Perhaps one of the most distorted stories in recent mainstream media history, the Valerie Plame CIA leak controversy, has become even more so with Plame’s upcoming "60 Minutes" interview with CBS Anchor, Katie Couric. On Friday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Harry Smith talked with Couric about the interview and began by describing Plame as "...beautiful, smart, a covert agent."
Smith then went on to summarize the media-manufactured scandal that ensued after Plame’s name was mentioned in Bob Novak's syndicated column:
Speculation was rampant that the leaking of her name, which is a crime, came from inside the Bush Administration, in retaliation for her husband's column. The leak grew into a scandal that embroiled the political elite in Washington....When it was all over, Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was charged and convicted of lying to investigators and obstruction of justice. President Bush later commuted sentence, no one was ever charged with knowingly leaking Valerie Plame's name.
The problem with this little summary is that it completely leaves out the fact that person responsible for giving Plame’s name to Novak was former Undersecretary of State, Richard Armitage, who mentioned her name in an interview with Novak and was never charged with any crime. Also missing was any indication of her husband, Joe Wilson, being a Kerry Campaign advisor in 2004.
Couric had nothing but praise for Plame: "She's very charming, incredibly intelligent and eloquent."
Not only did Smith and Couric fawn over Plame, but Smith expressed how "Valerie Plame spent nearly 20 years in the shadows of the CIA. Then suddenly, she became a public figure. But she's never told her own story, until now." In a preview clip of the "60 Minutes" interview, Couric sympathetically described how "...18 years of meticulously crafted cover were gone in an instant." Both Smith and Couric seem to have forgotten how quickly Plame and her husband were to relish the lime light with a "Vanity Fair" cover story, where even Plame admitted: "I did not listen to my instincts and threw my extreme caution about public exposure to the wind," according to an Associated Press story on Plame’s new book this past Wednesday. That incident was soon followed by Joe Wilson becoming a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party in the 2004 presidential election. Plame's book is but one more example of her willingness to make herself a public figure, not to mention a potential movie deal to follow.
Couric also made sure to voice Plame’s conspiracy theories about who was responsible:
She would contend that this was part of a smear campaign against her, that by minimizing her role at the CIA, by diminishing and, quite frankly, by demeaning her position, which was quite high, she was head of operations for the joint task force Iraq, which was charged with finding nuclear weapons. So, I think that she would just refute that whole notion that everybody knew this was the case...[discussing removed parts of Plame’s book by the CIA] Redacted. That's right. About 10%. And again, Valerie Plame feels this is political payback for criticizing the pre-war intelligence and the buildup to Iraq. She claims there's no classified material that was redacted...
Here is the full transcript of the 7:30am interview:
SMITH: "First, though, Valerie Plame spent nearly 20 years in the shadows of the CIA. Then suddenly, she became a public figure. But she's never told her own story, until now. Her life story reads like a spy novel. She is beautiful, smart, a covert agent. She became the center of a political scandal when her husband, career diplomat Joe Wilson, wrote an op-ed in "The New York Times" claiming the Bush Administration distorted intelligence about Iraq's efforts to obtain uranium in Africa. Eight days later, Robert Novak revealed her identify as an undercover CIA agent in his syndicated column. Speculation was rampant that the leaking of her name, which is a crime, came from inside the Bush Administration, in retaliation for her husband's column. The leak grew into a scandal that embroiled the political elite in Washington. And journalists who spent their careers protecting the identity of their sources were faced with a choice of naming names or going to jail. When it was all over, Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was charged and convicted of lying to investigators and obstruction of justice. President Bush later commuted sentence, no one was ever charged with knowingly leaking Valerie Plame's name. Valerie Plame gave her first-ever interview to "CBS Evening News" Anchor and "60 Minutes" Correspondent, Katie Couric. I spoke to Katie earlier about it. This interview, everybody in the world has wanted this interview. This is the interview. First off, what was she like?"
KATIE COURIC: "She's very charming, incredibly intelligent and eloquent."
SMITH: "Hmm."
COURIC: "And really mad about what happened to her, angry and resentful of being outed, if you will, having her career end this way. And she expresses it, you know, pretty openly."
SMITH: "Yeah. In the interview and in the book."
COURIC: "Yes."
SMITH: "Here's what I want to know -- her husband writes, Joe Wilson, writes this op-ed piece for "The New York Times" basically saying the Bush Administration got it all wrong, cooked the books on this uranium going into Niger."
COURIC: "Right."
SMITH: "And he writes this piece. Is she -- what is she thinking?"
COURIC: "Well, she knew about it. She knew he was going to submit it to "The New York Times." She knew that he had gone to Niger and found that the charges that Iraq was buying uranium ore from Niger were false, in his opinion."
SMITH: "Right."
COURIC: "And I asked her that, Harry, because I said weren't you afraid your two worlds were going to collide, that this was going to really put you in jeopardy? And she said absolutely not. I have lived my cover. I was living my cover. Nobody knew I worked for the CIA except an extremely small circle of people, i.e., I believe her parents and the people with whom she worked."
SMITH: "Yeah. What about the allegation, though? Because there were all these allegations that came out after the fact, people in Washington, these insiders say everybody knew she was in the CIA, everybody knew that she was a covert op. She wasn't outed at all."
COURIC: "She would contend that this was part of a smear campaign against her, that by minimizing her role at the CIA, by diminishing and, quite frankly, by demeaning her position, which was quite high, she was head of operations for the joint task force Iraq, which was charged with finding nuclear weapons. So, I think that she would just refute that whole notion that everybody knew this was the case."
SMITH: "Yeah. I want to take a look at another clip of the interview. Take a look at this."
COURIC: "Eight days after Joe Wilson's op-ed piece, his wife's name and CIA affiliation were printed in a newspaper by conservative columnist Robert Novak. 18 years of meticulously crafted cover were gone in an instant."
VALERIE PLAME: "I can tell you all the intelligence services in the world that morning were running my name through their databases to see did anyone by this name come in the country, when, do we know anything about it, where did she stay, who did she see."
COURIC: "And what would be the ramifications of that?"
PLAME: "Well, it's very serious. It puts in danger, if not shuts down, the operations that I'd worked on."
COURIC: "Did you ever hear about anything that happened to anyone with whom you had contact as a result of the leak?"
PLAME: "Yes, I have, and that's all I can say. Mm-hmm."
COURIC: "Was it bad news?"
PLAME: "That's -- I have heard. I have had some news."
COURIC: "Is it safe to say people were put in danger?"
PLAME: "There was a damage report done by the CIA. I never saw it. I certainly didn't reach out to my old assets and ask them how they're doing, although I would have liked to have."
COURIC: "You probably can speculate about the damage, though."
PLAME: "Mm-hmm."
COURIC: "If you had to write your own damage assessment, knowing what you know, how serious would it be?"
PLAME: "It would be serious."
SMITH: "There were whole sections of the book, the CIA --"
COURIC: "Redacted. That's right. About 10%. And again, Valerie Plame feels this is political payback for criticizing the pre-war intelligence and the buildup to Iraq. She claims there's no classified material that was redacted, but this is a process that books written by CIA agents go through."
SMITH: "Routinely, right, right, right. Cannot wait to see this on "60 Minutes."
COURIC: "Really?"
SMITH: "Yeah."
COURIC: "Thanks, Harry."
SMITH: "Yeah, absolutely. Katie Couric, always a pleasure to see you. You can see Katie's interview with Valerie Plame on "60 Minutes," this Sunday night at 7:00, 6:00 central, right here on CBS."
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I'm not wild about Harry
October 19, 2007 - 14:17 ET by allanfWhy do the people on the left have to get it wrong.
Novak's column is never read by people such a Smith. Novak wrote:
No where did Robert Novak say she was a covert agent.
Harry Smith stands out in a field of biased liberals for his blatant bias. His on-air tangles with former White House Press Secretary Tony Snow are worth noting.
It is a shame this click feels the need to lie and distort. The only problem for Harry is that no one watches his show.
Plame's new novel
October 19, 2007 - 14:01 ET by nkviking75I guess we can refer to Plame's book as a novel, since it's a work of fiction. I wonder if Couric will mention that the novel is published by Simon and Schuster, another part of CBS Inc.? I'm not holding my breath.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
This is hardly her first
October 19, 2007 - 14:06 ET by NL207This is hardly her first work of fiction!
Not her first work of fiction...
October 22, 2007 - 19:09 ET by heldmyw... And apparently not her 'shining moment in the sun' either!
http://www.democrati...
The DUmmies over at Democratic Underground are LIVID about Couric's handling of the interview. (WARNING: REALLY vulgar moonbat language.)
And I thought she was one of 'them'!
How long before Valerie
October 19, 2007 - 14:06 ET by Free StinkerHow long before Valerie Plame breaks Anna Nicole Smiths record of Extending Your "15 Minutes of Fame" Far Beyond It's Natural Life Span ?
Clueless
October 19, 2007 - 14:09 ET by rbchaffeAnd Katie wonders why her viewership is down?!?
Try not to be so obvious with your bias, Katie.
Clueless;
October 19, 2007 - 14:32 ET by merlin61This story had been overdone, overdone, overdone
like a burnt steak!!! Also, it stinks cuz its nothing
but publicity for Valerie. She deserves no more
wasted publicity..and it never was a true story, it
never needed Mr. Fitzgerald's bogus investigation,
Scooter Libby was the fall guy and wasn't even
guilty of anything but forgetfulness. NO MORE
PLEASE ON MS PFLAMEOUT111
SMITH: "There were whole
October 19, 2007 - 14:11 ET by drillanwrSMITH: "There were whole sections of the book, the CIA --"
COURIC: "Redacted. That's right. About 10%. And again, Valerie Plame feels this is political payback for criticizing the pre-war intelligence and the buildup to Iraq. She claims there's no classified material that was redacted, but this is a process that books written by CIA agents go through."
O-o-o-o-o-o-o!!!! I'm all twitter-pated, H and K!
Can't wait for someone with brains/balls in the CIA to come out after this book and say, "Say what???" to this Plame-important B.S. Anyone ... ANYONE formerly in the CIA (in ANY capacity) goes through this. If the CIA feels even one syllable threatens the identity or security of agents/operations they pretty much have last edit on it ...
The one thing that won't
October 19, 2007 - 14:14 ET by Free ThinkerThe one thing that won't change in this story is the facts. The msm will try all they can to continue to distort this, but historians will have to record it for what it really is - Joe Wilson lied, Richard Armitage passed on non-covert agent Valerie's name to a reporter which was not a crime. Katie and Harry live in an elitists world in which the factual record doesn't matter. How they get away with reporting obvious distortions on the airwaves is on par with communist propaganda machines.
The Plame Game
October 19, 2007 - 14:21 ET by richardCan anyone explain what the supposed payback to Joe Wilson, for writing unfavorable comments about the Bush regime, was attained by leaking that his wife was a CIA spook?
They and the MSM claim that it was very injurious to both Mr/Mrs Wilson, but in fact, it gave both of them notority, as well as $$$$. I'm quite sure that anyone with half a brain in the Bush administration would have known the outcome of this and as such, would have taken a far different tactic to get revenge, if that in fact was their motive.
This whole premise reeks of another typical left wing rant, as well as a terrible response by the Republicans, to an accusation without merit.
One of these days the Republicans will discover the best way to fight back is with their knuckles and not with indignation.
The disclosure of her
October 19, 2007 - 15:17 ET by KhyrisThe disclosure of her identity and involvement in this scheme was an effort by the administration to discredit Wilson's report because of the inherent bias involved.
The whole notion that this was a "retaliation" is based on the faulty premise that Wilson's report was a fair and accurate and above reproach of discredit.
How DARE the Bush administration attempt to discredit "the-truth"! The only fly in the ointment was that his report wasn't true... Ol Joe flew all the way out there and completely missed the fact that Saddam had sent his former head of atomic weapons development to Niger as a "political good-will ambassador." Nobody bothered to ask the obvious question: WTF interest would SADDAM HUSSEIN have in establishing "good will" with a country like Niger, even at the exclusion of other neighboring African countries?
Sorry, I can't help but doubt the sincerity of a "good-will tour" with ONE stop, which just HAPPENS to be the best place to buy Uranium Yellow Cake.... and just HAPPENS to be led by a former head of nuclear weapons development. Oh no, Joe decided that was totally irrelevent to his report.... "No link found!"
A colorful metaphor invloving a flashlight and a bodily orifice comes readily to mind.
One small point...
October 19, 2007 - 15:35 ET by Indiana Joe"The disclosure of her identity and involvement in this scheme was an effort by the administration..."
Um, I don't think you're saying Armitage was on a mission for W when he spilled the beans to Novak, are you? I don't think "the administration" had anything to do with the so-called "outing" of desk-jockey Plame.
Otherwise, spot on.
No, that was an opening
October 19, 2007 - 15:45 ET by drillanwrNo, that was an opening presumptive statement that the [poster] proceded to debunk ...
Possible /sarc button needed ... but /sarc might not fit there ...
I may have been unclear in
October 19, 2007 - 15:51 ET by KhyrisI may have been unclear in the way I phrased it. There definitely WAS an effort in the administration to do damage-control and discredit this report... I doubt there was ever a specific directive to "out" the CIA operative, but rather more likely the relay of information that "We know it's bogus because his wife was behind this whole trip, so find a way to use that fact when we confront the public." somewhere along the line got confused into "tell the PUBLIC his wife was behind this whole trip etc." I doubt that externalization was ever the intention of passing that tidbit around internally, but that would just be pure speculation on my part.
In my brain the conversation goes like this:
"We know it's bogus because Plame's behind it... let's get some good ideas about how we can show the public this is a bogus report."
"Hey Armitage, any idea how we can prove to the public this is a bogus report? We know it's bogus because Plame's behind it."
"Dur, hey Novak, didja hear Plame's behind this bogus report??"
Well, I can't imagine
October 19, 2007 - 16:03 ET by Indiana JoeWell, I can't imagine Armitage, as a Clinton appointee, would have been any part of the "inside track," if you will, but I suppose it's plausible. However, if he was in on it, I would have thought he'd have cleared things up long before Libby got to trial. And why has no effort been made to charge him? I believe it's because the left considers him one of their own.
Regards,
IJ
Well, actually before
October 19, 2007 - 16:44 ET by KhyrisWell, actually before Armitage was pubicly recognized as the source (dunno if they already knew privately), CIA director Tenet asked the DoJ to do a finding if the revelation of the operatives name proved to be a hazard to safety, or compromised US intelligence interests, and therefore met the statute for an illegal disclosure. The offical DoJ finding was that it did not.
}}---> Armitage
October 19, 2007 - 16:53 ET by Cool ArrowIt has been revealed that Patrick Fitzgerald (or was it Gerald Fitzpatrick? Anyway, one fits the other) already knew Armitage leaked the beans before he went out after Libby.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Correct, CA. IIRC,
October 19, 2007 - 17:12 ET by Indiana JoeCorrect, CA.
IIRC, Armitage himself said he informed PF (or GF, lol) within a matter of weeks of the "leak." And, if the DoJ found it was not illegal, why wasn't the investigation shut down at that point? Why did it drag on for years?
Answer: can you say "witch-hunt?" I knew you could....
;^D
Indiana
October 19, 2007 - 15:53 ET by bigtimerIndiana Joe...
OMG!
Long time no see....have missed you and your posts fella.
Just needed to throw that in real quick....
Thanks, BT
October 19, 2007 - 16:07 ET by Indiana JoeIt's nice to be missed... ;^)
Various reasons for my absence. I can fill you in via PM if you wish. Just let me know. I think you may have an inkling. If so, I can assure you that all is well.
And it's good to be back. Hope all is well with you and yours.
IJ
IJ... Go ahead and PM
October 19, 2007 - 16:23 ET by bigtimerIJ...
Go ahead and PM later when you can....or I will you before the week-end is over. Of course I have an idea, thought of you often... a lot has happened with me since I have seen ya guy.
Anyway...the Colts are still doing GREAT! I love it...hehehee
This is why her ratings stink
October 19, 2007 - 15:02 ET by celatorThis Plame story is a prime example of why her ratings stink. She obviously doesn't do her homework, she pronounces, word for word, the bigoted point of view of the left, she seems lost in the world of hard news.
People, particularly the demographic Couric and her handlers are aiming for, have left in droves. We can't stand this constant distortion of the facts. She would be great hosting a cooking show or a nice travel program. She just hasn't got the chops or integrity to be a news anchor.
I looked but couldn't find it on amazon.com
October 19, 2007 - 15:17 ET by drillanwrAbout 9 years ago we went to Disney World Florida with my sister who lives in Georgia.
Sis had this guide book she relied on while we were down there for tips/advice/pros/cons on shows and where to eat and the like in the park. Was written by Katie Couric ...
Yep...
October 19, 2007 - 15:21 ET by celatorThere you have it....she should have stuck to travel guides ;+}
Fantasyland
October 19, 2007 - 15:26 ET by acumenK Couric does seem to be an expert on Fantasyland drill.
}}---> An old Plame
October 19, 2007 - 15:12 ET by Cool ArrowCopping an old tired phrase: Does this rise to the level of stuffing the truth in your pants and socks to obstruct the single most important investigation of our generation?
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Double Nought Plame
October 19, 2007 - 15:17 ET by acumenPLAME: "Well, it's (the ramimfications of her outing) very serious. It puts in danger, if not shuts down, the operations that I'd worked on."
And what were those operations Double Naught Plame worked on?
"...she was head of operations for the joint task force Iraq, which was charged with finding nuclear weapons."
Er, I believe the Coalition Forces took over that "very serious" operation from former desk-jockey Plame long before she was outed by her hubby and Clinton appointee Armitage. In other words, Plame's services were no longer required (if ever). Finding nuclear weapons in Iraq is a non-issue now and in the foreseeable future.
The CIA would have been better suited sending Plame to Baghdad to find ice cream for Harry Smith.
Double nought
October 19, 2007 - 15:22 ET by Cool ArrowAnd she coulda' been a brain surgeon or a fry cook.
Hot Dawg Uncle Jed.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Flame repelling
October 19, 2007 - 17:11 ET by Jerry MackI would really like to watch this interview while eating popcorn and drinking beer. But after seeing and hearing the dingy one today, I will not be able to watch. I had to send my flame repelling underwear back to the manufacturer for major repairs.
I Have Corrected Factual Errors
October 19, 2007 - 22:07 ET by Kyle DrennenTo all readers, I have corrected some factual errors in my original blog posting:
-Bob Novak's column was not in "The New York Times."
-Armitage was a Bush appointee, not a Clinton one.
-Cited "Washington Post" article was an Associated Press story featured in the Post.
I apologize for these errors and will work to do better in the future.
Hey Kyle
October 19, 2007 - 22:22 ET by BlondeNo worries.
You've corrected the factual errors...something the MsM would never consider doing.
Life is learning.
And welcome here to a new blogger.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive