Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 25, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Ken Shepherd's blog
  • Taranto: ‘Obama Presidency Has Given Liberal Media Bias a New and Dangerous Form’
  • Fox's Ed Henry: Colleagues Cheered Me On When I Grilled Bush Administration - They Don't Now
  • Bozell Column: The 'Assassinate Wall Street' Movie
  • Paul Krugman’s Flagrant ‘Austerity’ Double Standard
  • WashPost's Milbank Mocks Nikki Haley, 'Reached Out to' 'White Supremacists'
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered
  • MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Gushes Over Obama Speech, Claims the President is ‘Reining In His Own Power’

Feminist Author Naomi Wolf Doubts New Yorkers Were Inconvenienced by Occupier March

By Ken Shepherd | November 18, 2011 | 16:31

A  A
Ken Shepherd's picture

Feminist author Naomi Wolf insisted on today's Now with Alex Wagner that New Yorkers were not really all that inconvenienced by the Occupy Wall Street movement.

"Yesterday, commuters and small business owners couldn't get to work the Occupiers were blocking subway entrances, you [also] had the Brooklyn Bridge" pedestrian walkway crammed with Occupiers, conservative columnist S.E. Cupp complained in a panel segment on Occupy Wall Street's political objectives, if any.

"I didn't see any of that. There's no reporting about that, I follow the reporting very carefully," Wolf retorted (see video below page break).

 

When Cupp informed Wolf that there's been "story after story after story" in the New York Post about  inconveniences to commuters and workers, Wolf snarked that the Post wasn't "fact-based" and dismissed the paper for not being as "as well-sourced" as other outlets.

But aside from the New York Post, ABC News also recorded the frustrations of everyday commuters in major cities such as New York and Philadelphia:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

As part of Occupy Wall Street’s plans for its largest protest ever, occupiers may garner more disdain from the 99 percent than the 1 percent by attempting to clog New York’s subway system. The notion of disrupting transit in the nation’s largest city isn’t sitting well with commuters, few of whom are Wall Street titans.

One commuter to the financial district expressed her frustration today over delays on her commute every day this week. Her normal commute should last about seven minutes but now takes 25 minutes.

“This has been every day for this past week, 25 minutes to get from Canal to Wall. It’s shameful — we are all 99 percent, this is ridiculous,” the unidentified woman told WABC.

[...]

At least one commuter defended the protests.

“It’s a small inconvenience for the ability to have everybody to be here on the street letting their voices be heard,” an unidentified man told WABC.

But commuters across the country are losing their empathy or patience with the protesters.

In Philadelphia, Gina Carrano, 30, said her biggest concern during her commute to city hall, where Occupy Philadelphia protesters have gathered, is sanitation.

“The subway is right below so a lot of protesters were going down and relieving themselves,” the legal reporter said. “I used to take their train to work but a week or two after the protest started, I stopped because the stench was so bad.”

John Tabacco, CEO of Locatestock.com, was so frustrated with the disruption by his office near Zuccotti Park that he started a “Free Wall Street” campaign on Thursday.

Tabacco is inviting other financial firms, business owners and commuters, to “rally” in opposition to Occupy Wall Street.

“The way to end any Occupation is to form a coalition of freedom fighters to rebel against the unwanted occupiers,” he said in a statement. “Since its inception, Occupy Wall Street protesters have caused problems for local businesses and hard working people that work on Wall Street and surrounding offices near Zuccotti Park.”

Liberal journalist Michelle Goldberg of the Daily Beast also noted the frustrations of average New Yorkers (emphasis mine):

Around 9 a.m. on Thursday morning, a man in the financial district pushed through a crowd of chanting protesters to talk to a policeman. “I work at 48 Wall Street,” he said. “How do I get in?” The cop shrugged. “You can’t,” he said.

[...]

“They claim to represent my interests, and I can’t get to work and earn my living,” said Kathleen Brady, a self-employed career counselor who had previously been sympathetic to the protesters. “They have served their purpose. They have made people aware of the issues, they have people talking about it, which is fabulous. But they’ve got no endgame.”

I asked some of the protesters blocking the corner of Wall Street and Hanover what they thought of the woman who sobbed because she couldn’t get to her office. “As far as individuals go, yeah, that’s unfortunate,” one began. Another jumped in, arguing that no one would get in trouble with their bosses because they all had good excuses. Then, a man named Luke Richardson told his fellow protesters to stop explaining themselves to me. “Don’t answer the question they’re asking,” he said. “Tell them what you want to tell them. Don’t talk about the people who are inconvenienced.”

Why, I asked Richardson, is it illegitimate to ask whether Occupy Wall Street threatens to alienate local workers, some of them far from wealthy? “It’s certainly not the story we want to talk about here,” he replied. “I mean, it’s definitely a consideration, but it’s something we already considered.” The implication is that it’s not necessary to engage with those who don’t already share the movement’s ideology. This strikes me as unproductive.

What's more, the Brooklyn Paper reported this morning on the "occupy the subway" protests (emphasis mine)

Who needs Zuccotti?

Occupy Wall Street took its incendiary movement underground at two subway stations in Brooklyn on Thursday as part of a huge day of protests celebrating the two-month anniversary of the first settlement at a once-obscure Lower Manhattan park.

Anti-Wall Street protesters gathered at the Broadway Junction and Borough Hall subway stops at around 3 pm to decry economic inequality but also to urge surprised bystanders to join them.

“We are the 99 percent,” the hundred or so protesters chanted as they marched from Cadman Plaza to the Manhattan-bound 4/5 platform. “So are you!”

Protesters filled up three cars on the empty train, using the “human mic” to share personal stories of economic hardship to win over surprised straphangers who had not planned to be a part of the day’s protests.

[...]

For some, the subway protest was a rude intrusion into what is one of the city’s most hallowed rituals — the daily subway commute.

“I’m not so happy to see these people.” said Olivia Tufo from Williamsburg, who not only had difficulty getting to her waitressing job in Lower Manhattan, but then didn’t get much business once she got there. “I made 20 bucks today.”

But the occupiers insist that discomfort is part of the plan for change.

“Inconvenience is a small thing compared to changing the country,” said Noah Fischer, an activist who’s started speaking out loud in subway cars on his own about Occupy Wall Street on his way over to Zuccotti Park from where he lives in Prospect Heights. “There are some moments in this that may be uncomfortable and that’s OK.”

Organizers also said that the subway protest is part of the movement’s attempts to radically redefine the notion of public space.

For his part, liberal panelist Richard Wolffe seemed to agree with Cupp that the Occupy movement was an inconvenience to city residents and commuters but then echoed the Occupiers by snarking, "you guys [conservatives] inconvenienced the entire world economy."

"Thank you!" a grateful Naomi Wolf crowed in agreement.

About the Author

Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Ken Shepherd on Twitter.
  • Wall Street protests
  • Events
  • Alex Wagner
  • Naomi Wolf
  • Richard Wolffe
  • S.E. Cupp
  • MSNBC
  • Now with Alex Wagner
  • Video
  • Ken Shepherd's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

I wonder if Naomi saw the Occuturds stalking kids?

Submitted by UpNorth on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 4:40pm.

Like in this article?

Probably not, it doesn't fit her narrative. 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Maybe her great-grandpa was . . .

Submitted by NC Boy on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 5:10pm.

Sergeant Schultz - "I see NOOOTHING"!

  • Login to post comments

Where's Shy When We Need Him?

Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 5:18pm.

Come to think of it, we may need to send a search party....he was concerned earlier about the OWies blocking commerce.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

"Inconvenience is a small

Submitted by ant on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 6:38pm.

"Inconvenience is a small thing compared to changing the country". F%#@ head, causing the working class to lose money is more than an inconvenience, but I wouldn't expect an Occupy maggot to understand that. Don't talk to us about discomfort and inconvenience, we get that from your boy in the White House. I'd like to ask this idiot just how he's plans to change the country, and how their little tailgating party/drug-rapefest has changed it in any way besides opening more people's eyes as to what the Democratic Party truly looks like.

  • Login to post comments

"Don't talk to us about discomfort and---

Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 6:45pm.

inconvenience, we get that from your boy in the White House."

That was a good one, ant.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Thanks,MD

Submitted by ant on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 9:27pm.

I may have to sign off soon, most days I can tolerate reading about moonbat idiocy, and some days my anger and frustration just get to dangerous levels. This is one of those some days.

  • Login to post comments

ant---

Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 9:50pm.

I am continually amazed by insightful comments by conservatives at NBs that are made as a reflection on or of events, rather than as a diatribe against what I see as liberal insanity.

Like you, though, some days I wish I had opted to read a book instead of stretching my patience past the breaking point by scanning posts offered up by the idiot class; and class clowns like Clevenative.

Unlike you, there are days when I would be happy to have all my posts read thusly:

&%!*^)&($#@   you, Clevenative, AND the horse you rode in on.

Only with the actual words, of course.   :o)

Hang in there; we'll outlast the bosstids.

MD

 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

"...were not really all that inconvenienced..."

Submitted by Rackie on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 8:15pm.

because for most New Yorkers life is eat, shit, die.

  • Login to post comments

The OWSers decided to scare schoolchildren instead.

Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 8:32pm.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/11/17/ows-protesters-chant-follow-those...

Footage of the event.

  • Login to post comments

Naomi Wolf has made a lot of money by lying

Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 9:10pm.

In one of her big selling books (mandatory reading on many college campuses), she cited a study that found approximately 150,000 American females die from anorexia each year. 150,000! Or roughly 3 times as many Americans each year as were killed in the entire Vietnam War.

Prof. Christina Hoff Sommers was suspicious of the number, so she contacted the institution that conducted the study and learned that they actually found that 150,000 American women and girls suffer from anorexia each year. The actual number of deaths is well under one hundred, and perhaps a few as twenty.

I instinctively assume that Wolf is lying whenever she opens her mouth or publishes her writings.

  • Login to post comments

Two idiots together!

Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Sat, 11/19/2011 - 1:04am.

First week, FIVE stories about her here! Wow, helleva week!

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. BEN FRANKLIN
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: Obama Can Close Gitmo By Making it a Government-Funded Solar Company
  • Charlie Sheen Changes Name to Carlos Estevez for Upcoming 'Machete Kills' Film
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use