Don Imus is, you know, racially-charged comments cause a furor, and he ends up losing his job. We still live in an America of the Jena 6.
MEACHAM: Absolutely. No, it's been called the 'American Dilemma.' I mean remember race is -- race is our original sin -- slavery's our original sin, the Constitution, Civil War, Jim Crow, the slurs and slights of our own time that sometimes we don't even notice. The symbolism and the reality of having Senator Obama doing so well in the presidential race is something that may, indeed, represent a landmark in a new chapter in that story. And I think that we definitely need a new chapter. And the fact that he's doing it is -- again, young man, he's doing it in a way that is -- he's running as a candidate for president. He's not of the civil rights generation.
Of course this was not the first time Smith examined the rascism epidemic in America, as he did following the Jena 6 controversy back in October.
The segment concluded by Smith getting this final reaction from Watson: "I think we're at a transformational moment...this is about a singular figure who has appealed to folks at their most broadest level, and that's magnificent. And we cannot lose sight of that, the uniqueness."
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
7:01AM TEASER:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: But besides the knock-down, drag-out political fighting in New Hampshire, we're asking the question this morning on everyone's mind, is America finally color-blind?
8:16AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: When Senator Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses, he became the first presidential candidate of color to achieve a significant victory in the race for the White House. Is America turning color-blind? Ready to elect its first African-American president? Jon Meacham is the Editor of Newsweek magazine who's written extensively about politics and race. Joe Watson is an author and diversity expert. Good morning to you both.
JOE WATSON: Morning.
JON MEACHAM: Morning.
SMITH: Joe, let me start with you. Your own personal reaction to this. Because in the world that I live in, this is the only thing anybody's talking about.
JOE WATSON: Oh, absolutely. Absolutely.
SMITH: Yeah. What are you thinking?
WATSON: Well, I think it's a magnificent moment for America. I think it's a moment where it's not so much about color-blindness and moving past that because we always see color. What it's about is that people recognizing that we can trust one another. That's even more impactful and more powerful. And that's what you see when folks stand up in the caucuses and put their hands up and they say 'I'm for Barack Obama,' they're saying, 'I trust him with my life and with my children's life.' That's powerful.
SMITH: Jon Meacham, I was on the bus with Barack Obama a week or two in Iowa. We're driving along in the bus and the snow outside is as white as that state is, as white as New Hampshire is, what is -- what is going on here? Are people seeing past color? Is that possible?
JON MEACHAM: Well, it is possible. I think this is a case where the particular is proving the universal. This is about Barack Obama, and I think we shouldn't take anything away from his achievement. This is a very young man, 46 years old, who has, in a way, slain the goliath of the Clinton machine in Iowa. What -- if, in fact, we make a lot more history this year, this week, this year with Senator Obama, it's going to be a tribute to him and to his ability to convince Americans that he is the man for the job and the fact that he is a candidate of color will have an enormous historical impact.
SMITH: Right.
MEACHAM: But it's -- he's not running, and I think it's to his credit, he's not running as an African-American for president. He's running as an American for president, and that in and of itself is progress.
SMITH: Right. But Jon, this is so interesting from the standpoint that just a couple months ago there were people saying 'well, he's not black enough.'
MEACHAM: Right.
SMITH: We still live in an America where Don Imus is, you know, racially-charged comments cause a furor, and he ends up losing his job. We still live in an America of the Jena 6.
MEACHAM: Absolutely. No, it's been called the 'American Dilemma.' I mean remember race is -- race is our original sin -- slavery's our original sin, the Constitution, Civil War, Jim Crow, the slurs and slights of our own time that sometimes we don't even notice. The symbolism and the reality of having Senator Obama doing so well in the presidential race is something that may, indeed, represent a landmark in a new chapter in that story. And I think that we definitely need a new chapter. And the fact that he's doing it is -- again, young man, he's doing it in a way that is -- he's running as a candidate for president. He's not of the civil rights generation.
SMITH: Right.
MEACHAM: And I think that what we're seeing is something that no matter what happens in the same way, even if Senator Kennedy had not become President Kennedy in 1960, Catholicism --
SMITH: Right. The game is changing, the game is definitely changing. Very quickly your thoughts.
WATSON: I think we're at a transformational moment with a new generation of post-civil rights leaders. And I think just like Oprah transcended in media, Michael Jordan in sports, that's what we're seeing. Jon is right, that this is about a singular figure who has appealed to folks at their most broadest level, and that's magnificent. And we cannot lose sight of that, the uniqueness.
SMITH: Alright, Joe thank you so much. Jon thank you very much.
MEACHAM: Thanks Harry.
SMITH: Do appreciate it.
WATSON: Thank you, Harry.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The media will never be
January 7, 2008 - 13:46 ET by rbosqueThe media will never be color-blind. Remember the Duke players and the Rutgers ladies? They will always jump at the chance to show the race angle to everything if it helps the leftist agenda.
Obama is himself a racist
January 7, 2008 - 14:29 ET by PShannonRead Obama's comments on race between 1975 and 1985 at the link below - - before he became a politician - - there's enough pure racism there to clearly document the fact that Obama doesn't like "white folks" - - the term he used to describe the grandparents who raised him after he was abandoned by his natural mother and father.
http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_more/obama.htm
When Obama slipped in the
January 7, 2008 - 13:49 ET by jwm45When Obama slipped in the polls a last month, weren't these same people calling US voters basically racist?
only racists would call his
January 7, 2008 - 13:53 ET by TruthMongeronly racists would call his iowa triumph "historic"
the left is no where near color-blind yet - still a long ways to go before they catch up to the right
This is the problem I had
January 7, 2008 - 13:57 ET by Conservative Voicedouble post
oops
January 7, 2008 - 14:11 ET by mattmdouble reply
This is the problem I had
January 7, 2008 - 13:54 ET by Conservative VoiceThis is the problem I had with Condi Rice. Were people asking her to run solely because she is a female black?
I have no problem voting for a Black or for a woman, and I think most people are this way. However, the same can't be said about religion.
Ideally, her race and sex
January 7, 2008 - 14:10 ET by mattmIdeally, her race and sex should not be an issue, BUT - putting her on the ticket would demonstrate that the categorization of the "Right" as racist is complete balderdash.
Some of these superficial issues that prop up the Left have to be dealt with and debunked even if it means sinking (temporarily) to their level.
Bush has appointed one of...if not THE most 'diverse' cabinets in history - yet he doesn't tout this fact... He should have been bragging about this since day one - despite how crass it is (he could have done it in a subtle way)
The GOP should put Condi on the ticket, even if it's mainly because she's a black female... They could easily deflect criticism by saying "she's no more a 'token' than Obama or Clinton; plus, she's eminently more qualified than either of them." It would be a slamaroonie!
qualifying as black is more
January 7, 2008 - 14:43 ET by TruthMongerqualifying as black is more about ideology than a skin color now...
Hence bubba earning the title of "our first black president"
Condi would be a great prez - has nothing to do with being a women or her skin color - it's all about her brain...
That's how Repubs have worked for a long time now - starting largely with Lincoln...
Is Democratic Party Sexist?
January 7, 2008 - 14:02 ET by zeestephenPeople, people. Don't you understand? Democrats are rejecting Hillary because she is a woman!
OH! Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!
January 7, 2008 - 14:02 ET by drillanwrTHIS man's race has absolutely NOTHING to do with it!!!
If he had the intelligence of Reagan, the heart of Duncan Hunter, the soul of Fred Thompson, and the balls of Rudy G., and was as BLACK as Yaphet Kotto ... I WOULD be voting for him!
BHO is an empty suit spewing pretty hope and change words, and a copy of Karl Marx's "The Communist Manifesto" tucked under his friggin arm!
I got NEWS for the MSM ... You WON'T be getting away with this crap ... NOT this time. If we have been successful at keeping our troops from being demonized by you for the last few years, WE sure as hell can smell and discard your political rot with ease ...
Give Obama credit
January 7, 2008 - 14:03 ET by KC MulvilleIf the media keeps asking if we have a race problem, and the answer keeps coming up no, then sooner or later you have to realize that the only people still focused on race are the media.
I'll give Obama credit for this. As far as race is concerned, he doesn't focus on it and goes on about his business. I'm grateful for that. It also means that I can feel free to criticize him on policy grounds, without worrying whether I'm insulting black people. That's the way it ought to be, and Obama has played a large part in that. He deserves some credit for that.
this is why he is winning,
January 7, 2008 - 17:05 ET by red_dragon311this is why he is winning, but what ever you do don't say you won't vote for him.
i did this at me buddy's house and his wife got all snippy
"well why won't you vote for him?"
she was so readly for me to say because he is black,
I hate how they (the left) bring up race and blame the right of racism. when is not even an issue, and when you tell a lefty that they call you a liar and say all whites are racist.
"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin
"Is America turning
January 7, 2008 - 14:04 ET by lotr"Is America turning color-blind?"
Duh.
Thanks to Christianity and pragmatic capitalism, people are for the most part judged by their abilities and/or character, not their skin color or ancestry.
but thanks to Democrats
January 7, 2008 - 14:44 ET by TruthMongerbut thanks to Democrats were still not quite completely there yet:)
Americans see race just fine
January 7, 2008 - 14:07 ET by Lame CherryEverybody knows Obama is black and white and something in between and denying it is just liberal dense!
What I have always said is this, "If I am drowning I sure as hell am not going to be asking a queer when they throw me a rope, "Are you a sodomite?"........just like a queer nation chanter is not going to be asking as I will be pulling the rope thrown to them, "Did you vote for Reagan?"
You just grab the rope and fight for life. Same with Obama you just pull the tab to vote for whoever is not Clinton.
The only difference is a Conservative sees a black, a sodomite etc... and THINKS what these people have chosen to be and catalogs the information, a Liberal sees these people and SAYS OUT LOUD what they are really thinking but claims it is "what others are thinking"
Oh and as a Newsbuster laugh, John McCain now blames George Bush for not getting bin Laden and promises he will get bin Laden if elected president.
Why didn't you just fly over and Rambo McCain could get him now?
http://www.worldnetd...
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Ah... The Race Card.
January 7, 2008 - 14:20 ET by Six String SpiffWhenever the Media brings up race,
it dumps gas all over the fire that not so shallow people are trying to put
out. I don’t know how many years it is
going to take them to stop focusing on the color of people’s skin. I certainly don’t care what color anyone
is. What matters is COMPETENCE. SCREW diversity. All of the MSM get wet over the fact that
Barack (Balck man) and Hillary (Sits when she pees) are front runners in a
PRESIDENTIAL race. No hard questions are
being asked. No one is sitting down and
dismissing this ‘Rock Star’ BS for
what it is. No, they only care about ‘minorities’
and color. ‘Making history’ blah blah
blah. Hey MSM, what about ISSUES
huh?! You people DISGUST me each and
every time the Race card is played. You people
are the true racists ‘Progressive’ … HMPH! You
lousy people are THE reason why racial tensions are so high in this
country. Open your eyes you fools.
Hmmm seems to be some trouble pasting form my word program..
Islamic Religious Services Will Be Held at the Firing Range At 0800 Daily.
If we take out race baiters,
January 7, 2008 - 15:36 ET by kgIf we take out race baiters, congress, the media and the PC crowd we would realize America became colorblind decades ago.
Isn't being "colorblind"
January 7, 2008 - 16:06 ET by FishFace222Isn't being "colorblind" racist in itself? Aren't we saying then that all colors are equal to white which indicates that colored people have "caught up" to whites? People of different colors have different heritages just as Norwegians and Germans do. The second we become "colorblind" we are ignoring the many different backgrounds that have made up this country and world.
Is America finally
January 7, 2008 - 16:32 ET by riff_raffIs America finally colorblind?
Maybe they should ask Clarence Thomas.
According to the lib
January 7, 2008 - 16:37 ET by chessplayerAccording to the lib pundits, the US is sexist if it does`nt elect H. Clinton, and racist if it does`nt elect Obama.
Selective memory
January 7, 2008 - 17:16 ET by well99"SMITH: We still live in an America where Don Imus is, you know, racially-charged comments cause a furor, and he ends up losing his job. We still live in an America of the Jena 6."
They always forget to mention those 6 kids beat up 1 white kid.Yes it seems racist to me.They are just afraid to show the other side of it.6 black kicks attacking 1 white kid.
"SMITH: We still live in an
January 7, 2008 - 17:34 ET by chessplayer"SMITH: We still live in an America where Don Imus is, you know, racially-charged comments cause a furor, and he ends up losing his job. We still live in an America of the Jena 6."
And we still live in an America where liberals automatically find LaCrosse players guilty of rape without benefit of a trial.
Yes
January 7, 2008 - 19:21 ET by well99Aint that the truth.
January 7, 2008 - 19:11 ET by KeithMan, SOME of you people are truly INSANE. It seems to me that you should celebrate the MSM even entertaining the possibility of the country becoming more "race neutral" yet all some of you can do is tear them down. Some of you actually live on fantasy island where you pretend that this country has been "race neutral" for a long time and you've just been waiting for everyone to catch up with your enlightenment. If it wasn't so stupid, it'd be funny! Some of you actually bristled at the acknowledgment of Obama's victory as "historic", although you've yet to provide an example of ANOTHER black winning a caucus in a practically lilly white state!
It seems as if the "poll tests" and the gazillions of whites against "interracial marriage", "busing" , and "CIVIL RIGHTS", which would have LOST on a popular vote ballot, btw, never even happened in some of your self deluded minds. We've all been imagining the racism! Study released just 2 days ago, shows that even DOCTORS give different meds to different people based on RACE, but I suppose you have a "disclaimer" for that too!
About six months ago, I was on the line with John Zeigler, a popular talk show host on 790 KABC in Los Angeles. He was bellowing that institutional racism, to the scant degree that he would acknowledge it had ever existed, was a thing of the past. WHILE I WAS ON HOLD during the break, his news announcer, reading breaking news, announced the culmination of a multi-year study of the Los Angeles criminal justice system. The government sponsored study concluded that indeed whites and blacks with IDENTICAL records and crimes were treated differently by the Los Angeles court system. The study found the inequity to rise to the level of an "equal protection" violation! When Zeigler returned after the break, he continued his rant. I asked, incredulously, how he could maintain his ridiculous stance in light of the study being announced by his own radio station! Without knowing anything about the study, he promptly began to "pooh-pooh" it as, "liberal". I pointed out that the panel of judges that had input in the study, were appointed by REAGAN and he said he'd "look into it". It's been six months and he hasn't even mentioned it again.
I am beginning to conclude that what "they" say about conservatives is certainly true for some if not all of you. Namely, that your conservatism is a dodge, a guise cleverly crafted, to hide deep seated hatred of others. Like Trent Lott. All those years pretending to care about people of color and then in the waning moments of an former racists life, he hearkens back to how great it would have been for the country to have lived under Thurmond's repudiated racism! How else to explain the sheer hatred of Mike Huckabee over his statements (confusing as some of them have been) about the children of illegals being treated humanely? Seems to me that it was conservatives who started the problem in the first place! Unless you think the agros and construction businesses are owned by Dems! If that were so why hasn't Bush closed the border, especially after 9/11? No, clearly the monied interests he's protected while sacrificing national security were on his side of the aisle! Not only has your side of the aisle benefitted from these people being here but your side of the aisle, INVITED THEM TO COME! Before someone with a short memory pipes up about me being an "open borders" guy or whatever, I'M NOT. I'm one of the people who OBJECTED to REAGAN'S AMNESTY! You'll recall that the "ideological" argument against his actions was that legalizing 3 million people would serve as a magnet to others who'd feel that if they just "waited us out", we'd end up legalizing them too! Well, now you have reaped what you have sown. But still your own complicity doesn't temper your rhetoric! "Kick 'em out" you say! Huckabee wants to treat children compassionately in light of his party's complicity and he's "not a conservative" you say. Despite his stand against the homosexual onslaught and abortion, you still prefer LIARS like Romney who would sell his mothers dirty drawers and lie about it to get elected and Guiliani a man so vile that he moved his adulterous WHORE into the MAYOR'S MANSION and announced his divorce on TELEVISION before telling his wife and kids! Not to mention his police protection of his aforementioned adulterous whore! But most of you couldn't care less about the "moral" issues facing our country, all you want is tax cuts. There was another guy who sold out all that is good for his thirty pieces of silver, seems to me that didn't work out so well for him.
Anyhoo, I wait with slightly baited breath, the cries of "liberal" or "race baiter" or whatever. Serene in the knowledge that someone with real intellect will read, appreciate and acknowledge.
No your just a bigot
January 7, 2008 - 22:09 ET by well99I would try to explain why but it is useless.Hell I even agree with some of what you say.Still you only see what you want so no need going further.Live in your little world of hate and lash out with your assumtions.Enjoy.
Funny how I accuse "SOME"
January 8, 2008 - 00:28 ET by KeithFunny how I accuse "SOME" people of being that way and YOU react like a scalded cat, huh? Gotcha.
Not really Keith
January 8, 2008 - 04:00 ET by well99I agree it was historic.I also agree with you on the Reagan amnesty.It is when you started lumping whites which to me is the same as those that lumping blacks or anyone else.That is bigotry to me.You dont need a sledge hammer to get your point across.I am a bigot when it comes to Lefties not libs but lefties.Anyhow you have the right to your opinion and I have right to mine.
scratch that
January 8, 2008 - 16:11 ET by lotrscratch that
Man who knew Keith was
January 7, 2008 - 22:52 ET by BlazerMan who knew Keith was gonna be lurking like a barricuda beneath the dock waiting in ambush for this post to spring up.
Oh that's right I forgot these are the only types of post's he leaves comment's on, but in no way is he consumed by race or is colorblind toward's it, and at every chance he get's, want's to rub everyone's noses in the past sin's of a country most of us alive today had nothing to do with.
Were not only in a new century Keith were in a new millenium and it's exactly people like you who allow yourselves to be hi-jacked mentally, emotionally and spiritually by the left, and the abject reason and epitome of why none of us can get past it. It's race-hustler's like yourself that keep racism alive and well and continue to make it a bankable interest in America.
Needless to say your projection of hate is wrongly focused and you are just as guilty in peddling it as the facist-socialist's over at Stormfront. So if you ever have the misfortune of meeting Don Black, buy the man a beer. It's guy's like Black and Sharpton who through thier symbiotic relationship's continue to bait and hustle race to thier faithfull minion's all the while laughing at you and getting filthy rich.
You can stay on the plantation all you like Keith but there's nothing keeping you there but your own ignorance and stubborness. So continue to stand in your dusty, parched field of hate and resentment, but you might want' to look out above you. The buzzard's are circling and were all moving on.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
How do you call what I wrote
January 8, 2008 - 00:25 ET by KeithHow do you call what I wrote "hate"? Wasn't it me pointing out how hateful you all were being? DUH.
I'm pointing out the fact
January 8, 2008 - 02:37 ET by BlazerI'm pointing out the fact Keith all you ever want to do is run through the race mill and rarely do you ever comment on a thread where race isn't an issue or can be constructed from it, and that's hardly conservative. Your a pro-life liberal at best.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
"Were not only in a new
January 8, 2008 - 00:35 ET by Keith"Were not only in a new century Keith were in a new millenium and it's exactly people like you who allow yourselves to be hi-jacked mentally, emotionally and spiritually by the left, and the abject reason and epitome of why none of us can get past it."
Dude, you must never have read a post of mine if you don't know that I'm more conservative than you all. I'm just not a nazi about it. It was people on this blog that couldn't even give Obama credit for his victory being both "stunning" and "historic" not me. That sounds like hate to me. To act as if the history of this country is not steeped in racism seems like the height of stupidity and willful blindness IMO. You would have African Americans who achieve a "first" not call it a "First" because of your feelings about how this is now a level playing field? The two things have nothing to do with one another. A "first" is still a "First" no matter how a bunch of racist neo-cons feel about it. As I wrote previously, I despise Obama because of his support of baby killing. But it would be CHURLISH not to acknowledge a properly won victory of one's enemies. Such behavior is without honor. Obviously something you know nothing about. I raised many salient points but instead of arguing about them you retreat to the realm of the small minded and argue like a woman, or a liberal, and call me names. Your opinion of me matters not a whit. However, there is no denying the truth of every word that I wrote. I am, after all, "that guy".
Your right Keith, and it
January 8, 2008 - 02:51 ET by BlazerYour right Keith, and it is indeed historic and a testament to how far we all have come in this country.
With that said I think your projecting and getting all bent out of shape because everyone's not jumping up all at once to buy you a hotdog and a beer because the opposing (Dem) team scored a touchdown.
I'm not looking at Obama as black. I'm looking at him as just another socialist-progressive. Sorry if that's not good enough for you.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
Keith is more conservative than us all
January 8, 2008 - 02:53 ET by mastersofdeceitKeith is more Christian than us all, keith is smarter than us all(his words), keith is blacker than us all. Keith can tell over a website who is a Christian and who is not. Keith thinks he knows it all.