At the top of Friday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Harry Smith declared: "The votes have been cast and history has been made. Democratic voters in Iowa give African-American Senator Barack Obama a giant victory."
Shortly following this "historic" proclamation, Smith also commented: "Barack Obama, the big winner on the Democratic side," and spoke of both the Obama and Huckabee wins in these terms: "What a stunning night last night, a big surprise, big votes for change."
Smith continued the "stunning" theme of Obama’s victory throughout the opening segment of the show:
For the Democrats, Obama came in first with 38% of the vote. Stunning. 38%...Now, while the polls may have predicted it, it was still no less a breathtaking win for Barack Obama because he became the clear winner in the Iowa caucuses last night...With a record turnout and support from the under-30 crowd, independent voters, and first-time caucus goers, Barack Obama stunned the political establishment, and much of the country, with his clear and decisive victory Thursday night in Iowa.
Smith also discussed the surprise win of Mike Huckabee, but did not place the Republican Governor’s victory in the same historic terms.
Another interesting aspect of Smith’s coverage was the way in which he described Hillary Clinton’s defeat in Iowa versus Mitt Romney’s, both of whom lost by a margin of 9 percentage points on their respective sides. This is how Smith described Hillary’s loss: "Iowans voted loud and clear for change, and that left Senator Hillary Clinton humbled, yet determined to continue her campaign." Compare that to what he said of Romney’s defeat: "Romney, who led the race here last summer, is in trouble. A crushing loss in Iowa and behind now in New Hampshire, where voting takes place this Tuesday." So Hillary is "humbled" and "determined," while Romney is "in trouble" and suffered a "crushing loss."
A report by CBS Correspondent Dean Reynolds at the end of the segment added to the discussion of Obama’s historic victory and broad support: "Barack Obama talked to us a little bit on the plane coming here to Portsmouth, and he said he was impressed by the support that he received from young people, from independents, and Republicans, and he said it was a harbinger of things to come."
In a later segement, "Face the Nation" host, Bob Schieffer, talked with Smith about the Obama victory and continued the gleeful coverage:
HARRY SMITH: And we are live again here in New Hampshire with Bob Schieffer, who we've been calling the sage of late. I tell you, this was really quite a night last night.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Oh, it's one of the most exciting nights that I can ever remember. I mean, what a story. I mean, think of what happened last night. A black Freshman Senator with very little record goes into a state virtually all white, takes on one of the most famous women in the world, a formidable campaigner in her own right who I would also add has raised $100 million.
SMITH: As has he.
SCHIEFFER: As has he, and he wins. Now, that's a news story. And that is the kind of thing that political movements are built on, because he goes in there and says, look, it's time to take the old order out and bring on the new order. It's time for change.
SMITH: We talked so much over the last couple of days, while so much of his campaign was based on young people getting out, people who had never caucused before, those people never showed up before.
SCHIEFFER: Yes.
SMITH: People came out in record numbers.
SCHIEFFER: And that's when you know there's something new and different going on out there. So, I think he's going to be very formidable from here on in.
Smith and Schieffer concluded their discussion overjoyed by Obama’s win:
SMITH: It really was kind of amazing last night. You feel like you're watching history being made.
SCHIEFFER: Oh, it's wonderful.
Here is the full transcript of the 7:03am segment:
7:00AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: The votes have been cast and history has been made. Democratic voters in Iowa give African-American Senator Barack Obama a giant victory.
BARACK OBAMA: On this January night, at this defining moment in history, you have done what the cynics said we couldn't do.
SMITH: Former Baptist preacher Mike Huckabee, out manned and hugely outspent, stuns the Republican Party by soundly defeating Mitt Romney.
7:02AM TEASER:
SMITH: Good morning, everybody. I'm Harry Smith live in New Hampshire, where all the eyes are turning now as this state's first in the country primary happens next Tuesday. Julie Chen and Russ Mitchell are in New York. We're going to check in with them in just a second. Let me show you the headline this morning from this morning's "Boston Herald" right next door here in -- from New Hampshire. "Shazam!" it's Mike Huckabee, full face, full smile, right on the front of the paper, and of course Barack Obama, the big winner on the Democratic side. We're going to hear from both of them in just a couple of minutes. What a stunning night last night, a big surprise, big votes for change. We'll have full team coverage here in just a little bit.
7:03AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: Yeah, what a night last night and so amazing just to watch the speeches, watch the numbers roll in. Drama -- high drama -- for both Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee. And here's how the numbers came down. For the Democrats, Obama came in first with 38% of the vote. Stunning. 38%. There's John Edwards in second. And Hillary Clinton narrowly behind in third place with 29%. On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee finished a big-time first with 34% of the vote. Mitt Romney far behind in second with 25%. Third place was a virtual tie between Fred Thompson and John McCain. Now, while the polls may have predicted it, it was still no less a breathtaking win for Barack Obama because he became the clear winner in the Iowa caucuses last night.
BARACK OBAMA: But on this January night, at this defining moment in history, you have done what the cynics said we couldn't do.
SMITH: With a record turnout and support from the under-30 crowd, independent voters, and first-time caucus goers, Barack Obama stunned the political establishment, and much of the country, with his clear and decisive victory Thursday night in Iowa.
OBAMA: We are choosing hope over fear. We're choosing unity over division and sending a powerful message that change is coming to America.
SMITH: Iowans voted loud and clear for change, and that left Senator Hillary Clinton humbled, yet determined to continue her campaign.
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, we're going to take this enthusiasm and go right to New Hampshire tonight.
SMITH: And John Edwards, who narrowly edged Clinton for second place, in a position to say his candidacy is still alive, too.
JOHN EDWARDS: And now we move on. We move on from Iowa to New Hampshire and to the other states to determine who's best suited to bring about the change that this country so desperately needed.
SMITH: Perhaps equally surprising for the Republicans was the margin of victory for former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee.
MIKE HUCKABEE: I wasn't sure that I would ever be able to love a state as much as I love my home state of Arkansas, but tonight, I love Iowa a whole lot.
SMITH: Huckabee says he was outspent by Mitt Romney 15-1, but Evangelical Christians, the most important force among Iowa's Republicans, weren't buying it.
HUCKABEE: Well, tonight we proved that American politics still is in the hands of ordinary folks like you and across this country.
SMITH: Romney, who led the race here last summer, is in trouble. A crushing loss in Iowa and behind now in New Hampshire, where voting takes place this Tuesday.
MITT ROMNEY: You win the silver in one event, it doesn't mean you're not going to come back and win the gold in the final event, and that we're going to do.
SMITH: Chris Dodd and Joe Biden barely registered in the caucus last night in Iowa, and both have already dropped out of the race. CBS News Correspondent Dean Reynolds has been following the campaign of Barack Obama here these many months in Iowa and across the country. He is just off the plane with Barack Obama and now in Portsmouth, New Hampshire with us this morning. Dean, good morning.
DEAN REYNOLDS: Good morning, Harry. I can report to you that the candidate is hoarse, he is fatigued, but he is exhilarated. Barack Obama talked to us a little bit on the plane coming here to Portsmouth, and he said he was impressed by the support that he received from young people, from independents, and Republicans, and he said it was a harbinger of things to come. But last night in Des Moines, in his victory statement, he spoke of hope.
OBAMA: Hope is the bedrock of this nation, the belief that our destiny will not be written for us but by us, by all those men and women who are not content to settle for the world as it is, who have the courage to remake the world as it should be, that is what we started here in Iowa, and that is the message we can now carry to New Hampshire and beyond...Because we are not a collection of red states and blue states. We are the United States of America. And in this moment, in this election, we are ready to believe again.
REYNOLDS: Now, in that chat we had with him on the plane, Barack Obama declined to speculate about what his victory means to the two other Democratic campaigns. He has things to do, of course. He's going to be campaigning in just a couple of hours here in Portsmouth, and then continuing on in this race, which is very tight. And this is a race that he hopes he'll get a bounce from Iowa to help him here in New Hampshire. Harry?
SMITH: Alright. Dean Reynolds live with us in New Hampshire this morning, thanks very much.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I suppose one might view it
January 4, 2008 - 13:58 ET by WhoIsJohnGaltI suppose one might view it as "stunning" and "history being made" if one expects white folk to vote based on race or color. If one has no expectations of racist or sexist tendencies among the electorate, then the results appear much less stunning, no?
Isn't that the liberal view of things in general? If a black/female is denied something, or does not accomplish something, it MUST be because of racism/sexism. My experience is that conservative people just don't hardly consider color/gender when it's not an appropriate factor, but won't ignore it when it is.
On the plus side, this might just cause a few ripples in the pond of liberal sterotypes...ya think?
I second that motion, but
January 4, 2008 - 22:43 ET by GregEI second that motion, but not that it will cause ripples. Indoctrination is not easily for their voter to overcome.
Joe Scarbourgh said the
January 4, 2008 - 13:59 ET by taterJoe Scarbourgh said the same thing this morning about Obama's historic win. I don't see this being put in history books anytime soon. In 10 months, nobody is going to care that Obama took Iowa.
Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could afford. -Montgomery Burns
Yea, right, stunning...sure,
January 4, 2008 - 14:09 ET by JayTeeIf History was made, it was Iowa History, Dufus.
Obama certainly made histroy "In Iowa", a Liberal state whose limited Cacus votes do not represent the other 90% of Americans, or even the other 90% of Iowa voters that did not vote this tme around.
Obama is still speaking in Platitudes...ex.--"sending a powerful message that change is coming to America". Details Obama, give us some Details about the message coming from 30,000 voters in Iowa....WOW, 30,000 votes, some power!!
March 15 2008 GatheringofEagles.org with MAF, FW, VFF, etc. will congregate in DC to Support Our Troops and Gen David Petraeus
Correction JT. Iowa, with a
January 4, 2008 - 14:15 ET by bassndudeCorrection JT. Iowa, with a population of 2,982,085 (2006) and the US with a population of 299,398,484 (2006), represents only about 1% of the US. So your wrong on the 90%. Its more like 99%. Iowa is a snapshot of 1% of the population, and has no meaning in the south, mid south or the majority of the west.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Bassmasterdude......you really gotta get out more
January 4, 2008 - 14:28 ET by JayTeeYou really gotta get outta the house more Bassdude, if you know the population of Iowa, down to the most significant Digit.
BUT, I stand corrected......., Iowa is even more insignificant than I thought, and the insignificant Talking Heads who are forming Grandiose Opinions on 30,000 votes need to get a Grip.
Somebody tell the MSM the Democratic Nominiee coming out of the Nominating convention STILL hasn't happened yet. Maybe the Convention can give the Democrats a platform to talk about, instead of the Platitudes we're hearing now.
March 15 2008 GatheringofEagles.org with MAF, FW, VFF, etc. will congregate in DC to Support Our Troops and Gen David Petraeus
Iowa is a conservative state
January 4, 2008 - 14:29 ET by c5thenIn Polk county (one of the biggest population wise) Obama got 472 votes, Huckebee got over 8000 votes. Don't let the perecentages fool you.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
number of votes
January 4, 2008 - 15:13 ET by easygoerI'm not exactly sure of the Democrat system in Iowa, but Obama's number of 472 in Polk County is the amount of county delegates won, not total votes garnered. Republicans in Iowa just add up the votes(Huckabee's 8000 votes) Since Democrat turnout was one hundred thousand higher than Republicans, it's pretty safe to assume that in actual votes cast Obama outpaced Huckabee, not only in Polk County but statewide as well. http://data.desmoine...
The way I understand it...
January 4, 2008 - 15:26 ET by c5thenCounty delegates = votes cast once viability has been determined (15% minimum to be counted) for the democrats
Republicans are 1 person 1 vote and count 'em up.
As you can see from this link, Iowa was a red state in 2004.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
c5then...So which is it..Conservative or Liberal
January 4, 2008 - 15:28 ET by JayTeeI've been hearing all week that Iowa was a Blue State, a liberal state, now you say it's a Red state.....which color was it in the 2004 Election ?
You just can't good accurate info from the MSM anymore.
WHOOPS...IOWA is BLUE RED..in 2004
DES MOINES, Iowa - President Bush won the Iowa vote Friday, after enough absentee ballots were counted to declare victory.
Although Democratic Sen. John Kerry had already conceded the race for the White House on Wednesday, the counting of absentee ballots continued in Iowa, which had been too close to call.
By Friday, Bush had 745,980 votes and Kerry had 732,764 with the number of outstanding ballots too few to change the outcome.
Iowa...
January 4, 2008 - 15:38 ET by Prester John...is so red that it went for the Dem presidential candiate in 1988(!!!), 1992, 1996, and 2000.
If you go by county...
January 4, 2008 - 16:25 ET by mvfreemanIowa is purple...
http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/elections/Multiyear3.gif
Here are the other maps:
http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/
Historically the Iowa caucus
January 4, 2008 - 14:12 ET by msh1973Historically the Iowa caucus means little or nothing: Ronald Reagan lost there in 1980 to George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton only received 3% of the vote there in 1992. I am just saying....
Notice that all of the MSM
January 4, 2008 - 14:28 ET by BruzillaNotice that all of the MSM media stories about the Republican caucuses are focused on who got beaten, and for the Democrats they are all about who won. I've read a lot of stories today about how Huckabee managed to win against Romney, how Romney lost despite spending millions, that it's a shock to Republicans that a minister could beat someone like Romney, etc. But on the Democrat side, it's all about how wonderful Obama is, how clean his campaign was, how historical the vitory is, etc., and no mention of how a political neophyte smacked down the most powerful woman and family in the Democrat party. That's the really big story.
When I read the Reuters
January 4, 2008 - 14:45 ET by Cape Conservativearticle online at midnight, it was something to the effect that Obama's victory indicated he "was on the road to the White House" and further in the article regarding Huckabee, NO such mention!
BIAS in the media?????? Why certainly not!
Personally, I don't think either of them will be the November candidate.
What Republicans....????
January 4, 2008 - 14:35 ET by wizardjr"..support that he received from young people, from independents, and Republicans,.."
What Republicans? The phony ones that have just been recently outed as Democrat supporters? How would a Republican support a full blown socialist with little to no experience? A tax raiser. A gun grabber. A redistributionist. Good grief, what alternate universe did this come from?
Heres' the break down...
January 4, 2008 - 14:51 ET by mvfreemanhttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/ap_on_el_pr/caucus_poll_glance;_ylt=ArwuY10PEmh6rDAnRcuc0Yxp24cA
In particular..."Six in 10 GOP voters said they were born again or evangelical Christians, and by far the largest share _almost half _supported Huckabee. Romney led among non-evangelical voters, getting a third of their support.
More than a third of Republicans said having the same religious beliefs as their candidate was very important, and of that group just over half favored Huckabee."
I hate to bust all the
January 4, 2008 - 15:18 ET by MarlettsmithI hate to bust all the excitement but Obama wouldn't be the first African-American to be nominated for President. It was Frederick Douglas.
Not true..
January 4, 2008 - 17:01 ET by allstar919Sorry. He was a vice presidential nominee and it was not in one of the two major political parties. Look it up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Douglas#Reconstruction_era
Obama's Win Stunning In One Respect
January 4, 2008 - 15:59 ET by Intellectual HonestyThe most important outcome of Iowa is that Obama beat Hillary decisively (for God's sakes she lost, barely, to Edwards). When you get down to brass tacks Hillary was fishing in the same sized pond as Obama. This gives Obama the momentum to defeat Hillary in the upcoming primaries but even if he doesn't win the nomination, he will have successfully scratched the veneer of the myth of manifest destiny for Hillary. For that I thank him.
"Shortly following this
January 6, 2008 - 15:42 ET by Keith"Shortly following this "historic" proclamation, Smith also commented: "Barack Obama, the big winner on the Democratic side," and spoke of both the Obama and Huckabee wins in these terms: "What a stunning night last night, a big surprise, big votes for...change."
Kyle, by your use of quotations around the words "historic" and by your highlighting the phrase what a stunning night etc, you seem to imply that it was neither "historic" or "stunning".
Are you one of those conservatives who like to pretend that we are not still in an age of "firsts"? I mean, I'm an African American and I despise Barack Obama, but I can still be intellectually honest enough to see that no OTHER blacks have won an Iowa caucus!
And since the dictionary defines historic this way....
"his·tor·ic (hĭ-stôr'ĭk, -stŏr'-) Pronunciation Key adj. 1. Having importance in or influence on history.2. Historical.
Seems to me that the adjective is appropriate. The word "stunning" also seems to fit since there wasn't a pundit in the entire country who predicted it. What's your problem dude? Are you one of those conservative/racists who gets his panties in a bunch over the acknowledgement of any African American milestone?
I'd really hate to think this of you but your article doesn't make any sense otherwise. Clearly a BLACK senator who by all accounts is short on "experience" beating the "smartest woman in the world" by NINE points in a practically LILLY WHITE STATE, is "BREATHTAKING"! Speaking just as well for the people of Iowa as it does for the senator. So what's your gripe with the praise? Don't get me wrong. I wouldn't vote for ANYONE so vile as to vote to kill the babies that survive abortions, which is what Obama did, but I'm hardly Harry Smith's demographic! Nor do my concerns about his baby killing penchants obviate the fact that he has done what no African American heretofore has done, namely, win. Please inform me as to the meaning of you article. I don't get it. Should a victory this out of the blue go unnoticed, or unheralded?
Keith, although your
January 6, 2008 - 15:53 ET by BlazerKeith, although your comment's aren't directed at me I couldn't help but to interject here. Are you one of those African-American's who when having one white parent, denies that part of your ethnicity and still call's yourself an African-American, or black?
Isn't that also racism per say?
You can call yourself a conservative all you want' but like a typical liberal you see racism everywhere, and if not you'll manufacture it.
Your race baiting is tiresome.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
No sir that's the law! See,
January 6, 2008 - 19:25 ET by KeithNo sir that's the law! See, the law that we were raised with said, according to white society that is, that if you had one drop of negro blood you were BLACK. That is the rubrick with which we were oppressed, so those of mixed heritage like Barack now use that same measuring stick as a badge of honor, I would imagine.Before you call me names, like "Race baiter" perhaps you should educate yourself on the history of race in this country and all that it entails. Many people of Obama's complexion were discriminated by white society just as vehemently as their darker skinned brethren. And I daresay that whites weren't anxious to look into his other half to find any similarity with themselves. They even coded it into law. As far as Obama goes, I've only heard him honor the white side of his heritage, not run away from it. But there can't be any denying that when you see him you see black. You have to actually know his lineage to know that there is white blood in him. Something that most racists are loathe to do since they react on his outward appearance.
Mr. keith, your age would be???
January 6, 2008 - 19:34 ET by JABBecause I have never seen this and I am a young man.
"No sir that's the law! See, the law that we were raised with said, according to white society that is, that if you had one drop of negro blood you were BLACK."
B.S., to your self pitty. You have a better chance a making a living as a minority than I do as a W.A.S.P. get over yourself and get to work.
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
Oh so I see Keith you
January 6, 2008 - 19:45 ET by BlazerOh so I see Keith you want to keep your head in the past like most of the liberal's, MSM and racebaiter's want you to. It's the mindset like you have that keep people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson gainfully employed and rich and keep getting Democrat's elected.
Just remember that as long as you keep the mindset like you do, you and your brethren will continue to be useful idiot's to all of the above. They need victim's or else they lose thier job's.
They dont' need shackles, bosses and dog's to keep people on the Plantation like you Keith, you keep yourself there due to your own ignorance.
Like I said it must it must be a pain in the @$$ to see racism everywhere you go even if it doesn't exist. Just keep in mind though, before you start wagging your finger's about people not recognizing Obama enough to your liking, that your on a conservative oriented website and not liking Obama may have something to do with him being just a run of the mill socialist and not the color of his skin.
If Allan Keyes got the nomination I would vote for him in a minute.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
Was I the only one who dozed
January 6, 2008 - 19:48 ET by Roger the ShrubberWas I the only one who dozed off trying to read this? This post was Tumbleresque...
Keith
January 6, 2008 - 19:56 ET by BlondeThanks for the insight.
A question...are these laws still current? I seriously have no idea, and am asking you a legitimate question.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Blonde...laws like the ones
January 6, 2008 - 20:11 ET by JerBlonde...laws like the ones Keith references were indeed part of the statutory enactments in several southern states for years--well into the 20th century. I'm unsure how many states had such laws, and my guess is they have been repealed. But I haven't researched the issue.
Jer
Keith - Please Stop Projecting Your Behavior Onto Us
January 6, 2008 - 20:08 ET by Free StinkerBut there can't be any denying that when you see him you see black
When I look at Obama I see Obama.
Maybe you judge people by superficialities such as skin, hair, or eye color, but I think of people as individuals. erhaps you are projecting your behavior onto us?
I see Obama and I see a guy who admits he wants to nationalize healthcare, therefore he is a bad candidate. End of story.
Newsbusters. Log on and find out What the heck is so yummy over here!
IMO, Keith, you're not seeing the larger picture
January 6, 2008 - 17:19 ET by RJPerhaps from a black pride perspective Obama's win in Iowa might seem historic (and congratulations for that important step), but in my opinion, it will get no more than a footnote describing a waypoint in history.
It may seem like nit-picking to some, but if you think about it, Iowa is really a relatively minor event that gives Obama only a couple more delegates than Hillary and Edwards. The media and political junkies like us make it seem more important than it is.
I'd argue that calling it "historic" takes away from the truly historic aspects of Obama's larger campaign.
Also, when (if) he becomes the Democrat nominee for President, then that will certainly be historic.
Hey RJ, Happy New Year! I
January 6, 2008 - 19:21 ET by KeithHey RJ, Happy New Year!
I didn't say that I thought it was historic. I don't think anything babykillers do is of ANY consequence in this world, as Hell awaits their efforts in the end. I said that as the world judges these things the "First" time something is accomplished, it is by definition historic. I also find that those who seek to marginalize such accomplishments usually do so through malevolent motivation.
Happy New Year to you, too, Keith
January 6, 2008 - 20:19 ET by RJI suppose you could also claim that my post "marginalizes" Obama's accomplishment in Iowa, because I said it is a footnote, not historic.
But to my mind, calling every little step historic marginalizes the bigger picture of his ongoing accomplishments.
Keith...
January 6, 2008 - 20:33 ET by JAB...and what in Gods name would this sentence:
"I don't think anything babykillers do is of ANY consequence in this world, as Hell awaits their efforts in the end."
have to do with the conversation at hand? other than to espouse your liberalism?
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
JAB -- How is a sentence
January 6, 2008 - 20:57 ET by Jack BauerJAB -- How is a sentence structured around condemning abortion, in any way "liberal."
I seriously don't understand your slam at Keith. He already said how he despises Mr Obama, one reason being Mr Obama's support for abortion.
Again... where the liberal in that?